Back to Details

academic-scientific-research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Academic Scientific Research

学术科学研究

Workflow

工作流程

Use search to discover scholarly sources, extract to verify source content, map or crawl for known scholarly sites and collections, and research for full literature-review synthesis. Keep this skill focused on research planning, source selection, extraction targets, and evidence synthesis; execution mechanics should come from companion endpoint skills.
Treat the guidance below as base guidance; adapt it to the user's request when appropriate.
  • Translate the user's question into search terms, synonyms, key entities, and likely source domains.
  • Break broad questions into short subqueries under 400 characters: core concept, synonyms, method names, target population or data, benchmark or dataset, author/lab, and year range.
  • Prefer scholarly and official sources when available: preprint servers, PubMed/NIH pages, journals, conference proceedings, professional societies, standards bodies, and official technical reports.
  • Extract from the strongest selected pages after screening titles, snippets, source type, recency, and relevance.
  • Reserve broad research synthesis for full literature reviews, research landscapes, or multi-method comparisons.
  • Distinguish primary studies, review papers, preprints, editorials, guidelines, standards, and news coverage.
使用 search 发现学术来源，使用 extract 验证来源内容，使用 map 或 crawl 查找已知的学术站点和资源集合，并使用 research 完成完整的文献综述综合。让此 skill 专注于研究规划、来源选择、提取目标和证据综合；具体执行机制应由配套的 endpoint skills 提供。
以下指导应作为基础建议，并在适当情况下根据用户请求进行调整。
  • 将用户的问题转化为检索词、同义词、关键实体和可能的来源领域。
  • 将宽泛问题拆分为长度不超过 400 个字符的简短子查询：核心概念、同义词、方法名称、目标人群或数据、基准或数据集、作者/实验室以及年份范围。
  • 在可行的情况下，优先选择学术和官方来源：预印本服务器、PubMed/NIH 页面、期刊、会议论文集、专业学会、标准机构和官方技术报告。
  • 在筛选标题、摘要片段、来源类型、时效性和相关性后，从选定的最强页面中提取内容。
  • 仅在需要完整文献综述、研究全景或多方法比较时，才进行广泛的研究综合。
  • 区分原始研究、综述论文、预印本、社论、指南、标准和新闻报道。

Research Budget

研究预算

  • Start with a small focused search set covering the main concept, synonyms, methods, and source type.
  • Extract only the strongest scholarly sources before drafting the evidence brief.
  • Add more searches only for named gaps, such as missing review papers, missing recent work, or missing primary studies.
  • Do not use map unless a known lab, journal, conference, repository, or documentation site has buried pages.
  • Do not use crawl unless the user needs broad collection from a known proceedings, publication list, or docs section.
  • 从覆盖核心概念、同义词、方法和来源类型的小规模聚焦检索开始。
  • 在起草证据简报前，仅提取最相关的学术来源。
  • 仅针对明确的缺口增加检索，例如缺少综述论文、缺少近期工作或缺少原始研究。
  • 除非已知实验室、期刊、会议、存储库或文档站点存在页面埋藏问题，否则不要使用 map。
  • 除非用户需要从已知来源广泛收集内容，例如会议论文集、实验室出版物列表或文档章节，否则不要使用 crawl。

Capability Guidance

能力使用指导

  • Use search first when the user needs papers, methods, benchmarks, authors, institutions, or recent work.
  • Use extract when comparing a small set of papers, reading abstracts, or verifying study claims.
  • Use map only when a known lab, journal, conference, repository, or documentation site has useful but hard-to-find pages.
  • Use crawl only when the user needs many pages from a known source, such as proceedings, a lab publication list, or a technical docs section.
  • Use research only when the user explicitly needs a full literature review or research landscape.
  • 当用户需要查找论文、方法、基准、作者、机构或近期工作时，首先使用 search。
  • 当需要比较少量论文、阅读摘要或验证研究主张时，使用 extract。
  • 仅当已知实验室、期刊、会议、存储库或文档站点包含有价值但难以查找的页面时，才使用 map。
  • 仅当用户需要从已知来源获取大量页面时，例如会议论文集、实验室出版物列表或技术文档章节，才使用 crawl。
  • 仅当用户明确需要完整的文献综述或研究全景时，才使用 research。

Query And Source Guidance

查询与来源指导

  • Pair formal terms with common synonyms and acronyms.
  • Include population, dataset, benchmark, organism, intervention, model, metric, or method terms when relevant.
  • For recent literature, include explicit year ranges or recency language in the query.
  • Prefer primary literature for claims, review papers for landscape summaries, and guidelines/standards for practice recommendations.
  • Deduplicate preprints and final publications; cite the final version when available.
  • Treat abstracts, papers, supplemental pages, tables, and official repositories as separate evidence surfaces.
  • Report failed or inaccessible sources when they affect key papers, guidelines, datasets, or primary evidence.
  • 将正式术语与常见同义词和缩写搭配使用。
  • 在相关时纳入人群、数据集、基准、生物体、干预措施、模型、指标或方法等术语。
  • 针对近期文献，在查询中明确加入年份范围或表示时效性的表述。
  • 对于研究主张，优先引用原始文献；对于全景总结，优先引用综述论文；对于实践建议，优先引用指南和标准。
  • 对预印本和正式发表的版本进行去重；如果正式版本可用，则引用正式版本。
  • 将摘要、论文、补充材料页面、表格和官方存储库视为不同的证据载体。
  • 当失败或无法访问的来源影响关键论文、指南、数据集或原始证据时，应予以说明。

Output Template

输出模板

Use this markdown structure and adapt sections to the user's scope:
markdown
undefined
使用以下 markdown 结构，并根据用户范围调整各部分：
markdown
undefined

Evidence Brief: <topic>

证据简报：<主题>

Research Question

研究问题

<brief framing of the question>
<简要说明问题范围>

Search Strategy

检索策略

  • Concepts searched:
  • Source types prioritized:
  • Inclusion logic:
  • Exclusions or limitations:
  • 检索的概念：
  • 优先考虑的来源类型：
  • 纳入逻辑：
  • 排除项或局限：

Key Sources

关键来源

SourceTypeWhy it mattersURL
来源类型重要性URL

Findings

发现

<Theme>

<主题>

  • Claim:
  • Evidence:
  • Limitations:
  • 主张：
  • 证据：
  • 局限：

<Theme>

共识与分歧

  • Claim:
  • Evidence:
  • Limitations:
  • 共识：
  • 分歧：
  • 证据缺口：

Consensus And Disagreement

后续检索查询

  • Consensus:
  • Disagreement:
  • Evidence gaps:
  • <查询思路>

对于医学、临床或生物医学主题，应采取谨慎态度：不提供诊断或治疗建议，并优先采用原始文献、系统综述、指南和官方健康来源。

Follow-Up Queries

—
  • <query idea> 

For medical, clinical, or biomedical topics, be conservative: do not provide diagnosis or treatment advice, and prioritize primary literature, systematic reviews, guidelines, and official health sources.
—