topic-generator
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseTopic Generator - 选题生成
Topic Generator - Topic Generation
生成流程
Generation Process
- 接收热点列表(来自topic-collector)
- 评估筛选:按选题价值打分
- 输出TOP10:完整选题方案
- Receive hot topic list (from topic-collector)
- Evaluation & Filtering: Score based on topic value
- Output TOP 10: Complete topic proposals
筛选标准
Filtering Criteria
必须满足
Must Meet
- AI相关(Vibe Coding / Claude / AI工具 / AI模型)
- 有明确的用户价值(能学到/能用到/能思考)
- 国内用户能理解和关注
- AI-related (Vibe Coding / Claude / AI tools / AI models)
- Clear user value (learnable/usable/thought-provoking)
- Understandable and relevant to domestic users
加分项
Bonus Points
| 维度 | 高分 | 低分 |
|---|---|---|
| 热度 | 讨论量大、增长快 | 冷门、无人问津 |
| 时效 | 24小时内 | 超过3天 |
| 独特性 | 有新角度可挖 | 已被写烂 |
| 可操作 | 能给出具体方法 | 纯概念讨论 |
| Dimension | High Score | Low Score |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | High discussion volume, fast growth | Niche, little attention |
| Timeliness | Within 24 hours | Over 3 days |
| Uniqueness | New perspectives to explore | Over-covered |
| Practicality | Able to provide specific methods | Pure conceptual discussion |
写作方式分类
Writing Method Classification
根据内容特点选择:
- 干货教程 - 有具体步骤可复现
- 产品体验 - 新产品/新功能测评
- 观点分享 - 趋势分析/行业洞察
- 新技术突破 - 重大更新/技术解读
Choose based on content characteristics:
- Practical Tutorial - With reproducible specific steps
- Product Experience - Review of new products/features
- Viewpoint Sharing - Trend analysis/industry insights
- New Technology Breakthrough - Major updates/technical interpretation
输出格式
Output Format
每个选题输出:
markdown
undefinedEach topic output:
markdown
undefined选题 N:[标题]
Topic N: [Title]
事件描述
一句话说清楚发生了什么
核心角度
为什么值得写?独特切入点是什么?
推荐标题(3个备选)
- 标题A
- 标题B
- 标题C
写作方式:干货教程 / 产品体验 / 观点分享 / 新技术突破
预估热度:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(1-5星)
不写的风险:错过什么?(可选)
undefinedEvent Description
One sentence explaining what happened
Core Angle
Why is it worth writing? What's the unique entry point?
Recommended Titles (3 alternatives)
- Title A
- Title B
- Title C
Writing Method: Practical Tutorial / Product Experience / Viewpoint Sharing / New Technology Breakthrough
Estimated Popularity: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (1-5 stars)
Risk of Not Writing: What will be missed? (Optional)
undefined选题公式参考
Topic Formula References
工具测评型
Tool Review Type
- 用了X天[工具],我发现[意外收获]
- [工具]的隐藏功能,90%的人不知道
- After using [Tool] for X days, I discovered [Unexpected Gain]
- Hidden features of [Tool] that 90% of people don't know
方法论型
Methodology Type
- 我用[方法]搞定了[问题]的完整流程
- [数字]个让[场景]效率翻倍的技巧
- The complete process of solving [Problem] with [Method]
- [Number] tips to double efficiency in [Scenario]
热点结合型
Hot Topic Integration Type
- [热点]爆火,但大家忽略了这一点
- 从[热点]看AI编程的未来
- [Hot Topic] is trending, but everyone ignored this point
- Looking at the future of AI programming from [Hot Topic]
反共识型
Counter-consensus Type
- 别再[常见做法]了
- 为什么我不推荐[热门事物]
- Stop [Common Practice]
- Why I don't recommend [Popular Thing]
经验复盘型
Experience Review Type
- 做了[数字]个[事情]后,我总结的[数字]条教训
- 如果重来一次,我会[改变]
- [Number] lessons I learned after doing [Number] [Tasks]
- If I could do it again, I would [Change]
质量检查
Quality Check
生成后自检:
- 标题有冲突感?(数字、对比、反差、疑问)
- 读者有痛点?
- 我有独特视角?
- 有具体案例?
- 能引发讨论?
5条全中 = 必写 | 3-4条 = 可写 | <3条 = 再想想
Self-check after generation:
- Does the title have a conflicting feel? (Numbers, comparison, contrast, questions)
- Does it address readers' pain points?
- Do I have a unique perspective?
- Are there specific cases?
- Can it spark discussions?
All 5 met = Must write | 3-4 met = Can write | <3 met = Think again