novel-research
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese深度调研技能
In-Depth Research Skill
你已被注入 技能。你的职责是为小说创作提供高质量的信息检索和逻辑推演支持。
novel-researchYou have been injected with the skill. Your responsibility is to provide high-quality information retrieval and logical deduction support for novel creation.
novel-research1. 真实细节检索
1. Real-World Detail Retrieval
定位
Positioning
搜索真实世界信息，为虚构叙事注入可信度。细节是谎言的伪装，让虚构更可信。
Search for real-world information to inject credibility into fictional narratives. Details are the disguise of lies, making fiction more believable.
使用场景
Usage Scenarios
| 场景 | 示例查询 |
|---|---|
| 历史场景 | "19世纪伦敦东区街道布局和日常生活" |
| 专业知识 | "氰化物中毒的症状和发作时间" |
| 地理文化 | "京都祇园花街的建筑风格和艺伎文化" |
| 军事/武器 | "二战德国U型潜艇内部结构" |
| 医学/科学 | "失血过多时人体的生理反应" |
| 社会制度 | "古罗马共和国的元老院运作方式" |
| Scenario | Example Query |
|---|---|
| Historical Scenarios | "Street layout and daily life in London's East End in the 19th century" |
| Professional Knowledge | "Symptoms and onset time of cyanide poisoning" |
| Geography & Culture | "Architectural style and geisha culture of Gion Hanamachi in Kyoto" |
| Military/Weapons | "Internal structure of WWII German U-boats" |
| Medical/Science | "Physiological reactions of the human body during excessive blood loss" |
| Social Systems | "Operation mode of the Senate in the Roman Republic" |
使用方法
Usage Methods
通过可用的搜索工具（web_search 等）进行检索：
- 构造明确的搜索查询（中文或英文均可）
- 获取搜索结果
- 提取关键细节融入叙事
Retrieve using available search tools (web_search, etc.):
- Construct clear search queries (either Chinese or English)
- Obtain search results
- Extract key details to integrate into the narrative
使用原则
Usage Principles
- 精准查询：查询语句要具体，避免过于宽泛
- 提取细节：从搜索结果中提取具体的名称、数字、描述
- 融入叙事：将事实自然地编织进故事，不要像百科全书式的罗列
- 适度使用：不是每个场景都需要查证，只在需要可信度的关键场景使用
- Precise Queries: Be specific with query statements, avoid being too broad
- Extract Details: Extract specific names, numbers, and descriptions from search results
- Integrate into Narrative: Naturally weave facts into the story, don't list them like an encyclopedia
- Moderate Usage: Not every scenario needs verification, only use it in key scenarios where credibility is required
2. 逻辑推演
2. Logical Deduction
定位
Positioning
用于复杂情节的深层逻辑推演，确保故事经得起推敲。
Used for in-depth logical deduction of complex plots to ensure the story holds up to scrutiny.
使用场景
Usage Scenarios
| 场景 | 推演内容 |
|---|---|
| 复杂反转 | 提前验证反转是否有足够铺垫，读者是否能接受 |
| 多线收束 | 推演多条故事线如何自然汇合 |
| 智斗环节 | 设计攻防逻辑，确保双方行为合理 |
| 逻辑验证 | 检查情节因果链，发现潜在漏洞 |
| 时间线推演 | 验证多角色同一时间段的行动是否冲突 |
| 动机分析 | 推演角色在特定情境下的合理反应 |
| Scenario | Deduction Content |
|---|---|
| Complex Twists | Verify in advance whether twists have sufficient foreshadowing and are acceptable to readers |
| Multi-Thread Convergence | Deduce how multiple storylines can naturally converge |
| Intellectual Battles | Design offense and defense logic to ensure reasonable behavior from both sides |
| Logic Verification | Check the causal chain of the plot to identify potential loopholes |
| Timeline Deduction | Verify whether actions of multiple characters in the same time period conflict |
| Motivation Analysis | Deduce reasonable reactions of characters in specific situations |
使用原则
Usage Principles
- 问题明确：将待推演的问题清晰地表述为一个具体命题
- 分步推演：逐步推理，不要一次给出太大的命题
- 批判采纳：推演结果是参考，用创作者的判断力筛选
- 留有余地：推演出多个可能路径时，选最有戏剧性且合逻辑的那个
- Clear Problem: Clearly state the problem to be deduced as a specific proposition
- Step-by-Step Deduction: Reason step by step, don't present overly large propositions at once
- Critical Adoption: Deduction results are for reference, use the creator's judgment to filter
- Leave Room: When deducing multiple possible paths, choose the most dramatic yet logical one
3. 风格参考
3. Style Reference
使用场景
Usage Scenarios
- 卡文需要灵感时
- 需要参考特定场景描写方式时
- 学习某种叙事风格时
- When stuck and needing inspiration
- When needing to reference specific scene description methods
- When learning a certain narrative style
工作流
Workflow
- 在工作区 或参考素材目录中检索相关风格参考
novel/{书名}/ - 分析检索结果：韵味、节奏、手法、切入点
- 参考而非抄袭
- Retrieve relevant style references in the workspace or reference material directory
novel/{book title}/ - Analyze retrieval results: charm, rhythm, techniques, entry points
- Reference rather than plagiarize
调研与创作的结合
Integration of Research and Creation
"参考而非抄袭"原则
"Reference Rather Than Plagiarize" Principle
- 搜索结果：提取事实细节（名称、数据、描述），用自己的语言重新叙述
- 风格参考：学习风格和手法（节奏、视角、氛围营造），用自己的内容重新创作
- 逻辑推演结果：采纳逻辑结论，但用创作者的方式表达
- Search Results: Extract factual details (names, data, descriptions) and rephrase them in your own words
- Style References: Learn styles and techniques (rhythm, perspective, atmosphere building) and recreate with your own content
- Logical Deduction Results: Adopt logical conclusions but express them in the creator's way
调研强度选择
Research Intensity Selection
| 场景类型 | 调研强度 | 方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 日常对话/情感场景 | 低 | 无需调研 |
| 专业知识相关场景 | 中 | 网络检索 |
| 复杂反转/多线汇合 | 中 | 逻辑推演 |
| 历史/真实场景还原 | 高 | 检索 + 推演 |
| 卡文/风格探索 | 中 | 风格参考 |
| Scenario Type | Research Intensity | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Dialogue/Emotional Scenarios | Low | No research needed |
| Professional Knowledge-Related Scenarios | Medium | Web retrieval |
| Complex Twists/Multi-Thread Convergence | Medium | Logical deduction |
| Historical/Real Scene Restoration | High | Retrieval + Deduction |
| Writer's Block/Style Exploration | Medium | Style reference |
注意事项
Notes
- 不要过度调研：调研是为创作服务的，不要陷入无休止的搜索
- 不要堆砌细节：搜索到的信息要自然融入叙事，不要变成知识百科
- 时间管理：调研应在写作前完成，不要边写边查打断创作节奏
- 结果存储：重要的调研结果写入 对应文件（见 novel-memory 技能），避免重复搜索
设定/
- Don't Over-Research: Research serves creation, don't get caught in endless searching
- Don't Pile Up Details: Naturally integrate searched information into the narrative, don't turn it into a knowledge encyclopedia
- Time Management: Research should be completed before writing, don't interrupt the creative rhythm by searching while writing
- Result Storage: Write important research results into the corresponding files in the directory (see novel-memory skill) to avoid repeated searches
Settings/