Total 50,487 skills, Code Quality has 2287 skills
Showing 12 of 2287 skills
Registro, priorización y planificación de deuda técnica: taxonomía, puntuación, informe, integración con sprint.
Used to confirm that development is completed and ensure all tests/checks have passed
Core engineering principles for sustainable, maintainable code. No shortcuts, no hacks. Quality gates before completion.
Error handling best practices across languages — error types, recovery strategies, user-facing messages, and logging. Reference when implementing error handling or designing error flows.
Review an existing game codebase for architecture, performance, and best practices
Local code review tool for self-inspection before git push. Triggered when users request phrases like "review my code", "check code changes", "review this commit", "review this", "code review", "git review", "help me check my code". Supports reviewing unstaged, staged uncommitted, and committed unpushed changes, and outputs a Markdown review report with scores.
Multi-language SOLID detection rules. Project type detection, interface locations, file size limits per language.
Find similar or analogous code patterns elsewhere in a codebase. Use when answering "Do we do something similar elsewhere?" or "What existing patterns match this?" Returns factual findings about similar code - locations, similarity type, and confidence.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
When writing or reviewing code to eliminate duplicated knowledge and business logic. Use when the user says "this is duplicated," "we have this in two places," "single source of truth," "DRY this up," or "shotgun surgery." For premature abstraction concerns, see yagni.
Create markdown-based behavioral rules preventing unwanted actions. create hookify rule, behavioral rule, prevent behavior, block command Use when: preventing dangerous commands, blocking debug commits, enforcing conventions DO NOT use when: hook scope (abstract:hook-scope-guide), SDK hooks (abstract:hook-authoring), evaluating hooks (abstract:hooks-eval).
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Python codebases with strong typing, explicit error handling, and maintainable module boundaries. Use when Python artifacts are created, changed, or reviewed and Python-specific quality rules must be enforced.