Total 55,498 skills, Code Quality has 2495 skills
Showing 12 of 2495 skills
Analyzes code based on John Ousterhout's "A Philosophy of Software Design". Identifies unnecessary complexity, shallow modules, information leaks, and design problems. Use when reviewing architecture, PRs, refactoring, or asking about code quality.
Set up, configure, and troubleshoot Salesforce Code Analyzer for any project. Handles installation, prerequisite checks, diagnosing broken setups, creating and editing code-analyzer.yml overrides, engine-specific settings, ignore patterns, severity overrides, and CI/CD pipeline setup. TRIGGER when: user says 'set up code analyzer', 'configure code analyzer', 'install code analyzer', 'code analyzer not working', 'fix my setup', 'scan is failing', 'check my setup', 'is code analyzer installed', 'enable/disable engine', 'exclude files', 'change severity', 'set up GitHub Actions', 'set up CI/CD', 'add code analyzer to pipeline', 'make pipeline fail', 'update my workflow', 'quality gate', 'fail on violations', 'scan changed files only', 'add SARIF', 'code-analyzer.yml', 'ESLint config', 'increase SFGE memory', or reports errors running Code Analyzer. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants to run a scan (use running-code-analyzer), fix violations, explain rules, create custom rules, or suppress violations.
End-to-end remediation workflow for PR review feedback by PR number. Use when Codex must export CodeRabbit issues for a PR, fix every issue completely, commit all fixes in a single commit, and resolve GitHub review threads afterward.
Java Web dead code cleanup and refactoring expert. It safely identifies and removes dead code, with testing and verification performed at every step. Trigger conditions: User requests for dead code cleanup, refactoring optimization, and unused code removal.
Profile-driven performance optimization with behavior proofs. Use when: optimize, slow, bottleneck, hotspot, profile, p95, latency, throughput, or algorithmic improvements.
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents (security, database, reliability, compatibility, data integrity, performance, frontend, copy) that independently review the diff and produce a converged report. Also includes two generalist reviewers for convergence validation.
Review code changes against STYLE_GUIDE.md before committing or creating PRs. Catches naming violations, import ordering issues, anti-pattern reintroduction, and convention drift. Run after /setup-ai or /generate-comprehensive-style-guide has created a style guide.
Catalogue of preferred linter rules, TypeScript flags, and architectural boundary checks for making bug classes and design drift mechanically impossible. Use when setting up linting in a new project, hardening an existing project, responding to a class of bug by encoding a rule, or deciding which linter to reach for on a given stack. Pairs with the `hk` skill which handles wiring hooks.
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Run a full Dune app platform review against a React/TypeScript CDF codebase, following the cognitedata/dune-app-reviews scoring criteria. Produces three artifacts: review-files.md (per-file inventory), review-packages.md (dependency audit), and review-report.md (scored report with must/should/nice-fix items). Use when the user asks for a Dune app review, pre-submit review, approval review, app certification review, code quality audit, CDF platform review, or "run dune-review" on a codebase before submission.
Phase 2 of the issue process — Read the issue report + read the code, identify the true root cause and assess repair risks, and finally provide users with 2-3 repair solution options for them to decide. **Do NOT start modifying code in this phase** — present the conclusions to the user after analysis, and only proceed to Phase 3 after the user confirms the solution. Prerequisite: cs-issue-report has been completed. Trigger scenarios: The user says "Analyze this bug", "Find the root cause", "Locate the issue", and {slug}-report.md already exists in the issue directory.
Detects framework-specific anti-patterns, convention violations, and idiom misuse across PHP/Laravel, React/Next.js, and Python/Django/FastAPI codebases. Loads framework-specific reference guides and checks against framework conventions. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "framework review", "framework check", "laravel best practices", "react best practices", "framework audit", "framework-specific review".