product-management

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Product Management (Jan 2026)

产品管理(2026年1月)

This skill turns the assistant into an operator, not a lecturer.
Everything here is:
  • Executable: templates, checklists, decision flows
  • Decision-first: measurable outcomes, explicit trade-offs, clear ownership
  • Organized: resources for depth; templates for immediate copy-paste

Modern Best Practices (Jan 2026):
  • Evidence quality beats confidence: label signals strong/medium/weak; write what would change your mind.
  • Outcomes > output: roadmaps are bets with measurable impact and guardrails, not feature inventories.
  • Metrics must be defined (formula + timeframe + data source) to be actionable.
  • Privacy, security, and accessibility are requirements, not afterthoughts.
  • Hybrid decision loops: AI surfaces anomalies, patterns, and forecasts; humans apply context, ethics, and long-term strategy.
  • Accountability: product is often held responsible for business outcomes; confirm the operating model in your org and validate benchmarks with current sources.
  • Portfolio diversification: a common heuristic is 70% core, 20% adjacent, 10% transformational; adapt to strategy and constraints.
该技能可将助手转变为实操执行者,而非讲师。
这里的所有内容均具备以下特点:
  • 可落地执行:模板、清单、决策流程
  • 决策导向:可衡量的成果、明确的取舍、清晰的责任人
  • 结构清晰:深度资源参考;可直接复制粘贴使用的模板

2026年1月现代最佳实践:
  • 证据质量胜于主观信心:标记信号为强/中/弱;记录会改变你决策的因素。
  • 成果优先于产出:路线图是带有可衡量影响和约束条件的赌注,而非功能清单。
  • 指标必须明确定义(公式+时间范围+数据源)才能具备可操作性。
  • 隐私、安全和可访问性是必备要求,而非事后补充项。
  • 混合决策循环:AI识别异常、模式和预测;人类结合上下文、伦理和长期战略做决策。
  • 问责制:产品团队通常需要为业务成果负责;确认你所在组织的运作模式,并通过当前数据源验证基准。
  • 产品组合多元化:常见的启发式比例为70%核心业务、20%相邻业务、10%转型业务;可根据战略和约束条件调整。

When to Use This Skill

何时使用该技能

Use this skill when the user asks to do real product work, such as:
  • “Create / refine a PRD / spec / business case / 1-pager”
  • “Turn this idea into a roadmap” / “Outcome roadmap for X”
  • “Design a discovery plan / interview script / experiment plan”
  • “Define success metrics / OKRs / metric tree”
  • “Position this product against competitors”
  • “Run a difficult conversation / feedback / 1:1 / negotiation”
  • “Plan a product strategy / vision / opportunity assessment”
Do not use this skill for:
  • Book summaries, philosophy, or general education
  • Long case studies or storytelling

当用户需要完成实际产品工作时使用该技能,例如:
  • “创建/完善PRD/规格文档/商业案例/单页摘要”
  • “将这个想法转化为路线图” / “针对X的成果导向路线图”
  • “设计发现计划/访谈脚本/实验计划”
  • “定义成功指标/OKR/指标树”
  • “针对竞争对手定位该产品”
  • “开展困难对话/反馈/一对一沟通/谈判”
  • “规划产品战略/愿景/机会评估”
以下情况请勿使用该技能:
  • 书籍摘要、哲学探讨或通识教育
  • 长篇案例研究或故事讲述

Quick Reference

快速参考

TaskTemplateDomainOutput
Discovery interview
customer-interview-template.md
DiscoveryInterview script with Mom Test patterns
Opportunity mapping
opportunity-solution-tree.md
DiscoveryOST with outcomes, problems, solutions
Outcome roadmap
outcome-roadmap.md
RoadmapNow/Next/Later with outcomes and themes
OKR definition
okr-template.md
Metrics1-3 objectives with 2-4 key results each
Product positioning
positioning-template.md
StrategyCompetitive alternatives -> value -> segment
Product vision
product-vision-template.md
StrategyFrom→To narrative with 3-5 year horizon
1:1 meeting
1-1-template.md
LeadershipCheck-in, progress, blockers, growth
Post-incident debrief
a3-debrief.md
LeadershipIntent vs actual, root cause, action items

任务模板领域输出
用户发现访谈
customer-interview-template.md
发现包含Mom Test模式的访谈脚本
机会映射
opportunity-solution-tree.md
发现包含成果、问题、解决方案的OST
成果导向路线图
outcome-roadmap.md
路线图包含成果和主题的“现在/下一步/未来”路线图
OKR定义
okr-template.md
指标1-3个目标,每个目标对应2-4个关键结果
产品定位
positioning-template.md
战略竞品替代方案→价值主张→目标细分群体
产品愿景
product-vision-template.md
战略包含3-5年时间跨度的“从→到”叙事
一对一会议
1-1-template.md
领导力进度跟进、工作进展、障碍排查、个人成长
事后复盘
a3-debrief.md
领导力预期与实际对比、根本原因、行动项

Decision Tree: Choosing the Right Workflow

决策树:选择合适的工作流程

text
User needs: [Product Work Type]
    ├─ Discovery / Validation?
    │   ├─ Customer insights? → Customer interview template
    │   ├─ Hypothesis testing? → Assumption test template
    │   └─ Opportunity mapping? → Opportunity Solution Tree
    ├─ Strategy / Vision?
    │   ├─ Long-term direction? → Product vision template
    │   ├─ Market positioning? → Positioning template (Dunford)
    │   ├─ Big opportunity? → Opportunity assessment
    │   └─ Amazon-style spec? → PR/FAQ template
    ├─ Planning / Roadmap?
    │   ├─ Outcome-driven? → Outcome roadmap (Now/Next/Later)
    │   ├─ Theme-based? → Theme roadmap
    │   └─ Metrics / OKRs? → Metric tree + OKR template
    └─ Leadership / Team Ops?
        ├─ 1:1 meeting? → 1-1 template
        ├─ Giving feedback? → Feedback template (SBI model)
        ├─ Post-incident? → A3 debrief
        └─ Negotiation? → Negotiation one-sheet (Voss)

text
用户需求:[产品工作类型]
    ├─ 发现/验证?
    │   ├─ 客户洞察? → 客户访谈模板
    │   ├─ 假设测试? → 假设验证模板
    │   └─ 机会映射? → 机会解决方案树(OST)
    ├─ 战略/愿景?
    │   ├─ 长期方向? → 产品愿景模板
    │   ├─ 市场定位? → 定位模板(Dunford模型)
    │   ├─ 重大机会? → 机会评估
    │   └─ 亚马逊风格规格? → PR/FAQ模板
    ├─ 规划/路线图?
    │   ├─ 成果驱动型? → 成果导向路线图(现在/下一步/未来)
    │   ├─ 主题型? → 主题路线图
    │   └─ 指标/OKR? → 指标树 + OKR模板
    └─ 领导力/团队运营?
        ├─ 一对一会议? → 1对1模板
        ├─ 反馈沟通? → 反馈模板(SBI模型)
        ├─ 事后复盘? → A3复盘模板
        └─ 谈判? → 谈判单页(Voss模型)

Do / Avoid (Jan 2026)

应做/不应做(2026年1月)

Do

应做

  • Start from the decision: what are we deciding, by when, and with what evidence.
  • Define metrics precisely (formula + timeframe + data source) and add guardrails.
  • Use discovery to de-risk value before building; prioritize by evidence, not opinions.
  • Write “match vs ignore” competitive decisions, not feature grids.
  • 从决策出发:我们要做什么决策、截止时间、依据什么证据。
  • 精确定义指标(公式+时间范围+数据源)并添加约束条件。
  • 在开发前通过发现环节降低价值风险;根据证据优先级排序,而非主观意见。
  • 记录“匹配/忽略”竞品的决策,而非功能对比表格。

Avoid

不应做

  • Roadmap theater (shipping lists) without outcomes and learning loops.
  • Vanity KPIs (raw signups, impressions) without activation/retention definitions.
  • “Build-first validation” (shipping MVPs without falsifiable hypotheses).
  • Collecting customer data without purpose limitation, retention, and access controls.
  • 无成果和学习循环的“路线图表演”(仅罗列待发布功能)。
  • 虚荣指标(原始注册量、曝光量),未定义激活/留存标准。
  • “先开发后验证”(发布MVP但无可证伪假设)。
  • 无目的限制、留存规则和访问控制地收集客户数据。

What Good Looks Like

优秀标准

  • Evidence: 5–10 real user touchpoints or equivalent primary data for material bets.
  • Scope: clear non-goals and acceptance criteria that can be tested.
  • Learning: post-launch review with metric deltas, guardrail impact, and next decision.
  • 证据:重大决策需具备5-10次真实用户接触或等效的一手数据。
  • 范围:明确的非目标和可测试的验收标准。
  • 学习:发布后复盘需包含指标变化、约束影响和后续决策。

PRDs and Specs

PRD与规格文档

For PRDs/specs and writing-quality requirements, use the templates in
../docs-ai-prd/
:
  • PRD templates: ../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/prd-template.md and ../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/ai-prd-template.md
如需PRD/规格文档及高质量写作要求,请使用
../docs-ai-prd/
中的模板:
  • PRD模板:../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/prd-template.md../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/ai-prd-template.md

Optional: AI / Automation

可选:AI/自动化

Use only when explicitly requested and policy-compliant.
  • AI system lifecycle: assets/ai/ai-lifecycle-template.md
  • Agentic workflow docs: assets/ai/agentic-ai-orchestration.md
  • AI product patterns: references/ai-product-patterns.md
仅在明确请求且符合政策时使用。
  • AI系统生命周期:assets/ai/ai-lifecycle-template.md
  • 智能代理工作流文档:assets/ai/agentic-ai-orchestration.md
  • AI产品模式:references/ai-product-patterns.md

Navigation

导航

Resources
  • references/discovery-best-practices.md
  • references/roadmap-patterns.md
  • references/delivery-best-practices.md
  • references/strategy-patterns.md
  • references/positioning-patterns.md
  • references/data-product-best-practices.md
  • references/interviewing-patterns.md
  • references/metrics-best-practices.md
  • references/leadership-decision-frameworks.md
  • references/operational-guide.md
  • data/sources.json
Templates
  • Discovery: assets/discovery/customer-interview-template.md, assets/discovery/assumption-test-template.md, assets/discovery/opportunity-solution-tree.md
  • Strategy/Vision: assets/strategy/product-vision-template.md, assets/strategy/opportunity-assessment.md, assets/strategy/positioning-template.md, assets/strategy/PRFAQ-template.md
  • Data: assets/data/data-product-canvas.md
  • Roadmaps: assets/roadmap/outcome-roadmap.md, assets/roadmap/theme-roadmap.md
  • Metrics: assets/metrics/metric-tree.md, assets/metrics/okr-template.md
  • Ops/Leadership: assets/ops/1-1-template.md, assets/ops/feedback-template.md, assets/ops/a3-debrief.md, assets/ops/negotiation-one-sheet.md
Related Skills
  • ../docs-ai-prd/SKILL.md — PRD, stories, and prompt/playbook templates
  • ../software-architecture-design/SKILL.md — System design guidance for specs and PRDs
  • ../software-frontend/SKILL.md — UI implementation considerations for product specs
  • ../software-backend/SKILL.md — Backend/API implications of product decisions

资源
  • references/discovery-best-practices.md
  • references/roadmap-patterns.md
  • references/delivery-best-practices.md
  • references/strategy-patterns.md
  • references/positioning-patterns.md
  • references/data-product-best-practices.md
  • references/interviewing-patterns.md
  • references/metrics-best-practices.md
  • references/leadership-decision-frameworks.md
  • references/operational-guide.md
  • data/sources.json
模板
  • 发现:assets/discovery/customer-interview-template.md, assets/discovery/assumption-test-template.md, assets/discovery/opportunity-solution-tree.md
  • 战略/愿景:assets/strategy/product-vision-template.md, assets/strategy/opportunity-assessment.md, assets/strategy/positioning-template.md, assets/strategy/PRFAQ-template.md
  • 数据:assets/data/data-product-canvas.md
  • 路线图:assets/roadmap/outcome-roadmap.md, assets/roadmap/theme-roadmap.md
  • 指标:assets/metrics/metric-tree.md, assets/metrics/okr-template.md
  • 运营/领导力:assets/ops/1-1-template.md, assets/ops/feedback-template.md, assets/ops/a3-debrief.md, assets/ops/negotiation-one-sheet.md
相关技能
  • ../docs-ai-prd/SKILL.md — PRD、用户故事及提示词/剧本模板
  • ../software-architecture-design/SKILL.md — 规格文档和PRD的系统设计指导
  • ../software-frontend/SKILL.md — 产品规格的UI实现考量
  • ../software-backend/SKILL.md — 产品决策对后端/API的影响

Operational Guide

实操指南

See references/operational-guide.md for detailed patterns, template walkthroughs, example flows, and execution checklists. Keep SKILL.md as the navigation hub; use assets/ when producing artifacts.

如需详细模式、模板演练、示例流程和执行清单,请查看references/operational-guide.md。请将SKILL.md作为导航枢纽;在生成交付物时使用assets/下的内容。

External Resources

外部资源

See data/sources.json for official frameworks (Lean Startup, OST, PR/FAQ, OKRs) and AI/LLM safety references.

Use the quick reference and decision tree above to choose a template, then follow the operational guide for depth.

如需官方框架(精益创业、OST、PR/FAQ、OKRs)及AI/LLM安全参考,请查看data/sources.json

使用上述快速参考和决策树选择合适的模板,然后参考实操指南获取详细内容。

Trend Awareness Protocol

趋势感知协议

IMPORTANT: When users ask recommendation questions about product management tools, frameworks, or practices, use a web search tool to check current trends before answering. If web search is unavailable, use
data/sources.json
and state clearly what you verified vs assumed.
重要提示:当用户询问产品管理工具、框架或实践的推荐时,请先使用网络搜索工具查看当前趋势再作答。若无法进行网络搜索,请使用
data/sources.json
中的内容,并明确说明哪些内容是已验证的、哪些是假设的。

Trigger Conditions

触发条件

  • "What's the best tool for [roadmapping/product analytics/discovery]?"
  • "What should I use for [OKRs/metrics/customer feedback]?"
  • "What's the latest in product management?"
  • "Current best practices for [discovery/roadmaps/prioritization]?"
  • "Is [framework/tool] still relevant in 2026?"
  • "[Linear] vs [Jira] vs [other]?" or "[Amplitude] vs [Mixpanel]?"
  • "Best approach for [AI product management/agentic products]?"
  • “[路线图/产品分析/发现]的最佳工具是什么?”
  • “[OKRs/指标/客户反馈]应该用什么工具?”
  • “产品管理的最新趋势是什么?”
  • “[发现/路线图/优先级排序]的当前最佳实践是什么?”
  • “[框架/工具]在2026年还适用吗?”
  • “[Linear] vs [Jira] vs [其他工具]?” 或 “[Amplitude] vs [Mixpanel]?”
  • “[AI产品管理/智能代理产品]的最佳方法是什么?”

Required Searches

必做搜索

  1. Search:
    "product management best practices 2026"
  2. Search:
    "[specific tool] vs alternatives 2026"
  3. Search:
    "product management trends January 2026"
  4. Search:
    "[discovery/roadmap/OKR] frameworks 2026"
  1. 搜索:
    "product management best practices 2026"
  2. 搜索:
    "[特定工具] vs alternatives 2026"
  3. 搜索:
    "product management trends January 2026"
  4. 搜索:
    "[discovery/roadmap/OKR] frameworks 2026"

What to Report

需汇报内容

After searching, provide:
  • Current landscape: What PM tools/frameworks are popular NOW
  • Emerging trends: New tools, methods, or patterns gaining traction
  • Deprecated/declining: Frameworks/tools losing relevance
  • Recommendation: Based on fresh data, not just static knowledge
搜索完成后,提供以下信息:
  • 当前格局:目前流行的PM工具/框架有哪些
  • 新兴趋势:正在兴起的新工具、方法或模式
  • 已淘汰/衰退:正在失去相关性的框架/工具
  • 推荐建议:基于最新数据,而非仅依赖静态知识

Example Topics (verify with fresh search)

示例主题(需通过最新搜索验证)

  • Product management tools (Linear, Productboard, Notion, Coda)
  • Analytics platforms (Amplitude, Mixpanel, PostHog)
  • Discovery and research tools (Maze, UserTesting, Dovetail)
  • Roadmapping approaches (outcome-based, theme-based, now/next/later)
  • AI product management patterns
  • Prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, opportunity scoring)
  • OKR and metrics tools
  • 产品管理工具(Linear, Productboard, Notion, Coda)
  • 分析平台(Amplitude, Mixpanel, PostHog)
  • 发现与研究工具(Maze, UserTesting, Dovetail)
  • 路线图方法(成果导向、主题导向、现在/下一步/未来)
  • AI产品管理模式
  • 优先级排序框架(RICE, ICE,机会评分)
  • OKR和指标工具",