deep-reading-analyst
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseDeep Reading Analyst
深度阅读分析工具
Transforms surface-level reading into deep learning through systematic analysis using 10+ proven thinking frameworks. Guides users from understanding to application through structured workflows.
通过10余种经过验证的思维框架进行系统性分析,将表层阅读转化为深度学习。通过结构化工作流引导用户从理解阶段过渡到应用阶段。
Framework Arsenal
框架库
Quick Analysis (15min)
快速分析(15分钟)
- 📋 SCQA - Structure thinking (Situation-Complication-Question-Answer)
- 🔍 5W2H - Completeness check (What, Why, Who, When, Where, How, How much)
- 📋 SCQA - 结构化思维(情境-冲突-问题-答案)
- 🔍 5W2H - 完整性检查(What、Why、Who、When、Where、How、How much)
Standard Analysis (30min)
标准分析(30分钟)
- 🎯 Critical Thinking - Argument evaluation
- 🔄 Inversion Thinking - Risk identification
- 🎯 批判性思维 - 论点评估
- 🔄 逆向思维 - 风险识别
Deep Analysis (60min)
深度分析(60分钟)
- 🧠 Mental Models - Multi-perspective analysis (physics, biology, psychology, economics)
- ⚡ First Principles - Essence extraction
- 🔗 Systems Thinking - Relationship mapping
- 🎨 Six Thinking Hats - Structured creativity
- 🧠 心智模型 - 多视角分析(物理学、生物学、心理学、经济学)
- ⚡ 第一性原理 - 本质提取
- 🔗 系统思维 - 关系映射
- 🎨 六顶思考帽 - 结构化创意
Research Analysis (120min+)
研究级分析(120分钟以上)
- 📊 Cross-Source Comparison - Multi-article synthesis
- 📊 跨来源对比 - 多篇文章整合
Workflow Decision Tree
工作流决策树
User provides content
↓
Ask: Purpose + Depth Level + Preferred Frameworks
↓
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│ Level 1 │ Level 2 │ Level 3 │ Level 4 │
│ Quick │ Standard │ Deep │ Research │
│ 15min │ 30min │ 60min │ 120min+ │
├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ • SCQA │ Level 1 + │ Level 2 + │ Level 3 + │
│ • 5W2H │ • Critical │ • Mental Models │ • Cross-source │
│ • Structure │ • Inversion │ • First Princ. │ • Web search │
│ │ │ • Systems │ • Synthesis │
│ │ │ • Six Hats │ │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘用户提供内容
↓
询问:目的 + 分析深度 + 偏好框架
↓
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│ 一级 │ 二级 │ 三级 │ 四级 │
│ 快速 │ 标准 │ 深度 │ 研究 │
│ 15分钟 │ 30分钟 │ 60分钟 │ 120分钟以上 │
├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ • SCQA │ 一级框架 + │ 二级框架 + │ 三级框架 + │
│ • 5W2H │ • 批判性思维 │ • 心智模型 │ • 跨来源对比 │
│ • 结构化分析 │ • 逆向思维 │ • 第一性原理 │ • 网络搜索 │
│ │ │ • 系统思维 │ • 整合分析 │
│ │ │ • 六顶思考帽 │ │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘Step 1: Initialize Analysis
步骤1:初始化分析
Ask User (conversationally):
- "What's your main goal for reading this?"
- Problem-solving / Learning / Writing / Decision-making / Curiosity
- "How deep do you want to go?"
- Quick (15min) / Standard (30min) / Deep (60min) / Research (120min+)
- "Any specific frameworks you'd like to use?"
- Suggest based on content type (see Framework Selection Guide below)
Default if no response: Level 2 (Standard mode) with auto-selected frameworks
以对话方式询问用户:
- "你阅读这份内容的主要目标是什么?"
- 解决问题 / 学习 / 写作 / 决策制定 / 满足好奇心
- "你希望分析到什么深度?"
- 快速(15分钟)/ 标准(30分钟)/ 深度(60分钟)/ 研究级(120分钟以上)
- "你有没有想要使用的特定框架?"
- 根据内容类型给出建议(见下方框架选择指南)
无回复时默认设置: 二级(标准模式)+ 自动选择框架
Framework Selection Guide
框架选择指南
Based on content type, auto-suggest:
markdown
📄 Strategy/Business articles → SCQA + Mental Models + Inversion
📊 Research papers → 5W2H + Critical Thinking + Systems Thinking
💡 How-to guides → SCQA + 5W2H + First Principles
🎯 Opinion pieces → Critical Thinking + Inversion + Six Hats
📈 Case studies → SCQA + Mental Models + Systems Thinking根据内容类型自动推荐:
markdown
📄 战略/商业文章 → SCQA + 心智模型 + 逆向思维
📊 研究论文 → 5W2H + 批判性思维 + 系统思维
💡 操作指南 → SCQA + 5W2H + 第一性原理
🎯 观点类文章 → 批判性思维 + 逆向思维 + 六顶思考帽
📈 案例研究 → SCQA + 心智模型 + 系统思维Step 2: Structural Understanding
步骤2:结构化理解
Always start here regardless of depth level.
无论分析深度如何,都从这里开始。
Phase 2A: Basic Structure
阶段2A:基础结构
markdown
📄 Content Type: [Article/Paper/Report/Guide]
⏱️ Estimated reading time: [X minutes]
🎯 Core Thesis: [One sentence]
Structure Overview:
├─ Main Argument 1
│ ├─ Supporting point 1.1
│ └─ Supporting point 1.2
├─ Main Argument 2
└─ Main Argument 3
Key Concepts: [3-5 terms with brief definitions]markdown
📄 内容类型:[文章/论文/报告/指南]
⏱️ 预估阅读时间:[X分钟]
🎯 核心论点:[一句话总结]
结构概述:
├─ 主要论点1
│ ├─ 支撑点1.1
│ └─ 支撑点1.2
├─ 主要论点2
└─ 主要论点3
关键概念:[3-5个术语及简要定义]Phase 2B: SCQA Analysis (Quick Framework)
阶段2B:SCQA分析(快速框架)
Load and apply:
references/scqa_framework.mdmarkdown
undefined加载并应用:
references/scqa_framework.mdmarkdown
undefinedSCQA Structure
SCQA结构
S (Situation): [Background/context the article establishes]
C (Complication): [Problem/challenge identified]
Q (Question): [Core question being addressed]
A (Answer): [Main solution/conclusion]
📊 Structure Quality:
- Clarity: [★★★★☆]
- Logic flow: [★★★★★]
- Completeness: [★★★☆☆]
undefinedS(情境):[文章建立的背景/上下文]
C(冲突):[识别出的问题/挑战]
Q(问题):[核心待解决问题]
A(答案):[主要解决方案/结论]
📊 结构质量:
- 清晰度:[★★★★☆]
- 逻辑流程:[★★★★★]
- 完整性:[★★★☆☆]
undefinedPhase 2C: 5W2H Completeness Check (if Level 1+)
阶段2C:5W2H完整性检查(若为一级及以上分析)
Quick scan using :
references/5w2h_analysis.mdmarkdown
undefined使用快速扫描:
references/5w2h_analysis.mdmarkdown
undefinedInformation Completeness
信息完整性
✅ Well-covered: [What, Why, How]
⚠️ Partially covered: [Who, When]
❌ Missing: [Where, How much]
🔴 Critical gaps: [List 1-2 most important missing pieces]
undefined✅ 覆盖完善:[What、Why、How]
⚠️ 部分覆盖:[Who、When]
❌ 缺失:[Where、How much]
🔴 关键缺口:[列出1-2个最重要的缺失部分]
undefinedStep 3: Apply Thinking Models
步骤3:应用思维模型
Select based on depth level and user preference:
根据分析深度和用户偏好选择:
Level 1 (Quick - 15 min)
一级(快速 - 15分钟)
Core: Structure + SCQA + 5W2H Quick Check
Output:
- SCQA breakdown
- Information gaps (from 5W2H)
- TOP 3 insights
- 1 immediate action item
核心:结构化分析 + SCQA + 5W2H快速检查
输出内容:
- SCQA拆解
- 信息缺口(来自5W2H)
- TOP 3核心见解
- 1个即时行动项
Level 2 (Standard - 30 min)
二级(标准 - 30分钟)
Add: Critical Thinking + Inversion
Load and apply:
-
:
references/critical_thinking.md- Argument quality assessment
- Logic flaw identification
- Evidence evaluation
- Alternative perspectives
-
:
references/inversion_thinking.md- How to ensure failure? (reverse the advice)
- What assumptions if wrong?
- Missing risks
- Pre-mortem analysis
markdown
undefined新增:批判性思维 + 逆向思维
加载并应用:
-
:
references/critical_thinking.md- 论点质量评估
- 逻辑漏洞识别
- 证据评估
- 替代视角分析
-
:
references/inversion_thinking.md- 如何确保失败?(反向建议)
- 哪些假设若错误会导致问题?
- 遗漏的风险
- 事前分析
markdown
undefinedCritical Analysis
批判性分析
Argument Strength: [X/10]
论点强度:[X/10]
Strengths:
- [Point 1]
Weaknesses:
- [Point 1]
Logical fallacies detected:
- [If any]
优势:
- [要点1]
劣势:
- [要点1]
检测到的逻辑谬误:
- [如有]
Inversion Analysis
逆向分析
🚨 How this could fail:
- [Failure mode 1] → Mitigation: [...]
- [Failure mode 2] → Mitigation: [...]
Missing risk factors:
- [Risk 1]
undefined🚨 可能失败的情况:
- [失败模式1] → 缓解方案:[...]\n2. [失败模式2] → 缓解方案:[...]\n 遗漏的风险因素:
- [风险1]
undefinedLevel 3 (Deep - 60 min)
三级(深度 - 60分钟)
Add: Mental Models + First Principles + Systems + Six Hats
Load and apply:
-
:
references/mental_models.md- Select 3-5 relevant models from different disciplines
- Apply each lens to the content
- Identify cross-model insights
-
:
references/first_principles.md- Strip to fundamental truths
- Identify core assumptions
- Rebuild understanding from base
-
:
references/systems_thinking.md- Map relationships and feedback loops
- Identify leverage points
- See the big picture
-
:
references/six_hats.md- White (facts), Red (feelings), Black (caution)
- Yellow (benefits), Green (creativity), Blue (process)
markdown
undefined新增:心智模型 + 第一性原理 + 系统思维 + 六顶思考帽
加载并应用:
-
:
references/mental_models.md- 从不同学科选择3-5个相关模型
- 用每个模型视角分析内容
- 识别跨模型的见解
-
:
references/first_principles.md- 剥离至基本事实
- 识别核心假设
- 从基础重建理解
-
:
references/systems_thinking.md- 绘制关系和反馈回路
- 识别杠杆点
- 把握全局
-
:
references/six_hats.md- 白色(事实)、红色(情感)、黑色(谨慎)
- 黄色(收益)、绿色(创意)、蓝色(流程)
markdown
undefinedMulti-Model Analysis
多模型分析
Mental Models Applied:
应用的心智模型:
-
[Model 1 from X discipline] Insight: [...]
-
[Model 2 from Y discipline] Insight: [...]
-
[Model 3 from Z discipline] Insight: [...]
Cross-model pattern: [Key insight from combining models]
- [来自X学科的模型1] 见解:[...]\n
- [来自Y学科的模型2] 见解:[...]\n
- [来自Z学科的模型3] 见解:[...]\n 跨模型模式:[结合多个模型得出的核心见解]
First Principles Breakdown:
第一性原理拆解:
Core assumptions:
- [Assumption 1] → Valid: [Yes/No/Conditional]
- [Assumption 2] → Valid: [Yes/No/Conditional]
Fundamental truth: [What remains after stripping assumptions]
核心假设:
- [假设1] → 有效性:[是/否/有条件]\n2. [假设2] → 有效性:[是/否/有条件]\n 基本事实:[剥离假设后剩余的内容]
Systems Map:
系统映射:
[Variable A] ──reinforces──> [Variable B]
↑ |
| |
balances reinforces
| |
└─────────<────────────────┘
Leverage point: [Where small change = big impact][变量A] ──强化──> [变量B]
↑ |
| |
平衡 强化
| |
└─────────<────────────────┘
Leverage point: [小改变带来大影响的位置]Six Hats Perspective:
六顶思考帽视角:
🤍 Facts: [Objective data]
❤️ Feelings: [Intuitive response]
🖤 Cautions: [Risks and downsides]
💛 Benefits: [Positive aspects]
💚 Ideas: [Creative alternatives]
💙 Process: [Meta-thinking]
undefined🤍 事实:[客观数据]
❤️ 感受:[直观反应]
🖤 警示:[风险和弊端]
💛 收益:[积极方面]
💚 创意:[替代方案]
💙 流程:[元思考]
undefinedLevel 4 (Research - 120 min+)
四级(研究级 - 120分钟以上)
Add: Cross-source comparison via web_search
Use web_search to find 2-3 related sources, then:
- Load
references/comparison_matrix.md - Compare SCQA across sources
- Identify consensus vs. divergence
- Synthesize integrated perspective
markdown
undefined新增:通过网络搜索进行跨来源对比
使用网络搜索找到2-3个相关来源,然后:
- 加载
references/comparison_matrix.md - 对比各来源的SCQA结构
- 识别共识与分歧
- 整合形成综合视角
markdown
undefinedMulti-Source Analysis
多来源分析
Source 1: [This article]
来源1:[当前文章]
S-C-Q-A: [Summary]
Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结]
核心主张:[...]\n
Source 2: [Found article]
来源2:[找到的文章]
S-C-Q-A: [Summary]
Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结]
核心主张:[...]\n
Source 3: [Found article]
来源3:[找到的文章]
S-C-Q-A: [Summary]
Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结]
核心主张:[...]\n
Synthesis
整合分析
Consensus: [What all agree on]
Divergence: [Where they differ]
Unique value: [What each contributes]
Integrated view: [Your synthesis]
undefined共识:[所有来源一致的观点]
分歧:[来源间的不同之处]
独特价值:[每个来源的贡献]
综合观点:[你的整合结论]
undefinedStep 4: Synthesis & Output
步骤4:整合与输出
Generate based on user goal:
根据用户目标生成内容:
For Problem-Solving:
解决问题场景:
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedApplicable Solutions
适用解决方案
[Extract 2-3 methods from content]
[从内容中提取2-3种方法]
Application Plan
应用计划
Problem: [User's specific issue]
Relevant insights: [From analysis]
Action steps:
- [Concrete action with timeline]
- [Concrete action with timeline]
- [Concrete action with timeline]
Success metrics: [How to measure]
问题:[用户的具体问题]
相关见解:[来自分析结果]
行动步骤:
- [具体行动及时间线]\n2. [具体行动及时间线]\n3. [具体行动及时间线]\n 成功指标:[衡量标准]
Risk Mitigation (from Inversion)
风险缓解(来自逆向思维)
Potential failure points:
- [Point 1] → Prevent by: [...]
- [Point 2] → Prevent by: [...]
undefined潜在失败点:
- [要点1] → 预防方案:[...]\n- [要点2] → 预防方案:[...]\n```
For Learning:
学习场景:
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedLearning Notes
学习笔记
Core concepts (explained simply):
- [Concept 1]: [Definition + Example]
- [Concept 2]: [Definition + Example]
Mental models gained:
- [Model 1]: [How it works]
Connections to prior knowledge:
- [Link to something user already knows]
核心概念(通俗解释):
- [概念1]:[定义 + 示例]\n2. [概念2]:[定义 + 示例]\n 获得的心智模型:
- [模型1]:[运作方式]\n 与已有知识的关联:
- [与用户已知内容的联系]
Deeper Understanding (First Principles)
深度理解(第一性原理)
Fundamental question: [...]
Core principle: [...]
基本问题:[...]\n核心原则:[...]\n
Verification Questions
验证问题
- [Question to test understanding]
- [Question to test application]
- [Question to test evaluation]
undefined- [测试理解的问题]\n2. [测试应用的问题]\n3. [测试评估的问题]\n```
For Writing Reference:
写作参考场景:
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedKey Arguments & Evidence
核心论点与证据
[Structured extraction with page/paragraph numbers]
[结构化提取,标注页码/段落数]
Quotable Insights
可引用见解
"[Quote 1]" — Context: [...]
"[Quote 2]" — Context: [...]
"[引用1]" — 上下文:[...]\n"[引用2]" — 上下文:[...]\n
Critical Analysis Notes
批判性分析笔记
Strengths: [For citing]
Limitations: [For balanced discussion]
优势:[适合引用的点]
局限性:[用于平衡讨论的点]
Alternative Perspectives (from Mental Models)
替代视角(来自心智模型)
[What other disciplines would say about this]
[其他学科对该内容的看法]
Gaps & Counterfactuals
缺口与反事实
What the article doesn't address:
- [Gap 1]
- [Gap 2]
undefined文章未涉及的内容:
- [缺口1]\n- [缺口2]\n```
For Decision-Making:
决策制定场景:
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedDecision Framework
决策框架
Options presented: [A / B / C]
Multi-model evaluation:
- Economic lens: [...]
- Risk lens (Inversion): [...]
- Systems lens: [...]
提出的选项:[A / B / C]
多模型评估:
- 经济学视角:[...]\n- 风险视角(逆向思维):[...]\n- 系统视角:[...]\n
Six Hats Decision Analysis
六顶思考帽决策分析
🤍 Facts: [Objective comparison]
🖤 Risks: [What could go wrong]
💛 Benefits: [Upside potential]
💚 Alternatives: [Other options not considered]
💙 Recommendation: [Synthesized advice]
🤍 事实:[客观对比]
🖤 风险:[可能出现的问题]
💛 收益:[潜在优势]
💚 替代方案:[未被考虑的其他选项]
💙 建议:[整合后的建议]
Scenario Analysis (from Inversion)
场景分析(来自逆向思维)
Best case: [...]
Worst case: [...]
Most likely: [...]
undefined最佳情况:[...]\n最坏情况:[...]\n最可能情况:[...]\n```
Step 5: Knowledge Activation
步骤5:知识激活
Always end with:
markdown
undefined始终以以下内容结尾:
markdown
undefined🎯 Immediate Takeaways (Top 3)
🎯 即时要点(TOP 3)
-
[Insight 1] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
-
[Insight 2] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
-
[Insight 3] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
- [见解1] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n
- [见解2] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n
- [见解3] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n
💡 Quick Win
💡 快速实践
[One thing to try in next 24 hours - make it TINY and SPECIFIC]
[未来24小时内可尝试的一件小事 - 要非常具体且微小]
🔗 Next Steps
🔗 下一步计划
To deepen understanding:
[ ] Further reading: [If relevant]
[ ] Apply framework X to topic Y
[ ] Discuss with: [Who could add perspective]
To apply:
[ ] Experiment: [Test in real context]
[ ] Teach: [Explain to someone else]
[ ] Combine: [Mix with another idea]
深化理解:
[ ] 进一步阅读:[如有相关内容]\n[ ] 将框架X应用于主题Y\n[ ] 与他人讨论:[能提供新视角的人]\n
应用知识:
[ ] 实践测试:[在真实场景中测试]\n[ ] 教授他人:[向他人解释该内容]\n[ ] 整合创新:[与其他想法结合]\n
🧭 Thinking Models Used
🧭 使用的思维模型
[Checkboxes showing which frameworks were applied]
✅ SCQA ✅ 5W2H ✅ Critical Thinking ✅ Inversion
□ Mental Models □ First Principles □ Systems □ Six Hats
undefined[勾选已应用的框架]
✅ SCQA ✅ 5W2H ✅ 批判性思维 ✅ 逆向思维
□ 心智模型 □ 第一性原理 □ 系统思维 □ 六顶思考帽
undefinedQuality Standards
质量标准
Every analysis must:
- ✅ Stay faithful to original content (no misrepresentation)
- ✅ Distinguish facts from opinions
- ✅ Provide concrete examples
- ✅ Apply frameworks appropriately (not force-fit)
- ✅ Connect to user's context when possible
- ✅ End with actionable steps
- ✅ Cite specific sections (paragraph numbers, quotes)
Avoid:
- ❌ Overwhelming with all frameworks at once (respect depth level)
- ❌ Academic jargon without explanation
- ❌ Analysis without application
- ❌ Copying text verbatim (always reword for understanding)
- ❌ Using frameworks superficially (go deep, not wide)
每一次分析都必须:
- ✅ 忠实于原文内容(不歪曲)
- ✅ 区分事实与观点
- ✅ 提供具体示例
- ✅ 恰当应用框架(不生搬硬套)
- ✅ 尽可能结合用户的上下文
- ✅ 以可行动的步骤结尾
- ✅ 标注具体章节(段落数、引用内容)
需避免:
- ❌ 一次性使用所有框架导致信息过载(尊重分析深度)
- ❌ 使用未经解释的学术术语
- ❌ 只做分析不提供应用方向
- ❌ 直接复制原文(需用自己的话重述以体现理解)
- ❌ 表面化应用框架(要深入,而非追求数量)
Interaction Patterns
交互模式
Progressive questioning:
- Understanding: "What do you think the author means by X?"
- Critical: "Do you see any gaps in this argument?"
- Application: "How might you use this in your work?"
- Meta: "Which thinking model helped you most? Why?"
Adapt to signals:
- User asks "what's the main point?" → They want conciseness, use SCQA
- User challenges your analysis → Lean into Critical Thinking + Inversion
- User asks "how do I use this?" → Focus on application + First Principles
- User wants "multiple perspectives" → Use Six Hats or Mental Models
- User mentions "risks" → Apply Inversion Thinking
- User asks "how does this connect?" → Use Systems Thinking
Framework suggestions during conversation:
- "Would you like me to apply [X framework] to this point?"
- "This seems like a good place for inversion thinking - want to explore failure modes?"
- "I notice several mental models at play here, want me to unpack them?"
渐进式提问:
- 理解层面:"你认为作者说的X是什么意思?"
- 批判层面:"你觉得这个论点有什么漏洞吗?"
- 应用层面:"你如何在工作中运用这个内容?"
- 元思考层面:"哪个思维模型对你帮助最大?为什么?"
根据用户信号调整:
- 用户问"核心观点是什么?" → 追求简洁,使用SCQA框架
- 用户质疑分析结果 → 侧重批判性思维 + 逆向思维
- 用户问"我该如何使用这个?" → 聚焦应用 + 第一性原理
- 用户想要"多视角分析" → 使用六顶思考帽或心智模型
- 用户提到"风险" → 应用逆向思维
- 用户问"这和什么有关联?" → 使用系统思维
对话中建议框架:
- "你希望我将[X框架]应用到这一点上吗?"
- "这里适合用逆向思维来探索失败模式,要不要深入看看?"
- "我注意到这里涉及多个心智模型,要不要我帮你拆解一下?"
Reference Materials
参考资料
Core Frameworks (All Levels)
核心框架(全级别)
- - Structure thinking (S-C-Q-A)
references/scqa_framework.md - - Completeness check (7 questions)
references/5w2h_analysis.md
- - 结构化思维(S-C-Q-A)
references/scqa_framework.md - - 完整性检查(7个问题)
references/5w2h_analysis.md
Standard Level Frameworks
标准级别框架
- - Argument analysis
references/critical_thinking.md - - Risk and failure mode analysis
references/inversion_thinking.md
- - 论点分析
references/critical_thinking.md - - 风险与失败模式分析
references/inversion_thinking.md
Deep Level Frameworks
深度级别框架
- - Multi-discipline model library
references/mental_models.md - - Essence extraction method
references/first_principles.md - - Relationship mapping
references/systems_thinking.md - - Multi-perspective protocol
references/six_hats.md
- - 跨学科模型库
references/mental_models.md - - 本质提取方法
references/first_principles.md - - 关系映射
references/systems_thinking.md - - 多视角分析协议
references/six_hats.md
Output Formats
输出格式
- - Note format examples
references/output_templates.md - - Cross-article analysis
references/comparison_matrix.md
- - 笔记格式示例
references/output_templates.md - - 跨文章分析模板
references/comparison_matrix.md
Advanced Usage
高级用法
Custom Framework Combinations
自定义框架组合
User can request specific combinations:
- "Use SCQA + Inversion" - Structure with risk analysis
- "Apply Mental Models + Systems Thinking" - Multi-lens system analysis
- "5W2H + Critical Thinking" - Completeness + quality check
用户可请求特定组合:
- "使用SCQA + 逆向思维" - 结构化分析 + 风险评估
- "应用心智模型 + 系统思维" - 多视角系统分析
- "5W2H + 批判性思维" - 完整性检查 + 质量评估
Iterative Deepening
迭代深化
Start with Level 1, then ask:
- "Want to go deeper on any part?"
- "Which framework would be most valuable here?"
- "Should we do an inversion analysis of this solution?"
从一级分析开始,然后询问:
- "要不要对某部分进行更深入的分析?"
- "哪个框架在这里最有价值?"
- "我们要不要对这个解决方案做逆向分析?"
Domain-Specific Optimizations
领域特定优化
Business/Strategy: SCQA + Mental Models (economics) + Inversion
Technical/Research: 5W2H + First Principles + Critical Thinking
Personal Development: Six Hats + Inversion + Systems
Decision-Making: Mental Models + Inversion + SCQA
Creative: Six Hats + First Principles + Mental Models
Remember: The goal is insight, not framework completion. Use frameworks as tools to reveal understanding, not as checklists to complete. Quality of thinking > quantity of frameworks applied.
商业/战略:SCQA + 心智模型(经济学) + 逆向思维
技术/研究:5W2H + 第一性原理 + 批判性思维
个人发展:六顶思考帽 + 逆向思维 + 系统思维
决策制定:心智模型 + 逆向思维 + SCQA
创意领域:六顶思考帽 + 第一性原理 + 心智模型
记住:目标是获得见解,而非完成框架应用。框架是揭示理解的工具,而非需要完成的清单。思考质量 > 应用框架的数量。