Back to Details

reader-hook

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Reader Entry Article Refiner

Reader Entry Article Refiner

这是对外公开入口 skill。
它可以独立使用，也可以作为内容流程里的后处理节点，专门负责把抽象判断改成读者愿意点开的入口。
This is a publicly available entry skill.
It can be used independently, or as a post-processing node in the content workflow, specifically responsible for converting abstract judgments into entrances that readers are willing to click into.

Purpose

Purpose

这不是一个“帮你想深刻观点”的 skill。
这是一个“帮你把深刻观点写得有人愿意看”的 skill。
它专门解决这类问题：
  • 观点本身没错，但太大、太远、太抽象
  • 开头就在讲本质，读者没有进入感
  • 标题像作者总结，不像读者困惑
  • 金句太早出现，导致文章一开始就悬空
  • 文章在讲“大命题”，读者却感受不到和自己有什么关系
这个 skill 的核心任务只有一个：
把“作者已经想明白的东西”，翻译成“读者已经感觉到的不对劲”。
This is not a skill that "helps you come up with profound viewpoints".
This is a skill that "helps you write profound viewpoints in a way that people are willing to read".
It is specifically designed to solve the following problems:
  • The viewpoint itself is correct, but it is too big, too distant, too abstract
  • The opening talks about the essence right away, and readers have no sense of immersion
  • The title looks like an author's summary, not a reader's confusion
  • Golden quotes appear too early, making the article feel ungrounded from the beginning
  • The article talks about "big propositions", but readers cannot feel what it has to do with themselves
The core task of this skill is only one:
Translate "what the author has already figured out" into "the sense of something wrong that readers have already felt".

When to use

When to use

当你写的内容有以下特征时，必须调用这个 skill：
  • 标题里出现大量抽象词，如：
    • 主体性
    • 判断权
    • 认知结构
    • 注意力分配权
    • 平台接管
    • 系统重写
  • 文章一上来就在讲“本质”“时代变化”“更深的问题”
  • 你自己觉得文章很对，但隐约感觉普通读者不会点
  • 你发现自己的句子“像结论”，不像“像痛感”
  • 你在写 AI、平台、工作流、人的价值等大主题
When the content you write has the following characteristics, you must call this skill:
  • A large number of abstract words appear in the title, such as:
    • Subjectivity
    • Right of judgment
    • Cognitive structure
    • Right of attention allocation
    • Platform takeover
    • System rewrite
  • The article starts talking about "essence", "changes of the times", "deeper problems" right away
  • You think the article is very good, but you vaguely feel that ordinary readers will not click it
  • You find that your sentences "look like conclusions", not "like a sense of pain"
  • You are writing about big topics such as AI, platforms, workflows, human value, etc.

Position in ark-skills

Position in ark-skills

  • 公开角色：标题与开头优化
  • 内部 subskills： 
    • subskills/pain-first-opening/SKILL.md
    • subskills/example-scene-selector/SKILL.md
    • subskills/anti-preach-rewrite/SKILL.md
    • subskills/distribution-hooks/SKILL.md
  • 推荐搭配：
    • 先用 
      ai-workflow-brand
      确定主线
    • 再用这个 skill 把主线改写成读者入口
    • 在 
      wechat-pipeline
      中可作为初稿或优化稿后的增强步骤
  • Public role: Title and opening optimization
  • Internal subskills: 
    • subskills/pain-first-opening/SKILL.md
    • subskills/example-scene-selector/SKILL.md
    • subskills/anti-preach-rewrite/SKILL.md
    • subskills/distribution-hooks/SKILL.md
  • Recommended collocation:
    • First use 
      ai-workflow-brand
      to determine the main line
    • Then use this skill to rewrite the main line into a reader entrance
    • Can be used as an enhancement step after the first draft or optimized draft in 
      wechat-pipeline

Internal Routing

Internal Routing

当问题更具体时，按下面分流：
  • 开头太抽象，没有损失感： 
    • subskills/pain-first-opening/SKILL.md
  • 例子只有任务名，没有故事现场： 
    • subskills/example-scene-selector/SKILL.md
  • 语气像上课、像方法论总结： 
    • subskills/anti-preach-rewrite/SKILL.md
  • 文章写得对，但缺点赞、收藏、转发的抓手： 
    • subskills/distribution-hooks/SKILL.md
When the problem is more specific, divert according to the following rules:
  • The opening is too abstract, no sense of loss: 
    • subskills/pain-first-opening/SKILL.md
  • Examples only have task names, no story scenes: 
    • subskills/example-scene-selector/SKILL.md
  • The tone is like giving a lecture, like a methodology summary: 
    • subskills/anti-preach-rewrite/SKILL.md
  • The article is well written, but lacks hooks for likes, collections, and shares: 
    • subskills/distribution-hooks/SKILL.md

Core principle

Core principle

始终遵守这个顺序：
症状 → 反常识解释 → 机制 → 本质 → 落点
绝对不要写成：
本质 → 机制 → 解释 → 例子
原因很简单：
读者不是为了你的“本质判断”点进来。
读者是为了自己的“现实困惑”点进来。
Always follow this order:
Symptom → Counterintuitive explanation → Mechanism → Essence → Landing point
Never write in this order:
Essence → Mechanism → Explanation → Example
The reason is very simple:
Readers do not click in for your "essential judgment".
Readers click in for their own "real-life confusion".

Non-negotiable rules

Non-negotiable rules

Rule 1: 结论不能当前门

Rule 1: Conclusions cannot be used as the front door

最锋利的句子，通常应该放在文章中后段，作为升维句或结论句。
不要直接拿来做标题和开头。
错误示例：
  • 你失去的不是注意力，而是决定注意力该投向哪里的权力
正确用法：
  • 把上面这句话放在文中 60%–80% 位置，作为总结句
The sharpest sentences should usually be placed in the middle and latter part of the article, as dimension-raising sentences or concluding sentences.
Do not use them directly as titles and openings.
Wrong example:
  • What you lose is not attention, but the right to decide where to put your attention
Correct usage:
  • Put the above sentence in the 60%–80% position of the article as a summary sentence

Rule 2: 标题必须先写“症状”，不能先写“本质”

Rule 2: The title must write "symptoms" first, not "essence" first

标题优先选择这类表达：
  • 为什么……反而……
  • 你明明……为什么却……
  • 你不是……你只是……
  • 当……越来越多，你为什么越来越难……
标题应该让读者感觉：
“这说的是我最近真的有的困惑。”
而不是：
“这篇作者想讨论一个很大的问题。”
The title prefers expressions like these:
  • Why... instead...
  • You obviously... why do you...
  • You are not... you are just...
  • When there are more and more..., why is it harder and harder for you to...
The title should make readers feel:
"This is the confusion I really have recently."
Instead of:
"The author of this article wants to discuss a very big problem."

Rule 3: 用读者语言，不用作者语言

Rule 3: Use reader language, not author language

优先用这些词：
  • 看了很多
  • 越来越难说清
  • 越来越像复述
  • 觉得自己知道了
  • 但其实没想明白
  • 明明更高效了，却更空了
慎用这些词作为标题和开头核心：
  • 主体性
  • 判断权
  • 认知结构
  • 注意力主权
  • 排序权危机
  • 平台接管
这些词不是不能用。
而是应该放在正文中后段，用来升维，不该放在入口。
Prioritize using these words:
  • Read a lot
  • Harder and harder to explain clearly
  • More and more like repeating
  • Feel like I know it
  • But actually didn't figure it out
  • Obviously more efficient, but more empty
Avoid using these words as the core of the title and opening:
  • Subjectivity
  • Right of judgment
  • Cognitive structure
  • Attention sovereignty
  • Sorting right crisis
  • Platform takeover
These words are not unusable.
They should be placed in the middle and latter part of the text to raise the dimension, not placed at the entrance.

Rule 4: 一篇文章只能有一个入口问题

Rule 4: An article can only have one entrance question

如果你同时想讲：
  • 注意力
  • 平台算法
  • AI 总结
  • 主体性
  • 人的价值
那说明你还没收束。
必须先压缩成一个单一入口问题，例如：
  • AI 帮你总结得越多，你为什么越难有自己的观点？
  • 为什么我们每天看很多信息，反而越来越没有判断？
  • 你不是不关心世界，你只是越来越依赖热点替你决定关心什么
只能选一个。
If you want to talk about:
  • Attention
  • Platform algorithm
  • AI summary
  • Subjectivity
  • Human value
It means you haven't converged yet.
You must first compress it into a single entrance question, for example:
  • The more AI helps you summarize, why is it harder for you to have your own opinions?
  • Why do we read a lot of information every day, but have less and less judgment?
  • You don't care less about the world, you just rely more and more on hot spots to decide what to care about
Only one can be selected.

Rule 5: 先写“最小可感损失”，再写“大命题”

Rule 5: Write "minimum perceptible loss" first, then write "big proposition"

不要直接写：
  • 人的主体性正在被平台接管
先写：
  • 看很多总结，但越来越难形成自己的观点
  • 刷很多信息，但越来越难说清一件事
  • 明明更高效了，但越来越像复述别人
先让读者感觉到损失，再解释这个损失背后的结构。
Don't write directly:
  • Human subjectivity is being taken over by platforms
Write first:
  • Read a lot of summaries, but it's harder and harder to form your own opinions
  • Scroll through a lot of information, but it's harder and harder to explain one thing clearly
  • Obviously more efficient, but more and more like repeating others
Let readers feel the loss first, then explain the structure behind this loss.

Workflow

Workflow

Step 1: 提取作者真正想说的“本质句”

Step 1: Extract the "essence sentence" that the author really wants to say

先问自己：
我真正想说的一句话是什么？
例子：
  • 你失去的不是注意力，而是决定注意力该投向哪里的权力
  • AI 提高了效率，也可能削弱了人形成判断的中间过程
  • workflow 不是只在放大你，也可能在蒸馏你
这一步先保留，不急着拿来做标题。
Ask yourself first:
What is the one sentence I really want to say?
Examples:
  • What you lose is not attention, but the right to decide where to put your attention
  • AI improves efficiency, but may also weaken the intermediate process of people forming judgments
  • workflow is not only amplifying you, it may also distill you
Keep this step first, don't rush to use it as a title.

Step 2: 找出读者已经感受到的“症状句”

Step 2: Find the "symptom sentences" that readers have already felt

再问自己：
读者最近真实会感到哪里不对劲？
把它写成生活化、可体感的句子。
例子：
  • 为什么我看了那么多信息，反而越来越没判断？
  • 为什么 AI 总结看得越多，我越难有自己的观点？
  • 为什么我越来越像在复述，而不是在思考？
  • 为什么明明效率更高了，我却越来越像可替代的流程？
Ask yourself again:
Where will readers really feel something wrong recently?
Write it into a life-like, sensory sentence.
Examples:
  • Why do I read so much information, but have less and less judgment?
  • Why the more AI summaries I read, the harder it is for me to have my own opinions?
  • Why do I feel more and more like repeating, not thinking?
  • Why is it obviously more efficient, but I feel more and more like a replaceable process?

Step 3: 做一次“本质句 → 症状句”翻译

Step 3: Do a "essence sentence → symptom sentence" translation

把抽象句翻译成可点开的读者问题。
例如：
作者本质句：
你失去的不是注意力，而是决定注意力该投向哪里的权力。
翻译后入口句：
为什么我们每天看那么多信息，反而越来越没有判断？
再例如：
作者本质句：
AI 替你接管了形成观点的中间过程。
翻译后入口句：
AI 帮你总结得越多，你为什么越难有自己的观点？
Translate abstract sentences into clickable reader questions.
For example:
Author's essence sentence:
What you lose is not attention, but the right to decide where to put your attention.
Translated entrance sentence:
Why do we read so much information every day, but have less and less judgment?
Another example:
Author's essence sentence:
AI has taken over the intermediate process of forming opinions for you.
Translated entrance sentence:
The more AI helps you summarize, why is it harder for you to have your own opinions?

Step 4: 验证标题是不是“读者会自己说出来的话”

Step 4: Verify if the title is "something readers would say themselves"

检查标题时，问这三个问题：
  1. 普通读者会不会把这句话当成自己的困惑？
  2. 这句话是不是先讲症状，而不是先讲结论？
  3. 这句话是不是能在 3 秒内看懂？
如果三项里有一项是否，继续改。
When checking the title, ask these three questions:
  1. Will ordinary readers regard this sentence as their own confusion?
  2. Does this sentence talk about symptoms first, not conclusions first?
  3. Can this sentence be understood within 3 seconds?
If any of the three items is no, keep modifying.

Step 5: 用固定结构搭正文

Step 5: Build the text with a fixed structure

正文必须按这个结构展开：
The text must be expanded according to this structure:

1. 症状

1. Symptoms

写读者已经有的真实体验。
Write about the real experience that readers already have.

2. 反常识解释

2. Counterintuitive explanation

告诉他：问题不是你以为的那个。
Tell him: The problem is not what you think it is.

3. 机制

3. Mechanism

解释平台、AI、分发、总结、外包，是怎么运作的。
Explain how platforms, AI, distribution, summarization, outsourcing work.

4. 本质

4. Essence

再把文章升到更高层，比如：
  • 判断形成机制
  • 主体性
  • 价值被蒸馏
  • 中间过程消失
Then raise the article to a higher level, for example:
  • Judgment formation mechanism
  • Subjectivity
  • Value being distilled
  • Intermediate process disappearing

5. 落点

5. Landing point

最后收束到一句真正属于你的判断。
Finally converge to a judgment that truly belongs to you.

Output format

Output format

每次运行本 skill，输出必须包含以下 5 个部分：
Every time you run this skill, the output must include the following 5 parts:

1. 本质句

1. Essence sentence

作者真正想说的核心判断，只保留 1 句。
The core judgment that the author really wants to say, only keep 1 sentence.

2. 症状句

2. Symptom sentences

读者已经感受到的具体困惑，至少写 3 句备选。
The specific confusion that readers have already felt, write at least 3 alternative sentences.

3. 标题候选

3. Title candidates

给出 3 个标题：
  • 一个最稳
  • 一个最适合传播
  • 一个最像作者定位
Give 3 titles:
  • The most stable one
  • The most suitable for dissemination
  • The most consistent with the author's positioning

4. 文章骨架

4. Article skeleton

严格按： 症状 → 反常识解释 → 机制 → 本质 → 落点
Strictly follow: Symptoms → Counterintuitive explanation → Mechanism → Essence → Landing point

5. 风险检查

5. Risk check

指出这篇文章目前最容易犯的 3 个错误。
Point out the 3 most common mistakes this article is prone to make at present.

Anti-abstraction checklist

Anti-abstraction checklist

写完后必须过一遍这个检查表。
After writing, you must go through this checklist.

标题检查

Title check

  • 标题里有没有抽象大词直接顶在前面？
  • 标题是不是像“作者总结”而不是“读者困惑”？
  • 标题有没有明确呈现一种具体损失？
  • Are there any big abstract words directly placed at the front of the title?
  • Does the title look like "author's summary" instead of "reader's confusion"?
  • Does the title clearly present a specific loss?

开头检查

Opening check

  • 开头是不是一上来就在讲大道理？
  • 开头有没有日常体验或明显症状？
  • 读者能不能在 5 句内知道“这篇到底在说我什么问题”？
  • Does the opening talk about big principles right away?
  • Is there any daily experience or obvious symptom in the opening?
  • Can readers know "what problem of mine this article is talking about" within 5 sentences?

正文检查

Text check

  • 有没有把最强金句放得太早？
  • 有没有同时塞进两个以上入口问题？
  • 有没有“先升维、后落地”导致悬空？
  • Is the strongest golden quote placed too early?
  • Are there more than two entrance questions stuffed in at the same time?
  • Is there a situation of "raise dimension first, then land" leading to ungrounded content?

结尾检查

Ending check

  • 结尾是不是只是在重复标题？
  • 结尾有没有把局部症状翻到更高层机制？
  • 结尾有没有留下真正属于作者的判断？
  • Is the ending just repeating the title?
  • Does the ending raise the local symptoms to a higher-level mechanism?
  • Does the ending leave a judgment that truly belongs to the author?

Example transform

Example transform

Input

Input

作者本质句： 你失去的不是注意力，而是决定注意力该投向哪里的权力。
Author's essence sentence: What you lose is not attention, but the right to decide where to put your attention.

Bad title

Bad title

平台拿走的不是你的时间，而是你判断什么值得在意的权力
问题：
  • 太像作者总结
  • 太抽象
  • 代价太远
  • 普通读者不觉得这是自己眼前的问题
What the platform takes away is not your time, but your right to judge what is worth caring about
Problems:
  • Too much like an author's summary
  • Too abstract
  • The cost is too distant
  • Ordinary readers don't think this is their immediate problem

Better title

Better title

为什么我们每天看那么多信息，反而越来越没有判断？
Why do we read so much information every day, but have less and less judgment?

Best title for AI context

Best title for AI context

AI 帮你总结得越多，你为什么越难有自己的观点？
The more AI helps you summarize, why is it harder for you to have your own opinions?

Style constraints

Style constraints

  • 不要一上来就用“大词压人”
  • 不要假装深刻，先让读者有进入感
  • 不要把所有议题一次讲完
  • 不要把金句顶在标题和开头
  • 一篇文章，只允许一个入口问题
  • 所有“本质判断”，都必须通过一个具体症状落地
  • Don't use "big words to oppress people" right at the beginning
  • Don't pretend to be profound, let readers have a sense of immersion first
  • Don't talk about all topics at once
  • Don't put golden quotes at the title and opening
  • An article is only allowed to have one entrance question
  • All "essential judgments" must be landed through a specific symptom

Final command

Final command

当你觉得一篇文章“很对，但可能没人点”时，不要继续拔高。
先问：
这篇文章里，读者已经感受到的那个不对劲，到底是什么？
先把这个写出来。
剩下的，再慢慢升上去。
When you think an article is "very good, but probably no one will click it", don't keep raising it.
Ask first:
In this article, what is the sense of something wrong that readers have already felt?
Write this out first.
The rest can be raised slowly later.