Ye Tong Local-Member Xiaohongshu Titles

Entry Conditions

• You must have a specific local-member question, a selected topic, an existing title, or finished body copy. If the only request is “Help me come up with a few fat-loss titles” and there is no specific question for the piece to answer, hand it to the topic-selection Skill first. If a topic has already been selected and only a title is requested, do not turn it into a full draft.
• The user must provide the path to that coach’s

  person-dna.md

  . Read only the specified profile and the materials explicitly provided for this task; do not scan private directories. First run

  python3 scripts/check_profile.py <person-dna.md>

  from this Skill’s own directory, or use the script’s actual absolute path; do not treat the user’s current project directory as the Skill directory. Even after the profile structure and activation status pass, verify the source, currency, and publication permission of every fact individually.
• If no profile path has been provided, ask only for the path. If the identity does not match, first confirm which coach to use. If

  status

  is not

  active

  , the file is missing, or the structure is invalid, do not output titles that pretend to belong to that coach. Reproduce the following message exactly:

Person DNA has not yet been activated. At present, only the generic method can be used; personalized topic selection, real-experience mapping, and personal-expression calibration cannot be enabled. Complete the “Person Foundation Interview” and confirm the profile before the full Ye Tong content-method engine can be unlocked.

• Only when the user explicitly asks to skip the interview may you provide generic title ideas containing no personal city, venue, experiences, member stories, or voice. Mark them as “Generic Version”; do not activate the profile independently.

schema_version: 2

Workflow

1. Lock the content promise. Extract one sentence from the selected topic or body copy: which type of local member this is for, which question it answers, and what answer or process the body copy actually provides. If the original title promises more than the body copy delivers, identify that gap first.
2. Gather the coach’s evidence. Use only confirmed, publishable information that the body copy can substantiate: the city and service area, the actual goals and obstacles of the primary local audience, member quotes, venue features, the coach’s strengths and experience, actual in-class and out-of-class services, and authorized cases. Distinguish member quotes, coach paraphrases, self-described strengths, and inferences. If certificate names and scope, service frequency, case numbers, class benefits, outcomes, or prices have not been verified, mark them “To be confirmed”; they must not appear in a publishable title. Do not assume dietary tracking is performed daily, and do not assume anonymized cases authorize publication of their data or images.
3. Choose an angle. Select an expression angle relevant to this piece according to the Local Title Method. By default, provide 2–4 candidates that offer genuinely different reasons to read. If there is only one reliable fact or one content promise, usually provide 1–3. If the user requests more but the material is insufficient, honestly provide fewer and explain what is missing. Do not pad the list with synonym swaps, added place names, conflict, numbers, or trends. Upstream labels such as persona-led, marketing-oriented, altruistic, and traffic- or engagement-oriented describe content goals and should not mechanically determine how the title is written.
4. Screen each candidate. Check whether local members would recognize their own situation, whether the specific question is clear, whether the title and body copy fulfill each other’s promises, whether it sounds like something this coach would say, and whether the facts, privacy considerations, health claims, and service promises can be disclosed. Then perform a difference check: if two titles attract the same audience, ask the same question, and promise the same answer, retain only the one that reads more naturally. Calibrate the wording using the coach’s language samples. If the corpus is insufficient, the title should at least read like natural spoken language rather than stiff internal terminology. Remove redundant wording while preserving the most important information for a mobile screen. Do not present unverified platform character limits as hard rules.
5. Recommend and hand off. Select one top recommendation and explain why it is stronger than the other candidates. If there is no body copy yet, clearly label it “Title direction, pending body-copy fulfillment.” Once the user selects a title, hand the title, content promise, and factual boundaries back to the Copywriting Skill. If the user only wants the original title revised, first identify one key problem with it and prioritize one minimal revision. Add an alternative only when there is genuinely another evidence-backed angle, and do not rewrite the entire draft.

Output