archify-review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseArchify Review
Archify 审查
Judge whether a problem is worth addressing and an approach is worth maintaining over time.
- Value: Identify the real problem, who benefits, how often it occurs, its consequences, and whether it is worth addressing now.
- Cost: Consider implementation and verification effort, along with the future cost of understanding, changing, and maintaining the code. Prefer existing capabilities and keep the solution proportional to the problem.
- Impact: Identify affected behavior and modules, consequences for users and future development, and whether the change improves maintainability or adds coupling and constraints.
Consider maintainability, complexity, compatibility, performance, and other relevant concerns within these three dimensions, according to the specific problem.
Ground judgments in evidence: verify the target revision and relevant facts, distinguish direct verification from existing evidence and assumptions, and choose checks that resolve the key uncertainties.
Explain whether the work is worthwhile, the approach's cost and impact, any better alternatives, and unresolved questions that matter to the decision. Give reasons and scale the detail to the importance of each concern.
For repository-specific review and contribution requirements, consult REVIEWING.md and CONTRIBUTING.md as needed.
判断一个问题是否值得处理，以及一种方案是否值得长期维护。
- 价值：识别真正的问题、谁会受益、问题的发生频率、造成的后果，以及现在是否值得处理。
- 成本：考虑实施和验证所需的工作量，以及未来理解、修改和维护代码的成本。优先利用现有能力，并使解决方案与问题规模相称。
- 影响：识别受影响的行为和模块、对用户和未来开发造成的后果，以及该变更是否提升了可维护性，或者引入了耦合和约束。
根据具体问题，在这三个维度内考虑可维护性、复杂性、兼容性、性能及其他相关因素。
以证据为依据作出判断：验证目标修订版本和相关事实，区分直接验证结果、已有证据与假设，并选择能够解决关键不确定性的检查。
说明这项工作是否值得投入、该方案的成本和影响、是否有更优的替代方案，以及对决策仍有影响的未决问题。给出充分理由，并 根据每个问题的重要程度调整说明的详细程度。
如需了解特定代码仓库的审查和贡献要求，请根据需要查阅 REVIEWING.md 和 CONTRIBUTING.md。