topic-reviewer

Original：🇨🇳 Chinese
Translated

Topic Review Tool. Checks whether a topic meets the publishing standards, provides a pass/fail judgment and revision suggestions. Triggered when the user says "review the topic", "is this topic acceptable", "help me see if this is worth writing about".

1installs
Sourcezephyrwang6/myskill
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add zephyrwang6/myskill topic-reviewer

Tags

Translated version includes tags in frontmatter
topic-reviewcontent-creationeditorial-toolwriting-guidelinecontent-quality

SKILL.md Content (Chinese)

View Translation Comparison →

Topic Reviewer - Topic Review

Review Process

  1. Receive Topic (from topic-generator or user input)
  2. Item-by-Item Check: Score according to the review checklist
  3. Output Conclusion: Pass/Fail + Reasons

Review Checklist

Must-pass Items (One-Vote Veto)

Check ItemFailure Criteria
PopularityDiscussion volume <100 or no growth trend
RelevanceUnrelated to AI/programming/efficiency
TimelinessOld news older than 72 hours
WritabilityNo actionable content output

Scoring Items (Full Score: 100)

DimensionWeightScoring Criteria
Unique Perspective30%Whether there is an entry point no one else has written about
User Value25%What readers can gain
Domestic Adaptation20%Whether domestic users care about it
Title Attractiveness15%Whether people want to click in to read
Writing Difficulty10%Whether it can be completed quickly and with high quality
Passing Score: 70/100

Common Reasons for Failure

  1. Insufficient Popularity
    • Performance: Low discussion volume at the source, no dissemination trend
    • Suggestion: Wait for the popularity to rise before writing, or switch to a hot topic
  2. Lack of Unique Perspective
    • Performance: A large number of similar articles already exist
    • Suggestion: Find a differentiated entry point, or abandon the topic
  3. Not Aligned with Domestic Users' Interests
    • Performance: Pure overseas events with no local relevance
    • Suggestion: Find resonance points for domestic users, or translate and localize
  4. Hot Topic Chasing without Substance
    • Performance: Only paraphrasing news with no incremental information
    • Suggestion: Add practical operations/reviews/in-depth analysis
  5. High Writing Cost
    • Performance: Requires extensive research or high technical threshold
    • Suggestion: Simplify the scope or split into a series

Output Format

markdown
## Topic Review Result

**Topic**: [Title]

**Conclusion**: ✅ Pass / ❌ Fail

**Score**: XX/100

| Dimension | Score | Description |
|------|------|------|
| Unique Perspective | /30 | |
| User Value | /25 | |
| Domestic Adaptation | /20 | |
| Title Attractiveness | /15 | |
| Writing Difficulty | /10 | |

**Review Comments**
- Strengths: ...
- Issues: ...
- Suggestions: ...

**Revision Directions** (if failed)
1. ...
2. ...

Quick Judgment

When there's no time for a detailed review, ask yourself:
  1. Will I regret not writing it today?
  2. What feedback will I get after writing it?
  3. Can I explain in one sentence why it's worth writing?
All three "Yes" = Write directly