analyze-dependencies

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Audit project dependencies for risk when the user asks to check dependencies, audit packages, review dependency health, check for vulnerabilities, or assess supply chain risk

21installs

Sourcegeneraljerel/chalk-skills

Added on2026-03-18

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add generaljerel/chalk-skills analyze-dependencies

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Analyze Dependencies

Overview

Audit the project's dependency tree across five risk dimensions: freshness, vulnerabilities, bundle impact, license compliance, and maintenance status. Produce a risk-scored report with actionable recommendations for each dependency.

Workflow

Read project context — Check
```
.chalk/docs/engineering/
```
for:
- Architecture docs (to understand which dependencies are critical path)
- Previous dependency audits
- Any documented dependency policies or license requirements

Locate dependency manifests — Scan the project for:

package.json

package-lock.json

yarn.lock

pnpm-lock.yaml

(Node.js)

pyproject.toml

requirements.txt

Pipfile

poetry.lock

(Python)

```
pubspec.yaml
```
/
```
pubspec.lock
```
(Dart/Flutter)
```
Cargo.toml
```
/
```
Cargo.lock
```
(Rust)
```
go.mod
```
/
```
go.sum
```
(Go)
```
Gemfile
```
/
```
Gemfile.lock
```
(Ruby)
```
pom.xml
```
/
```
build.gradle
```
(Java/Kotlin)
If
```
$ARGUMENTS
```
specifies a file, focus on that manifest

Inventory dependencies — For each manifest, list:
- Direct dependencies (production)
- Direct dev dependencies
- Note the declared version constraints (exact, range, caret, tilde)
Assess freshness — For each dependency:
- Current installed version vs. latest available version
- Run the appropriate command:
```
npm outdated
```
  ,
```
pip list --outdated
```
  ,
```
pub outdated
```
  , etc.
- Classify the gap:
  - Current: on latest or within one minor version
  - Stale: one or more minor versions behind
  - Outdated: one or more major versions behind
  - Abandoned: no release in 2+ years
Check for vulnerabilities — Run the appropriate audit command:
- ```
npm audit
```
  /
```
yarn audit
```
  /
```
pnpm audit
```
- ```
pip audit
```
  or
```
safety check
```
- ```
cargo audit
```
- ```
bundle audit
```
- Record: CVE ID, severity (critical/high/medium/low), affected version range, fix available (yes/no)
- Check transitive dependencies, not just direct ones
Evaluate bundle impact — Where applicable:
- For Node.js: check package size, number of transitive dependencies, tree-shakeability
- For frontend projects: note if a large library is used for a small feature (e.g., lodash for one function)
- Flag dependencies that pull in disproportionately large sub-dependency trees
Check license compliance — For each dependency:
- Identify the license (MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL, LGPL, AGPL, BSD, ISC, etc.)
- Flag copyleft licenses (GPL, AGPL, LGPL) that may have viral implications
- Flag unlicensed or custom-licensed packages
- Flag license changes between the installed version and latest version
- Note: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD, ISC are generally permissive and low risk
Assess maintenance status — For each dependency, check:
- Last publish date
- Open issues and PRs (especially security-related)
- Number of maintainers (bus factor)
- Whether the project is archived or deprecated
- Classify: Active (regular releases, responsive maintainers), Maintained (occasional releases, issues addressed), Minimal (rare updates, issues pile up), Unmaintained (no activity in 12+ months)
Score each dependency — Assign a risk score based on all dimensions:
- Low: Current, no vulnerabilities, permissive license, actively maintained
- Medium: Stale or one minor concern (e.g., slightly outdated, minimal maintenance)
- High: Outdated or multiple concerns (known vulnerability with fix available, copyleft license, large bundle impact)
- Critical: Known exploitable vulnerability, abandoned with no alternative, or license violation
Generate recommendations — For each dependency with medium or higher risk:
- Update: Newer version fixes the issue. Note any breaking changes.
- Replace: Better-maintained alternative exists. Name the alternative.
- Remove: Dependency is unused or its functionality can be inlined.
- Monitor: Risk is acceptable for now but should be tracked.
- Immediate Action: Critical vulnerability or license violation requiring urgent attention.
Determine the next file number — List files in
```
.chalk/docs/engineering/
```
matching
```
*_dependency_audit*
```
. Find the highest number and increment by 1.

Write the report — Save to

.chalk/docs/engineering/<n>_dependency_audit.md

Confirm — Summarize: total dependencies analyzed, risk distribution, critical items requiring immediate attention.

Filename Convention

<number>_dependency_audit.md

Examples:

```
5_dependency_audit.md
```
```
9_dependency_audit.md
```

Dependency Audit Format

markdown

# Dependency Audit

Last updated: <YYYY-MM-DD>
Package manager: <npm / pip / pub / cargo / etc.>
Manifest: <path to manifest file>

## Summary

| Risk Level | Count | Action Required |
|------------|-------|-----------------|
| Critical | <n> | Immediate action |
| High | <n> | Plan remediation this sprint |
| Medium | <n> | Schedule for next maintenance window |
| Low | <n> | No action needed |
| **Total** | **<n>** | |

## Vulnerability Summary

| CVE | Severity | Package | Installed | Fixed In | Transitive? |
|-----|----------|---------|-----------|----------|-------------|
| CVE-XXXX-XXXXX | Critical | <name> | <version> | <version> | No |

## Critical & High Risk Dependencies

### <package-name> — CRITICAL

| Dimension | Status | Detail |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| Freshness | Outdated | Installed: 2.1.0, Latest: 4.0.0 |
| Vulnerabilities | CVE-XXXX-XXXXX (High) | RCE via crafted input |
| Bundle Impact | 450KB | Pulls in 23 transitive deps |
| License | MIT | No issues |
| Maintenance | Unmaintained | Last release: 2022-01-15 |

**Risk**: <Why this is critical>
**Recommendation**: Replace with `<alternative>`. Migration guide: <link or steps>.

### <package-name> — HIGH

| Dimension | Status | Detail |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| ... | ... | ... |

**Risk**: <explanation>
**Recommendation**: <action>

## Medium Risk Dependencies

| Package | Version | Risk Factors | Recommendation |
|---------|---------|-------------|----------------|
| <name> | <ver> | Stale (3 minor behind), minimal maintenance | Update to <ver> |

## Low Risk Dependencies

| Package | Version | License | Last Updated |
|---------|---------|---------|-------------|
| <name> | <ver> | MIT | 2024-11-01 |

## License Compliance

| License | Count | Packages | Risk |
|---------|-------|----------|------|
| MIT | <n> | <list> | None |
| Apache-2.0 | <n> | <list> | None |
| GPL-3.0 | <n> | <list> | Copyleft — review required |
| Unlicensed | <n> | <list> | Unknown — investigate |

## Recommendations Summary

### Immediate Action
1. <package>: <action and reason>

### This Sprint
1. <package>: <action and reason>

### Next Maintenance Window
1. <package>: <action and reason>

### Monitor
1. <package>: <what to watch for>

Risk Scoring Matrix

Dimension	Low	Medium	High	Critical
Freshness	Current or 1 minor behind	2+ minor behind	1+ major behind	Abandoned (2+ years)
Vulnerabilities	None known	Low severity	High severity, fix available	Critical severity or no fix
Bundle Impact	< 50KB, few transitive	50-200KB	200KB-1MB	> 1MB or 50+ transitive deps
License	MIT, BSD, ISC, Apache-2.0	LGPL	GPL	AGPL or unlicensed
Maintenance	Active (monthly releases)	Maintained (quarterly)	Minimal (yearly)	Unmaintained or archived

The overall risk score for a dependency is the highest score across all dimensions.

Note: These risk levels assume distributed, proprietary software. Adjust based on your project's distribution model — for internal-only tools, even copyleft licenses may be low risk. For dynamically linked libraries, LGPL is often low risk.

Anti-patterns

Only checking for vulnerabilities, ignoring staleness — A dependency with no CVEs but abandoned for 3 years is a ticking time bomb. When a vulnerability is discovered, there will be no one to patch it. Staleness is a leading indicator of future risk.
Not checking transitive dependencies — Your project may have 20 direct dependencies but 200 transitive ones. A critical vulnerability in a transitive dependency is just as exploitable. Always audit the full tree.
Ignoring license issues — Using a GPL library in a proprietary product can create legal exposure. License compliance is not optional, and "we will deal with it later" becomes expensive when a customer or investor asks.
Only auditing production dependencies — Dev dependencies run in your CI/CD pipeline and developer machines. A compromised dev dependency can inject malicious code into your build artifacts. Audit everything.
Treating the audit as a one-time activity — Dependencies change constantly. New vulnerabilities are disclosed daily. Schedule regular audits (at least monthly) and integrate
```
npm audit
```
/
```
pip audit
```
into CI.
Recommending updates without checking breaking changes — "Just update to latest" is not actionable advice. Check the changelog for breaking changes, especially across major versions, and note migration effort in the recommendation.
Ignoring bundle impact in frontend projects — A 2MB dependency for a single utility function destroys load time. Always consider whether the functionality can be achieved with a smaller package or inlined code.