Total 50,520 skills, Code Quality has 2287 skills
Showing 12 of 2287 skills
Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin code that stores CoroutineScope, launches from init/non-suspending APIs, calls runBlocking, or catches broad exceptions around suspend calls.
Runs validator checks only without AI reviews for requests such as "run validator checks", "check without reviews", or "validate before commit without AI review".
Generate a single-file interactive HTML code-review artifact for a GitHub PR. Fetches the diff via the gh CLI, performs an honest severity-coded self-review, and renders an artifact with: collapsible per-file diffs with colored inline annotations, severity filter chips, per-finding checkboxes, and a "Create feedback prompt" modal that aggregates the checked items into a paste-ready follow-up prompt ending with "Please address this feedback. Address each individual item in its own conventional commit." Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a pull request visually, asks for an HTML or static review artifact, says "review PR", "review this PR", "build a PR review", wants color-coded findings, feedback aggregation, or a review file they can share — even if they don't explicitly say "HTML". Also trigger on "code review artifact", "interactive review", "feedback prompt for a PR", or when the user mentions reviewing a specific PR number.
Codex code review closeout: local dirty changes, PR branch vs main, parallel tests.
Hypothesis-driven debugging with ranked hypotheses, git bisect strategy, instrumentation planning, and minimal reproduction design. Triggers on: "debug this systematically", "root cause analysis", "bisect this bug", "rank hypotheses", "isolate this issue", "minimal reproduction". NOT for general reasoning.
Investigate a bug observed in the running application by reading the generated code in plain_modules/, tracing the issue back to the specs, and fixing only the .plain files. Generated code is never modified. Use when the user reports unexpected behavior, visual glitches, crashes, or incorrect logic in the app.
Token-efficient GitHub source code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing and structured retrieval
Reviews the current local diff or branch at the end of a coding session for high-confidence bugs and repository instruction-file compliance. Use when asked to run `/pr-reviewer` before commit, before push, or before handing changes off for PR creation or update, and when only certain, actionable findings should be reported while style feedback is ignored.
Guide for simplifying and refining code after coding sessions. Use when cleaning up complex code, reviewing PRs for readability, or applying consistent refactoring patterns.
Emulate supported AI code-review GitHub Actions locally and print a terminal-only review from portable skill instructions. Use when running /review-action or checking local PR-review feedback before publishing.
Run a read-only, fresh-context branch-diff code review and report findings. Use when running /review-code, before finishing issue work, or when a local review gate should inspect committed, staged, unstaged, and untracked changes without mutating code or GitHub state.
Detects misplaced classes and fixes component hierarchy problems — finds code that should belong inside a component but sits at the root level. Use when asking "clean up component structure", "find orphaned classes", "fix module hierarchy", "flatten nested components", or analyzing why namespaces have misplaced code. Do NOT use for dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis) or domain grouping (use domain-identification-grouping).