Total 50,396 skills, Code Quality has 2287 skills
Showing 12 of 2287 skills
Reviews Elixir code for idiomatic patterns, OTP basics, and documentation. Use when reviewing .ex/.exs files, checking pattern matching, GenServer usage, or module documentation.
Use when writing code - follow Google style guides where available, otherwise follow established best practices for the language
Refactor Salesforce triggers into handler patterns with automated test generation and deployment. Use when modernizing legacy triggers with DML/SOQL in loops or inconsistent patterns.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "roast my code", "review code brutally", "find code sins", "what's wrong with my code", "shame my code", "critique this code", "find antipatterns", "code quality roast", or wants entertaining but actionable code criticism with severity-ranked fixes. Delivers brutally honest roasts with file:line citations and redemption paths.
Adopt a typed .spec.ts for an existing hand-written CLAUDE.md — start from the file you already have, non-destructively
Identify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt. Trigger with "tech debt", "technical debt audit", "what should we refactor", "code health", or when the user asks about code quality, refactoring priorities, or maintenance backlog.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "configure ruff", "set up ruff linting", "use ruff formatter", "replace flake8 with ruff", or needs guidance on Python code quality with Ruff linting and formatting best practices.
Provides SonarQube and SonarCloud integration patterns via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Enables quality gate monitoring, issue discovery and triaging, pre-push code analysis, and rule education directly in the agent workflow. Use when the user wants to check quality gates, search for Sonar issues, analyze code snippets before committing, or understand SonarQube rules. Triggers on "sonarqube", "sonarcloud", "quality gate", "sonar issues", "analyze with sonar", "check sonar", "sonar rule", "pre-push analysis".
Remove code duplication by extracting shared logic into reusable components. Use when the same logic appears in multiple places.
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Defense-in-depth verification before declaring any task complete. Run tests, check build, validate changed files, verify no regressions. Applies 4-level adversarial artifact verification (EXISTS > SUBSTANTIVE > WIRED > DATA FLOWS) with goal-backward framing. Use before saying "done", "fixed", or "complete" on any code change. Use for "verify", "make sure it works", "check before committing", or "validate changes". Do NOT use for debugging (use systematic-debugging) or code review (use systematic-code-review).
Checkpoint - Pre-publish review with multi-layer deep analysis. Triggers: Preparing to publish an npm package, requiring pre-release review, or checking code change quality. Review Layers: - Per-Change: In-depth analysis of each change group (up to 10 Agents) - Holistic: Parallel review by 5 roles (Architecture/Development/Testing/Security/Documentation) - Synthesis: 1 Agent summarizes review results Commands: - /把关 - Start pre-publish review - /把关 check - Check unpublished changes - /把关 version - Recommend version upgrade - /把关 report - Generate review report - /review - English command Capabilities: Unpublished change detection, in-depth per-change analysis, multi-role review, version recommendation, release risk assessment.