triz
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseTRIZ Skill
TRIZ 技能
Systematic innovation via Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. AI-enhanced.
基于发明问题解决理论的系统化创新方法,结合AI增强能力。
Problem Routing
问题路由
| Problem Type | Tool | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| "Improve A but B worsens" | Contradiction Matrix | 40-principles.md |
| "Need opposite properties" | Separation Principles | Below |
| "System not working" | Su-Field Analysis | advanced.md |
| "How will tech evolve?" | Evolution Trends | advanced.md |
| "What do others do?" | FOS (cross-industry) | ai-prompts.md |
| "Very complex problem" | ARIZ Algorithm | ai-prompts.md |
| 问题类型 | 工具 | 参考文档 |
|---|---|---|
| "优化A但B恶化" | 矛盾矩阵 | 40-principles.md |
| "需要对立属性" | 分离原则 | 如下 |
| "系统无法正常运行" | Su-Field 分析 | advanced.md |
| "技术将如何演进?" | 演进趋势 | advanced.md |
| "其他行业如何解决?" | FOS(跨行业) | ai-prompts.md |
| "极复杂问题" | ARIZ 算法 | ai-prompts.md |
6-Step Process
六步流程
1. DEFINE IFR → "The [system] ITSELF [does X] WITHOUT [cost/harm]"
2. IDENTIFY → What contradiction? (Technical or Physical)
3. MAP → Which of 39 parameters? [39-parameters.md]
4. RETRIEVE → Matrix suggests which principles?
5. GENERATE → Apply each principle specifically
6. EVALUATE → Feasibility? Implementation?1. 定义 IFR → "[系统] 自身就能 [实现X功能],且无需 [成本/损害]"
2. 识别矛盾 → 属于哪种矛盾?(技术矛盾或物理矛盾)
3. 匹配参数 → 对应39个参数中的哪一个?[39-parameters.md]
4. 检索原则 → 矛盾矩阵推荐哪些原则?
5. 生成方案 → 针对性应用每个原则
6. 评估方案 → 可行性?可落地性?Step 1: Ideal Final Result (IFR)
步骤1:理想最终结果(IFR)
"The [object] ITSELF [performs function] WITHOUT [cost/harm/complexity]"
Formula:
Ideality = Benefits / (Cost + Harm)Examples:
- "The pipe itself prevents leaks" (not: add sensors)
- "The code itself fixes bugs" (not: add more tests)
"[对象] 自身就能 [执行功能],且无需 [成本/损害/复杂度]"
公式:
Ideality = 收益 / (成本 + 损害)示例:
- "管道自身就能防止泄漏"(而非:添加传感器)
- "代码自身就能修复漏洞"(而非:增加更多测试)
Step 2: Identify Contradiction
步骤2:识别矛盾
Technical: Improving A worsens B
"If we [improve A], then [B gets worse]"
→ ถ้าเราทำให้รถเร็วขึ้น, ประสิทธิภาพน้ำมันแย่ลงPhysical: Same element needs opposite properties
"[Element] must be [Property] for X AND [Opposite] for Y"
→ API ต้อง complex (power users) AND simple (beginners)技术矛盾: 优化A会导致B恶化
"如果我们 [优化A],那么 [B会恶化]"
→ 若提升车辆速度,燃油经济性会下降物理矛盾: 同一元素需要具备对立属性
"[元素] 必须为X具备 [属性],同时为Y具备 [对立属性]"
→ API 需同时满足复杂(面向高级用户)和简易(面向新手)的需求Step 3: Map to 39 Parameters
步骤3:匹配39个参数
See 39-parameters.md. Common ones:
| # | Parameter | Software Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Speed | Performance, latency |
| 27 | Reliability | Uptime, MTBF |
| 33 | Ease of operation | UX, usability |
| 36 | Complexity | Code complexity |
| 39 | Productivity | Throughput |
详见 39-parameters.md。常见参数如下:
| 编号 | 参数 | 软件领域对应项 |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Speed | 性能、延迟 |
| 27 | Reliability | 可用性、平均无故障时间(MTBF) |
| 33 | Ease of operation | 用户体验(UX)、易用性 |
| 36 | Complexity | 代码复杂度 |
| 39 | Productivity | 吞吐量 |
Step 4: Top 10 Principles
步骤4:十大核心原则
| # | Principle | Modern Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Segmentation | Microservices |
| 2 | Taking Out | Separation of concerns |
| 10 | Preliminary Action | Caching |
| 13 | The Other Way Round | Event-driven vs polling |
| 15 | Dynamics | Adaptive algorithms |
| 24 | Intermediary | Middleware, adapters |
| 25 | Self-Service | Self-healing systems |
| 35 | Parameter Changes | Transform data format |
Full list: 40-principles.md
| 编号 | 原则 | 现代示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Segmentation(分割原则) | 微服务 |
| 2 | Taking Out(抽取原则) | 关注点分离 |
| 10 | Preliminary Action(预先作用原则) | 缓存 |
| 13 | The Other Way Round(反向作用原则) | 事件驱动 vs 轮询 |
| 15 | Dynamics(动态特性原则) | 自适应算法 |
| 24 | Intermediary(中介原则) | 中间件、适配器 |
| 25 | Self-Service(自服务原则) | 自修复系统 |
| 35 | Parameter Changes(参数变化原则) | 数据格式转换 |
完整列表:40-principles.md
Step 5: Physical Contradiction → Separation
步骤5:物理矛盾 → 分离方法
| Separation | Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|
| In Time | Different times | Landing gear: extend/retract |
| In Space | Different locations | Pencil: hard core, soft eraser |
| In Condition | Different conditions | Smart glass: transparent/opaque |
| In Scale | Different levels | Water: liquid macro, molecules nano |
| 分离维度 | 策略 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 时间分离 | 不同时间下满足不同需求 | 起落架:可伸出/收回 |
| 空间分离 | 不同位置具备不同属性 | 铅笔:坚硬笔芯,柔软橡皮 |
| 条件分离 | 不同条件下切换属性 | 智能玻璃:透明/不透明切换 |
| 尺度分离 | 不同尺度下呈现不同状态 | 水:宏观液态,微观分子态 |
Creative Mode: FOS/MOS
创意模式:FOS/MOS
Function Oriented Search (FOS): Find how OTHER industries solve same function.
1. ABSTRACT → "Remove ice" → "Separate materials"
2. SEARCH → Find 5+ industries with similar function
3. TRANSFER → Adapt mechanism to your problemMethod Oriented Search (MOS): Apply known method to NEW domains.
See ai-prompts.md for detailed prompts.
面向功能搜索(FOS): 了解其他行业如何解决相同功能需求。
1. 抽象需求 → "除冰" → "分离两种材料"
2. 跨行业搜索 → 找到5个以上有类似功能需求的行业
3. 迁移应用 → 将其他行业的机制适配到你的问题中面向方法搜索(MOS): 将已知方法应用到新领域。
详细提示词可查看 ai-prompts.md。
Output Format
输出格式
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedProblem: [Restated]
问题:[重述问题]
IFR: "The [system] itself [does X] without [cost/harm]"
IFR:"[系统] 自身就能 [实现X功能],且无需 [成本/损害]"
Contradiction:
矛盾:
- Type: Technical / Physical
- Improving: Parameter #__
- Worsening: Parameter #__
- 类型:技术矛盾 / 物理矛盾
- 优化参数:第__号参数
- 恶化参数:第__号参数
Principles: [#, #, #]
推荐原则:[#, #, #]
Solutions:
解决方案:
Principle #X: [Name]
原则#X:[名称]
- Application: [How]
- Idea: [Concrete solution]
- Feasibility: High/Medium/Low
- 应用方式:[具体如何应用]
- 创意方案:[具体解决思路]
- 可行性:高/中/低
Next Steps:
下一步行动:
- [Prototype which solution]
- [Validation approach]
undefined- [原型验证哪个方案]
- [验证方法]
undefinedReferences
参考文档
| Type | File | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Core | 40-principles.md | All 40 principles + examples |
| Core | 39-parameters.md | All 39 parameters |
| Advanced | advanced.md | Su-Field, 76 Standards, ARIZ, Evolution |
| AI | ai-prompts.md | Ready-to-use prompt templates |
| AI | methodology.md | TRIZ + LLM integration |
| Examples | examples.md | Case studies (Samsung, SpaceX, Netflix) |
| 类型 | 文件 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 核心 | 40-principles.md | 全部40条原则及示例 |
| 核心 | 39-parameters.md | 全部39个参数 |
| 进阶 | advanced.md | Su-Field分析、76个标准解、ARIZ算法、技术演进 |
| AI相关 | ai-prompts.md | 可直接使用的提示词模板 |
| AI相关 | methodology.md | TRIZ与大语言模型(LLM)的集成方法 |
| 案例 | examples.md | 案例研究(三星、SpaceX、Netflix) |
Related Skills
相关技能
- — Complement with broader brainstorming
/generate-creative-ideas - — Research cross-industry solutions (FOS/MOS)
/deep-research - — Evaluate trade-offs systematically
/boost-intel - — Structure the problem before applying TRIZ
/problem-solving
- — 结合更广泛的头脑风暴
/generate-creative-ideas - — 研究跨行业解决方案(FOS/MOS)
/deep-research - — 系统化评估权衡方案
/boost-intel - — 应用TRIZ前先梳理问题结构
/problem-solving