Back to Details

paper-writing

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Academic Paper Writing Skill

学术论文写作技能

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for writing excellent academic and research papers across all disciplines. It covers structure, style, argumentation, and best practices from initial planning through final revision.
本技能为各学科撰写优秀学术与研究论文提供全面指导，涵盖从初始规划到最终修订的结构、风格、论证方法及最佳实践。

When to Use This Skill

适用场景

Use this skill when working on:
  • Research papers and journal articles
  • Conference papers and proceedings
  • Technical reports and white papers
  • Thesis chapters and dissertations
  • Literature reviews and survey papers
  • Position papers and perspectives
在处理以下内容时可使用本技能：
  • 研究论文与期刊文章
  • 会议论文与会议录
  • 技术报告与白皮书
  • 论文章节与学位论文
  • 文献综述与调研论文
  • 立场论文与观点文章

Quick Start

快速入门

For immediate guidance, see the task-specific workflows below. For comprehensive reference material, consult:
  • references/REFERENCE.md
    - Complete writing guidelines and best practices
  • references/STRUCTURE.md
    - Detailed templates for different paper types
  • references/STYLE.md
    - Writing style and clarity guidelines
  • assets/
    - Ready-to-use paper templates
如需即时指导，请查看下方针对具体任务的工作流程。如需全面参考资料，请查阅：
  • references/REFERENCE.md
    - 完整写作指南与最佳实践
  • references/STRUCTURE.md
    - 不同类型论文的详细模板
  • references/STYLE.md
    - 写作风格与清晰度指南
  • assets/
    - 可直接使用的论文模板

Core Workflow

核心工作流程

1. Planning Phase

1. 规划阶段

Understand the Requirements
  • Identify target venue (journal, conference, report)
  • Check formatting requirements (APA, IEEE, ACM, Chicago, etc.)
  • Note page limits, section requirements, and citation style
  • Clarify submission deadlines and review process
Define the Research Question
  • Formulate a clear, focused research question or hypothesis
  • Ensure the question is specific, measurable, and answerable
  • Identify the gap in existing knowledge or practice
  • State the contribution your work will make
Create an Outline
  • Draft section headings based on paper type (see Structure section)
  • Allocate approximate space to each section
  • Identify key points for each section
  • Map evidence and references to sections
明确要求
  • 确定目标发表渠道（期刊、会议、报告）
  • 核对格式要求（APA、IEEE、ACM、Chicago等）
  • 注意页数限制、章节要求与引用格式
  • 明确提交截止日期与评审流程
定义研究问题
  • 制定清晰、聚焦的研究问题或假设
  • 确保问题具体、可衡量且可解答
  • 识别现有知识或实践中的空白
  • 阐述你的研究将做出的贡献
创建大纲
  • 根据论文类型草拟章节标题（见结构部分）
  • 为每个章节分配大致篇幅
  • 确定每个章节的核心要点
  • 为各章节匹配相关证据与参考文献

2. Writing Phase

2. 写作阶段

Follow the Structured Approach
Work section-by-section, not necessarily in order. Many authors write in this sequence:
  1. Methods (clearest, most concrete)
  2. Results (present findings)
  3. Introduction (frame the problem)
  4. Discussion (interpret results)
  5. Conclusion (summarize contributions)
  6. Abstract (last, summarizes everything)
Section-Specific Guidance
Abstract (150-300 words)
  • State the problem and motivation (1-2 sentences)
  • Describe your approach/method (1-2 sentences)
  • Summarize key results (2-3 sentences)
  • State conclusions and implications (1-2 sentences)
  • Make it self-contained (no citations, no undefined acronyms)
Introduction
  • Hook: Why should anyone care? (1 paragraph)
  • Context: What's the broader problem space? (1-2 paragraphs)
  • Gap: What's missing in current solutions? (1 paragraph)
  • Your contribution: What does this paper do? (1 paragraph)
  • Paper organization: Brief roadmap (optional, 1 paragraph)
Related Work / Literature Review
  • Group work thematically, not chronologically
  • Compare and contrast approaches
  • Identify limitations of existing work
  • Position your work clearly vs. alternatives
  • Be fair and accurate (don't strawman competitors)
Methodology / Approach
  • Describe methods with enough detail for replication
  • Justify design choices
  • Define metrics and evaluation criteria
  • Explain data collection and analysis procedures
  • Include diagrams for complex processes
Results
  • Present findings objectively without interpretation
  • Use tables and figures effectively (see Visualization section)
  • Report statistical significance where applicable
  • Address both positive and negative results
  • Organize by research question or hypothesis
Discussion
  • Interpret results in context of research questions
  • Compare with related work
  • Explain unexpected findings
  • Acknowledge limitations honestly
  • Discuss implications for theory and practice
Conclusion
  • Restate key contributions (1 paragraph)
  • Summarize main findings (1 paragraph)
  • Discuss broader implications (1 paragraph)
  • Suggest future work (1 paragraph)
  • End with a strong closing statement
遵循结构化方法
逐个章节推进，不必按顺序撰写。许多作者会按以下顺序写作：
  1. 方法（最清晰、最具体的部分）
  2. 结果（呈现研究发现）
  3. 引言（构建问题框架）
  4. 讨论（解读结果）
  5. 结论（总结贡献）
  6. 摘要（最后撰写，总结全文）
分章节指导
摘要（150-300词）
  • 阐述问题与研究动机（1-2句）
  • 描述研究方法（1-2句）
  • 总结核心结果（2-3句）
  • 说明结论与意义（1-2句）
  • 确保内容独立完整（无需引用，无未定义缩写）
引言
  • 切入点：为什么这项研究值得关注？（1段落）
  • 背景：更广泛的问题领域是什么？（1-2段落）
  • 研究空白：现有解决方案存在哪些不足？（1段落）
  • 你的贡献：本文将实现什么？（1段落）
  • 论文结构：简要 roadmap（可选，1段落）
相关工作/文献综述
  • 按主题而非时间顺序梳理已有研究
  • 对比不同研究方法
  • 指出现有研究的局限性
  • 明确你的研究与其他研究的区别
  • 保持客观准确（勿歪曲竞争对手的观点）
方法论/研究方法
  • 详细描述方法，确保可重复
  • 论证设计选择的合理性
  • 定义评估指标与标准
  • 解释数据收集与分析流程
  • 复杂流程需配示意图
结果
  • 客观呈现研究发现，不加入主观解读
  • 有效使用表格与图表（见可视化最佳实践部分）
  • 适用时报告统计显著性
  • 同时呈现正面与负面结果
  • 按研究问题或假设组织内容
讨论
  • 结合研究问题解读结果
  • 与相关工作进行对比
  • 解释意外发现
  • 坦诚承认研究局限性
  • 讨论研究对理论与实践的意义
结论
  • 重申核心贡献（1段落）
  • 总结主要发现（1段落）
  • 讨论更广泛的意义（1段落）
  • 提出未来研究方向（1段落）
  • 以有力的收尾语句结束

3. Refinement Phase

3. 润色阶段

First Revision: Structure and Argument
  • Does each section serve its purpose?
  • Is the argument logical and complete?
  • Are transitions between sections smooth?
  • Does evidence support all claims?
  • Are counterarguments addressed?
Second Revision: Clarity and Style
  • Remove jargon and define technical terms
  • Eliminate redundancy and wordiness
  • Use active voice for clarity (prefer "We analyzed" over "Analysis was performed")
  • Ensure parallel structure in lists
  • Check paragraph length (aim for 4-8 sentences)
Third Revision: Polish
  • Check grammar, spelling, punctuation
  • Verify all citations are formatted correctly
  • Ensure figures/tables are referenced in text
  • Number sections, equations, figures consistently
  • Proofread carefully (reading aloud helps)
第一轮修订：结构与论证
  • 每个章节是否符合其定位？
  • 论证逻辑是否完整合理？
  • 章节间过渡是否流畅？
  • 所有论点是否有证据支持？
  • 是否回应了反论点？
第二轮修订：清晰度与风格
  • 去除不必要的行话，定义专业术语
  • 消除冗余与冗长表述
  • 为清晰起见使用主动语态（优先用“我们分析了”而非“进行了分析”）
  • 确保列表格式平行统一
  • 检查段落长度（目标为4-8句）
第三轮修订：精细化打磨
  • 检查语法、拼写与标点
  • 验证所有引用格式正确
  • 确保图表在正文中被引用
  • 章节、公式、图表编号保持一致
  • 仔细校对（朗读有助于发现问题）

Visualization Best Practices

可视化最佳实践

Tables
  • Use for precise numerical comparisons
  • Keep simple and readable (avoid excessive gridlines)
  • Include clear column headers and units
  • Caption goes above the table
  • Reference in text before the table appears
Figures
  • Use for trends, patterns, relationships
  • Ensure axes are labeled with units
  • Use readable fonts (at least 10pt in final size)
  • Caption goes below the figure
  • Make interpretable in grayscale (avoid color-only distinctions)
General Rules
  • Every table/figure must be referenced in the text
  • Each should be self-explanatory with its caption
  • Number consecutively (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)
  • Place close to first reference when possible
表格
  • 用于精确的数值对比
  • 保持简洁易读（避免过多网格线）
  • 包含清晰的列标题与单位
  • 标题置于表格上方
  • 在正文表格出现前引用
图表
  • 用于展示趋势、模式与关系
  • 确保坐标轴标注单位
  • 使用易读字体（最终尺寸至少10pt）
  • 标题置于图表下方
  • 确保灰度模式下可解读（避免仅用颜色区分）
通用规则
  • 每个表格/图表必须在正文中被引用
  • 标题应能独立说明内容
  • 按顺序编号（图1、图2等）
  • 尽可能靠近首次引用位置放置

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

常见误区规避

Structural Issues
  • ❌ Burying the contribution in the middle
  • ✅ State contribution clearly in introduction
  • ❌ Results section that interprets rather than presents
  • ✅ Keep results objective, interpret in discussion
  • ❌ Conclusion that introduces new information
  • ✅ Conclusion only synthesizes existing content
Writing Issues
  • ❌ Passive constructions: "It was found that..."
  • ✅ Active voice: "We found that..."
  • ❌ Hedging excessively: "It seems to possibly suggest..."
  • ✅ Be direct: "The results indicate..."
  • ❌ Undefined acronyms and jargon
  • ✅ Define terms on first use
Citation Issues
  • ❌ Missing citations for claims
  • ✅ Every factual claim needs a source
  • ❌ Over-citing obvious facts
  • ✅ Common knowledge doesn't need citation
  • ❌ Citing without reading (citation padding)
  • ✅ Cite only what you've actually read and verified
结构问题
  • ❌ 核心贡献被埋没在文中
  • ✅ 在引言中清晰阐述贡献
  • ❌ 结果部分加入主观解读
  • ✅ 结果保持客观，解读放在讨论部分
  • ❌ 结论引入新信息
  • ✅ 结论仅总结已有内容
写作问题
  • ❌ 被动语态：“研究发现...”
  • ✅ 主动语态：“我们发现...”
  • ❌ 过度模糊：“这似乎可能表明...”
  • ✅ 直接表述：“结果表明...”
  • ❌ 未定义的缩写与行话
  • ✅ 首次出现时定义术语
引用问题
  • ❌ 论点缺少引用支持
  • ✅ 所有事实性论点均需来源
  • ❌ 对常识性内容过度引用
  • ✅ 常识无需引用
  • ❌ 未阅读原文就引用（凑引用数）
  • ✅ 仅引用实际阅读并验证过的内容

Discipline-Specific Considerations

学科专属注意事项

Computer Science / Engineering
  • Emphasize reproducibility and implementation details
  • Include complexity analysis where relevant
  • Provide algorithm pseudocode or code snippets
  • Compare against state-of-the-art baselines
  • Make code/data available when possible
Natural Sciences
  • Follow strict IMRAD structure (Intro, Methods, Results, Discussion)
  • Report statistical power and effect sizes
  • Include detailed experimental protocols
  • Address confounding variables
  • Report null results honestly
Social Sciences
  • Contextualize within theoretical frameworks
  • Justify sampling and participant selection
  • Report demographic information
  • Address potential biases
  • Discuss generalizability limitations
Humanities
  • Develop clear thesis statement
  • Support arguments with textual evidence
  • Engage with scholarly debates
  • Use close reading and analysis
  • Contextualize within historical/cultural frameworks
计算机科学/工程
  • 强调可重复性与实现细节
  • 相关时包含复杂度分析
  • 提供算法伪代码或代码片段
  • 与当前最优基准进行对比
  • 尽可能公开代码/数据
自然科学
  • 严格遵循IMRAD结构（引言、方法、结果、讨论）
  • 报告统计功效与效应量
  • 包含详细实验方案
  • 说明混淆变量
  • 坦诚报告无效结果
社会科学
  • 在理论框架内进行 contextualize
  • 论证抽样与参与者选择的合理性
  • 报告人口统计信息
  • 说明潜在偏差
  • 讨论可推广性的局限性
人文学科
  • 制定清晰的论文论点
  • 用文本证据支持论点
  • 参与学术辩论
  • 使用细读与分析方法
  • 在历史/文化框架内进行 contextualize

Conversation-First Approach

对话优先方法

When helping users write papers, prioritize natural conversation over rapid-fire questions:
  1. Start simple: Ask ONE opening question to understand their situation
    • "What's your paper about?" (topic/working title)
    • OR "What stage are you at?" (if they're already focused)
  2. Listen and follow up: Based on their answer, ask the next most relevant question
    • If they're starting: Ask about target venue or research gap
    • If they're revising: Ask which section needs work
    • If they're stuck: Ask what specific challenge they're facing
  3. Build context progressively: Let information emerge naturally through dialogue
  4. Provide targeted help: Focus on their immediate need, not all possible topics
  5. Maintain author voice: Edit to improve, not to rewrite in a different style
  6. Explain recommendations: Help them understand why changes strengthen their paper
  7. Load references as needed: Use reference documents for deeper guidance only when relevant
帮助用户撰写论文时，优先自然对话而非连续提问：
  1. 简单开场: 提出一个问题了解用户情况
    • “你的论文主题是什么？”（主题/暂定标题）
    • 或“你目前处于哪个阶段？”（如果用户已有明确方向）
  2. 倾听并跟进: 根据用户回答提出下一个相关问题
    • 如果用户刚开始：询问目标发表渠道或研究空白
    • 如果用户在修订：询问哪个章节需要帮助
    • 如果用户遇到瓶颈：询问具体挑战
  3. 逐步构建上下文: 通过对话自然获取信息
  4. 提供针对性帮助: 聚焦用户当前需求，而非所有可能话题
  5. 保留作者风格: 编辑以提升质量，而非改写为不同风格
  6. 解释建议: 帮助用户理解修改为何能提升论文质量
  7. 按需使用参考资料: 仅在需要时使用参考文档提供深度指导

Using Reference Materials

参考资料使用

This skill includes detailed reference materials for deeper guidance:
  • Load 
    references/REFERENCE.md
     for comprehensive writing guidelines, style guides, and detailed best practices
  • Load 
    references/STRUCTURE.md
     for complete templates for different paper types (journal article, conference paper, thesis, etc.)
  • Load 
    references/STYLE.md
     for in-depth guidance on academic writing style, word choice, and clarity
  • Check 
    assets/
     for ready-to-use templates in various formats
Only load these materials when needed to conserve context. For most tasks, the guidance above is sufficient.
本技能包含详细参考资料以提供深度指导：
  • 加载 
    references/REFERENCE.md
     获取全面写作指南、风格指南与详细最佳实践
  • 加载 
    references/STRUCTURE.md
     获取不同类型论文（期刊文章、会议论文、学位论文等）的完整模板
  • 加载 
    references/STYLE.md
     获取学术写作风格、措辞与清晰度的深度指导
  • 查看 
    assets/
     获取多种格式的可直接使用模板
仅在需要时加载这些资料以节省上下文空间。大多数任务使用上述指导即可完成。

Progressive Enhancement

进阶使用

Basic use: Follow the Core Workflow for writing or revising papers
Intermediate use: Consult reference materials for specific sections or challenges
Advanced use: Use templates from assets/ and customize for specific venues
基础使用: 遵循核心工作流程撰写或修订论文
中级使用: 针对特定章节或挑战查阅参考资料
高级使用: 使用assets/中的模板并针对特定发表渠道定制

Quality Checklist

质量检查清单

Before considering a paper complete, verify:
  • Clear research question or contribution stated in introduction
  • All claims supported by evidence or citations
  • Logical flow from section to section
  • Methods sufficiently detailed for replication
  • Results presented objectively
  • Discussion interprets results and addresses limitations
  • All figures/tables referenced in text and have clear captions
  • Citations formatted consistently
  • Abstract accurately summarizes the paper
  • No typos or grammatical errors
  • Meets venue requirements (format, length, style)
在认为论文完成前，请验证以下内容：
  • 引言中清晰阐述研究问题或核心贡献
  • 所有论点均有证据或引用支持
  • 章节间逻辑连贯
  • 方法详细到可重复
  • 结果客观呈现
  • 讨论部分解读结果并说明局限性
  • 所有图表在正文中被引用且标题清晰
  • 引用格式统一
  • 摘要准确总结全文
  • 无拼写或语法错误
  • 符合发表渠道要求（格式、篇幅、风格）

Examples

示例

Example 1: Progressive discovery—starting fresh
User: Help me write a research paper.

Claude: What's your paper about? (topic, working title, or research question)

User: It's about federated learning for edge devices.

Claude: Got it—that's a focused topic. Are you at the stage of having completed
research and needing to write it up, or are you still planning the work?

User: I've done the research and have preliminary results. I just don't know
where to start.

Claude: Perfect—let me help you structure this. What's your target venue?
(e.g., a specific conference, journal, or is this a thesis chapter?)
Notice: One question asked, then the next, building naturally from their answers.
Example 2: Targeted revision (existing draft)
User: My introduction feels weak and I'm not sure why.

Claude: I'd like to take a look. Can you share what you have, or tell me
what the main challenge is? (e.g., doesn't grab attention, doesn't explain
why this work matters, etc.)

User: I think I'm not making the research gap clear enough. Here's what I wrote...

Claude: [Reads their draft]

Looking at your introduction, I see you've identified the problem nicely,
but you're right—the gap (what's missing in current solutions) isn't
explicit. Here's what I'd suggest...
Notice: Start with curiosity about their specific challenge, then provide targeted feedback on the actual content.
Example 3: Stuck in the middle
User: I have my methods section written, but I'm stuck on results.

Claude: What's tripping you up about the results section specifically?
(e.g., how to organize findings, whether to include raw data, interpretation
vs. presentation, etc.)

User: I have a lot of data. I don't know what to include and how to present it
so it's not overwhelming.

Claude: That's a common challenge. Let me help you think through data selection
and visualization...
Notice: Rather than lecturing about results sections in general, we drill down into their specific problem first.
示例1：逐步引导——从零开始
用户：帮我写一篇研究论文。

Claude：你的论文主题是什么？（主题/暂定标题）

用户：是关于边缘设备的联邦学习。

Claude：明白了，这个主题很聚焦。你是已经完成研究需要撰写，还是仍在规划阶段？

用户：我已经完成研究，有初步结果，只是不知道从哪里开始写。

Claude：太好了——我来帮你梳理结构。你的目标发表渠道是什么？（比如特定会议、期刊，还是学位论文章节？）
注意：先问一个问题，再根据回答提出下一个问题，自然构建上下文。
示例2：针对性修订（已有草稿）
用户：我的引言看起来很薄弱，但不知道为什么。

Claude：我想看看具体内容。你能分享一下你写的内容，或者告诉我主要问题是什么吗？（比如不够吸引人、没说明研究意义等）

用户：我觉得研究空白没有讲清楚。这是我写的内容...

Claude：[阅读草稿]

看了你的引言，我发现你很好地提出了问题，但确实——研究空白（现有解决方案的不足）没有明确指出。我的建议是...
注意：先好奇用户的具体挑战，再针对实际内容提供反馈。
示例3：写作瓶颈
用户：我已经写完方法部分，但卡在结果部分了。

Claude：你在结果部分具体遇到了什么问题？（比如如何组织发现、是否包含原始数据、解读 vs 呈现等）

用户：我有很多数据，不知道该包含哪些，以及如何呈现才不会显得杂乱。

Claude：这是常见挑战。我来帮你梳理数据选择与可视化的思路...
注意：不泛泛讲解结果部分，而是先深入了解用户的具体问题。

Tips for Success

成功技巧

Writing Process
  • Write regularly in focused sessions (2-3 hours)
  • Don't edit while drafting (separate creation from refinement)
  • Get feedback early and often
  • Read papers in your target venue for style/structure
Revision Strategy
  • Take breaks between revision passes
  • Read paper aloud to catch awkward phrasing
  • Get fresh eyes (colleagues, advisors)
  • Use revision checklist systematically
Time Management
  • Allocate 40% planning, 30% writing, 30% revision
  • Build in buffer time before deadlines
  • Start with rough drafts, refine iteratively
  • Don't aim for perfection in first draft
Remember: All good papers go through multiple revisions. Writing is rewriting.
写作流程
  • 定期进行专注写作（2-3小时）
  • 撰写时不要编辑（将创作与润色分开）
  • 尽早并经常获取反馈
  • 阅读目标发表渠道的论文以学习风格/结构
修订策略
  • 每次修订之间休息一下
  • 朗读论文以发现拗口的表述
  • 寻求他人的新鲜视角（同事、导师）
  • 系统使用修订检查清单
时间管理
  • 分配40%时间规划，30%时间写作，30%时间修订
  • 截止日期前预留缓冲时间
  • 先写草稿，再逐步完善
  • 第一稿不必追求完美
记住：所有优秀论文都经过多次修订。写作就是不断改写的过程。

Sources and Credits

来源与致谢

This skill is based on authoritative academic writing resources:
本技能基于权威学术写作资源：