Total 56,891 skills
Showing 12 of 56891 skills
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
Setup Sentry Tracing (Performance Monitoring) in any project. Use when asked to enable tracing, track transactions/spans, measure latency, or add performance monitoring. Supports JavaScript, Python, and Ruby.
Deploy to 9 cloud providers — AWS, Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Fly.io, Heroku, DigitalOcean, Linode, Cloudflare. Provider selection, deployment patterns, cost comparison.
Use this skill when the user wants to audit Agent Skills, SKILL.md files, imported skills, prompts, tools, scripts, or skill repositories for safety, prompt injection risk, secret leakage, unsafe commands, unclear permissions, untrusted external references, or repo policy violations. Trigger phrases include "audit this skill," "skill security," "review imported skills," "prompt injection risk," "unsafe skill," "scan skills," and "security audit for skills."
Use when the user has a video + an SRT and wants the subtitles either burned into the pixels (libass, always-visible) or soft-muxed as a togglable track. Also handles the final composite step for the localization pipeline — burn subs, mix a dub track, and keep the original audio as a low-volume bed, all in ONE ffmpeg encode (no cascade). Verifies libass availability and auto-downloads a static evermeet ffmpeg build when Homebrew's stripped binary lacks it. Triggers — "烧字幕", "硬字幕", "burn subtitles", "burn-in subs", "embed subtitle", "soft mux SRT", "把字幕烧进视频", "做最终合成".
Start and scale networked products using Andrew Chen's "The Cold Start Problem" framework for network effects. Use when the user mentions "network effects", "chicken and egg", "cold start", "two-sided marketplace", "atomic network", "hard side", "liquidity", "critical mass", "invite-only launch", "how do I get my first users", or "the marketplace has no buyers or sellers". Also trigger when launching a marketplace, social, or collaboration product that is worthless without other users, deciding launch sequencing and seeding tactics, or diagnosing stalled network growth at scale. Covers the five stages: cold start, tipping point, escape velocity, hitting the ceiling, and the moat. For word-of-mouth virality, see contagious. For habit-driven retention, see hooked-ux.
Manage for output using Grove's "High Output Management": a manager's output is their organization's output, raised by high-leverage activities. Use when the user mentions "high output management", "managerial leverage", "one-on-ones", "1:1 agenda", "OKRs", "performance review", "task-relevant maturity", "delegation", "meeting overload", "new manager", "how do I run a 1:1", or "just got promoted to manager". Also trigger when structuring a manager's calendar and meeting cadence, designing team metrics, running planning, coaching delegation, or preparing performance reviews. Covers leverage, production principles, meetings as the medium of management, decisions, OKRs, and task-relevant maturity. For intrinsic motivation, see drive-motivation. For a company operating system, see traction-eos.
Publish text, image, video or carousel posts to your Threads (@threads) account via the official Threads API, and read your own recent posts. Use when the user wants to post to Threads, cross-post a short update / thread, attach an image or link, or review their own Threads posts. Auth uses a Threads access token (BYOC). 支持 Threads 文本 / 图片 / 视频 / 轮播发布与自有贴文读取。
Ask which skill or process is suitable for the current scenario; it is the router for all skills in this repository.
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.
Carve guardrail-adjacent items out of scope with safe alternatives before risk-adjacent work starts, then run the safe remainder at full strength in a fresh subagent that only ever sees the carved prompt, never the risky input. Use when a task includes stealth, scraping, privacy, IP, policy, licensing, security, or other safety-adjacent material that could be silently dropped, over-elaborated, or needlessly diluted. Fires on the impulse, not only the topic: the moment you notice yourself about to hedge, soften, silently skip, or brace for a refusal, carve before you execute.
Audit any eval, metric, experiment, or benchmark for leakage — does external ground-truth enter independently, or are the model, scorer, and designer just confirming a result no outside truth ever produced? Use before trusting any 'how we'll know it worked' — an A/B, a holdout, a score, a validation — and whenever a result feels too clean or self-confirming. Walks an 8-pattern leakage taxonomy and returns only the patterns that fire, each with an independence fix. Read-only.