Create or update the pull request for the current task with a concise description that helps a reviewer understand why the change exists and the shape of the implementation.
-
Read the description template:
Read({SKILLBASE}/references/pr_description_template.md)
-
Identify or create the pull request:
- Check the current branch for a PR with
gh pr view --json url,number,title,state,baseRefName,headRefName 2>/dev/null
.
- If no PR exists, inspect
git status --short --branch
and the commits on the current branch.
- Commit task-related changes when needed, push the branch with an upstream, and create a PR for it. Follow the repository's git safety protocol.
- Ask the user to select a PR only when the current branch has no relevant work and there is no safe current-branch PR to create.
-
Gather only the context needed to explain the change:
- Read the ticket and any relevant task artifacts.
- Read the complete PR diff and enough surrounding code to understand behavior and ownership.
- Use to collect PR metadata and changed files.
- Read
{SKILLBASE}/references/show-me.md
for the visual-outline conventions used in the PR body.
-
Write the PR description using the template:
- Keep Why the change to exactly one sentence.
- Keep Special things to note to 1-3 bullets. Prioritize reviewer warnings, migrations, compatibility constraints, deliberate omissions, or surprising decisions. Write when there are no special considerations.
- Make Change outline a compact, -inspired structural view rather than prose or a file-by-file changelog.
- Include only the views that help explain this PR:
- SQL table and endpoint contract changes, plus pseudocode for business logic.
- key data structure / type changes
- A shallow file tree showing changed responsibilities.
- React component tree changes, including important hooks, state, and package boundaries.
- Call-tree, call-stack, control-flow, or data-flow changes.
- Prefer blocks when showing changes to an existing shape. Show the complete target shape when most of it is new or diff notation would obscure ownership or order.
- Keep each view focused on what a reviewer needs. Omit categories that did not change.
- End with Things to be aware of, the last section, for what lies outside "what changed": decisions you made alone, surprises, what's not in the PR, and follow-ups, each marked as a ticket, a todo for the maintainer, or nothing needed. Keep its four lines, writing after an empty one, so the reader knows it was considered. Special things to note stays about the change itself.
- Link a ticket the PR finishes with , but a ticket still waiting for the maintainer to try it (QA) with , so the merge doesn't close it first.
- optionaL: if you are aware of a ticket id/url, or related plan/document urls, or other relevant links, include them in the header, otherwise omit the header
-
Save and publish the description:
- Save it to
.scratch/pr-{number}/description.md
: is gitignored, and GitHub holds the published description, so saving or rewriting it leaves nothing to commit.
- Update the PR with
gh pr edit {number} --body-file {output-path}
.
- Confirm the update succeeded.
-
Report completion:
- Read
{SKILLBASE}/references/describe_pr_final_answer.md
.
- Respond using that final answer template with the PR URL, the saved description path, and a concise list of changed files.
- Give each changed file two review links, built from the PR's head commit as it stands after your push (
gh pr view {number} --json url,headRefOid,files
), so an updated PR links its new head. Take from the PR :
- Final version:
https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{headRefOid}/{path}
, where GitHub renders Markdown.
- Diff:
{pr_url}/files#diff-{hash}
, where is the SHA-256 of the path (printf %s '{path}' | shasum -a 256
, or on Linux).
- When many files changed, link the key ones and list the rest by path.
Always read and follow
{SKILLBASE}/references/pr_description_template.md
. Do not expand the PR body beyond that template.
Write as one human talking to another: avoid jargon and slang, and use simple, coherent, concise language.
Name an issue or pull request by its title, never by its number alone:
, not
. This holds in the title, the body and anything you tell the user.