ccbox-insights

Original🇺🇸 English
Translated

Summarize lessons learned from ccbox session logs (projects/sessions/history/skills) so the agent can do better next time. Produce copy-ready instruction updates (project + global) backed by evidence, with optional skill-span context to attribute failures to specific skills. Use when asked to run /ccbox:insights, generate a "lessons learned" memo, or propose standing instructions from session history.

24installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add diskd-ai/ccbox ccbox-insights

ccbox-insights

Use
ccbox
session logs to produce an evidence-based "lessons learned" memo for the agent (and humans), plus copy-ready instruction snippets that improve future sessions.
Tool-call failures are an important signal, but the goal is broader than errors: capture what worked, what did not, and what should become standing behavior in the future.

Requirements

  • ccbox
    on your
    $PATH
    .
  • Access to the local sessions directory scanned by
    ccbox
    (see
    ccbox --help
    if discovery looks empty).

Quick start (single session)

  1. Find the latest session for the current folder:
bash
ccbox sessions --limit 5 --offset 0 --size
  1. Inspect the latest session timeline (increase
    --limit
    if needed):
bash
ccbox history --full --limit 200 --offset 0

Workflow (recommended)

Follow a staged pipeline: collect -> filter -> summarize -> label -> aggregate -> synthesize -> propose instructions.

Stage 0: Choose scope

  • Session: one
    .jsonl
    log for deep root-cause analysis.
  • Project: last N sessions for one project to find recurring failure patterns.
  • Global: a sample across projects to find cross-project patterns.

Stage 1: Collect evidence with
ccbox

  • Project discovery:
    ccbox projects
  • Session listing:
    ccbox sessions [project-path] --limit N --offset 0 --size
  • Timeline capture:
    ccbox history [log-or-project] --full --limit N --offset 0
  • Skill spans (optional):
    ccbox skills [log-or-project] --json
When triaging quickly, scan the timeline for failure signals (examples):
error
,
failed
,
non-zero
,
rejected
,
permission
,
timeout
.

Stage 1.5: Identify clarifications, corrections, and interruptions

Treat user clarifications/corrections as high-signal evidence of workflow breakdowns. Your goal is to pinpoint where the agent went off-track and what rule would prevent it next time.
Look for user messages that:
  • Clarify intent ("I meant X", "not that", "use Y instead").
  • Correct mistakes ("this is wrong", "stop", "revert", "you didn't follow the instructions").
  • Restate constraints after the fact ("do not run X", "no emojis", "do not use cargo", "do not change version", "do not release automatically").
  • Interrupt the session due to friction (hangs, repeated retries, "cancel", abandoning the thread).
For each such moment, capture a small "course-correction record":
  • Trigger: what the agent did immediately before (tool call, plan, edit, or assumption).
  • Correction: the exact user sentence(s) that clarified/corrected.
  • Fix: what changed after the correction (new approach, different tool, narrower scope).
  • Lesson: one rule that would have prevented the detour (copy-ready, scoped project/global).
If the session ends without a clear resolution (or the user abandons it), mark the outcome accordingly and explain the likely interruption reason using evidence (for example: hang/timeout, repeated invalid tool use, conflicting constraints).

Stage 2: Summarize long timelines (only if needed)

If the timeline is too large to analyze in one pass, summarize in chunks:
  • Focus on: user request, tool calls, tool outputs/errors, and outcome.
  • Preserve: tool names, command lines, error messages, and user feedback.
  • Keep each chunk summary to 3-5 sentences.

Stage 3: Extract per-session tool-call facets

For each session in scope, produce one JSON object matching
references/facets.md
.
If skill spans are available (via
ccbox skills --json
), annotate each failure with the active skill context when possible (e.g., "this failure happened inside the commit skill span").
Hard rules:
  • Use only evidence from the session log; do not guess missing details.
  • Separate "tool failed" from "wrong approach" (a tool can succeed but still be the wrong move).
  • Count explicit user rejections as their own category (the tool did not fail; the action was declined).

Stage 4: Aggregate and analyze

Aggregate the facet set to produce:
  • Top failing tools and failure categories.
  • Three root-cause themes with concrete evidence snippets.
  • Repeated user constraints that should become standing instructions.
  • Engine-neutral recommendations that reduce tool-call failures and improve UX.
Use
references/report.md
as the output template.

Stage 5: Propose instruction updates (project + global)

Produce two additive sets of copy-ready snippets:
  • Project-level: bullets to add to
    AGENTS.md
    .
  • Global: bullets for the user's global agent instructions.
Guidelines:
  • Do not include local paths, repository names, or one-off incident details.
  • Prefer rules that prevent repeated errors (2+ occurrences) over one-time fixes.
  • Each instruction should include: what to do, what to avoid, and why (1 sentence).

Stage 6: Deliverables

Deliver:
  • A concise lessons learned memo (Markdown), following
    references/report.md
    .
  • Proposed additive
    AGENTS.md
    snippet (project-level).
  • Proposed additive global instruction snippet.
Optional (for future memory systems):
  • "AutoMemorial candidates": a short, structured list of rules that should become standing agent memory, each backed by evidence and scoped (project vs global).

References

  • Facet schema + taxonomy:
    references/facets.md
  • Report template + instruction templates:
    references/report.md