startup-idea-validation
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseStartup Idea Validation
创业想法验证
Systematic validation for testing ideas before building: define hypotheses, collect evidence, score the opportunity, and make a decision you can defend.
在开发产品前对想法进行系统化验证:定义假设、收集证据、评估机会价值,并生成可辩护的决策。
Operating Principles (2026)
操作原则(2026)
- Prefer decisions over inventories: each dimension ends with and a next action.
GO / CONDITIONAL / PIVOT / NO-GO - Separate evidence quality from confidence: weak evidence cannot justify a high score.
- Pre-register thresholds and stop rules before running experiments (avoid moving goalposts).
- Validate willingness-to-pay and time-to-value early (price is part of the product).
- Calibrate thresholds to the target outcome (venture-scale vs cash-flow business) and business model (B2B SaaS, B2C, marketplace, services).
- Stay safe and ethical: no misrepresentation, respect ToS, and handle customer data with minimization and retention limits.
- 优先决策而非积累:每个维度最终都要给出结论及下一步行动。
GO / CONDITIONAL / PIVOT / NO-GO - 区分证据质量与信心:薄弱证据无法支撑高分。
- 在开展实验前预先设定阈值和停止规则(避免改变目标)。
- 尽早验证付费意愿和价值交付时间(价格是产品的一部分)。
- 根据目标成果(风险投资规模vs现金流业务)和商业模式(B2B SaaS、B2C、平台、服务)调整阈值。
- 保持安全与合规:不得虚假陈述,遵守服务条款,最小化客户数据处理并设置保留期限。
Intake Checklist (Ask First)
接收清单(先询问)
- One-sentence idea + target user + job-to-be-done
- Business model: B2B/B2C, SaaS/usage-based/marketplace/services, ACV/ARPU range
- Geography, constraints (regulated domain, procurement/security requirements, data access)
- Target outcome: venture-scale, profitable small business, or thesis-driven R&D
- Current evidence: interviews, pilots, pre-sales, traffic, competitor list, pricing assumptions
- 一句话描述的想法+目标用户+待完成任务
- 商业模式:B2B/B2C、SaaS/按使用付费/平台/服务,ACV/ARPU范围
- 地域、约束条件(受监管领域、采购/安全要求、数据访问权限)
- 目标成果:风险投资规模、盈利型小企业、或基于理论的研发
- 当前已有证据:访谈、试点、预售、流量、竞品列表、定价假设
Choose the Right Output
选择合适的输出
| If the user asks… | Produce… | Use… |
|---|---|---|
| “Validate this idea” / “Is this worth building?” | 9-dimension scorecard + verdict | validation-scorecard.md, go-no-go-decision.md |
| “What’s the riskiest assumption?” | RAT + test plan | riskiest-assumption-test.md, validation-experiment-planner.md |
| “Test my hypothesis” | Hypothesis canvas + experiment design | hypothesis-canvas.md, hypothesis-testing-guide.md |
| “Market size for X” | TAM/SAM/SOM sizing + assumptions table | market-sizing-worksheet.md, market-sizing-patterns.md |
| “Can this be profitable / what’s my runway?” | Unit economics + runway + scenarios | financial-modeling-calculator.md |
| “Should I build X or Y?” | Comparative scorecard + decision memo | validation-scorecard.md, go-no-go-decision.md |
| 如果用户问… | 生成… | 使用… |
|---|---|---|
| “验证这个想法” / “这个值得开发吗?” | 9维度评分卡 + 结论 | validation-scorecard.md, go-no-go-decision.md |
| “最具风险的假设是什么?” | RAT + 测试计划 | riskiest-assumption-test.md, validation-experiment-planner.md |
| “测试我的假设” | 假设画布 + 实验设计 | hypothesis-canvas.md, hypothesis-testing-guide.md |
| “X的市场规模是多少?” | TAM/SAM/SOM规模测算 + 假设表 | market-sizing-worksheet.md, market-sizing-patterns.md |
| “这个能盈利吗 / 我的现金流能撑多久?” | 单位经济效益 + 现金流周期 + 场景分析 | financial-modeling-calculator.md |
| “我应该开发X还是Y?” | 对比评分卡 + 决策备忘录 | validation-scorecard.md, go-no-go-decision.md |
Workflow
工作流程
- Clarify the target outcome and business model; set default thresholds accordingly.
- Identify the RAT (the assumption that kills the business if wrong).
- Plan the validation ladder: interviews -> smoke test -> concierge/WoZ -> paid pilot.
- Run the cheapest falsifiable test first; pre-register PASS/FAIL thresholds and stop rules.
- Score all 9 dimensions using evidence; downgrade scores when evidence is weak.
- Produce a decision memo: verdict, why, what would change the decision, and the next smallest reversible step.
- 明确目标成果和商业模式;据此设置默认阈值。
- 确定RAT(即如果错误会导致业务失败的假设)。
- 规划验证阶梯:访谈→烟雾测试→礼宾/WoZ模式→付费试点。
- 先开展成本最低的可证伪测试;预先注册通过/失败阈值和停止规则。
- 基于证据对所有9个维度评分;证据薄弱时降低分数。
- 生成决策备忘录:结论、理由、会改变决策的因素、以及最小的可逆下一步行动。
9-Dimension Scorecard
9维度评分卡
| Dimension | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Problem severity | 15% | Urgency, cost of inaction, current workarounds |
| Market size | 12% | Sufficient demand for the target outcome |
| Market timing | 10% | Clear “why now” and tailwinds |
| Competitive moat | 12% | Defensibility over time |
| Unit economics | 15% | Profit path (incl. payback and margins) |
| Founder-market fit | 8% | Access, expertise, and execution capability |
| Technical feasibility | 10% | Buildability, dependencies, constraints |
| GTM clarity | 10% | ICP, channels, motion, first customers |
| Risk profile | 8% | What can kill it and likelihood |
Verdict thresholds (default):
- : GO
80–100 - : CONDITIONAL (validate RAT first)
60–79 - : PIVOT
40–59 - : NO-GO
<40
Deep scoring rubrics and calibration live in validation-methodology.md.
| 维度 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 问题严重性 | 15% | 紧迫性、不作为的成本、当前的解决方案 |
| 市场规模 | 12% | 目标成果对应的需求充足性 |
| 市场时机 | 10% | 明确的“为什么是现在”和发展趋势 |
| 竞争护城河 | 12% | 长期防御能力 |
| 单位经济效益 | 15% | 盈利路径(包括回收期和利润率) |
| 创始人-市场匹配度 | 8% | 资源获取、专业能力和执行能力 |
| 技术可行性 | 10% | 可开发性、依赖项、约束条件 |
| 上市策略清晰度 | 10% | 理想客户画像、渠道、策略、首批客户 |
| 风险概况 | 8% | 可能导致失败的因素及其概率 |
结论阈值(默认):
- : GO
80–100 - : CONDITIONAL(先验证RAT)
60–79 - : PIVOT
40–59 - : NO-GO
<40
详细评分标准和校准规则见validation-methodology.md。
Evidence Rules
证据规则
- Strong evidence is behavioral commitment with cost (time, money, switching, access); weak evidence is opinions and hypotheticals.
- Triangulate important claims across at least two sources (especially market sizing and competitor state).
- Keep an evidence trail: link + capture month; separate “fact” vs “assumption”.
- 强证据是带有成本(时间、金钱、转换、权限)的行为承诺;弱证据是观点和假设。
- 重要结论至少通过两个来源交叉验证(尤其是市场规模和竞品状态)。
- 保留证据轨迹:链接 + 记录月份;区分“事实”与“假设”。
Validation Ladder (Default)
验证阶梯(默认)
| Step | Goal | Strong signal |
|---|---|---|
| Interviews | Validate the problem and context | Repeated pain with real workarounds and spend |
| Smoke test | Validate demand | Qualified conversion with price shown |
| Concierge/WoZ | Validate workflow value | Users complete the job and return |
| Paid pilot | Validate willingness-to-pay | Paid, renewed, or expanded |
| 步骤 | 目标 | 强信号 |
|---|---|---|
| 访谈 | 验证问题和背景 | 反复出现的痛点、真实的解决方案和相关支出 |
| 烟雾测试 | 验证需求 | 显示价格后的合格转化 |
| 礼宾/WoZ模式 | 验证流程价值 | 用户完成任务并再次使用 |
| 付费试点 | 验证付费意愿 | 付费、续费或扩展使用 |
AI / Automation Notes (2026)
AI/自动化说明(2026)
If the idea depends on AI (agents, copilots, automation), validate these explicitly:
- Data rights and access: can you legally and reliably access required data?
- Reliability: define success metrics, failure modes, and human fallback; validate on real workflows.
- Cost-to-serve: model inference + retrieval + human-in-the-loop costs in .
assets/financial-modeling-calculator.md
See hypothesis-testing-guide.md for AI-specific experiment patterns.
如果想法依赖AI(agents、copilots、自动化),需明确验证以下内容:
- 数据权限与获取:能否合法且可靠地获取所需数据?
- 可靠性:定义成功指标、失败模式和人工 fallback;在真实流程中验证。
- 服务成本:在中建模推理+检索+人工介入成本。
assets/financial-modeling-calculator.md
AI特定实验模式见hypothesis-testing-guide.md。
Integration Points
集成点
Receives From
接收自
- startup-review-mining - Pain point evidence
- startup-trend-prediction - Market timing inputs
- startup-competitive-analysis - Competitor landscape
- startup-review-mining - 痛点证据
- startup-trend-prediction - 市场时机输入
- startup-competitive-analysis - 竞品格局
Feeds Into
输出至
- router-startup - Startup decision routing
- product-management - Validated requirements and roadmap inputs
- startup-business-models - Monetization and packaging decisions
- router-startup - 创业决策路由
- product-management - 经过验证的需求和路线图输入
- startup-business-models - 变现和包装决策
Resources
资源
| Resource | Purpose |
|---|---|
| validation-methodology.md | Scoring rubrics and calibration |
| hypothesis-testing-guide.md | Experiment design and RAT workflows |
| market-sizing-patterns.md | TAM/SAM/SOM methods and pitfalls |
| moat-assessment-framework.md | Defensibility analysis |
| 资源 | 用途 |
|---|---|
| validation-methodology.md | 评分标准和校准 |
| hypothesis-testing-guide.md | 实验设计和RAT工作流程 |
| market-sizing-patterns.md | TAM/SAM/SOM方法和注意事项 |
| moat-assessment-framework.md | 防御能力分析 |
Templates
模板
| Template | Purpose |
|---|---|
| validation-scorecard.md | Full 9-dimension scoring |
| go-no-go-decision.md | Decision memo format |
| hypothesis-canvas.md | Hypothesis definition |
| validation-experiment-planner.md | Experiment planning + thresholds |
| riskiest-assumption-test.md | RAT identification and test design |
| market-sizing-worksheet.md | Sizing worksheet |
| financial-modeling-calculator.md | Runway + scenarios + unit economics |
| 模板 | 用途 |
|---|---|
| validation-scorecard.md | 完整9维度评分 |
| go-no-go-decision.md | 决策备忘录格式 |
| hypothesis-canvas.md | 假设定义 |
| validation-experiment-planner.md | 实验规划 + 阈值 |
| riskiest-assumption-test.md | RAT识别和测试设计 |
| market-sizing-worksheet.md | 规模测算工作表 |
| financial-modeling-calculator.md | 现金流周期 + 场景分析 + 单位经济效益 |
Data
数据
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| sources.json | Curated validation resources |
| 文件 | 用途 |
|---|---|
| sources.json | 精选验证资源 |