deep-think

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Deep Think (ReAct-Plan Framework)

When This Skill Activates

Trigger when user requests deeper analysis beyond surface-level responses:

"帮我深入思考", "请仔细分析", "帮我详细拆解", "请梳理一下思路"
"深入理解", "仔细考虑", "详细分析"

Trigger when user requests deeper analysis beyond surface-level responses:

"Help me think deeply", "Please analyze carefully", "Help me break it down in detail", "Please organize my thoughts"
"Gain in-depth understanding", "Think carefully", "Analyze in detail"

Core Philosophy

Think Globally, Act Locally, Reflect Continuously

Explicit Planning: Create structured plan before execution
Dynamic Re-planning: Update plan after new insights emerge
Prediction: Anticipate outcomes before diving in
Reflection: Assess progress and update belief state

Think Globally, Act Locally, Reflect Continuously

Explicit Planning: Create structured plan before execution
Dynamic Re-planning: Update plan after new insights emerge
Prediction: Anticipate outcomes before diving in
Reflection: Assess progress and update belief state

Output Structure

1. Initial Planning (P0)

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

初始规划

Initial Planning

核心问题: [简述]

目标: [成功标准]

已知: [关键事实 1-3 条]

关键未知: [需要弄清 1-3 条]

计划 P0:

[阶段 1: 步骤 1-2]
[阶段 2: 步骤 1-2]
[阶段 3: 步骤 1-2]

undefined

Core Problem: [Brief description]

Objective: [Success criteria]

Known Information: [1-3 key facts]

Key Unknowns: [1-3 points to clarify]

Plan P0:

[Phase 1: Steps 1-2]
[Phase 2: Steps 1-2]
[Phase 3: Steps 1-2]

undefined

2. Iterative Deep Dives (2-4 次)

2. Iterative Deep Dives (2-4 iterations)

Keep it concise! 每个迭代聚焦一个核心维度：

markdown

undefined

Keep it concise! Each iteration focuses on one core dimension:

markdown

undefined

思考：[主题]

Reflection: [Topic]

问题: [当前步骤的不足或新发现的问题]

分析: [1-2 句关键分析]

新发现: [简列 1-2 条]

计划更新:

- [子要点]


**重要原则**:
- 只显示变化的部分，不要重复整个计划
- 每个迭代 10-15 行以内
- 聚焦关键发现，避免细节堆砌

Problem: [Shortcomings of current steps or newly discovered issues]

Analysis: [1-2 key sentences of analysis]

New Findings: [List 1-2 key points concisely]

Plan Update:

[Phase X]: [Added/Revised Content]
- [Sub-point]


**Key Principles**:
- Only show changed parts, do not repeat the entire plan
- Keep each iteration within 10-15 lines
- Focus on key findings, avoid overloading with details
- Limit to 2-4 iterations
- Do not repeat previous content in the final plan

3. Final Synthesis

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

最终综合

Final Synthesis

核心发现 (3-5 条核心洞察):

[发现 1]
[发现 2]

最终计划:

阶段 1: [步骤 1, 2] ([关键细节])
阶段 2: [步骤 1, 2, 3] ([关键细节])
阶段 3: [步骤 1, 2] ([关键细节])

关键成功因素 (3 条):

[因素 1]
[因素 2]

主要风险:

[风险 1] → [应对]
[风险 2] → [应对]

undefined

Core Findings (3-5 core insights):

[Finding 1]
[Finding 2]

Final Plan:

Phase 1: [Steps 1, 2] ([Key Details])
Phase 2: [Steps 1, 2, 3] ([Key Details])
Phase 3: [Steps 1, 2] ([Key Details])

Key Success Factors (3 items):

[Factor 1]
[Factor 2]

Main Risks:

[Risk 1] → [Response]
[Risk 2] → [Response]

undefined

Conciseness Guidelines

避免这样做	建议这样做
完整重复之前的计划	只显示变化部分
长篇分析解释	1-2 句直击要点
细节过多堆砌	提炼关键信息
迭代次数过多	2-4 次迭代即可
最终计划重复前文	精炼总结，聚焦变化

Avoid	Recommend
Repeating the entire previous plan	Only show changed parts
Long-winded analysis and explanations	Use 1-2 sentences to hit the key points
Overloading with details	Extract key information
Excessive iterations	Limit to 2-4 iterations
Repeating previous content in the final plan	Summarize concisely, focus on changes

Example

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

初始规划

Initial Planning

核心问题: 如何到达火星

目标: 安全送达火星并返回

计划 P0:

发射火箭
飞往火星
着陆火星

Core Problem: How to reach Mars

Objective: Safely deliver to Mars and return

Plan P0:

Launch rocket
Fly to Mars
Land on Mars

思考：运载能力

Reflection: Payload Capacity

问题: "发射火箭"太笼统，未考虑载荷和燃料

分析: 地火转移需 50-100 吨载荷，单次发射无法满足

新发现: 需要轨道加油，多次发射补给燃料

计划更新:

阶段 1: 增加轨道加油能力

Problem: "Launch rocket" is too vague, does not consider payload and fuel

Analysis: Earth-Mars transfer requires 50-100 tons of payload, which cannot be achieved with a single launch

New Finding: In-orbit refueling is needed, with multiple launches to supply fuel

Plan Update:

Phase 1: Add in-orbit refueling capability

思考：时间窗口

Reflection: Time Window

问题: 未考虑返程窗口

分析: 需在火星停留 500 天等返程窗口

新发现: 任务总时长约 3 年

计划更新:

新增阶段 4: 火星停留 (~500 天)
新增阶段 5: 返程

Problem: Return window was not considered

Analysis: Need to stay on Mars for 500 days waiting for the return window

New Finding: Total mission duration is approximately 3 years

Plan Update:

Add Phase 4: Mars Stay (~500 days)
Add Phase 5: Return Trip

思考：生存与 ISRU

Reflection: Survival and ISRU

问题: 返程燃料从哪来？

分析: 无法从地球携带，必须就地生产

新发现: 利用火星 CO₂ 生产甲烷+氧气

计划更新:

阶段 2: 增加货运先行，运送 ISRU 设备
阶段 4: 增加 ISRU 生产返程燃料

Problem: Where does return fuel come from?

Analysis: Cannot carry it from Earth, must produce it locally

New Finding: Use Mars' CO₂ to produce methane + oxygen

Plan Update:

Phase 2: Add cargo pre-deployment to deliver ISRU equipment
Phase 4: Add ISRU production of return fuel

最终综合

Final Synthesis

核心发现:

轨道加油和货运先行是必需策略
ISRU 就地生产燃料是返程关键
任务总时长约 3 年

最终计划:

阶段 1: 技术开发 (运载+着陆+ISRU)
阶段 2: 货运先行 (4 艘船预置基础设施)
阶段 3: 载人发射 (轨道加油 → 地火转移 200 天)
阶段 4: 火星停留 (500-800 天，生产燃料+探索)
阶段 5: 返程 (200 天返回地球)

关键成功因素:

Starship 达到设计载荷
ISRU 无故障运行
生命保障维持 3 年

主要风险:

着陆失败 → 货运先行验证
ISRU 产能不足 → 增加设备，延长停留期

undefined

Core Findings:

In-orbit refueling and cargo pre-deployment are essential strategies
ISRU local fuel production is key for the return trip
Total mission duration is approximately 3 years

Final Plan:

Phase 1: Technology Development (Launch + Landing + ISRU)
Phase 2: Cargo Pre-deployment (4 ships to pre-position infrastructure)
Phase 3: Manned Launch (In-orbit refueling → 200-day Earth-Mars transfer)
Phase 4: Mars Stay (500-800 days, fuel production + exploration)
Phase 5: Return Trip (200-day return to Earth)

Key Success Factors:

Starship reaches designed payload
ISRU operates without failures
Life support sustains for 3 years

Main Risks:

Landing failure → Verify with cargo pre-deployment
Insufficient ISRU capacity → Add equipment and extend stay duration

undefined