paper-talk

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Paper Talk: End-to-End Conference Talk Pipeline

Paper Talk：端到端会议演讲全流程

Workflow: from a completed paper to a conference-ready talk artifact — slide outline, Beamer source, editable PPTX, speaker notes, full talk script, polished visuals, and assurance checks.

Pipeline target: $ARGUMENTS

工作流：从已完成的论文到可直接用于会议的演讲成果——幻灯片大纲、Beamer源码、可编辑PPTX、演讲者备注、完整讲稿、优化后的视觉效果，以及合规检查。

流程目标：$ARGUMENTS

Assurance Ladder

合规等级阶梯

The skill takes an explicit

— assurance:

argument; default is

polished

Level	Phases run	Use when
`draft`	0 → 1 → 2 → 5 → 6	Internal practice talk; quick first-pass deck
`polished` (default)	0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 5 → 6	Lab seminar, workshop, default conference talk
`conference-ready` (or `submission` )	0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6	Top-venue oral / spotlight where slide claims are scrutinised; or anonymous submission

Phase 4 (assurance checks) is opt-in via

— assurance: conference-ready

. The lower levels skip claim / citation / anonymity audits, which is correct when content has already been audited at the paper-writing stage.

该技能支持显式的

— assurance:

参数；默认值为

polished

。

等级	执行阶段	适用场景
`draft`	0 → 1 → 2 → 5 → 6	内部演练演讲；快速生成第一版幻灯片
`polished` （默认）	0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 5 → 6	实验室研讨会、工作坊、常规会议演讲
`conference-ready` （或 `submission` ）	0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6	顶级会议口头报告/重点展示（幻灯片论点会被严格审查）；或匿名投稿演讲

阶段4（合规检查）需通过

— assurance: conference-ready

主动开启。低等级会跳过论点/引用/匿名性审计，这在论文撰写阶段已完成内容审核的场景下是合理的。

Hard Invariants

核心不变规则

These are non-negotiable across all phases:

Original paper is read-only. This workflow consumes the paper directory; it never modifies
```
paper/main.tex
```
or other paper artifacts.
Original deck is preserved.
```
/paper-slides
```
produces a baseline deck;
```
/slides-polish
```
writes a
```
_polished
```
versioned copy. The original Beamer + PPTX are never overwritten.
Speaker notes are byte-stable. Polish must not change
```
slide.notes_slide
```
content. Phase 4 verifies this.
No new content anywhere in the pipeline. All slide text, speaker notes, talk script, Q&A answers, claims, numbers, citations, URLs, author names, affiliations, anonymity placeholders, and experiment results must be either paper-grounded (extracted from
```
PAPER_DIR/
```
artefacts) or explicitly user-provided. The pipeline never invents content during outline, build, polish, audit, or export. Phase-4 anonymity scan + claim audit verify this end-to-end.
No slide reordering. Add / drop / reorder requires explicit user flags.
Cross-model independence. Per-page Codex calls in
```
/slides-polish
```
use fresh threads (no
```
codex-reply
```
). See
```
../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
```
.
Anonymity fail-closed. If any audit (or any Codex fix proposal) would replace a placeholder with a real title / count / URL, the workflow halts and surfaces the proposal for human review. See
```
../shared-references/experiment-integrity.md
```
.
Style references are guidance, not text source. A
```
— reference:
```
PDF or
```
— style:
```
preset informs visual weight and structural rhythm; never copy prose, examples, slide titles, or speaker-note text from the reference.
Final report cannot be
conference-ready
unless required audits pass. Phase 6 verifies and downgrades verdict if audits fail.
reasoning_effort: xhigh
is invariant across all
```
effort
```
levels for any Codex call invoked by sub-skills.

以下规则在所有阶段均不可违反：

原始论文为只读状态。该工作流仅读取论文目录；绝不会修改
```
paper/main.tex
```
或其他论文产物。
原始幻灯片保留。
```
/paper-slides
```
生成基线幻灯片；
```
/slides-polish
```
会写入带
```
_polished
```
后缀的版本副本。原始Beamer + PPTX文件绝不会被覆盖。
演讲者备注字节级稳定。优化阶段不得修改
```
slide.notes_slide
```
内容。阶段4会对此进行验证。
流程中不得生成新内容。所有幻灯片文本、演讲者备注、讲稿、问答内容、论点、数据、引用、URL、作者姓名、机构信息、匿名占位符及实验结果，必须要么来自论文（从
```
PAPER_DIR/
```
产物中提取），要么由用户明确提供。在大纲生成、幻灯片构建、优化、审计或导出阶段，流程绝不会自行生成内容。阶段4的匿名性扫描+论点审计会端到端验证这一点。
不得重新排序幻灯片。添加/删除/重新排序需用户明确设置参数。
跨模型独立。
```
/slides-polish
```
中的逐页Codex调用使用全新线程（不依赖
```
codex-reply
```
）。详见
```
../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
```
。
匿名性检查失败即终止。若任何审计（或Codex修复建议）会将占位符替换为真实标题/数据/URL，工作流将暂停并将建议提交给人工审核。详见
```
../shared-references/experiment-integrity.md
```
。
风格参考仅作指导，而非文本来源。
```
— reference:
```
指定的PDF或
```
— style:
```
预设仅用于指导视觉权重和结构节奏；绝不能从参考中复制文案、示例、幻灯片标题或演讲者备注文本。
最终报告仅在通过要求的审计后才能标记为
conference-ready
。阶段6会进行验证，若审计失败则降级结论。
**
```
reasoning_effort: xhigh
```
**在所有
```
effort
```
等级下，对所有子技能调用的Codex请求均保持不变。

Constants

固定参数

PAPER_DIR =
paper/
— Source paper directory. Override via positional argument.
OUTPUT_DIR =
slides/
— Where the deck artefacts live.
STATE_DIR =
.aris/paper-talk/
— Workflow state, audit logs, final report.
TALK_TYPE =
spotlight
— Default talk format. Inherited by
```
/paper-slides
```
.
TALK_MINUTES = 15 — Default duration. Inherited by
```
/paper-slides
```
.
VENUE =
NeurIPS
— Default venue (used by
```
/paper-slides
```
color schemes when
```
— style
```
is not passed).
ASPECT_RATIO =
16:9
— Inherited by
```
/paper-slides
```
.
STYLE_PRESET —
```
generic
```
if not passed;
```
why-rf
```
and venue presets supported by
```
/slides-polish
```
.
REFERENCE_VISUAL — Required when
```
assurance ≥ polished
```
. The Beamer compile of this talk is an acceptable self-reference; an external academic talk PDF is preferred when the user wants visual alignment beyond defaults.
AUTO_PROCEED = false — Each major phase pauses for user approval. Set
```
true
```
only when explicitly requested.

PAPER_DIR =
paper/
— 源论文目录。可通过位置参数覆盖。
OUTPUT_DIR =
slides/
— 幻灯片产物存储目录。
STATE_DIR =
.aris/paper-talk/
— 工作流状态、审计日志、最终报告存储目录。
TALK_TYPE =
spotlight
— 默认演讲格式。由
```
/paper-slides
```
继承。
TALK_MINUTES = 15 — 默认演讲时长。由
```
/paper-slides
```
继承。
VENUE =
NeurIPS
— 默认会议场地（当未传递
```
— style
```
参数时，
```
/paper-slides
```
会使用该场地的配色方案）。
ASPECT_RATIO =
16:9
— 由
```
/paper-slides
```
继承。
STYLE_PRESET — 未传递时为
```
generic
```
；
```
/slides-polish
```
支持
```
why-rf
```
及场地预设。
REFERENCE_VISUAL — 当
```
assurance ≥ polished
```
时为必填项。该演讲的Beamer编译版可作为自参考；若用户希望视觉效果超出默认值，优先使用外部学术演讲PDF。
AUTO_PROCEED = false — 每个主要阶段都会暂停等待用户确认。仅当用户明确要求时才设置为
```
true
```
。

Inputs

输入项

Discovered from

$ARGUMENTS

and the project directory:

PAPER_DIR/
— compiled paper (
```
main.tex
```
+
```
main.pdf
```
). The paper must already be in good shape; this workflow does not write the paper.
PAPER_DIR/sections/*.tex
— section sources for content extraction.
PAPER_DIR/figures/
— figures available for slide reuse.
(optional)
slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md
— pre-existing outline (resume mode); skips Phase 1 generation.
(optional)
— reference: <pdf>
— visual anchor for
```
/slides-polish
```
. If absent and the assurance level requires polish, the workflow uses the Beamer self-compile as reference.

(optional)
— talk_type
,
— minutes
,
— style
,
— effort
— see Constants.

从

$ARGUMENTS

和项目目录中获取：

PAPER_DIR/
— 已编译的论文（
```
main.tex
```
+
```
main.pdf
```
）。论文需已完成定稿；该工作流不负责撰写论文。
PAPER_DIR/sections/*.tex
— 用于内容提取的章节源码。
PAPER_DIR/figures/
— 可复用至幻灯片的图片。
（可选）
slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md
— 已存在的大纲（恢复模式）；跳过阶段1的生成步骤。
（可选）
— reference: <pdf>
—
```
/slides-polish
```
的视觉锚点。若未提供且合规等级要求优化，工作流会使用Beamer自编译版作为参考。

（可选）
— talk_type
,
— minutes
,
— style
,
— effort
— 详见固定参数。

Output Layout

输出结构

File names match

/paper-slides

's emit contract — this workflow is a non-renaming consumer.

slides/
├── SLIDE_OUTLINE.md                # Phase-1 outline (claim-first per slide)
├── main.tex                        # Beamer source (from /paper-slides)
├── main.pdf                        # compiled Beamer
├── presentation.pptx               # editable PPTX (from /paper-slides; emit name fixed by /paper-slides)
├── presentation_pre_polish.pptx    # snapshot before /slides-polish
├── presentation_polished.pptx      # /slides-polish output (when assurance ≥ polished)
├── presentation_polished.pdf       # rendered (LibreOffice or user-export)
├── speaker_notes.md                # per-slide notes (from /paper-slides)
├── TALK_SCRIPT.md                  # full word-for-word talk script + Q&A (from /paper-slides)
└── assets/                         # per-slide PNG previews

.aris/paper-talk/
├── PIPELINE_STATE.json             # phase pointer, status, timestamps
├── FINAL_REPORT.md                 # human-readable summary at end
├── audit-input/                    # Phase-4 staging copies of slide text + notes + script (so /paper-claim-audit and /citation-audit can run on slide content as a synthetic "paper")
│   ├── main.tex                    # \input{sections/slide_text.tex} \input{sections/notes.tex} \input{sections/script.tex}
│   ├── sections/
│   │   ├── slide_text.tex          # all visible slide bullets/titles/callouts as \section{Slide K}
│   │   ├── notes.tex               # speaker_notes.md → LaTeX, one \section per slide
│   │   └── script.tex              # TALK_SCRIPT.md → LaTeX, one \section per slide
│   ├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib   # symlink to source paper bib for /citation-audit
│   ├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/                # symlink — claim audit needs real evidence
│   └── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/                # symlink — citation audit may reference figure captions
└── audits/
    ├── slide_claim_audit.json      # 6-state verdict per claim (PASS/WARN/FAIL/NOT_APPLICABLE/BLOCKED/ERROR)
    ├── citation_audit.json         # citation existence / metadata
    ├── anonymity_scan.json         # placeholder discipline check
    └── export_integrity.json       # page-count / aspect / blank-slide / notes-preserved

The audit JSON files follow the shared 6-state schema; see

../shared-references/assurance-contract.md

文件名遵循

/paper-slides

的输出约定 — 该工作流为非重命名消费者。

slides/
├── SLIDE_OUTLINE.md                # 阶段1生成的大纲（每页以论点为核心）
├── main.tex                        # Beamer源码（来自/paper-slides）
├── main.pdf                        # 编译后的Beamer文件
├── presentation.pptx               # 可编辑PPTX（来自/paper-slides；文件名由/paper-slides固定）
├── presentation_pre_polish.pptx    # /slides-polish优化前的快照
├── presentation_polished.pptx      # /slides-polish输出文件（当assurance ≥ polished时生成）
├── presentation_polished.pdf       # 渲染后的文件（LibreOffice或用户导出）
├── speaker_notes.md                # 逐页演讲者备注（来自/paper-slides）
├── TALK_SCRIPT.md                  # 完整逐字讲稿+问答内容（来自/paper-slides）
└── assets/                         # 逐页PNG预览图

.aris/paper-talk/
├── PIPELINE_STATE.json             # 阶段指针、状态、时间戳
├── FINAL_REPORT.md                 # 最终可读总结报告
├── audit-input/                    # 阶段4的幻灯片文本+备注+讲稿暂存副本（以便/paper-claim-audit和/citation-audit将幻灯片内容作为合成"论文"进行审核）
│   ├── main.tex                    # \\input{sections/slide_text.tex} \\input{sections/notes.tex} \\input{sections/script.tex}
│   ├── sections/
│   │   ├── slide_text.tex          # 所有可见幻灯片项目符号/标题/标注，按\\section{Slide K}组织
│   │   ├── notes.tex               # speaker_notes.md转换为LaTeX格式，每页对应一个\\section
│   │   └── script.tex              # TALK_SCRIPT.md转换为LaTeX格式，每页对应一个\\section
│   ├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib   # 指向源论文bib文件的符号链接
│   ├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/                # 符号链接 — 论点审核需要真实证据
│   └── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/                # 符号链接 — 引用审核可能需要参考图片标题
└── audits/
    ├── slide_claim_audit.json      # 每个论点的6种状态结论（PASS/WARN/FAIL/NOT_APPLICABLE/BLOCKED/ERROR）
    ├── citation_audit.json         # 引用存在性/元数据检查
    ├── anonymity_scan.json         # 占位符规范性检查
    └── export_integrity.json       # 页数/比例/空白幻灯片/备注保留情况检查

审计JSON文件遵循通用的6状态 schema；详见

../shared-references/assurance-contract.md

。

Workflow

工作流

Phase 0: Setup

阶段0：初始化

Validate paper directory:
```
ls $PAPER_DIR/main.tex $PAPER_DIR/main.pdf
```
. If absent → halt and ask user to point to the compiled paper.
Check prerequisites:
- LaTeX:
```
which xelatex pdflatex latexmk
```
- PPTX rendering:
```
which soffice
```
  (LibreOffice headless) — required for Phase 4 export integrity check; otherwise prompt user to export PDF manually.
- PDF tools:
```
which pdfinfo pdftoppm
```
  (poppler) — required for
```
/slides-polish
```
  PNG rendering.
- Codex MCP availability.
- python-pptx (
```
python3 -c 'import pptx'
```
  ).

Resolve overrides from

$ARGUMENTS

talk_type

minutes

assurance

reference

style

effort

State init: write
```
.aris/paper-talk/PIPELINE_STATE.json
```
with
```
phase: 0
```
, timestamp, all resolved overrides.
Resume mode: if
```
slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md
```
exists and
```
PIPELINE_STATE.json
```
shows recent in-progress work, prompt the user — resume from last phase or start fresh.

验证论文目录：检查
```
$PAPER_DIR/main.tex $PAPER_DIR/main.pdf
```
是否存在。若缺失→暂停并提示用户指定已编译的论文。
检查前置依赖：
- LaTeX：
```
which xelatex pdflatex latexmk
```
- PPTX渲染：
```
which soffice
```
  （LibreOffice无头模式）—— 阶段4导出完整性检查必需；否则提示用户手动导出PDF。
- PDF工具：
```
which pdfinfo pdftoppm
```
  （poppler）——
```
/slides-polish
```
  生成PNG预览必需。
- Codex MCP可用性。
- python-pptx（执行
```
python3 -c 'import pptx'
```
  验证）。

解析
$ARGUMENTS
中的覆盖参数：

talk_type

minutes

assurance

reference

style

effort

。

初始化状态：写入
```
.aris/paper-talk/PIPELINE_STATE.json
```
，包含
```
phase: 0
```
、时间戳及所有解析后的覆盖参数。
恢复模式：若
```
slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md
```
存在且
```
PIPELINE_STATE.json
```
显示近期有未完成工作，提示用户——从上次阶段恢复或重新开始。

Phase 1: Slide Outline (Checkpoint)

阶段1：幻灯片大纲（检查点）

Goal: produce or accept a

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

that the user signs off on before any deck-building happens.

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

already exists, present its summary (slide count, time budget, claim-per-slide map) to the user and ask:

"Use existing outline (Y/n)? Modify? Regenerate?"

Otherwise, delegate to

/paper-slides

Phase-1 only (content extraction + slide outline generation).

/paper-slides

writes the outline into its own state; we adopt it as

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

The outline must contain, per slide:

A claim-first title (states the slide's point, not the topic).
One main idea per slide.
Bullet content (sentence fragments, not paragraphs).
Figure / equation / callout note.
Time budget (seconds).
Transition cue.
Speaker note seed (1-3 sentences; expanded in Phase 2).

Checkpoint: present the outline. Default behavior: pause for user approval. Set

AUTO_PROCEED = true

only when the user is explicitly running unattended.

目标：生成或接收

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

，并在开始构建幻灯片前获得用户确认。

若

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

已存在，向用户展示其摘要（幻灯片数量、时间分配、每页论点映射）并询问：

"是否使用现有大纲（Y/n）？修改？重新生成？"

否则，仅调用

/paper-slides

的阶段1（内容提取+幻灯片大纲生成）。

/paper-slides

会将大纲写入自身状态；我们将其复制为

slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md

。

大纲需包含每页幻灯片的以下内容：

以论点为核心的标题（明确幻灯片的核心观点，而非仅主题）。
每页一个核心思想。
项目符号内容（短句片段，而非段落）。
图片/公式/标注说明。
时间分配（秒）。
过渡提示。
演讲者备注初稿（1-3句话；阶段2会扩展）。

检查点：展示大纲。默认行为：暂停等待用户确认。仅当用户明确要求无人值守时设置

AUTO_PROCEED = true

。

Phase 2: Build Baseline Deck

阶段2：构建基线幻灯片

Invoke

/paper-slides

to generate Beamer source + PPTX from the approved outline.

/paper-slides "<paper-dir>" — talk_type: <T> — minutes: <N> — venue: <V> — aspect: 16:9 — notes: true

Forward

— style-ref:

if the user originally passed it (writer-side; the reviewer-side polish in Phase 3 must NOT see it — see invariant 8).

/paper-slides

produces (emit names fixed by

/paper-slides

```
slides/main.tex
```
+
```
slides/main.pdf
```
(Beamer)
```
slides/presentation.pptx
```
(editable PPTX)
```
slides/speaker_notes.md
```
```
slides/TALK_SCRIPT.md
```

After return: verify the four artefacts exist. If any missing, halt with a diagnostic. Do not rename outputs — downstream phases bind to these exact paths.

调用

/paper-slides

根据已确认的大纲生成Beamer源码+PPTX。

/paper-slides "<paper-dir>" — talk_type: <T> — minutes: <N> — venue: <V> — aspect: 16:9 — notes: true

若用户最初传递了

— style-ref:

参数，则转发该参数（仅用于撰写侧；阶段3的审核侧优化不得使用该参数——见核心不变规则8）。

/paper-slides

生成以下产物（文件名由

/paper-slides

固定）：

```
slides/main.tex
```
+
```
slides/main.pdf
```
（Beamer文件）
```
slides/presentation.pptx
```
（可编辑PPTX）
```
slides/speaker_notes.md
```
```
slides/TALK_SCRIPT.md
```

返回后：验证这四个产物是否存在。若有缺失，暂停并输出诊断信息。不得重命名输出——后续阶段依赖这些精确路径。

Phase 3: Visual Polish (when assurance ≥ polished)

阶段3：视觉优化（当assurance ≥ polished时执行）

Skip when

assurance == draft

Invoke

/slides-polish

against the freshly generated PPTX, with a reference. If the user passed

— reference:

, use that. Otherwise, use the Beamer compile (

slides/main.pdf

) as the visual reference — the Beamer is the design intent for the same talk, so it is the correct anchor when no external reference is available.

/slides-polish "slides/presentation.pptx" — reference: slides/main.pdf — style: <preset> — effort: <effort>

After return: verify

slides/presentation_polished.pptx

exists; if rendering tools are available, also verify

slides/presentation_polished.pdf

The polish phase is read-only on content (see Hard Invariants). If

/slides-polish

emits a

BLOCKED

verdict because a Codex fix proposal would alter content, surface that block to the user and halt rather than overriding.

当

assurance == draft

时跳过。

调用

/slides-polish

对刚生成的PPTX进行优化，并指定参考文件。若用户传递了

— reference:

，则使用该文件；否则使用Beamer编译版（

slides/main.pdf

）作为视觉参考——Beamer是同一演讲的设计意图，因此在无外部参考时是正确的锚点。

/slides-polish "slides/presentation.pptx" — reference: slides/main.pdf — style: <preset> — effort: <effort>

返回后：验证

slides/presentation_polished.pptx

是否存在；若渲染工具可用，同时验证

slides/presentation_polished.pdf

是否存在。

优化阶段对内容为只读（见核心不变规则）。若

/slides-polish

因Codex修复建议会修改内容而输出

BLOCKED

结论，需将该阻塞提示给用户并暂停，而非强制覆盖。

Phase 4: Assurance Checks (when assurance == conference-ready)

阶段4：合规检查（当assurance == conference-ready时执行）

Skip when

assurance ∈ {draft, polished}

/paper-claim-audit

and

/citation-audit

expect a paper-shaped input (

paper/main.tex

paper/sections/*.tex

paper/results/

) and emit JSON under

paper/

. Slides have a different shape, so this phase first stages slide artefacts into a synthetic paper directory, then invokes the audits against that synthetic input. Verdicts are written under

.aris/paper-talk/audits/

using the shared 6-state schema (

PASS

WARN

FAIL

NOT_APPLICABLE

BLOCKED

ERROR

) — see

../shared-references/assurance-contract.md

当

assurance ∈ {draft, polished}

时跳过。

/paper-claim-audit

和

/citation-audit

期望论文格式的输入（

paper/main.tex

paper/sections/*.tex

paper/results/

）并在

paper/

目录下输出JSON。幻灯片格式不同，因此该阶段首先将幻灯片产物暂存为合成论文目录，然后针对该合成输入执行审核。结论将写入

.aris/paper-talk/audits/

，使用通用的6状态 schema（

PASS

WARN

FAIL

NOT_APPLICABLE

BLOCKED

ERROR

）——详见

../shared-references/assurance-contract.md

。

4.0 Staging adapter

4.0 暂存适配

The staged "paper" mirrors

/paper-claim-audit

and

/citation-audit

's expected layout:

main.tex

at the root that

\input{}

sections/*.tex

, plus a

.bib

file and

results/

figures/

symlinks.

.aris/paper-talk/audit-input/
├── main.tex
│   # contains: \input{sections/slide_text.tex}
│   #           \input{sections/notes.tex}
│   #           \input{sections/script.tex}
│   #           \bibliography{references}
├── sections/
│   ├── slide_text.tex      # one \section{Slide K — <title>} per slide; visible bullets, titles, callout text, in-slide \cite{...}
│   ├── notes.tex           # speaker_notes.md converted to LaTeX, one \section per slide
│   └── script.tex          # TALK_SCRIPT.md converted to LaTeX, one \section per slide
├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib  # symlink to source paper bib (or copy if symlink not allowed)
├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/              # symlink — claim audit needs real evidence
└── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/              # symlink — citation audit may reference figure captions

If the source paper uses a different bib name (e.g.,

paper.bib

), mirror the actual file. If multiple bibs are used, link them all.

The staged "paper" exists only for the duration of Phase 4 and is removed in Phase 6 unless the user passes

— keep-audit-input

暂存的"论文"镜像

/paper-claim-audit

和

/citation-audit

main.tex

通过

\\input{}

引入

sections/*.tex

，加上

.bib

文件及

results/

figures/

符号链接。

.aris/paper-talk/audit-input/
├── main.tex
│   # 内容：\\input{sections/slide_text.tex}
│   #           \\input{sections/notes.tex}
│   #           \\input{sections/script.tex}
│   #           \\bibliography{references}
├── sections/
│   ├── slide_text.tex      # 每页对应一个\\section{Slide K — <title>}；包含可见项目符号、标题、标注文本及幻灯片内的\\cite{...}
│   ├── notes.tex           # speaker_notes.md转换为LaTeX格式，每页对应一个\\section
│   └── script.tex          # TALK_SCRIPT.md转换为LaTeX格式，每页对应一个\\section
├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib  # 指向源论文bib文件的符号链接（若不允许符号链接则复制）
├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/              # 符号链接 — 论点审核需要真实证据
└── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/              # 符号链接 — 引用审核可能需要参考图片标题

若源论文使用不同的bib文件名（如

paper.bib

），则镜像实际文件。若使用多个bib文件，则全部链接。

暂存的"论文"仅在阶段4存在，阶段6会删除，除非用户传递

— keep-audit-input

参数。

4.1 Slide claim audit

4.1 幻灯片论点审核

Invoke

/paper-claim-audit

against the staged input. Scope is slide text + speaker notes + full talk script — talks often smuggle unsupported claims into spoken parts that the visible bullets don't show.

/paper-claim-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"

The audit emits

audit-input/PAPER_CLAIM_AUDIT.json

with the shared 6-state schema. Move it to

.aris/paper-talk/audits/slide_claim_audit.json

and de-stage the path prefix so the verdicts cite slide K rather than synthetic-paper sections.

FAIL

BLOCKED

verdict on any claim downgrades the Phase-6 final verdict from

conference-ready

polished

调用

/paper-claim-audit

针对暂存输入执行审核。范围覆盖幻灯片文本+演讲者备注+完整讲稿——演讲中常将未验证的论点隐藏在口头内容中，而幻灯片可见部分并未体现。

/paper-claim-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"

审核会在

audit-input/PAPER_CLAIM_AUDIT.json

中输出通用6状态结论。将其移动至

.aris/paper-talk/audits/slide_claim_audit.json

，并移除路径前缀，使结论指向第K页幻灯片而非合成论文章节。

若任何论点的结论为

FAIL

或

BLOCKED

，阶段6的最终结论将从

conference-ready

降级为

polished

。

4.2 Citation audit

4.2 引用审核

Invoke

/citation-audit

over the staged input. Verify any

\cite{...}

in slides + notes + script via DBLP / CrossRef; flag fabricated entries.

/citation-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"

Output →

.aris/paper-talk/audits/citation_audit.json

(6-state).

调用

/citation-audit

针对暂存输入执行审核。通过DBLP / CrossRef验证幻灯片+备注+讲稿中的所有

\\cite{...}

；标记伪造的引用条目。

/citation-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"

输出→

.aris/paper-talk/audits/citation_audit.json

（6状态）。

4.3 Anonymity scan

4.3 匿名性扫描

When the talk is for an anonymous-submission venue or the user passed

— anonymous

, scan slides + notes + script for:

Real paper titles where placeholders should be (
```
[anonymized]
```
,
```
Withheld for anonymous review
```
, etc.).
Real author names beyond the talk's own author block.
Real submission counts.
Real URLs that would deanonymize.

Output →

.aris/paper-talk/audits/anonymity_scan.json

(6-state). Any

FAIL

(real-content leak) blocks

conference-ready

当演讲用于匿名投稿场地或用户传递

— anonymous

参数时，扫描幻灯片+备注+讲稿以检查：

应使用占位符（
```
[anonymized]
```
、
```
Withheld for anonymous review
```
等）的位置出现真实论文标题。
演讲作者信息之外出现真实作者姓名。
真实投稿数量。
会暴露身份的真实URL。

输出→

.aris/paper-talk/audits/anonymity_scan.json

（6状态）。任何

FAIL

（真实内容泄露）会阻止结论标记为

conference-ready

。

Phase 5: Final Export + Integrity

阶段5：最终导出+完整性检查

Resolve the final PPTX path:

FINAL_PPTX = slides/presentation_polished.pptx  if Phase 3 ran
           = slides/presentation.pptx           if assurance == draft (Phase 3 skipped)

Then:

Recompile Beamer cleanly:
```
cd slides && latexmk -pdf -xelatex main.tex
```
(or
```
pdflatex
```
for non-CJK). Confirm
```
main.pdf
```
page count matches outline slide count.

Render
FINAL_PPTX
→ PDF via

soffice --headless --convert-to pdf <FINAL_PPTX> -outdir slides/

. If unavailable, prompt user.

Export integrity check →
```
.aris/paper-talk/audits/export_integrity.json
```
(6-state):
- PPTX-PDF page count == Beamer-PDF page count.
- Aspect ratio == declared (16:9 default).
- No fully-blank slide.
- Speaker notes preserved on every slide that had them in the baseline. When Phase 3 ran, sha256 match against
```
presentation_pre_polish.pptx
```
  's notes; when Phase 3 skipped, against
```
presentation.pptx
```
  's own notes (no-op).
- Embedded fonts are appropriate for projector use (e.g., Calibri / Helvetica Neue / PingFang SC for Chinese).

If any integrity check fails, downgrade the Phase-6 verdict and surface specifics to the user.

确定最终PPTX路径：

FINAL_PPTX = slides/presentation_polished.pptx  若阶段3已执行
           = slides/presentation.pptx           若assurance == draft（阶段3跳过）

然后执行：

重新编译Beamer：
```
cd slides && latexmk -pdf -xelatex main.tex
```
（非CJK文档使用
```
pdflatex
```
）。确认
```
main.pdf
```
页数与大纲幻灯片数量一致。
将FINAL_PPTX渲染为PDF：通过
```
soffice --headless --convert-to pdf <FINAL_PPTX> -outdir slides/
```
执行。若工具不可用，提示用户手动操作。
导出完整性检查→
```
.aris/paper-talk/audits/export_integrity.json
```
（6状态）：
- PPTX导出PDF的页数 == Beamer PDF的页数。
- 比例 == 声明的比例（默认16:9）。
- 无完全空白的幻灯片。
- 所有基线中包含备注的幻灯片，备注均已保留。若阶段3已执行，需与
```
presentation_pre_polish.pptx
```
  的备注进行sha256匹配；若阶段3跳过，则与
```
presentation.pptx
```
  自身的备注匹配（无操作）。
- 嵌入字体适合投影使用（如中文使用Calibri / Helvetica Neue / PingFang SC）。

若任何完整性检查失败，阶段6的结论将降级，并向用户展示具体失败细节。

Phase 6: Final Report

阶段6：最终报告

Write

.aris/paper-talk/FINAL_REPORT.md

with:

Verdict:
```
draft
```
|
```
polished
```
|
```
conference-ready
```
(downgraded if audits failed).
Artefact paths: Beamer source / PDF, baseline PPTX, polished PPTX, polished PDF, notes, script.
Slide count, time budget vs target.
Audit summary (one line per audit run + PASS / WARN / FAIL).
Open warnings: any unresolved Codex polish notes the user should review by hand.
Next steps: e.g., "drop in real QR images on slide N", "verify HF Daily Papers screenshot", "rehearse to confirm 25-min budget".

A final

conference-ready

verdict requires:

Phases 0-5 all completed without halt.
All Phase-4 audit JSONs returned
```
PASS
```
(or
```
NOT_APPLICABLE
```
when the audit's content detector did not match — e.g., no citations on slides). Any
```
WARN
```
,
```
FAIL
```
,
```
BLOCKED
```
, or
```
ERROR
```
downgrades the verdict.
Phase-5 export integrity returned
```
PASS
```
.
No anonymity-scan
```
FAIL
```
when anonymous submission is declared.

Otherwise the report emits the highest passing level (

polished

draft

) and itemises why

conference-ready

was not granted, citing the specific audit JSON and the failing verdict line.

写入

.aris/paper-talk/FINAL_REPORT.md

，包含：

结论：
```
draft
```
|
```
polished
```
|
```
conference-ready
```
（若审计失败则降级）。
产物路径：Beamer源码/PDF、基线PPTX、优化后PPTX、优化后PDF、备注、讲稿。
幻灯片数量、时间分配与目标对比。
审计总结（每次审核一行 + PASS / WARN / FAIL）。
未解决警告：用户需手动查看的Codex优化未决建议。
后续步骤：例如"在第N页插入真实二维码图片"、"验证HF Daily Papers截图"、"排练以确认25分钟时长"。

最终

conference-ready

结论需满足：

阶段0-5全部完成且未暂停。
阶段4所有审计JSON均返回
```
PASS
```
（或当审计内容检测器未匹配时返回
```
NOT_APPLICABLE
```
——如幻灯片无引用）。任何
```
WARN
```
、
```
FAIL
```
、
```
BLOCKED
```
或
```
ERROR
```
都会降级结论。
阶段5导出完整性检查返回
```
PASS
```
。
当声明为匿名投稿时，匿名性扫描无
```
FAIL
```
结论。

否则报告将输出最高通过等级（

polished

或

draft

），并逐项说明未达到

conference-ready

的原因，引用具体审计JSON及失败结论行。

Effort Levels

工作量等级

See

../shared-references/effort-contract.md

`effort`	Behavior
`lite`	Forwarded to sub-skills. `/slides-polish` runs in `lite` (BLOCKERS only). Phase 4 still runs at the requested assurance level — `effort` controls depth, never audit gating (see `../shared-references/assurance-contract.md` ).
`balanced` (default)	Standard pipeline. `/slides-polish` runs `balanced` .
`max`	`/slides-polish` runs `max` (per-page review on every slide). Phase-4 audits read all artefacts in full.
`beast`	`/slides-polish` runs `beast` (second polish round). Phase-4 audits include extended assurance checks; final report adds an executive summary.

reasoning_effort: xhigh

is invariant.

assurance

and

effort

are independent axes. The user may legally combine

effort: lite, assurance: conference-ready

to mean "fast pipeline, but every audit must emit a verdict before finalisation."

详见

../shared-references/effort-contract.md

。

`effort`	行为
`lite`	传递给子技能。 `/slides-polish` 以 `lite` 模式运行（仅处理阻塞项）。阶段4仍会按请求的合规等级执行—— `effort` 控制深度，绝不跳过审计（详见 `../shared-references/assurance-contract.md` ）。
`balanced` （默认）	标准流程。 `/slides-polish` 以 `balanced` 模式运行。
`max`	`/slides-polish` 以 `max` 模式运行（逐页审核所有幻灯片）。阶段4审计会完整读取所有产物。
`beast`	`/slides-polish` 以 `beast` 模式运行（第二轮优化）。阶段4审计包含扩展合规检查；最终报告增加执行摘要。

reasoning_effort: xhigh

保持不变。

assurance

和

effort

是独立维度。用户可合法组合

effort: lite, assurance: conference-ready

，意为"快速流程，但所有审计必须输出结论后才能完成最终定稿"。

Parameter Pass-Through

参数传递示例

/paper-talk "paper/" — talk_type: oral — minutes: 25 — assurance: conference-ready \
            — reference: ./refs/why_rf_2025.pdf — style: why-rf — effort: max

Forwarded to:

/paper-slides

(Phase 2):

paper-dir

talk_type

minutes

venue

aspect

notes

style-ref

if writer-side.

```
/slides-polish
```
(Phase 3): polished pptx target,
```
reference
```
,
```
style
```
,
```
effort
```
.
```
/paper-claim-audit
```
(Phase 4.1): scoped to slide deck artefacts (not paper).
```
/citation-audit
```
(Phase 4.2): scoped to slide-deck-only citations.
Anonymity scan (Phase 4.3): inline tool, no external skill.

/paper-talk "paper/" — talk_type: oral — minutes: 25 — assurance: conference-ready \\
            — reference: ./refs/why_rf_2025.pdf — style: why-rf — effort: max

传递给：

/paper-slides

（阶段2）：

paper-dir

talk_type

minutes

venue

aspect

notes

, 若为撰写侧则传递

style-ref

。

```
/slides-polish
```
（阶段3）：优化后的PPTX目标、
```
reference
```
,
```
style
```
,
```
effort
```
。
```
/paper-claim-audit
```
（阶段4.1）：范围限定为幻灯片产物（而非论文）。
```
/citation-audit
```
（阶段4.2）：范围限定为幻灯片中的引用。
匿名性扫描（阶段4.3）：内置工具，无需调用外部技能。

When NOT to Use

不适用于以下场景

The paper is not yet compiled or claims are not stable. Run
```
/paper-writing
```
first.
The user wants a poster, not a talk. Use
```
/paper-poster
```
.
The user already has a finished deck and only needs visual polish. Use
```
/slides-polish
```
directly —
```
/paper-talk
```
would needlessly rebuild.
The talk content is unrelated to a paper (general lecture, demo). The orchestration assumes a paper-grounded talk; for ad-hoc decks, use
```
/paper-slides
```
directly with manual outline.

论文尚未编译或论点未稳定。请先运行
```
/paper-writing
```
。
用户需要海报而非演讲。请使用
```
/paper-poster
```
。
用户已有完成的幻灯片，仅需视觉优化。请直接使用
```
/slides-polish
```
——
```
/paper-talk
```
会不必要地重新构建幻灯片。
演讲内容与论文无关（通用讲座、演示）。该流程假设演讲基于论文；对于临时幻灯片，请直接使用
```
/paper-slides
```
并手动提供大纲。

Prior Skill Relationship

与其他技能的关联

Composes

/paper-slides

/slides-polish

/paper-claim-audit

/citation-audit

Does not call
```
/kill-argument
```
by default — that is upstream intellectual stress-test, not deck QA. Users who want talk-story stress-test before slide build can run
```
/kill-argument paper/
```
first.
Sister workflow to
```
/paper-writing
```
(paper) and
```
/paper-poster
```
(poster).

整合了

/paper-slides

/slides-polish

/paper-claim-audit

/citation-audit

。

默认不会调用
```
/kill-argument
```
——该技能属于上游观点压力测试，而非幻灯片质量保证。若用户希望在构建幻灯片前对演讲内容进行压力测试，可先运行
```
/kill-argument paper/
```
。
与
```
/paper-writing
```
（论文）和
```
/paper-poster
```
（海报）为姐妹工作流。

Empirical Origin

经验来源

This workflow generalises a 30+ iteration polish run on a Chinese-spoken academic conference talk (May 2026). The convergent learning was that talk preparation has the same shape as paper preparation — plan, build, polish, audit, export, report — and benefits from the same assurance ladder. The per-page Codex polish pass (Phase 3) is the single most expensive but highest-value step, and is hidden behind the

polished

default so users get it without thinking about it.

该工作流基于2026年5月一场中文学术会议演讲的30+次迭代优化总结而来。核心发现是演讲准备与论文准备的流程一致——规划、构建、优化、审计、导出、报告——并可从相同的合规等级阶梯中获益。逐页Codex优化步骤（阶段3）是成本最高但价值最大的环节，因此默认启用

polished

等级，让用户无需额外设置即可获得该功能。",