eval-guidance-actionability

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Eval Guidance & Actionability

评估指导性与可操作性

Use this skill to evaluate whether an assistant response provides clear, usable guidance the user can act on.

使用此skill来评估助手回复是否为用户提供了清晰、可用且可执行的指导。

Inputs

输入要求

Require:

The assistant response text to evaluate.
(Optional) The user’s request or goal (helps judge whether guidance matches what’s needed).

必填：

待评估的助手回复文本。 -（可选）用户的请求或目标（有助于判断指导内容是否符合需求）。

Internal Rubric (1–5)

内部评分标准（1–5分）

5 = Provides concrete, actionable steps; prioritized; includes key details/constraints; user could execute without guessing
4 = Mostly actionable; minor missing details or ordering, but still usable
3 = Some guidance, but generic; missing important steps/details; requires user to infer next actions
2 = Largely non-actionable; mostly high-level advice; lacks steps or specifics
1 = No usable guidance; purely vague, deflective, or irrelevant to “what to do next”

5分 = 提供具体、可执行的步骤；有优先级；包含关键细节/约束条件；用户无需猜测即可执行
4分 = 基本可执行；仅缺少少量细节或步骤顺序略有问题，但仍可使用
3分 = 有一定指导内容，但较为笼统；缺少重要步骤/细节；需要用户自行推断后续操作
2分 = 基本不可执行；多为高层次建议；缺乏具体步骤或细节
1分 = 无可用指导内容；完全模糊、回避问题或与“下一步该做什么”无关

Workflow

工作流程

Check whether the response includes specific next actions (steps, checklist, examples, decision points).
Check completeness (missing prerequisites, constraints, caveats).
Score on a 1-5 integer scale using the rubric only.
Write concise rationale tied directly to rubric criteria.
Produce actionable suggestions that improve actionability.

检查回复是否包含具体的后续操作（步骤、清单、示例、决策点）。
检查内容完整性（是否缺少前提条件、约束条件、注意事项）。
仅依据上述评分标准给出1-5之间的整数分数。
撰写与评分标准直接相关的简洁理由。
提出可提升可操作性的具体改进建议。

Output Contract

输出规范

Return JSON only. Do not include markdown, backticks, prose, or extra keys.

Use exactly this schema:

{ "dimension": "guidance_actionability", "score": 1, "rationale": "...", "improvement_suggestions": [ "..." ] }

仅返回JSON格式内容。不得包含markdown、反引号、散文式文本或额外的键值对。

必须使用以下精确格式：

{ "dimension": "guidance_actionability", "score": 1, "rationale": "...", "improvement_suggestions": [ "..." ] }

Hard Rules

硬性规则

```
dimension
```
must always equal
```
"guidance_actionability"
```
.
```
score
```
must be an integer from 1 to 5.
```
rationale
```
must be concise (max 3 sentences).
Do not include step-by-step reasoning.
```
improvement_suggestions
```
must be a non-empty array of concrete edits.
Never output text outside the JSON object.

```
dimension
```
的值必须始终为
```
"guidance_actionability"
```
。
```
score
```
必须是1到5之间的整数。
```
rationale
```
必须简洁（最多3句话）。
不得包含逐步推理的内容。
```
improvement_suggestions
```
必须是包含具体修改建议的非空数组。
绝对不能在JSON对象外输出任何文本。