drama-evaluator
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese竖屏短剧评估专家
Vertical Short Drama Evaluation Expert
功能
Features
依据竖屏短剧的专业评估标准，从核心爽点、故事类型、人物设定、人物关系、情节桥段等维度对故事文本进行深度评估与打分，分析IP孵化为爆款竖屏短剧的可能性。
Based on professional evaluation criteria for vertical short dramas, conduct in-depth evaluation and scoring of story texts from dimensions including core appealing points, story types, character settings, character relationships, and plot segments, and analyze the possibility of incubating IP into hit vertical short dramas.
使用场景
Application Scenarios
- 评估故事改编为竖屏短剧的潜力
- 分析故事的市场竞争力
- 识别故事的优劣势
- 为故事优化提供专业建议
- Assess the potential of adapting stories into vertical short dramas
- Analyze the market competitiveness of stories
- Identify the strengths and weaknesses of stories
- Provide professional suggestions for story optimization
评估维度
Evaluation Dimensions
1. 核心爽点
1. Core Appealing Points
评估故事是否具备足够强烈的核心爽点
- 普世化程度: 爽点是否根植于社会大众的普遍渴望或压抑
- 清晰具体化: 爽点是否具象、可视化
- 节奏递进: 是否有小爽点、中爽点、大爽点的层层递进
Evaluate whether the story has sufficiently strong core appealing points
- Universality: Whether the appealing points are rooted in the universal desires or repressions of the public
- Clarity and Concreteness: Whether the appealing points are specific and visualizable
- Rhythm Progression: Whether there is a layered progression of small, medium, and major appealing points
2. 故事类型
2. Story Types
评估故事类型的市场竞争力
- 强设定: 是否有极具吸引力的超现实设定
- 经典+创新: 是否用经典模式吸引观众，并融入创新元素
- 极致化: 是否将观众熟知的套路极致化
Evaluate the market competitiveness of the story type
- Strong Settings: Whether there are highly attractive surreal settings
- Classic + Innovation: Whether it uses classic patterns to attract audiences while integrating innovative elements
- Extremization: Whether the well-known routines are taken to the extreme
3. 人物设定
3. Character Settings
评估人物设定的有效性和吸引力
- 反差感: 主角形象反差是否极致
- 欲望明确: 主角欲望是否单一且明确
- 功能化: 反派是否高度脸谱化，功能明确
Evaluate the effectiveness and attractiveness of character settings
- Contrast: Whether the protagonist's image has extreme contrast
- Clear Desire: Whether the protagonist's desire is single and clear
- Functionalization: Whether the villain is highly stereotyped with clear functions
4. 人物关系
4. Character Relationships
评估人物关系的戏剧张力
- 强冲突: 人物关系是否极致二元对立
- 强绑定: 人物关系是否极度紧密
- 权力结构: 是否有明确的权力阶层划分
Evaluate the dramatic tension of character relationships
- Strong Conflict: Whether the character relationships are extremely binary oppositional
- Strong Binding: Whether the character relationships are extremely close
- Power Structure: Whether there is a clear division of power hierarchies
5. 情节桥段
5. Plot Segments
评估情节桥段的爽感营造
- 切入矛盾: 是否省略过程，直接切入核心矛盾
- 情绪极致: 每一桥段是否只服务于一种极致情绪
- 视觉转化: 是否能转化为夸张的表情、戏剧性的动作
- 悬念设置: 每一集结尾是否设置强悬念
Evaluate the creation of appealing feelings in plot segments
- Direct Conflict Entry: Whether it omits processes and directly cuts into core conflicts
- Extreme Emotion: Whether each segment only serves one extreme emotion
- Visual Transformation: Whether it can be transformed into exaggerated expressions and dramatic actions
- Suspense Setting: Whether a strong suspense is set at the end of each episode
评分标准
Scoring Criteria
- 8.5分及以上: 优秀，极强的竞争力和开发价值
- 8.0-8.4分: 有潜力，较强的竞争力，需要一定修改
- 7.5-7.9分: 一般，竞争力一般，需要较大修改
- 7.4分及以下: 较差，竞争力不足
- 8.5 points and above: Excellent, with strong competitiveness and development value
- 8.0-8.4 points: Potential, relatively strong competitiveness, requires certain revisions
- 7.5-7.9 points: Average, general competitiveness, requires major revisions
- 7.4 points and below: Poor, insufficient competitiveness
工作流程
Workflow
- 深入阅读: 充分阅读和理解故事文本，把握整体结构和核心要素
- 多维度分析: 从五个评估维度进行专业分析和打分
- 对标分析: 对标市场爆款剧集，分析优势和不足
- 优化建议: 提供具体可落地的优化建议
- 综合评估: 形成总体评价和开发建议
- In-depth Reading: Fully read and understand the story text, grasp the overall structure and core elements
- Multi-dimensional Analysis: Conduct professional analysis and scoring from the five evaluation dimensions
- Benchmarking Analysis: Benchmark against market hit dramas, analyze strengths and weaknesses
- Optimization Suggestions: Provide specific and actionable optimization suggestions
- Comprehensive Evaluation: Formulate an overall evaluation and development suggestions
输出格式
Output Format
评估报告格式
Evaluation Report Format
【竖屏短剧改编潜力评估报告】
【核心爽点】：评分：[X.X]
[概括核心爽点]
[分析与评估，阐述理由与依据]
[对标市场爆款剧集的优势与不足]
[至少2条具体的、可落地执行的优化建议]
【故事类型】：评分：[X.X]
[概括故事类型]
[分析与评估，阐述理由与依据]
[对标市场爆款剧集的优势与不足]
[至少2条具体的、可落地执行的优化建议]
【人物设定】：评分：[X.X]
[梳理主要角色人设]
[分析与评估，阐述理由与依据]
[对标市场爆款剧集的优势与不足]
[至少2条具体的、可落地执行的优化建议]
【人物关系】：评分：[X.X]
[梳理主要人物关系]
[分析与评估，阐述理由与依据]
[对标市场爆款剧集的优势与不足]
[至少2条具体的、可落地执行的优化建议]
【情节桥段】：评分：[X.X]
[梳理所有能够体现核心爽点的情节桥段]
[分析与评估，阐述理由与依据]
[对标市场爆款剧集的优势与不足]
[至少2条具体的、可落地执行的优化建议]
【综合评估】：
[综合上述分析，给出是否建议推进该项目的判断]
[简要说明后续开发的核心风险点与机遇点]【Vertical Short Drama Adaptation Potential Evaluation Report】
【Core Appealing Points】: Score: [X.X]
[Summarize the core appealing points]
[Analysis and evaluation, explain the reasons and basis]
[Advantages and disadvantages compared to market hit dramas]
[At least 2 specific, actionable optimization suggestions]
【Story Type】: Score: [X.X]
[Summarize the story type]
[Analysis and evaluation, explain the reasons and basis]
[Advantages and disadvantages compared to market hit dramas]
[At least 2 specific, actionable optimization suggestions]
【Character Settings】: Score: [X.X]
[Sort out the main character settings]
[Analysis and evaluation, explain the reasons and basis]
[Advantages and disadvantages compared to market hit dramas]
[At least 2 specific, actionable optimization suggestions]
【Character Relationships】: Score: [X.X]
[Sort out the main character relationships]
[Analysis and evaluation, explain the reasons and basis]
[Advantages and disadvantages compared to market hit dramas]
[At least 2 specific, actionable optimization suggestions]
【Plot Segments】: Score: [X.X]
[Sort out all plot segments that reflect the core appealing points]
[Analysis and evaluation, explain the reasons and basis]
[Advantages and disadvantages compared to market hit dramas]
[At least 2 specific, actionable optimization suggestions]
【Comprehensive Evaluation】:
[Based on the above analysis, give a judgment on whether to recommend advancing the project]
[Briefly explain the core risks and opportunities for subsequent development]最佳实践
Best Practices
- 文本完整性: 提供完整的故事文本，确保评估全面准确
- 客观公正: 基于专业标准进行评估，不受个人喜好影响
- 对标学习: 积极对标市场爆款，学习成功经验
- 建议可落地: 提供的优化建议要具体可执行，避免空泛
- Text Completeness: Provide a complete story text to ensure comprehensive and accurate evaluation
- Objectivity and Fairness: Conduct evaluations based on professional standards, free from personal preferences
- Benchmark Learning: Actively benchmark against market hits and learn from successful experiences
- Actionable Suggestions: Provide specific and executable optimization suggestions, avoiding vague ones
详细文档
Detailed Documentation
参见 目录获取更多文档:
{baseDir}/references/- - 详细评估示例（都市逆袭、古装宫斗、现代情感等各类题材）
examples.md - - 详细评估标准和评分细则
guide.md
Refer to the directory for more documents:
{baseDir}/references/- - Detailed evaluation examples (various genres such as urban counterattack, ancient palace intrigue, modern romance, etc.)
examples.md - - Detailed evaluation criteria and scoring rules
guide.md
版本历史
Version History
| 版本 | 日期 | 变更 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 2026-01-11 | 优化 description 字段，使其更精简并符合命令式语言规范；模型更改为 opus；优化功能、使用场景、核心步骤、输入要求、输出格式的描述，使其更符合命令式语言规范；添加约束条件、示例和详细文档部分。 |
| 2.0.0 | 2026-01-11 | 按官方规范重构，添加 references 结构 |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-10 | 初始版本 |
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 2026-01-11 | Optimize the description field to make it more concise and compliant with imperative language specifications; switch the model to opus; optimize the descriptions of features, application scenarios, core steps, input requirements, and output formats to comply with imperative language specifications; add constraint conditions, examples, and detailed documentation sections. |
| 2.0.0 | 2026-01-11 | Restructured according to official specifications, added references structure |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-10 | Initial version |