Back to Details

institutional_position_shift_skill

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Institutional Position Shift Skill

Institutional Position Shift Skill

数据依赖与执行前置条件

Data Dependencies and Pre-execution Requirements

推荐使用万得 
wind-mcp-skill
获取底层数据。执行前先检查本地是否已有 
wind-mcp-skill
；若没有，提示用户安装：
bash
undefined
It is recommended to use Wind's 
wind-mcp-skill
to obtain underlying data. Before execution, check whether 
wind-mcp-skill
is already available locally; if not, prompt the user to install it:
bash
undefined

GitHub

GitHub

npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

Gitee 镜像（国内）

Gitee Mirror (Domestic)

npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
undefined
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
undefined

技能定位

Skill Positioning

本技能用于分析机构持仓变化，回答“哪些方向被机构明显增配或减配、这些变化体现了什么共识、是高信念加仓还是被动调整、对后续市场和个股意味着什么”。输出重点不是简单比较持股数量，而是解释持仓变化背后的偏好迁移和潜在影响。
This skill is used to analyze changes in institutional holdings, answering questions such as "Which directions are obviously overweighted or underweighted by institutions, what consensus do these changes reflect, whether it is high-conviction buying or passive adjustment, and what do these mean for the subsequent market and individual stocks". The focus of the output is not simply comparing shareholding quantities, but interpreting the preference migration and potential impacts behind the changes in holdings.

执行流程

Execution Process

Step 1：确认样本范围、报告周期与解读口径

Step 1: Confirm Sample Scope, Reporting Period and Interpretation Caliber

先明确本次研究的样本和边界：
  • 观察的是哪类机构
  • 覆盖的是单只股票、一个行业，还是更大的股票池
  • 对应的是哪个报告周期
  • 用户更关心机构共识变化，还是某几家核心机构的动作
同时要提醒使用者：机构持仓披露通常存在时间滞后，结论应结合这一点解读。
First clarify the sample and boundaries of this study:
  • Which type of institutions are being observed
  • Whether it covers a single stock, an industry, or a larger stock pool
  • Which reporting period it corresponds to
  • Whether the user cares more about changes in institutional consensus, or the actions of several core institutions
At the same time, remind users: Institutional holding disclosures usually have a time lag, and conclusions should be interpreted in combination with this point.

Step 2：梳理持仓变化的总体特征

Step 2: Sort Out the Overall Characteristics of Holding Changes

先从整体上判断：
  • 哪些行业或风格被集中增配
  • 哪些方向被系统性减配
  • 机构持仓是更集中还是更分散
  • 原有热门方向是否仍在强化，还是开始松动
这一阶段的目标是先把大方向看清楚。
First judge from the overall perspective:
  • Which industries or styles are concentratedly overweighted
  • Which directions are systematically underweighted
  • Whether institutional holdings are more concentrated or dispersed
  • Whether the original popular directions are still being strengthened, or have begun to loosen
The goal of this stage is to first clarify the general direction.

Step 3：拆解重点公司和代表性变化

Step 3: Disassemble Key Companies and Representative Changes

进一步聚焦最有代表性的持仓变化：
  • 哪些公司被明显增持
  • 哪些公司被明显减持
  • 哪些变化来自原有核心仓位继续加码
  • 哪些变化体现机构从旧主线转向新主线
应优先挑选能代表共识变化的样本，而不是机械罗列全部名单。
Further focus on the most representative changes in holdings:
  • Which companies are obviously increased holdings
  • Which companies are obviously reduced holdings
  • Which changes come from the continued increase of original core positions
  • Which changes reflect institutions shifting from old main lines to new main lines
Priority should be given to selecting samples that can represent changes in consensus, rather than mechanically listing all names.

Step 4：区分高信念调仓与被动变化

Step 4: Distinguish High-Conviction Position Adjustments from Passive Changes

机构持仓变化并不都具有同样含义，需要进一步判断：
  • 是主动表达观点，还是被动因涨跌、基准调整或流动性原因而变化
  • 加仓是否伴随更高集中度
  • 减仓是否代表观点转弱，还是阶段性兑现
  • 是否存在机构之间分歧加大而非单一共识强化
Changes in institutional holdings do not all have the same meaning, and further judgment is required:
  • Whether it is actively expressing opinions, or passively changing due to price fluctuations, benchmark adjustments or liquidity reasons
  • Whether buying is accompanied by higher concentration
  • Whether selling represents a weakening of views, or phased realization
  • Whether there is increased divergence among institutions rather than a single consensus strengthening

Step 5：提炼对行业、主题与个股的含义

Step 5: Refine Implications for Industries, Themes and Individual Stocks

围绕调仓结果，说明：
  • 哪些行业或主题正在获得机构共识支持
  • 哪些公司可能因机构增持得到估值与流动性支撑
  • 哪些公司若出现机构撤退，风险应如何评估
  • 后续需要通过哪些经营或市场信号验证机构判断是否正确
Focusing on the results of position adjustment, explain:
  • Which industries or themes are gaining institutional consensus support
  • Which companies may receive valuation and liquidity support due to institutional buying
  • How to assess the risks if institutions withdraw from certain companies
  • Which operating or market signals are needed to verify whether institutional judgments are correct in the follow-up

Step 6：形成机构调仓洞察成稿

Step 6: Form the Institutional Position Adjustment Insight Draft

最终输出应帮助使用者理解机构共识在往哪里走，以及该如何看待这些披露信息。正文只保留持仓变化、偏好解读、局限说明和验证框架。
The final output should help users understand where institutional consensus is moving, and how to view these disclosed information. Only retain holding changes, preference interpretations, limitation explanations and verification frameworks in the main text.

输出结构

Output Structure

机构调仓洞察（{报告周期}）

Institutional Position Adjustment Insights ({Report Period})

一、30 秒结论

I. 30-Second Conclusion

  • 本期机构偏好方向：{内容}
  • 最明显的增配线索：{内容}
  • 最明显的减配线索：{内容}
  • 当前含义：{共识强化 / 分歧加大 / 结构切换}
  • Institutional Preference Direction This Period: {Content}
  • Most Obvious Overweight Clues: {Content}
  • Most Obvious Underweight Clues: {Content}
  • Current Implication: {Consensus Strengthening / Increased Divergence / Structural Switch}

二、总体持仓变化

II. Overall Holding Changes

维度当前表现判断
行业层面{内容}{判断}
风格层面{内容}{判断}
集中度变化{内容}{判断}
DimensionCurrent PerformanceJudgment
Industry Level{Content}{Judgment}
Style Level{Content}{Judgment}
Concentration Change{Content}{Judgment}

三、重点公司变化

III. Key Company Changes

  • 明显增持公司：{内容}
  • 明显减持公司：{内容}
  • 最具代表性的调仓动作：{内容}
  • Companies with Obvious Increased Holdings: {Content}
  • Companies with Obvious Reduced Holdings: {Content}
  • Most Representative Position Adjustment Actions: {Content}

四、调仓性质判断

IV. Judgment on Position Adjustment Nature

  • 高信念主动调仓：{内容}
  • 可能的被动变化：{内容}
  • 机构分歧点：{内容}
  • High-Conviction Active Position Adjustment: {Content}
  • Possible Passive Changes: {Content}
  • Points of Institutional Divergence: {Content}

五、市场含义与风险提示

V. Market Implications and Risk Warnings

  • 对行业/主题的含义：{内容}
  • 对个股的含义：{内容}
  • 解读局限：{内容}
  • Implications for Industries/Themes: {Content}
  • Implications for Individual Stocks: {Content}
  • Interpretation Limitations: {Content}

六、后续观察清单

VI. Follow-up Observation List

  • {观察点 1}
  • {观察点 2}
  • {观察点 3}
  • {Observation Point 1}
  • {Observation Point 2}
  • {Observation Point 3}

质量要求

Quality Requirements

  1. 机构持仓分析必须提醒披露滞后，避免把历史持仓直接当成当前动作。
  2. 要区分主动高信念调仓与被动变化，提升解释可信度。
  3. 需同时覆盖行业、风格和重点个股三个层次。
  4. 若机构之间分歧明显，应明确写出，而不是强行概括成一致共识。
  5. 输出要帮助使用者理解机构偏好迁移，而不是停留在持股名单罗列。
  1. Institutional holding analysis must remind of disclosure lag, avoiding directly treating historical holdings as current actions.
  2. Distinguish between active high-conviction position adjustments and passive changes to improve interpretation credibility.
  3. Cover three levels: industry, style and key individual stocks at the same time.
  4. If there is obvious divergence among institutions, it should be clearly stated instead of forcibly summarizing it as a consistent consensus.
  5. The output should help users understand the migration of institutional preferences, rather than staying at listing shareholding names.