deep-reading-analyst

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Deep Reading Analyst

深度阅读分析工具

Transforms surface-level reading into deep learning through systematic analysis using 10+ proven thinking frameworks. Guides users from understanding to application through structured workflows.
通过10余种经过验证的思维框架进行系统性分析,将表层阅读转化为深度学习。通过结构化工作流引导用户从理解阶段过渡到应用阶段。

Framework Arsenal

框架库

Quick Analysis (15min)

快速分析(15分钟)

  • 📋 SCQA - Structure thinking (Situation-Complication-Question-Answer)
  • 🔍 5W2H - Completeness check (What, Why, Who, When, Where, How, How much)
  • 📋 SCQA - 结构化思维(情境-冲突-问题-答案)
  • 🔍 5W2H - 完整性检查(What、Why、Who、When、Where、How、How much)

Standard Analysis (30min)

标准分析(30分钟)

  • 🎯 Critical Thinking - Argument evaluation
  • 🔄 Inversion Thinking - Risk identification
  • 🎯 批判性思维 - 论点评估
  • 🔄 逆向思维 - 风险识别

Deep Analysis (60min)

深度分析(60分钟)

  • 🧠 Mental Models - Multi-perspective analysis (physics, biology, psychology, economics)
  • First Principles - Essence extraction
  • 🔗 Systems Thinking - Relationship mapping
  • 🎨 Six Thinking Hats - Structured creativity
  • 🧠 心智模型 - 多视角分析(物理学、生物学、心理学、经济学)
  • 第一性原理 - 本质提取
  • 🔗 系统思维 - 关系映射
  • 🎨 六顶思考帽 - 结构化创意

Research Analysis (120min+)

研究级分析(120分钟以上)

  • 📊 Cross-Source Comparison - Multi-article synthesis
  • 📊 跨来源对比 - 多篇文章整合

Workflow Decision Tree

工作流决策树

User provides content
Ask: Purpose + Depth Level + Preferred Frameworks
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│   Level 1       │   Level 2       │   Level 3       │   Level 4       │
│   Quick         │   Standard      │   Deep          │   Research      │
│   15min         │   30min         │   60min         │   120min+       │
├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ • SCQA          │ Level 1 +       │ Level 2 +       │ Level 3 +       │
│ • 5W2H          │ • Critical      │ • Mental Models │ • Cross-source  │
│ • Structure     │ • Inversion     │ • First Princ.  │ • Web search    │
│                 │                 │ • Systems       │ • Synthesis     │
│                 │                 │ • Six Hats      │                 │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘
用户提供内容
询问:目的 + 分析深度 + 偏好框架
┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│   一级          │   二级          │   三级          │   四级          │
│   快速          │   标准          │   深度          │   研究          │
│   15分钟        │   30分钟        │   60分钟        │   120分钟以上    │
├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ • SCQA          │ 一级框架 +       │ 二级框架 +       │ 三级框架 +       │
│ • 5W2H          │ • 批判性思维     │ • 心智模型       │ • 跨来源对比     │
│ • 结构化分析     │ • 逆向思维       │ • 第一性原理     │ • 网络搜索       │
│                 │                 │ • 系统思维       │ • 整合分析       │
│                 │                 │ • 六顶思考帽     │                 │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘

Step 1: Initialize Analysis

步骤1:初始化分析

Ask User (conversationally):
  1. "What's your main goal for reading this?"
    • Problem-solving / Learning / Writing / Decision-making / Curiosity
  2. "How deep do you want to go?"
    • Quick (15min) / Standard (30min) / Deep (60min) / Research (120min+)
  3. "Any specific frameworks you'd like to use?"
    • Suggest based on content type (see Framework Selection Guide below)
Default if no response: Level 2 (Standard mode) with auto-selected frameworks
以对话方式询问用户:
  1. "你阅读这份内容的主要目标是什么?"
    • 解决问题 / 学习 / 写作 / 决策制定 / 满足好奇心
  2. "你希望分析到什么深度?"
    • 快速(15分钟)/ 标准(30分钟)/ 深度(60分钟)/ 研究级(120分钟以上)
  3. "你有没有想要使用的特定框架?"
    • 根据内容类型给出建议(见下方框架选择指南)
无回复时默认设置: 二级(标准模式)+ 自动选择框架

Framework Selection Guide

框架选择指南

Based on content type, auto-suggest:
markdown
📄 Strategy/Business articles → SCQA + Mental Models + Inversion
📊 Research papers → 5W2H + Critical Thinking + Systems Thinking
💡 How-to guides → SCQA + 5W2H + First Principles
🎯 Opinion pieces → Critical Thinking + Inversion + Six Hats
📈 Case studies → SCQA + Mental Models + Systems Thinking
根据内容类型自动推荐:
markdown
📄 战略/商业文章 → SCQA + 心智模型 + 逆向思维
📊 研究论文 → 5W2H + 批判性思维 + 系统思维
💡 操作指南 → SCQA + 5W2H + 第一性原理
🎯 观点类文章 → 批判性思维 + 逆向思维 + 六顶思考帽
📈 案例研究 → SCQA + 心智模型 + 系统思维

Step 2: Structural Understanding

步骤2:结构化理解

Always start here regardless of depth level.
无论分析深度如何,都从这里开始。

Phase 2A: Basic Structure

阶段2A:基础结构

markdown
📄 Content Type: [Article/Paper/Report/Guide]
⏱️ Estimated reading time: [X minutes]
🎯 Core Thesis: [One sentence]

Structure Overview:
├─ Main Argument 1
│   ├─ Supporting point 1.1
│   └─ Supporting point 1.2
├─ Main Argument 2
└─ Main Argument 3

Key Concepts: [3-5 terms with brief definitions]
markdown
📄 内容类型:[文章/论文/报告/指南]
⏱️ 预估阅读时间:[X分钟]
🎯 核心论点:[一句话总结]

结构概述:
├─ 主要论点1
│   ├─ 支撑点1.1
│   └─ 支撑点1.2
├─ 主要论点2
└─ 主要论点3

关键概念:[3-5个术语及简要定义]

Phase 2B: SCQA Analysis (Quick Framework)

阶段2B:SCQA分析(快速框架)

Load
references/scqa_framework.md
and apply:
markdown
undefined
加载
references/scqa_framework.md
并应用:
markdown
undefined

SCQA Structure

SCQA结构

S (Situation): [Background/context the article establishes] C (Complication): [Problem/challenge identified] Q (Question): [Core question being addressed] A (Answer): [Main solution/conclusion]
📊 Structure Quality:
  • Clarity: [★★★★☆]
  • Logic flow: [★★★★★]
  • Completeness: [★★★☆☆]
undefined
S(情境):[文章建立的背景/上下文] C(冲突):[识别出的问题/挑战] Q(问题):[核心待解决问题] A(答案):[主要解决方案/结论]
📊 结构质量:
  • 清晰度:[★★★★☆]
  • 逻辑流程:[★★★★★]
  • 完整性:[★★★☆☆]
undefined

Phase 2C: 5W2H Completeness Check (if Level 1+)

阶段2C:5W2H完整性检查(若为一级及以上分析)

Quick scan using
references/5w2h_analysis.md
:
markdown
undefined
使用
references/5w2h_analysis.md
快速扫描:
markdown
undefined

Information Completeness

信息完整性

✅ Well-covered: [What, Why, How] ⚠️ Partially covered: [Who, When] ❌ Missing: [Where, How much]
🔴 Critical gaps: [List 1-2 most important missing pieces]
undefined
✅ 覆盖完善:[What、Why、How] ⚠️ 部分覆盖:[Who、When] ❌ 缺失:[Where、How much]
🔴 关键缺口:[列出1-2个最重要的缺失部分]
undefined

Step 3: Apply Thinking Models

步骤3:应用思维模型

Select based on depth level and user preference:
根据分析深度和用户偏好选择:

Level 1 (Quick - 15 min)

一级(快速 - 15分钟)

Core: Structure + SCQA + 5W2H Quick Check
Output:
  • SCQA breakdown
  • Information gaps (from 5W2H)
  • TOP 3 insights
  • 1 immediate action item
核心:结构化分析 + SCQA + 5W2H快速检查
输出内容:
  • SCQA拆解
  • 信息缺口(来自5W2H)
  • TOP 3核心见解
  • 1个即时行动项

Level 2 (Standard - 30 min)

二级(标准 - 30分钟)

Add: Critical Thinking + Inversion
Load and apply:
  • references/critical_thinking.md
    :
    • Argument quality assessment
    • Logic flaw identification
    • Evidence evaluation
    • Alternative perspectives
  • references/inversion_thinking.md
    :
    • How to ensure failure? (reverse the advice)
    • What assumptions if wrong?
    • Missing risks
    • Pre-mortem analysis
markdown
undefined
新增:批判性思维 + 逆向思维
加载并应用:
  • references/critical_thinking.md
    • 论点质量评估
    • 逻辑漏洞识别
    • 证据评估
    • 替代视角分析
  • references/inversion_thinking.md
    • 如何确保失败?(反向建议)
    • 哪些假设若错误会导致问题?
    • 遗漏的风险
    • 事前分析
markdown
undefined

Critical Analysis

批判性分析

Argument Strength: [X/10]

论点强度:[X/10]

Strengths:
  • [Point 1]
Weaknesses:
  • [Point 1]
Logical fallacies detected:
  • [If any]
优势:
  • [要点1]
劣势:
  • [要点1]
检测到的逻辑谬误:
  • [如有]

Inversion Analysis

逆向分析

🚨 How this could fail:
  1. [Failure mode 1] → Mitigation: [...]
  2. [Failure mode 2] → Mitigation: [...]
Missing risk factors:
  • [Risk 1]
undefined
🚨 可能失败的情况:
  1. [失败模式1] → 缓解方案:[...]\n2. [失败模式2] → 缓解方案:[...]\n 遗漏的风险因素:
  • [风险1]
undefined

Level 3 (Deep - 60 min)

三级(深度 - 60分钟)

Add: Mental Models + First Principles + Systems + Six Hats
Load and apply:
  • references/mental_models.md
    :
    • Select 3-5 relevant models from different disciplines
    • Apply each lens to the content
    • Identify cross-model insights
  • references/first_principles.md
    :
    • Strip to fundamental truths
    • Identify core assumptions
    • Rebuild understanding from base
  • references/systems_thinking.md
    :
    • Map relationships and feedback loops
    • Identify leverage points
    • See the big picture
  • references/six_hats.md
    :
    • White (facts), Red (feelings), Black (caution)
    • Yellow (benefits), Green (creativity), Blue (process)
markdown
undefined
新增:心智模型 + 第一性原理 + 系统思维 + 六顶思考帽
加载并应用:
  • references/mental_models.md
    • 从不同学科选择3-5个相关模型
    • 用每个模型视角分析内容
    • 识别跨模型的见解
  • references/first_principles.md
    • 剥离至基本事实
    • 识别核心假设
    • 从基础重建理解
  • references/systems_thinking.md
    • 绘制关系和反馈回路
    • 识别杠杆点
    • 把握全局
  • references/six_hats.md
    • 白色(事实)、红色(情感)、黑色(谨慎)
    • 黄色(收益)、绿色(创意)、蓝色(流程)
markdown
undefined

Multi-Model Analysis

多模型分析

Mental Models Applied:

应用的心智模型:

  1. [Model 1 from X discipline] Insight: [...]
  2. [Model 2 from Y discipline] Insight: [...]
  3. [Model 3 from Z discipline] Insight: [...]
Cross-model pattern: [Key insight from combining models]
  1. [来自X学科的模型1] 见解:[...]\n
  2. [来自Y学科的模型2] 见解:[...]\n
  3. [来自Z学科的模型3] 见解:[...]\n 跨模型模式:[结合多个模型得出的核心见解]

First Principles Breakdown:

第一性原理拆解:

Core assumptions:
  1. [Assumption 1] → Valid: [Yes/No/Conditional]
  2. [Assumption 2] → Valid: [Yes/No/Conditional]
Fundamental truth: [What remains after stripping assumptions]
核心假设:
  1. [假设1] → 有效性:[是/否/有条件]\n2. [假设2] → 有效性:[是/否/有条件]\n 基本事实:[剥离假设后剩余的内容]

Systems Map:

系统映射:

[Variable A] ──reinforces──> [Variable B]
      ↑                          |
      |                          |
   balances                  reinforces
      |                          |
      └─────────<────────────────┘

Leverage point: [Where small change = big impact]
[变量A] ──强化──> [变量B]
      ↑                          |
      |                          |
   平衡                  强化
      |                          |
      └─────────<────────────────┘

Leverage point: [小改变带来大影响的位置]

Six Hats Perspective:

六顶思考帽视角:

🤍 Facts: [Objective data] ❤️ Feelings: [Intuitive response] 🖤 Cautions: [Risks and downsides] 💛 Benefits: [Positive aspects] 💚 Ideas: [Creative alternatives] 💙 Process: [Meta-thinking]
undefined
🤍 事实:[客观数据] ❤️ 感受:[直观反应] 🖤 警示:[风险和弊端] 💛 收益:[积极方面] 💚 创意:[替代方案] 💙 流程:[元思考]
undefined

Level 4 (Research - 120 min+)

四级(研究级 - 120分钟以上)

Add: Cross-source comparison via web_search
Use web_search to find 2-3 related sources, then:
  • Load
    references/comparison_matrix.md
  • Compare SCQA across sources
  • Identify consensus vs. divergence
  • Synthesize integrated perspective
markdown
undefined
新增:通过网络搜索进行跨来源对比
使用网络搜索找到2-3个相关来源,然后:
  • 加载
    references/comparison_matrix.md
  • 对比各来源的SCQA结构
  • 识别共识与分歧
  • 整合形成综合视角
markdown
undefined

Multi-Source Analysis

多来源分析

Source 1: [This article]

来源1:[当前文章]

S-C-Q-A: [Summary] Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结] 核心主张:[...]\n

Source 2: [Found article]

来源2:[找到的文章]

S-C-Q-A: [Summary] Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结] 核心主张:[...]\n

Source 3: [Found article]

来源3:[找到的文章]

S-C-Q-A: [Summary] Key claim: [...]
S-C-Q-A:[总结] 核心主张:[...]\n

Synthesis

整合分析

Consensus: [What all agree on] Divergence: [Where they differ] Unique value: [What each contributes] Integrated view: [Your synthesis]
undefined
共识:[所有来源一致的观点] 分歧:[来源间的不同之处] 独特价值:[每个来源的贡献] 综合观点:[你的整合结论]
undefined

Step 4: Synthesis & Output

步骤4:整合与输出

Generate based on user goal:
根据用户目标生成内容:

For Problem-Solving:

解决问题场景:

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Applicable Solutions

适用解决方案

[Extract 2-3 methods from content]
[从内容中提取2-3种方法]

Application Plan

应用计划

Problem: [User's specific issue] Relevant insights: [From analysis]
Action steps:
  1. [Concrete action with timeline]
  2. [Concrete action with timeline]
  3. [Concrete action with timeline]
Success metrics: [How to measure]
问题:[用户的具体问题] 相关见解:[来自分析结果]
行动步骤:
  1. [具体行动及时间线]\n2. [具体行动及时间线]\n3. [具体行动及时间线]\n 成功指标:[衡量标准]

Risk Mitigation (from Inversion)

风险缓解(来自逆向思维)

Potential failure points:
  • [Point 1] → Prevent by: [...]
  • [Point 2] → Prevent by: [...]
undefined
潜在失败点:
  • [要点1] → 预防方案:[...]\n- [要点2] → 预防方案:[...]\n```

For Learning:

学习场景:

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Learning Notes

学习笔记

Core concepts (explained simply):
  1. [Concept 1]: [Definition + Example]
  2. [Concept 2]: [Definition + Example]
Mental models gained:
  • [Model 1]: [How it works]
Connections to prior knowledge:
  • [Link to something user already knows]
核心概念(通俗解释):
  1. [概念1]:[定义 + 示例]\n2. [概念2]:[定义 + 示例]\n 获得的心智模型:
  • [模型1]:[运作方式]\n 与已有知识的关联:
  • [与用户已知内容的联系]

Deeper Understanding (First Principles)

深度理解(第一性原理)

Fundamental question: [...] Core principle: [...]
基本问题:[...]\n核心原则:[...]\n

Verification Questions

验证问题

  1. [Question to test understanding]
  2. [Question to test application]
  3. [Question to test evaluation]
undefined
  1. [测试理解的问题]\n2. [测试应用的问题]\n3. [测试评估的问题]\n```

For Writing Reference:

写作参考场景:

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Key Arguments & Evidence

核心论点与证据

[Structured extraction with page/paragraph numbers]
[结构化提取,标注页码/段落数]

Quotable Insights

可引用见解

"[Quote 1]" — Context: [...] "[Quote 2]" — Context: [...]
"[引用1]" — 上下文:[...]\n"[引用2]" — 上下文:[...]\n

Critical Analysis Notes

批判性分析笔记

Strengths: [For citing] Limitations: [For balanced discussion]
优势:[适合引用的点] 局限性:[用于平衡讨论的点]

Alternative Perspectives (from Mental Models)

替代视角(来自心智模型)

[What other disciplines would say about this]
[其他学科对该内容的看法]

Gaps & Counterfactuals

缺口与反事实

What the article doesn't address:
  • [Gap 1]
  • [Gap 2]
undefined
文章未涉及的内容:
  • [缺口1]\n- [缺口2]\n```

For Decision-Making:

决策制定场景:

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Decision Framework

决策框架

Options presented: [A / B / C]
Multi-model evaluation:
  • Economic lens: [...]
  • Risk lens (Inversion): [...]
  • Systems lens: [...]
提出的选项:[A / B / C]
多模型评估:
  • 经济学视角:[...]\n- 风险视角(逆向思维):[...]\n- 系统视角:[...]\n

Six Hats Decision Analysis

六顶思考帽决策分析

🤍 Facts: [Objective comparison] 🖤 Risks: [What could go wrong] 💛 Benefits: [Upside potential] 💚 Alternatives: [Other options not considered] 💙 Recommendation: [Synthesized advice]
🤍 事实:[客观对比] 🖤 风险:[可能出现的问题] 💛 收益:[潜在优势] 💚 替代方案:[未被考虑的其他选项] 💙 建议:[整合后的建议]

Scenario Analysis (from Inversion)

场景分析(来自逆向思维)

Best case: [...] Worst case: [...] Most likely: [...]
undefined
最佳情况:[...]\n最坏情况:[...]\n最可能情况:[...]\n```

Step 5: Knowledge Activation

步骤5:知识激活

Always end with:
markdown
undefined
始终以以下内容结尾:
markdown
undefined

🎯 Immediate Takeaways (Top 3)

🎯 即时要点(TOP 3)

  1. [Insight 1] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
  2. [Insight 2] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
  3. [Insight 3] Why it matters: [Personal relevance] One action: [Specific, time-bound]
  1. [见解1] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n
  2. [见解2] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n
  3. [见解3] 重要性:[个人相关性] 行动:[具体、有时限的行动]\n

💡 Quick Win

💡 快速实践

[One thing to try in next 24 hours - make it TINY and SPECIFIC]
[未来24小时内可尝试的一件小事 - 要非常具体且微小]

🔗 Next Steps

🔗 下一步计划

To deepen understanding: [ ] Further reading: [If relevant] [ ] Apply framework X to topic Y [ ] Discuss with: [Who could add perspective]
To apply: [ ] Experiment: [Test in real context] [ ] Teach: [Explain to someone else] [ ] Combine: [Mix with another idea]
深化理解: [ ] 进一步阅读:[如有相关内容]\n[ ] 将框架X应用于主题Y\n[ ] 与他人讨论:[能提供新视角的人]\n 应用知识: [ ] 实践测试:[在真实场景中测试]\n[ ] 教授他人:[向他人解释该内容]\n[ ] 整合创新:[与其他想法结合]\n

🧭 Thinking Models Used

🧭 使用的思维模型

[Checkboxes showing which frameworks were applied] ✅ SCQA ✅ 5W2H ✅ Critical Thinking ✅ Inversion □ Mental Models □ First Principles □ Systems □ Six Hats
undefined
[勾选已应用的框架] ✅ SCQA ✅ 5W2H ✅ 批判性思维 ✅ 逆向思维 □ 心智模型 □ 第一性原理 □ 系统思维 □ 六顶思考帽
undefined

Quality Standards

质量标准

Every analysis must:
  • ✅ Stay faithful to original content (no misrepresentation)
  • ✅ Distinguish facts from opinions
  • ✅ Provide concrete examples
  • ✅ Apply frameworks appropriately (not force-fit)
  • ✅ Connect to user's context when possible
  • ✅ End with actionable steps
  • ✅ Cite specific sections (paragraph numbers, quotes)
Avoid:
  • ❌ Overwhelming with all frameworks at once (respect depth level)
  • ❌ Academic jargon without explanation
  • ❌ Analysis without application
  • ❌ Copying text verbatim (always reword for understanding)
  • ❌ Using frameworks superficially (go deep, not wide)
每一次分析都必须:
  • ✅ 忠实于原文内容(不歪曲)
  • ✅ 区分事实与观点
  • ✅ 提供具体示例
  • ✅ 恰当应用框架(不生搬硬套)
  • ✅ 尽可能结合用户的上下文
  • ✅ 以可行动的步骤结尾
  • ✅ 标注具体章节(段落数、引用内容)
需避免:
  • ❌ 一次性使用所有框架导致信息过载(尊重分析深度)
  • ❌ 使用未经解释的学术术语
  • ❌ 只做分析不提供应用方向
  • ❌ 直接复制原文(需用自己的话重述以体现理解)
  • ❌ 表面化应用框架(要深入,而非追求数量)

Interaction Patterns

交互模式

Progressive questioning:
  • Understanding: "What do you think the author means by X?"
  • Critical: "Do you see any gaps in this argument?"
  • Application: "How might you use this in your work?"
  • Meta: "Which thinking model helped you most? Why?"
Adapt to signals:
  • User asks "what's the main point?" → They want conciseness, use SCQA
  • User challenges your analysis → Lean into Critical Thinking + Inversion
  • User asks "how do I use this?" → Focus on application + First Principles
  • User wants "multiple perspectives" → Use Six Hats or Mental Models
  • User mentions "risks" → Apply Inversion Thinking
  • User asks "how does this connect?" → Use Systems Thinking
Framework suggestions during conversation:
  • "Would you like me to apply [X framework] to this point?"
  • "This seems like a good place for inversion thinking - want to explore failure modes?"
  • "I notice several mental models at play here, want me to unpack them?"
渐进式提问:
  • 理解层面:"你认为作者说的X是什么意思?"
  • 批判层面:"你觉得这个论点有什么漏洞吗?"
  • 应用层面:"你如何在工作中运用这个内容?"
  • 元思考层面:"哪个思维模型对你帮助最大?为什么?"
根据用户信号调整:
  • 用户问"核心观点是什么?" → 追求简洁,使用SCQA框架
  • 用户质疑分析结果 → 侧重批判性思维 + 逆向思维
  • 用户问"我该如何使用这个?" → 聚焦应用 + 第一性原理
  • 用户想要"多视角分析" → 使用六顶思考帽或心智模型
  • 用户提到"风险" → 应用逆向思维
  • 用户问"这和什么有关联?" → 使用系统思维
对话中建议框架:
  • "你希望我将[X框架]应用到这一点上吗?"
  • "这里适合用逆向思维来探索失败模式,要不要深入看看?"
  • "我注意到这里涉及多个心智模型,要不要我帮你拆解一下?"

Reference Materials

参考资料

Core Frameworks (All Levels)

核心框架(全级别)

  • references/scqa_framework.md
    - Structure thinking (S-C-Q-A)
  • references/5w2h_analysis.md
    - Completeness check (7 questions)
  • references/scqa_framework.md
    - 结构化思维(S-C-Q-A)
  • references/5w2h_analysis.md
    - 完整性检查(7个问题)

Standard Level Frameworks

标准级别框架

  • references/critical_thinking.md
    - Argument analysis
  • references/inversion_thinking.md
    - Risk and failure mode analysis
  • references/critical_thinking.md
    - 论点分析
  • references/inversion_thinking.md
    - 风险与失败模式分析

Deep Level Frameworks

深度级别框架

  • references/mental_models.md
    - Multi-discipline model library
  • references/first_principles.md
    - Essence extraction method
  • references/systems_thinking.md
    - Relationship mapping
  • references/six_hats.md
    - Multi-perspective protocol
  • references/mental_models.md
    - 跨学科模型库
  • references/first_principles.md
    - 本质提取方法
  • references/systems_thinking.md
    - 关系映射
  • references/six_hats.md
    - 多视角分析协议

Output Formats

输出格式

  • references/output_templates.md
    - Note format examples
  • references/comparison_matrix.md
    - Cross-article analysis
  • references/output_templates.md
    - 笔记格式示例
  • references/comparison_matrix.md
    - 跨文章分析模板

Advanced Usage

高级用法

Custom Framework Combinations

自定义框架组合

User can request specific combinations:
  • "Use SCQA + Inversion" - Structure with risk analysis
  • "Apply Mental Models + Systems Thinking" - Multi-lens system analysis
  • "5W2H + Critical Thinking" - Completeness + quality check
用户可请求特定组合:
  • "使用SCQA + 逆向思维" - 结构化分析 + 风险评估
  • "应用心智模型 + 系统思维" - 多视角系统分析
  • "5W2H + 批判性思维" - 完整性检查 + 质量评估

Iterative Deepening

迭代深化

Start with Level 1, then ask:
  • "Want to go deeper on any part?"
  • "Which framework would be most valuable here?"
  • "Should we do an inversion analysis of this solution?"
从一级分析开始,然后询问:
  • "要不要对某部分进行更深入的分析?"
  • "哪个框架在这里最有价值?"
  • "我们要不要对这个解决方案做逆向分析?"

Domain-Specific Optimizations

领域特定优化

Business/Strategy: SCQA + Mental Models (economics) + Inversion Technical/Research: 5W2H + First Principles + Critical Thinking Personal Development: Six Hats + Inversion + Systems Decision-Making: Mental Models + Inversion + SCQA Creative: Six Hats + First Principles + Mental Models

Remember: The goal is insight, not framework completion. Use frameworks as tools to reveal understanding, not as checklists to complete. Quality of thinking > quantity of frameworks applied.
商业/战略:SCQA + 心智模型(经济学) + 逆向思维 技术/研究:5W2H + 第一性原理 + 批判性思维 个人发展:六顶思考帽 + 逆向思维 + 系统思维 决策制定:心智模型 + 逆向思维 + SCQA 创意领域:六顶思考帽 + 第一性原理 + 心智模型

记住:目标是获得见解,而非完成框架应用。框架是揭示理解的工具,而非需要完成的清单。思考质量 > 应用框架的数量。