Total 54,069 skills, Code Quality has 2437 skills
Showing 12 of 2437 skills
Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.
Chinese Code Review Communication Reference - Script Templates, Priority Labeling (Must Fix/Suggested Change/For Reference Only), Countermeasures for Common Anti-patterns in Domestic Teams. Only invoke when the user explicitly uses /chinese-code-review, do not trigger automatically based on context.
Used when completing tasks, implementing important features, or before merging to verify whether the work results meet the requirements
Shared behavior and mutation-path rules for cmux. Use when a behavior is exposed through multiple entrypoints such as keyboard shortcuts, command palette, context menu, CLI, settings, debug menu, optimistic UI, or tests that previously missed a bug.
Provides reflective questioning framework to challenge assumptions about work completeness, catching incomplete implementations before they're marked "done". Use before claiming features complete, before moving ADRs to completed status, during self-review, or when declaring work finished. Triggers on "is this really done", "self-review my work", "challenge my assumptions", "verify completeness", or proactively before marking tasks complete. Works with any type of implementation work. Enforces critical thinking about integration, testing, and execution proof.
Guides strict Test-Driven Development (TDD) using the Red-Green-Refactor cycle. Ensures no production code is written without a prior failing test. Use this skill when implementing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code to ensure high test coverage and design quality. Triggers on phrases like 'TDD', 'write tests first', 'test-driven', 'red-green-refactor', 'watch it fail', 'test first', or 'behavior driven'.
Use this to verify whether the work meets requirements when completing tasks, implementing main features, or before merging.
Use when asked to fix, resolve, or address a GitHub PR — including review comments, Copilot suggestions, and CI test failures. Triggers on phrases like "fix PR", "fix PR comments", "resolve review", "address Copilot feedback", "fix review comments", "fix CI", "fix failing tests on PR", or when given a PR number to fix.
Systematic debugging methodology — binary search isolation, hypothesis-driven debugging, reproducing issues, and root cause analysis. Use when debugging errors, unexpected behavior, or test failures.
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Use when validating code quality after modifications. Runs sniper agent in isolated forked context for clean, fast validation.
Iterative codebase quality audit with multi-agent validation and escalating-depth SEEK/VALIDATE/FIX/RECURSE cycle. Use for quality audit, code audit, codebase review, technical debt audit, refactoring opportunities, module quality check, or architecture review.