Back to Details

short-drama-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

短剧审查

Short Drama Review

优先由未参与当前版本创作的 reviewer 执行；条件不允许时可以自检并如实说明。审查与修改是两个工作 单元：本技能只定位问题、影响和必须达到的修订结果，不在同一轮替 owner 改来源。
Prefer to have a reviewer who did not participate in the creation of the current version perform the review; when conditions do not allow, self-review is acceptable and should be disclosed honestly. Review and revision are two separate work units: this skill only identifies issues, impacts, and revision results that must be achieved; it does not modify sources on behalf of the owner in the same round.

Quick Start

Quick Start

直接读取用户点名的当前文件。单集审查需要落盘时写 
审查/EP001-审查.md
；独立文件审查使用 
审查/<主题>-审查.md
。用户只要口头结论时直接回复，不为“完整”创建审查文件。
审查 Markdown 建议结构：
markdown
undefined
Read the current file named by the user directly. When a single-episode review needs to be persisted, write 
review/EP001-review.md
; for standalone file reviews, use 
review/<topic>-review.md
. If the user only wants verbal conclusions, respond directly; do not create a review file for the sake of "completeness".
Suggested structure for review Markdown:
markdown
undefined

EP001 审查

EP001 Review

  • 范围：剧本、分镜、视频提示词
  • 结论：REVISE
  • 复核方式：独立 reviewer / 自检
  • Scope: script, storyboard, video prompts
  • Conclusion: REVISE
  • Review method: independent reviewer / self-check

Blocker · REV-001 · 画面文字未被镜头承载

Blocker · REV-001 · On-screen text is not carried by any shot

  • 位置：剧本.md / EP001-SC002；分镜.md / SHOT-EP001-004
  • 证据：……
  • 影响：……
  • 修订结果：由 short-drama-storyboard 补入准确文字及可读条件。
  • 规则：SHT-01 · reviewed_invariant

引用只使用文件名、标题 ID、行号或短引文；不建立 sources 声明、哈希、record ID 或第二套状态。
  • Location: script.md / EP001-SC002; storyboard.md / SHOT-EP001-004
  • Evidence: ...
  • Impact: ...
  • Required revision: add accurate text and legibility conditions via short-drama-storyboard.
  • Rule: SHT-01 · reviewed_invariant

Citations use only file names, heading IDs, line numbers, or short quotes; do not create sources declarations, hashes, record IDs, or a second set of states.

选择审查范围

Choosing the Review Scope

  • source_analysis
  • story_script
  • assets_continuity
  • image_prompts
  • storyboard_keyframes
  • video_prompts
  • production_outputs
  • full_episode
  • delivery_privacy
  • project_calibration
只读对应资料，不预加载整个项目：
  • 原著分析：原著分析审查表
  • 故事、场景、行动与对白：故事剧本审查表
  • 身份、变体、连续性与图片提示词：资产提示词审查表
  • 原文落实、镜头、关键帧与视频运动：视觉运动审查表
  • 完整审查方法：审查方法
  • 制作端常见缺陷：生产质量门
  • 授权生产观察的项目内校准：项目校准
  • 模板感、重复手法或 AI 味：反模板修订
  • 阶段边界、参考媒体与规则表：阶段契约
  • source_analysis
  • story_script
  • assets_continuity
  • image_prompts
  • storyboard_keyframes
  • video_prompts
  • production_outputs
  • full_episode
  • delivery_privacy
  • project_calibration
Read only the corresponding materials; do not preload the entire project:
  • Source analysis: Source Analysis Review Rubric
  • Story, scenes, actions, and dialogue: Story & Script Review Rubric
  • Identity, variants, continuity, and image prompts: Asset Prompt Review Rubric
  • Source text delivery, shots, keyframes, and video motion: Visual Motion Review Rubric
  • Complete review methodology: Review Method
  • Common production-side defects: Production Quality Gates
  • In-project calibration from authorized production observations: Project Calibration
  • Template feel, repetitive techniques, or AI flavor: Anti-Template Repair
  • Stage boundaries, reference media, and rule tables: Stage Contract

工作流

Workflow

1. 冻结范围

1. Freeze the Scope

写清当前要审哪些文件、章节、镜头或提示词，以及创作者已经明确的限制。目标在审查中发生变化时， 重新读取再下结论。
Clearly write down which files, sections, shots, or prompts are under review, along with the constraints the creator has explicitly stated. If the target changes during the review, re-read before drawing conclusions.

2. 先查可证明事实

2. Check Provable Facts First

  • 五文档的可见 ID、引用和时长是否一致；
  • 剧本对白、动作、声音、画面文字是否都有画面/声音承载；
  • 人物、地点、道具状态和镜头起止是否连续；
  • 提示词是否从准确起点到准确终点；
  • 目标模型画音同轨时，声音内容、时序和发声边界是否与来源一致；无对白镜是否交代底声或静默 （
    VID-22
    、
    VID-23
    ，见 视觉运动审查表）；
  • 私有输入、凭据、绝对路径或内部流程文字是否泄漏。
缺少必要输入时只停止依赖它的判断，其他问题可以继续汇总。
  • Whether the visible IDs, citations, and durations across the five documents are consistent;
  • Whether script dialogue, actions, sounds, and on-screen text all have visual/audio carriers;
  • Whether characters, locations, prop states, and shot start/end points are continuous;
  • Whether prompts run from an accurate start point to an accurate end point;
  • When the target model produces synchronized audio and video, whether the audio content, timing, and vocal boundaries are consistent with the source; whether dialogue-free shots specify room tone or silence (
    VID-22
    , 
    VID-23
    , see Visual Motion Review Rubric);
  • Whether private inputs, credentials, absolute paths, or internal process text are leaked.
When necessary inputs are missing, only pause the judgments that depend on them; other issues can still be aggregated.

3. 带证据审内容

3. Review Content with Evidence

每个 finding 包含：位置、必要短引文或冲突事实、观众/制作影响、必须达到的修订结果、owner、严重 程度和规则等级。不能只说“AI 味”“不够电影感”或给无证据分数。
Each finding includes: location, necessary short quotation or conflicting facts, audience/production impact, the revision result that must be achieved, owner, severity, and rule level. Do not merely say "AI flavor", "not cinematic enough", or give scores without evidence.

4. 跨文档综合

4. Cross-Document Synthesis

text
剧本事实 -> 视觉设定 -> 镜头职责与边界 -> 冻结关键帧 -> 视频运动 -> 下一状态
优先守住原意、知情时机与连续性，不奖励脱离来源的华丽提示词。
text
Script facts -> visual design -> shot responsibility and boundaries -> frozen keyframes -> video motion -> next state
Prioritize preserving intent, information timing, and continuity; do not reward flashy prompts detached from the source.

5. 结论与分派

5. Conclusion and Assignment

  • APPROVE
    ：没有阻断问题；
  • APPROVE_WITH_NOTES
    ：只有不阻断的改进；
  • REVISE
    ：存在结构、内容或限制冲突；
  • PROVISIONAL
    ：关键输入不足，暂时无法完成判断。
按 owner 分组修订要求。本轮完成后交还控制权；修改和复审只有用户明确请求时开始。
  • APPROVE
    : no blocking issues;
  • APPROVE_WITH_NOTES
    : only non-blocking improvements;
  • REVISE
    : structural, content, or constraint conflicts exist;
  • PROVISIONAL
    : key inputs are insufficient; judgment cannot be completed for now.
Group revision requirements by owner. Return control after this round; revision and re-review begin only when the user explicitly requests them.

严重程度

Severity

  • blocker
    ：不安全、不可交付或会让流程走错；
  • major
    ：明显破坏剧情理解、连续性或制作结果；
  • minor
    ：有具体影响但不阻断；
  • note
    ：创作选择或可选润色。
  • blocker
    : unsafe, undeliverable, or would send the process in the wrong direction;
  • major
    : clearly damages story comprehension, continuity, or production results;
  • minor
    : has concrete impact but does not block;
  • note
    : creative choice or optional polish.

边界

Boundaries

  • 不提交图片、视频、TTS 或音乐任务，不配置 adapter，不把 Dashboard 操作当生产授权。
  • 无法读取媒体时明确限制，不从文字或 adapter 状态推断脸部一致、表演、口型、混音或市场表现。
  • 生产观察必须绑定准确输入、提示词、参考、配置和结果版本；不能泛化成通用规则。
  • 审查文件只保留修订所需的最小证据，不复制完整私有输入。
  • Do not submit image, video, TTS, or music tasks, do not configure adapters, and do not treat Dashboard operations as production authorization.
  • When media cannot be read, state the limitation explicitly; do not infer facial consistency, performance, lip sync, mixing, or market performance from text or adapter states.
  • Production observations must be tied to exact inputs, prompts, references, configurations, and result versions; they must not be generalized into universal rules.
  • Review files retain only the minimal evidence needed for revision and do not copy complete private inputs.

安装维护

Installation and Maintenance

只有安装、升级或排障时运行 
python3 scripts/selftest.py
。
Run 
python3 scripts/selftest.py
only during installation, upgrade, or troubleshooting.