Total 50,395 skills, Code Quality has 2287 skills
Showing 12 of 2287 skills
Use this skill when > Identify architectural friction and propose deepening opportunities — refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones for better testability and AI-navigability. Use when improving architecture, finding refactoring opportunities, consolidating tightly-coupled modules, or making a codebase more testable.
Builds and queries code knowledge graph for dependency analysis, references, implementations, and architecture overview. Use when starting work on unfamiliar codebase or before refactoring.
Use when reviewing a PR/MR diff and producing a structured finding list — covers security, logic, performance, cross-file impact, test coverage, and spec compliance. Posts a sticky summary comment plus inline review comments to the PR. NOT for writing PR descriptions, design reviews requiring business judgment, or deep CVE/supply-chain audits.
Build and maintain project-specific review policy for `agentic-review` by combining repository docs (`AGENTS.md`, `ENGINEERING.md`, `CONTEXT.md`/`CONTEXT-MAP.md`, ADRs), repository-mined conventions, and structured user input, then writing machine-usable policy files under `<docs-dir>/review/policies/`, including audit-governance metadata consumed by `agentic-review`. Use when the user wants architecture integrity checks (onion/clean/hexagonal), module-specific review rules, dependency-direction policy, naming/inheritance convention enforcement, stricter project/domain review standards, or explicit auditability requirements for specialist review coverage.
Analyze code for logic bugs, error handling issues, and edge cases. Detects off-by-one errors, null handling, race conditions, and incorrect error paths. Use when reviewing core business logic or complex algorithms.
arthrod's coding philosophy and dispatcher. Universal red-green TDD, stacked PRs, test-always, evidence-before-claims. Routes to conejo-code (active coding), conejo-frontend (strict UI), conejo-merge (calm PR/merge). Use when starting any coding work or deciding how to approach a task.
Use when code has been written and needs validation before committing, or when the user asks for a code review or security check.
Safely track pull request feedback, resolve review comments or merge conflicts, validate fixes, and use a read-only cross-review before committing or pushing follow-up changes.
Findings-first review discipline for code, diffs, task plans, live workflow changes, and implementation evidence.
Verifies that implemented code is actually integrated into the system and executes at runtime, preventing "done but not integrated" failures. Use when marking features complete, before moving ADRs to completed status, after implementing new modules/nodes/services, or when claiming "feature works". Triggers on "verify implementation", "is this integrated", "check if code is wired", "prove it runs", or before declaring work complete. Works with Python modules, LangGraph nodes, CLI commands, API endpoints, and service classes. Enforces Creation-Connection-Verification (CCV) principle.
Show session analytics, learning patterns, correction trends, heatmaps, and productivity metrics. Use when wanting to understand your coding patterns over time.
This skill should be used when implementing code that requires SOLID principles and clean code practices. It provides detailed guidance on Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion principles with comparison examples in TypeScript.