Total 54,043 skills, Code Quality has 2436 skills
Showing 12 of 2436 skills
Run comprehensive 3-wave review against all source files in the repo, producing a prioritized issue backlog. Use for "full repo review", "review entire repo", "codebase health check", "review all files", "full codebase review". Do NOT use for PR-scoped reviews (use comprehensive-review) or single-concern reviews (use individual agents).
Perses-aware code review: check Go backend against Perses patterns, React components against Perses UI conventions, CUE schemas against plugin spec, and dashboard definitions against best practices. Dispatches appropriate sub-reviewers. Use for "review perses", "perses pr", "perses code review". Do NOT use for general Go/React review without Perses context.
Run Go quality checks via make check with intelligent error categorization and actionable fix suggestions. Use when user requests "run quality checks", "check PR quality", "verify code quality", or "run make check". Use before creating commits or during PR review. Do NOT use for non-Go repositories, repositories without a Makefile, or manual linter invocation.
Use when assessing task complexity, before starting complex tasks, when stuck after multiple attempts, or reviewing code against best practices. Provides quality-gates scoring (1-5), escalation workflows, and pattern library management.
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer
Guides efficient Haskell aligned with GHC practice -- laziness and strictness, purity, fusion, newtypes, pragmas, Core reading, and space-leak avoidance. Use when writing or reviewing Haskell, optimizing or profiling, debugging strictness or memory, or when the user mentions GHC, thunks, foldl vs foldl', list fusion, SPECIALIZE, or UNPACK.
Comprehensive code review checklist for Go projects. Evaluates code quality, idiomatic patterns, error handling, naming, package structure, and test coverage. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or before merging changes. Trigger examples: "review this code", "check this PR", "code review", "review Go file". Do NOT use for security-specific audits (use go-security-audit) or performance-specific analysis (use go-performance-review).
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
Run Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI reviews against the current branch concurrently, deduplicate the findings, and report only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase.
Run Claude Code review against the current branch and report only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, without applying fixes.
Run Codex code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.