triz

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

TRIZ Skill

TRIZ 技能

Systematic innovation via Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. AI-enhanced.
基于发明问题解决理论的系统化创新方法,结合AI增强能力。

Problem Routing

问题路由

Problem TypeToolReference
"Improve A but B worsens"Contradiction Matrix40-principles.md
"Need opposite properties"Separation PrinciplesBelow
"System not working"Su-Field Analysisadvanced.md
"How will tech evolve?"Evolution Trendsadvanced.md
"What do others do?"FOS (cross-industry)ai-prompts.md
"Very complex problem"ARIZ Algorithmai-prompts.md
问题类型工具参考文档
"优化A但B恶化"矛盾矩阵40-principles.md
"需要对立属性"分离原则如下
"系统无法正常运行"Su-Field 分析advanced.md
"技术将如何演进?"演进趋势advanced.md
"其他行业如何解决?"FOS(跨行业)ai-prompts.md
"极复杂问题"ARIZ 算法ai-prompts.md

6-Step Process

六步流程

1. DEFINE IFR    → "The [system] ITSELF [does X] WITHOUT [cost/harm]"
2. IDENTIFY      → What contradiction? (Technical or Physical)
3. MAP           → Which of 39 parameters? [39-parameters.md]
4. RETRIEVE      → Matrix suggests which principles?
5. GENERATE      → Apply each principle specifically
6. EVALUATE      → Feasibility? Implementation?
1. 定义 IFR    → "[系统] 自身就能 [实现X功能],且无需 [成本/损害]"
2. 识别矛盾      → 属于哪种矛盾?(技术矛盾或物理矛盾)
3. 匹配参数           → 对应39个参数中的哪一个?[39-parameters.md]
4. 检索原则      → 矛盾矩阵推荐哪些原则?
5. 生成方案      → 针对性应用每个原则
6. 评估方案      → 可行性?可落地性?

Step 1: Ideal Final Result (IFR)

步骤1:理想最终结果(IFR)

"The [object] ITSELF [performs function] WITHOUT [cost/harm/complexity]"
Formula:
Ideality = Benefits / (Cost + Harm)
Examples:
  • "The pipe itself prevents leaks" (not: add sensors)
  • "The code itself fixes bugs" (not: add more tests)
"[对象] 自身就能 [执行功能],且无需 [成本/损害/复杂度]"
公式:
Ideality = 收益 / (成本 + 损害)
示例:
  • "管道自身就能防止泄漏"(而非:添加传感器)
  • "代码自身就能修复漏洞"(而非:增加更多测试)

Step 2: Identify Contradiction

步骤2:识别矛盾

Technical: Improving A worsens B
"If we [improve A], then [B gets worse]"
→ ถ้าเราทำให้รถเร็วขึ้น, ประสิทธิภาพน้ำมันแย่ลง
Physical: Same element needs opposite properties
"[Element] must be [Property] for X AND [Opposite] for Y"
→ API ต้อง complex (power users) AND simple (beginners)
技术矛盾: 优化A会导致B恶化
"如果我们 [优化A],那么 [B会恶化]"
→ 若提升车辆速度,燃油经济性会下降
物理矛盾: 同一元素需要具备对立属性
"[元素] 必须为X具备 [属性],同时为Y具备 [对立属性]"
→ API 需同时满足复杂(面向高级用户)和简易(面向新手)的需求

Step 3: Map to 39 Parameters

步骤3:匹配39个参数

See 39-parameters.md. Common ones:
#ParameterSoftware Equivalent
9SpeedPerformance, latency
27ReliabilityUptime, MTBF
33Ease of operationUX, usability
36ComplexityCode complexity
39ProductivityThroughput
详见 39-parameters.md。常见参数如下:
编号参数软件领域对应项
9Speed性能、延迟
27Reliability可用性、平均无故障时间(MTBF)
33Ease of operation用户体验(UX)、易用性
36Complexity代码复杂度
39Productivity吞吐量

Step 4: Top 10 Principles

步骤4:十大核心原则

#PrincipleModern Example
1SegmentationMicroservices
2Taking OutSeparation of concerns
10Preliminary ActionCaching
13The Other Way RoundEvent-driven vs polling
15DynamicsAdaptive algorithms
24IntermediaryMiddleware, adapters
25Self-ServiceSelf-healing systems
35Parameter ChangesTransform data format
Full list: 40-principles.md
编号原则现代示例
1Segmentation(分割原则)微服务
2Taking Out(抽取原则)关注点分离
10Preliminary Action(预先作用原则)缓存
13The Other Way Round(反向作用原则)事件驱动 vs 轮询
15Dynamics(动态特性原则)自适应算法
24Intermediary(中介原则)中间件、适配器
25Self-Service(自服务原则)自修复系统
35Parameter Changes(参数变化原则)数据格式转换
完整列表:40-principles.md

Step 5: Physical Contradiction → Separation

步骤5:物理矛盾 → 分离方法

SeparationStrategyExample
In TimeDifferent timesLanding gear: extend/retract
In SpaceDifferent locationsPencil: hard core, soft eraser
In ConditionDifferent conditionsSmart glass: transparent/opaque
In ScaleDifferent levelsWater: liquid macro, molecules nano
分离维度策略示例
时间分离不同时间下满足不同需求起落架:可伸出/收回
空间分离不同位置具备不同属性铅笔:坚硬笔芯,柔软橡皮
条件分离不同条件下切换属性智能玻璃:透明/不透明切换
尺度分离不同尺度下呈现不同状态水:宏观液态,微观分子态

Creative Mode: FOS/MOS

创意模式:FOS/MOS

Function Oriented Search (FOS): Find how OTHER industries solve same function.
1. ABSTRACT → "Remove ice" → "Separate materials"
2. SEARCH → Find 5+ industries with similar function
3. TRANSFER → Adapt mechanism to your problem
Method Oriented Search (MOS): Apply known method to NEW domains.
See ai-prompts.md for detailed prompts.
面向功能搜索(FOS): 了解其他行业如何解决相同功能需求。
1. 抽象需求 → "除冰" → "分离两种材料"
2. 跨行业搜索 → 找到5个以上有类似功能需求的行业
3. 迁移应用 → 将其他行业的机制适配到你的问题中
面向方法搜索(MOS): 将已知方法应用到新领域。
详细提示词可查看 ai-prompts.md

Output Format

输出格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Problem: [Restated]

问题:[重述问题]

IFR: "The [system] itself [does X] without [cost/harm]"

IFR:"[系统] 自身就能 [实现X功能],且无需 [成本/损害]"

Contradiction:

矛盾:

  • Type: Technical / Physical
  • Improving: Parameter #__
  • Worsening: Parameter #__
  • 类型:技术矛盾 / 物理矛盾
  • 优化参数:第__号参数
  • 恶化参数:第__号参数

Principles: [#, #, #]

推荐原则:[#, #, #]

Solutions:

解决方案:

Principle #X: [Name]

原则#X:[名称]

  • Application: [How]
  • Idea: [Concrete solution]
  • Feasibility: High/Medium/Low
  • 应用方式:[具体如何应用]
  • 创意方案:[具体解决思路]
  • 可行性:高/中/低

Next Steps:

下一步行动:

  1. [Prototype which solution]
  2. [Validation approach]
undefined
  1. [原型验证哪个方案]
  2. [验证方法]
undefined

References

参考文档

TypeFileContent
Core40-principles.mdAll 40 principles + examples
Core39-parameters.mdAll 39 parameters
Advancedadvanced.mdSu-Field, 76 Standards, ARIZ, Evolution
AIai-prompts.mdReady-to-use prompt templates
AImethodology.mdTRIZ + LLM integration
Examplesexamples.mdCase studies (Samsung, SpaceX, Netflix)
类型文件内容
核心40-principles.md全部40条原则及示例
核心39-parameters.md全部39个参数
进阶advanced.mdSu-Field分析、76个标准解、ARIZ算法、技术演进
AI相关ai-prompts.md可直接使用的提示词模板
AI相关methodology.mdTRIZ与大语言模型(LLM)的集成方法
案例examples.md案例研究(三星、SpaceX、Netflix)

Related Skills

相关技能

  • /generate-creative-ideas
    — Complement with broader brainstorming
  • /deep-research
    — Research cross-industry solutions (FOS/MOS)
  • /boost-intel
    — Evaluate trade-offs systematically
  • /problem-solving
    — Structure the problem before applying TRIZ
  • /generate-creative-ideas
    — 结合更广泛的头脑风暴
  • /deep-research
    — 研究跨行业解决方案(FOS/MOS)
  • /boost-intel
    — 系统化评估权衡方案
  • /problem-solving
    — 应用TRIZ前先梳理问题结构