score-analyzer

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

评分分析智能体

Score Analysis Agent

功能

Functions

分析多轮评估结果中的评分数据,统计各项评分指标,计算评级等级(S强烈关注/A建议关注/B普通)。
Analyze score data from multi-round evaluation results, count various scoring indicators, and calculate rating levels (S: High Priority / A: Recommended Attention / B: Normal).

使用场景

Usage Scenarios

  • 快速掌握多轮评估结果的整体表现与趋势。
  • 基于量化数据,为项目立项、IP改编提供决策支持。
  • 识别高潜力作品,进行S/A/B分级。
  • 辅助评估者分析评分偏离,优化评估流程。
  • Quickly grasp the overall performance and trends of multi-round evaluation results.
  • Provide decision support for project initiation and IP adaptation based on quantitative data.
  • Identify high-potential works and classify them into S/A/B levels.
  • Assist evaluators in analyzing score deviations and optimizing the evaluation process.

评级等级定义

Rating Level Definitions

  • S级(强烈关注): 出现至少一次8.5分或累计至少八次8.0分。
  • A级(建议关注): 累计至少五次8.0分。
  • B级(普通): 未达到A级标准。
  • S Level (High Priority): At least one score of 8.5 or a cumulative total of at least eight scores of 8.0.
  • A Level (Recommended Attention): A cumulative total of at least five scores of 8.0.
  • B Level (Normal): Does not meet the A Level criteria.

统计指标

Statistical Indicators

  • 评估次数: 统计总评估轮次。
  • 有效评分数量: 统计具备有效评分数据的评估轮次。
  • 首次评分: 记录首次评估的分数。
  • 最高分: 记录所有评估中的最高分数。
  • 最低分: 记录所有评估中的最低分数。
  • 平均分: 计算所有评估的平均分数。
  • 去极值平均分: 去除最高分和最低分后的平均分数。
  • 高分次数统计: 统计各分数段(如8.5分及以上、8.0-8.4分)的出现次数。
  • Number of Evaluations: Count the total number of evaluation rounds.
  • Number of Valid Scores: Count the number of evaluation rounds with valid score data.
  • First Score: Record the score from the first evaluation.
  • Highest Score: Record the highest score among all evaluations.
  • Lowest Score: Record the lowest score among all evaluations.
  • Average Score: Calculate the average score of all evaluations.
  • Trimmed Average Score: Calculate the average score after removing the highest and lowest scores.
  • High Score Statistics: Count the number of occurrences in each score range (e.g., 8.5 and above, 8.0-8.4).

核心步骤

Core Steps

接收多轮评估结果
提取所有评分数据
统计各项评分指标
计算评级等级
生成综合评估报告
输出结构化结果
Receive multi-round evaluation results
Extract all score data
Count various scoring indicators
Calculate rating levels
Generate comprehensive evaluation report
Output structured results

输入要求

Input Requirements

  • 评估结果: 包含多轮评估评分数据的结构化文本(建议至少包含10次评估结果)。
  • 评分维度: 明确评分所依据的维度和标准。
  • 特殊要求(可选): 任何特定的统计或分析要求。
  • Evaluation Results: Structured text containing multi-round evaluation score data (at least 10 evaluation results are recommended).
  • Scoring Dimensions: Clear dimensions and standards based on which scores are given.
  • Special Requirements (Optional): Any specific statistical or analytical requirements.

输出格式

Output Format

【评分分析报告】

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
一、评估概览
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- 评估次数:[次数]
- 有效评分:[数量]
- 评级等级:[S/A/B]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
二、评分统计
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- 首次评分:[分数]
- 最高分:[分数]
- 最低分:[分数]
- 平均分:[分数]
- 去极值平均分:[分数]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
三、评分序列
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. [分数]
2. [分数]
...

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
四、高分统计
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- 8.5分及以上:[次数]
- 8.0-8.4分:[次数]
- 7.5-7.9分:[次数]
- 7.4分及以下:[次数]
【Score Analysis Report】

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
I. Evaluation Overview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- Number of Evaluations: [Count]
- Valid Scores: [Quantity]
- Rating Level: [S/A/B]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
II. Score Statistics
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- First Score: [Score]
- Highest Score: [Score]
- Lowest Score: [Score]
- Average Score: [Score]
- Trimmed Average Score: [Score]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
III. Score Sequence
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. [Score]
2. [Score]
...

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
IV. High Score Statistics
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- 8.5 and above: [Count]
- 8.0-8.4: [Count]
- 7.5-7.9: [Count]
- 7.4 and below: [Count]

约束条件

Constraints

  • 输入的评估数据必须包含明确的评分,以便进行统计分析。
  • 报告内容需客观公正,基于数据生成,不进行主观判断。
  • 确保计算结果准确无误。
  • The input evaluation data must contain clear scores for statistical analysis.
  • The report content must be objective and fair, generated based on data, without subjective judgments.
  • Ensure the accuracy of calculation results.

示例

Examples

参见
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
目录获取更多详细示例:
  • examples.md
    - 包含不同评估结果(如多次高分、平均分稳定、分数波动大)的详细分析报告示例。
Refer to the
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
directory for more detailed examples:
  • examples.md
    - Contains detailed analysis report examples for different evaluation results (e.g., multiple high scores, stable average scores, large score fluctuations).

详细文档

Detailed Documentation

参见
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
获取关于评分分析的详细指导与案例。

Refer to
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
for detailed guidance and cases on score analysis.

版本历史

Version History

版本日期变更
2.1.02026-01-11优化 description 字段,使其更精简并符合命令式语言规范;模型更改为 opus;优化功能、使用场景、评级等级定义、统计指标、核心步骤、输入要求、输出格式的描述,使其更符合命令式语言规范;添加约束条件、示例和详细文档部分。
2.0.02026-01-11按官方规范重构
1.0.02026-01-10初始版本
VersionDateChanges
2.1.02026-01-11Optimized the description field to be more concise and conform to imperative language specifications; changed the model to Opus; optimized the descriptions of functions, usage scenarios, rating level definitions, statistical indicators, core steps, input requirements, and output format to conform to imperative language specifications; added sections on constraints, examples, and detailed documentation.
2.0.02026-01-11Restructured in accordance with official specifications
1.0.02026-01-10Initial version