Total 50,510 skills, Code Quality has 2287 skills
Showing 12 of 2287 skills
[Review & Quality] Review all uncommitted changes before commit
Apply the "How I Made Your Machine" coding style guide to implementation, refactoring, and code review tasks across TypeScript, Rust, and Python. Use when a request asks for this style guide, when improving maintainability and type safety, when modeling domain concepts with explicit variants/types, or when enforcing behavior-first testing.
Anti-patterns for CLI development. Do NOT use commander, inquirer.js, yargs, or other CLI libraries in Constructive projects. Use inquirerer instead. Triggers on "commander", "inquirer.js", "yargs", "CLI library", or when reviewing CLI code.
Worker that checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates architectural decisions via MCP Ref: (1) Optimality (2) Compliance (3) Performance. Reports issues with SEC-, PERF-, MNT-, ARCH-, BP-, OPT- prefixes.
Performs semantic code intelligence and token optimization through context engineering and automated context packing. Use when reducing token overhead for large codebases, creating repository digests with Gitingest, packaging code context with Repomix, or tracing cross-file dependencies with llm-tldr.
Generate custom lint rules from architectural patterns. ESLint local plugins (JS/TS) or ast-grep YAML rules (Python/Go/Rust/any). Invoke when: codifying an import boundary, enforcing API conventions, blocking deprecated patterns, or any "always/never" constraint.
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)
Use this skill when orchestrating multiple review types. Use when general review needed without knowing which specific skill applies, full multi-domain review desired, integrated reporting needed. Do not use when specific review type known - use bug-review, test-review, etc. DO NOT use when: architecture-only focus - use architecture-review.
Comprehensive Python expertise covering language fundamentals, idiomatic patterns, software design principles, and production best practices. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring Python code. Triggers: Python, .py files, pip, uv, pytest, dataclasses, asyncio, type hints, or any Python library.