hierarchy-of-engagement
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseHierarchy of Engagement
Hierarchy of Engagement
What It Is
框架定义
The Hierarchy of Engagement is a three-level framework for building consumer products that retain users and create defensibility. The core insight: retention comes from making the product better the more you use it, so users have more to lose by leaving.
Most consumer products fail not because they lack users, but because they lack retention. Getting someone to sign up is one thing; getting them to stay is everything. This framework provides a systematic approach to building products where engagement compounds over time.
The key shift: Move from asking "How do we get more users?" to asking "How do we make each user's experience improve the more they use us?"
Hierarchy of Engagement是一个三层框架，用于打造能留存用户并建立竞争壁垒的消费类产品。核心洞见：留存来自于产品使用得越多就越好用，这样用户离开时会损失更多。
大多数消费类产品失败并非因为缺乏用户，而是因为缺乏留存。让用户注册是一回事，让他们留下来才是关键。该框架提供了系统化的方法来打造用户参与度随时间复利增长的产品。
核心转变：从问「我们如何获取更多用户？」转变为问「我们如何让每个用户的使用体验随使用次数增加而变得更好？」
Response Posture
响应准则
- Apply the framework directly to the user's product.
- Never mention the repository, skills, SKILL.md, patterns, or references.
- Do not run tools or read files; answer from the framework.
- Avoid process/meta commentary; respond as a retention-focused product operator.
- 直接将框架应用于用户的产品。
- 绝不要提及仓库、技能、SKILL.md、模式或参考资料。
- 不要运行工具或读取文件；直接基于框架作答。
- 避免流程/元评论；以专注于留存的产品运营者身份回应。
When to Use It
适用场景
Use the Hierarchy of Engagement when you need to:
- Define your North Star metric (what action matters most?)
- Improve retention in a consumer or social product
- Build product stickiness beyond features alone
- Create switching costs that protect against competitors
- Design your onboarding/activation flow
- Evaluate product-market fit through engagement quality
- Prioritize features that drive compounding value
当你需要以下操作时，使用Hierarchy of Engagement：
- 定义北极星指标（哪个行动最重要？）
- 优化消费类或社交产品的留存
- 打造超越功能本身的产品粘性
- 建立抵御竞争对手的转换成本
- 设计新用户引导/激活流程
- 通过参与度质量评估产品-市场契合度
- 优先开发能带来复利价值的功能
When Not to Use It
不适用场景
Don't apply this framework when:
- Building B2B enterprise software (different retention dynamics)
- The product is transactional by nature (one-time purchase)
- There's no meaningful "use over time" pattern
- You're optimizing for viral acquisition before proving retention
- Your product has no user-generated content or personalization opportunity
在以下情况不要应用该框架：
- 打造B2B企业软件（留存机制不同）
- 产品本质是交易型（一次性购买）
- 不存在有意义的「长期使用」模式
- 在证明留存之前就优化病毒式获客
- 产品没有用户生成内容或个性化机会
Patterns
应用模式
Detailed examples showing how to apply the Hierarchy of Engagement correctly. Each pattern shows a common mistake and the correct approach.
以下是正确应用Hierarchy of Engagement的详细示例。每个模式都展示了常见错误及正确做法。
Critical (get these wrong and you've wasted your time)
关键模式（一旦出错，所有努力都白费）
| Pattern | What It Teaches |
|---|---|
| wrong-core-action | Your core action must predict retention, not just engagement |
| benefit-doesnt-accrue | The product must get better the more someone uses it |
| no-mounting-loss | Users need something to lose by leaving |
| skipping-level-one | You can't build retention without first nailing the core action |
| vanity-engagement | Measuring opens and sessions instead of meaningful actions |
| 模式 | 核心要点 |
|---|---|
| wrong-core-action | 核心行动必须能预测留存，而不仅仅是参与度 |
| benefit-doesnt-accrue | 产品必须使用得越多就越好用 |
| no-mounting-loss | 用户离开时必须有可损失的东西 |
| skipping-level-one | 不先搞定核心行动就无法建立留存 |
| vanity-engagement | 不要只衡量打开次数和会话数，而要关注有意义的行动 |
High Impact
高影响力模式
| Pattern | What It Teaches |
|---|---|
| forcing-level-three | Not every product can or should have virality loops |
| activation-without-education | Users must understand the mental model before they can engage |
| anonymous-users | Pure anonymity prevents accruing benefit and mounting loss |
| geographic-spray | Growing everywhere means retaining nowhere |
| youtube-subscribe-example | When one action serves both sides of a network |
| pinterest-pinning | How Pinterest discovered pinning was the core action |
| 模式 | 核心要点 |
|---|---|
| forcing-level-three | 并非所有产品都能或应该拥有病毒循环 |
| activation-without-education | 用户必须先理解产品的思维模型才能参与其中 |
| anonymous-users | 纯匿名模式会阻碍收益累积和损失感知 |
| geographic-spray | 遍地开花意味着无处留存 |
| youtube-subscribe-example | 单一行动如何服务于网络的双方 |
| pinterest-pinning | Pinterest如何发现「钉图」是其核心行动 |
Medium Impact
中等影响力模式
| Pattern | What It Teaches |
|---|---|
| evernote-trap | Strong Level 2 can't compensate for missing Level 3 |
| comparing-to-mature-products | Don't build the full expression before the foundation |
| 模式 | 核心要点 |
|---|---|
| evernote-trap | 强大的第二层无法弥补第三层的缺失 |
| comparing-to-mature-products | 不要在基础未打牢之前就追求完整的产品形态 |
Deep Dives
深度解析
Read only when you need extra detail.
- : Expanded framework detail, checklists, and examples.
references/hierarchy-of-engagement-playbook.md
仅在需要额外细节时阅读。
- ：扩展的框架细节、清单和示例。
references/hierarchy-of-engagement-playbook.md
Resources
参考资源
Writing:
- The Hierarchy of Engagement by Sarah Tavel — the original framework
- The Hierarchy of Engagement, Expanded by Sarah Tavel — deeper on Level 2 and 3
Related:
- Hooked by Nir Eyal — habit-forming product design (complements Level 1)
- Lenny Rachitsky's North Star Metric compilation — examples of core actions across companies
Podcast:
- Sarah Tavel on Lenny's Podcast — source conversation for this framework
文章：
- The Hierarchy of Engagement by Sarah Tavel — 框架原文
- The Hierarchy of Engagement, Expanded by Sarah Tavel — 关于第二层和第三层的深度解析
相关书籍：
- Hooked by Nir Eyal — 习惯养成型产品设计（补充第一层内容）
- Lenny Rachitsky的北极星指标合集 — 各公司核心行动示例
播客：
- Sarah Tavel on Lenny's Podcast — 该框架的来源访谈