sota-literature-review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseSOTA Literature Review
前沿(SOTA)文献综述
Build literature review artifacts that are reproducible, inspectable, and easy
to continue later.
构建可复现、可检查且便于后续跟进的文献综述成果。
Read First
必读内容
references/repository-contract.mdreferences/source-ledger.mdreferences/mcp-catalog.md
references/repository-contract.mdreferences/source-ledger.mdreferences/mcp-catalog.md
Search Strategy
检索策略
Create or update with:
sota/search-strategy.md- research question
- inclusion and exclusion criteria
- databases queried
- query strings
- date range
- filters
- screening decisions
- known blind spots
Prefer API-backed sources: arXiv, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed,
DBLP metadata, and Zotero. Use Google Scholar as a discovery fallback, not the
primary evidence layer.
创建或更新,内容需包含:
sota/search-strategy.md- 研究问题
- 纳入与排除标准
- 检索的数据库
- 检索字符串
- 时间范围
- 筛选条件
- 筛选决策
- 已知盲区
优先使用基于API的数据源:arXiv、Semantic Scholar、OpenAlex、Crossref、PubMed、DBLP元数据以及Zotero。将Google Scholar作为发现性备选方案,而非主要证据来源。
Literature Matrix
文献矩阵
Maintain with at least:
sota/literature-matrix.csv- source_id
- title
- authors
- year
- venue
- method
- dataset/sample
- task/problem
- key claim
- metric/result
- limitations
- relevance
- citation_count_or_signal
- identifiers
维护,至少包含以下字段:
sota/literature-matrix.csv- source_id(来源ID)
- title(标题)
- authors(作者)
- year(年份)
- venue(发表场所)
- method(方法)
- dataset/sample(数据集/样本)
- task/problem(任务/问题)
- key claim(核心论点)
- metric/result(指标/结果)
- limitations(局限性)
- relevance(相关性)
- citation_count_or_signal(引用量或信号值)
- identifiers(标识符)
Synthesis
综合分析
Write synthesis in , not only in chat. Separate:
sota/synthesis.md- established findings
- contested claims
- methodological families
- dataset or benchmark differences
- missing baselines
- open gaps
- implications for this project
在中撰写综合分析内容,而非仅在聊天中完成。需区分:
sota/synthesis.md- 已确立的研究发现
- 存在争议的论点
- 方法学类别
- 数据集或基准的差异
- 缺失的基线
- 研究空白
- 对本项目的启示
Quality Rules
质量规则
- No paper-by-paper laundry list unless the user explicitly asks for annotated bibliography.
- Claims need inline source IDs or wiki links.
- SOTA claims need date, benchmark, metric, and scope.
- Contradictions go to .
wiki/contradictions.md - Reusable findings should be linked from .
wiki/index.md
- 除非用户明确要求注释文献目录,否则不要采用逐篇罗列的方式。
- 论点需附带内嵌的来源ID或维基链接。
- 前沿(SOTA)论点需包含时间、基准、指标和范围。
- 矛盾内容需记录到中。
wiki/contradictions.md - 可复用的研究发现应从链接跳转。
wiki/index.md