Total 50,524 skills, Project Management has 1846 skills
Showing 12 of 1846 skills
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
Pre-sprint brief that locks scope, the decision the sprint must unlock, team and role assignments, logistics, inputs to bring, and success criteria before Day 1 of a Foundation Sprint. Use after the readiness verdict is Go and before the sprint begins. Produces a one-page artifact the team and Decider sign off on as the contract for the next two days.
To do / In progress / In review / Done 四列, 卡片 + 头像 + 泳道
Set a tracking document as the source of truth for the current feature or task. Use when starting work on a feature, bug fix, or multi-step task that benefits from a persistent record of decisions, discoveries, and progress. Keeps the document updated as work proceeds.
Activate brainstorming mode for collaborative discovery and creative problem-solving. Use when users have vague requests, want to explore ideas, or need requirements discovery.
Create lean-spec style GitHub issues as specs for human-AI aligned implementation on the current repo. Use when asked to "create a spec", "write a spec issue", "spec this feature", "spec this", or when planning work that needs a specification before implementation. Follows the lean-spec SDD methodology — small focused specs (<2000 tokens), intent over implementation, context economy. Creates GitHub issues with Overview, Design, Plan, Test, Alignment, and Notes sections. Repo-specific area taxonomy, sister-skill names, custom body sections (e.g. Provider impact / Schema impact / Reach), and additional principles are overlaid by the consumer repo's CLAUDE.md and its `*-dev-process` / `*-pre-push` / `*-pr-lifecycle` sister skills — read those first when the repo isn't obvious.
Guides end-to-end lifecycle governance for mission-critical, high-assurance, or zero-failure- tolerance systems—concept through retirement: phases, gates, evidence, traceability, obsolescence, tech refresh, configuration baselines, NDA-safe regulated/classified patterns, assurance/DevSecOps/ ATO interfaces, decommissioning and data disposition. Use for extreme lifecycle, system lifecycle, mission-critical lifecycle, lifecycle gates, sustainment, tech refresh, obsolescence management, decommissioning, configuration baseline, lifecycle evidence, end-to-end lifecycle, or retire a system—not TPM-only (technical-program-manager), HRO-only (zero-tolerance-for-failure), tiering-only (mission-critical), classified pipeline-only (classified-software-devsecops-engineer), formal proofs (software-assurance-formal-methods-specialist), compliance-only (compliance-engineer), CI-only (build-validator), infra portfolio-only (vp-of-infrastructure).
Use when migrating messy academic research repositories, downloaded archives, proposal folders, ad hoc notebooks, scripts, datasets, or paper assets into the standard research project structure.
Drafts, reviews, rewrites, and coaches outcome-based OKR sets across team, department, product, or company scopes. Supports five entry modes (Guided default, One-Shot via --oneshot, Sustained Coach, Audit Only, Rewrite). Diagnoses empowered-team context and adjusts framing; refuses to fabricate baselines or targets; refuses to use OKR scores for compensation; reframes feature-delivery KRs into outcome KRs. Use when planning quarterly OKRs, translating strategy into team outcomes, reviewing draft OKRs for quality, or converting roadmap-as-OKR drafts into proper OKR sets.
Runs the morning maintainer standup for NemoClaw. Triages the backlog, determines the day's target version, labels selected items, surfaces stragglers from previous versions, and outputs the daily plan. Use at the start of the workday. Trigger keywords - morning, standup, start of day, daily plan, what are we shipping today.
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
Track multiple live deals with milestones, deadlines, action items, and status updates. Maintains a deal pipeline view and surfaces upcoming deadlines and overdue items. Use when managing a book of business, tracking process milestones, or preparing for weekly deal reviews. Triggers on "deal tracker", "deal status", "where are we on", "process update", "deal pipeline", or "weekly deal review".