1. Can we see this opportunity? (Information/Insight)
2. Can we seize it? (Existing capabilities/resources)
3. Can competitors also grasp it equally? (If yes, it is not a differentiated opportunity, reduce priority)
→ Pass all three checks → Listed as valid O, retain PESTEL number (e.g., O1 ← [E-02])
→ Fail → Demoted to observation item, with conditions attached

1. Will this threat immediately and urgently affect the enterprise's survival or competitive position?
2. Will it occur specifically within the time window?
→ Pass both checks → Listed as valid T, retain PESTEL number (e.g., T1 ← [P-01])
→ Fail → Demoted to observation item

S Candidate Items → Ask four questions:
1. Is this strength verified by the market? (Customer recognition/data support)
2. Is this a strength relative to competitors, not an absolute capability?
3. Is this strength not contaminated by the enterprise's recent performance?
4. Can consumers perceive it and choose us because of it?
→ Only pass all to be listed as valid S, and mark importance (High/Medium/Low)

W Candidate Items → First exclude:
- "High price" → Exclude if it is a positioning choice
- "Insufficient budget" → This is a resource status, not a competitive weakness
- "Low brand awareness" → Exclude if the target customer group is already aware
→ The remaining items are the real W that need to be addressed

SO Collision:
  S1 × O1 → Does it have strategic significance? → Yes: Write strategy, mark source [S1×O1]
  S1 × O2 → Does it have strategic significance? → No: Skip
  S2 × O1 → ...
  (And so on, exhaust all S × O combinations)

ST Collision:
  S1 × T1 → [S1×T1]
  S2 × T1 → ...
  (And so on)

WO Collision:
  W1 × O1 → [W1×O1]
  ...

WT Collision:
  W1 × T1 → [W1×T1]
  ...

[Source Tag] Strategy Description

Example:
[S2×O1] Leverage our mature cold chain logistics capability (S2) to preemptively lay out in the e-commerce fresh food delivery market (O1)
[W1×O2] Cooperate with local channel partners (O2) to make up for insufficient store coverage (W1)
[S1×T2] Use brand premium capability (S1) to maintain high-end market stickiness and reduce erosion from low-price competitors (T2)

If S > W and O > T → Core Quadrant: SO (Seize the Moment)
If S > W and T > O → Core Quadrant: ST (Hold Ground)
If W > S and O > T → Core Quadrant: WO (Strategic Alliance)
If W > S and T > O → Core Quadrant: WT (Fight to Survive)

✅ Core Strategy (Final Selection)
Source: [Sx×Oy]
Strategy Description: ____
Selection Reason: Feasibility ____ points / Impact ____ points / Timeliness ____ points, Total Score ____
Why It Is Better Than Other Candidates: ____

🔁 Supporting Strategies (Can Be Executed Simultaneously Without Competing for Resources)
[Sx×Oy] ____

⏸ Suspended Strategies (Launch When Conditions Are Mature)
[Wx×Oy] ____ Waiting Conditions: ____

❌ Abandoned Strategies (Clearly Explain Reasons for Not Implementing)
[Wx×Ty] ____ Abandonment Reason: ____

【SWOT Strategy Positioning Card】
Analysis Level: ____
Comparison Benchmark (Compared With Whom): ____
Overall Situation: S>W / W>S, O>T / T>O → Core Quadrant: ____

【Overview of Candidate Strategies】
SO Candidates: [Sx×Oy] ____ (Feasibility__ / Impact__ / Timeliness__)
ST Candidates: [Sx×Ty] ____ (Feasibility__ / Impact__ / Timeliness__)
WO Candidates: [Wx×Oy] ____ (Feasibility__ / Impact__ / Timeliness__)
WT Candidates: [Wx×Ty] ____ (Feasibility__ / Impact__ / Timeliness__)

✅ Core Strategy (Final Selection): [Sx×Oy] ____
   Selection Reason: ____

🔁 Supporting Strategies: [____] ____
⏸ Suspended: [____] ____ Waiting Conditions: ____
❌ Abandoned: [____] ____ Reason: ____

【Action Directions】
Short-Term (0-6 Months): ____
Mid-Term (6-18 Months): ____
Long-Term Observation Items: ____

【Regular Review Suggestions】
Review Frequency: ____ months
Key Focus for Next Review: ____
Conditions Triggering Immediate Re-Review: ____