Total 44,135 skills, Code Quality has 2068 skills
Showing 12 of 2068 skills
Run TypeScript type checking with tsc --noEmit and parse errors into actionable, file-grouped output. Use when validating TypeScript code before commits, after refactors, or when checking for type regressions. Use for "type check", "tsc", "TypeScript errors", "type validation", or pre-commit TypeScript verification. Do NOT use for linting, test execution, runtime errors, or JavaScript-only projects without tsconfig.json.
Perses-aware code review: check Go backend against Perses patterns, React components against Perses UI conventions, CUE schemas against plugin spec, and dashboard definitions against best practices. Dispatches appropriate sub-reviewers. Use for "review perses", "perses pr", "perses code review". Do NOT use for general Go/React review without Perses context.
Run Go quality checks via make check with intelligent error categorization and actionable fix suggestions. Use when user requests "run quality checks", "check PR quality", "verify code quality", or "run make check". Use before creating commits or during PR review. Do NOT use for non-Go repositories, repositories without a Makefile, or manual linter invocation.
4-phase code review methodology: UNDERSTAND changes, VERIFY claims against code, ASSESS security/performance/architecture risks, DOCUMENT findings with severity classification. Use when reviewing pull requests, auditing code before release, evaluating external contributions, or pre-merge verification. Use for "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check this PR", or "review my changes". Do NOT use for writing new code or implementing features.
Gold-standard code review for SAP CC Go repositories against the project's lead review standards. Dispatches 10 domain-specialist agents in parallel — each loads domain-specific references and scans ALL packages for violations in their assigned domain. Produces a prioritized report with REJECTED/CORRECT code examples. Optional --fix mode applies corrections on a worktree branch. This is the definitive "would this code pass lead review?" assessment.
Review and fix comments containing temporal references, development-activity language, or relative comparisons. Use when reviewing code comments, preparing documentation for release, or auditing inline comments for timelessness. Use for "check comments", "temporal language", "comment review", or "fix docs". Do NOT use for writing new documentation, API reference generation, or code style linting unrelated to comment content.
Systematic detection and prioritization of neglected code quality issues: stale TODOs, unused imports, deprecated functions, high complexity, dead code. Use when user requests "code cleanup", "find TODOs", "technical debt scan", or "quality of life fixes". Do NOT use for bug fixing (use systematic-debugging), feature work (use test-driven-development), or formatting-only (use code-linting).
Fetch PR feedback from all GitHub sources and validate every comment before acting. Use when user needs to process PR review comments, address reviewer feedback, or triage pull request discussions. Use for "review comments", "PR feedback", "address reviews", "address feedback", or "what did reviewers say". Do NOT use for creating new PRs, code review of local changes, or general code analysis without an existing PR.
Verify cross-component wiring: exports are imported AND used, real data flows through connections, output shapes match input expectations. Use after /feature-implement, before /feature-validate, or standalone on any codebase. Use for "check integration", "verify wiring", "are components connected", "integration check", or "/integration-checker". Do NOT use for unit test failures, linting, or single-file correctness issues.
Run Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome) linting, formatting, and code quality checks with auto-fix support. Use when code needs linting, formatting, or style checking before commits. Use for "lint", "format", "ruff", "biome", "code style", or "check quality". Do NOT use for comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
Multi-language code quality gate with auto-detection and language-specific linters. Use when user asks to "run quality checks", "quality gate", "lint all", "check everything", "pre-commit checks", or "is this code ready to commit". Use for verifying code quality across polyglot repos. Do NOT use for single-language linting (use code-linting) or comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
Review pull requests for the MiniMax Skills repository. Use when reviewing PRs, validating new skill submissions, or checking existing skills for compliance. Run the validation script first for hard checks, then apply quality guidelines for content review. Triggers: PR review, pull request, validate skill, check skill.