【Review Summary】
Original text quality score: X/10
Total issues found: X (Critical: X, Important: X, Minor: X)

【Key Issues】
1. XXX issue
2. XXX issue
3. XXX issue

【Revision Suggestions】
(Summarized suggestions)

【Revised Version】
(Full revised text)

【Review Summary】
Original text quality score: X/10
Total issues found: X (Critical: X, Important: X, Minor: X)

【Detailed Issue Analysis】
1. [Critical] Grammar Error
   Location: Line X, Word X
   Issue: XXX
   Suggestion: XXX
   Revision: XXX

2. [Important] Insufficient Clarity
   Location: Line X, Word X
   Issue: XXX
   Suggestion: XXX
   Revision: XXX

...

【Revised Version】
(Full revised text with special symbols marking changes)

【Improvement Directions】
(Suggestions for further optimization)

【Review Summary】
...

【Annotated Original Text】
(Use [[deleted content]] for deletions, 【added content】 for additions)

【Revised Version】
(Clear revised text)

【Issue List】
1. XXX issue → Corrected
2. XXX issue → Corrected
...

I will review this text for you. Please confirm the following requirements:

1. Review Focus Areas (multiple selection allowed, optional):
   [1] Grammar check
   [2] Spelling check
   [3] Punctuation check
   [4] Logic check
   [5] Clarity of expression check
   [6] Consistency check
   [7] Factual accuracy check
   [8] Compliance check (sensitive words, non-compliant content)

2. Target Audience (optional):
   [1] General public
   [2] Professionals
   [3] Academic community
   [4] Young people
   [5] Business professionals

3. Tone Requirement (optional):
   [1] Formal
   [2] Semi-formal (Recommended)
   [3] Casual

4. Return Format (optional):
   [1] Return only summary and revision suggestions
   [2] Return detailed analysis and revision suggestions (Recommended)
   [3] Return annotated original text and revised version

5. Highlight Changes? (optional):
   [1] Highlight modified content (Recommended)
   [2] No highlighting

You can:
- Reply with all selections at once (e.g., 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 1, 2, 2, 1)
- Reply with partial parameters, and I will confirm if additional information is needed
- Reply "review" or "ok" to execute with recommended settings (Recommended: all aspects checked, general public audience, semi-formal tone, detailed format, highlighting enabled)
- If you have other requirements, please include them in your reply

Please reply:

source_text: "This product has many great features that can help users improve work efficiency. However, sometimes it has some issues that need further improvement. We believe that through continuous efforts, this product will become better and better."
review_aspects: ["grammar", "spelling", "clarity", "consistency"]
return_format: "detailed"

【Review Summary】
Original text quality score: 7/10
Total issues found: 3 (Critical: 0, Important: 2, Minor: 1)

【Detailed Issue Analysis】
1. [Important] Redundant Expression
   Location: Sentence 1
   Issue: "has many great features" is slightly wordy
   Suggestion: Revise to "is feature-rich" or "has diverse features"
   Revision: This product is feature-rich and can help users improve work efficiency.

2. [Important] Vague Expression
   Location: Sentence 2
   Issue: "sometimes it has some issues" is ambiguous and does not specify the exact problems
   Suggestion: Clearly indicate the specific type of issues
   Revision: However, it may encounter compatibility issues under certain circumstances, which need further improvement.

3. [Minor] Optimizable Logic
   Location: Sentence 3
   Issue: "through continuous efforts" is slightly vague
   Suggestion: Specify the direction of efforts more concretely
   Revision: We believe that through continuous optimization and user feedback, this product will become better and better.

【Revised Version】
This product is feature-rich and can help users improve work efficiency. However, it may encounter compatibility issues under certain circumstances, which need further improvement. We believe that through continuous optimization and user feedback, this product will become better and better.

【Improvement Directions】
1. You can further enrich the content by adding specific cases
2. You can add data support to enhance persuasiveness
3. You can optimize the paragraph structure to make the content clearer

---

The above content is reviewed and optimized by an AI large model. Please conduct manual review before use

source_text: "This investment product has absolutely no risks, guarantees 100% returns, and has no losses whatsoever."
review_aspects: ["compliance", "factual_accuracy"]
return_format: "summary_only"

【Review Summary】
Original text quality score: 3/10
Total issues found: 3 (Critical: 3, Important: 0, Minor: 0)

【Key Issues】
1. [Critical] Compliance Issue: Use of absolute expressions like "absolutely no risks" violates financial advertising regulations
2. [Critical] Compliance Issue: Use of promissory expressions like "guarantees 100% returns" violates financial advertising regulations
3. [Critical] Factual Issue: No investment product can guarantee 100% returns and zero risks

【Revision Suggestions】
It is strongly recommended to revise all absolute and promissory expressions to more objective and cautious ones. Financial product promotion should follow the "risk warning" principle and fully disclose risks.

【Revised Version】
This investment product has certain profit potential but also corresponding investment risks. Please carefully read the product prospectus before investing, fully understand the product features and risk level, and make investment decisions based on your own risk tolerance.

---

The above content is reviewed and optimized by an AI large model. Please conduct manual review before use

source_text: "We did a study to see if this method is really useful. The results show that this method is better than all other methods."
review_aspects: ["grammar", "clarity", "tone_requirement"]
tone_requirement: "formal"
return_format: "detailed"
highlight_changes: true

【Review Summary】
Original text quality score: 6/10
Total issues found: 3 (Critical: 0, Important: 3, Minor: 0)

【Detailed Issue Analysis】
1. [Important] Informal Expression
   Location: Sentence 1
   Issue: "did a study", "to see if", "really useful" are too colloquial
   Suggestion: Use more formal academic terms
   Revision: 【This study aims to】 evaluate 【the】 effectiveness of this method

2. [Important] Inaccurate Expression
   Location: Sentence 2
   Issue: "is better than all other methods" is too absolute
   Suggestion: Use more accurate expressions
   Revision: The study results show that this method 【performs better than】 【existing】 other methods 【in multiple metrics】

3. [Important] Structure Optimization Needed
   Location: Overall
   Issue: The connection between the two sentences is not tight enough
   Suggestion: Add conjunctions to make logic clearer
   Revision: 【This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of】 this method. The study results show that this method performs better than existing other methods in multiple metrics.

【Revised Version】
【This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of】 this method. The study results show that this method performs better than existing other methods in multiple metrics.

【Improvement Directions】
1. You can further add research background and significance
2. You can provide specific data and metrics
3. You can add detailed discussion of the results

---

The above content is reviewed and optimized by an AI large model. Please conduct manual review before use

I will evaluate these versions for you. Please confirm the following requirements:

1. Version List (Required):
   Please provide the versions to be evaluated (2-5 versions)
   Format example:
   Version A: (content)
   Version B: (content)

2. Evaluation Criteria (multiple selection allowed, optional):
   [1] Clarity
   [2] Engagement
   [3] Persuasion
   [4] Professionalism
   [5] Creativity
   [6] Readability
   [7] Emotional impact
   [8] Target audience fit

3. Target Audience (optional):
   [1] General public
   [2] Professionals
   [3] Young people
   [4] Business professionals
   [5] Academic community
   [6] Custom (please describe)

4. Usage Scenario (optional):
   [1] Marketing promotion
   [2] Information dissemination
   [3] Education and training
   [4] Entertainment
   [5] Brand building
   [6] Custom

5. Evaluation Method (optional):
   [1] Comparative evaluation
   [2] Scoring evaluation
   [3] Comparative + Scoring (Recommended)

6. Provide Optimization Suggestions? (optional):
   [1] Provide optimization suggestions for each version (Recommended)
   [2] Do not provide

You can:
- Reply with all information at once
- Reply with partial parameters, and I will confirm if additional information is needed
- Reply "evaluate" or "ok" to execute with recommended settings (Recommended: all evaluation criteria, general public audience, automatically determined scenario, comparative + scoring, provide optimization suggestions)
- If you have other ideas, please include them in your reply

Please reply:

versions: [
  {"version_name": "Version A", "content": "Our product is powerful, easy to operate, and user-friendly. Welcome to experience it!"},
  {"version_name": "Version B", "content": "This product is super useful, super powerful, super easy to get started, and super good-looking! Come and try it now!"}
]
evaluation_criteria: ["clarity", "engagement", "persuasion", "readability"]
evaluation_method: "both"

【Version Evaluation Report】

Overview:
- Number of versions: 2
- Evaluation criteria: Clarity, Engagement, Persuasion, Readability
- Target audience: General public
- Usage scenario: Marketing promotion

---

Detailed Analysis of Each Version:

【Version A】
Content: "Our product is powerful, easy to operate, and user-friendly. Welcome to experience it!"

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 9/10 - Very clear expression, no ambiguity
- Engagement: 6/10 - Relatively plain, lack of engagement
- Persuasion: 7/10 - Persuasive, but not strong enough
- Readability: 10/10 - Very readable

Total Score: 8/10

Advantages:
- Clear and concise expression
- Standard and professional language
- High readability

Disadvantages:
- Lack of engagement, plain
- Persuasion is not strong enough

Optimization Suggestions:
1. Enhance engagement: Use more vivid expressions such as "super powerful", "super useful"
2. Enhance persuasion: Add specific data or cases such as "100,000 users have chosen us"

---

【Version B】
Content: "This product is super useful, super powerful, super easy to get started, and super good-looking! Come and try it now!"

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 8/10 - Relatively clear, but repeated use of "super" is slightly redundant
- Engagement: 9/10 - Very engaging, lively and vivid
- Persuasion: 8/10 - Relatively strong persuasion, with call-to-action
- Readability: 7/10 - Relatively readable, but repeated "super" is slightly wordy

Total Score: 8/10

Advantages:
- Very engaging, lively and vivid
- Strong call-to-action
- Fits the preferences of young audiences

Disadvantages:
- Repeated use of "super" is slightly redundant
- Slightly less professional

Optimization Suggestions:
1. Reduce repeated use of "super" to avoid redundancy
2. Appropriately enhance professionalism, such as changing "super useful" to "very useful"

---

Comparative Analysis:

| Dimension | Version A | Version B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Clarity   | 9/10      | 8/10      | Version A |
| Engagement| 6/10      | 9/10      | Version B |
| Persuasion| 7/10      | 8/10      | Version B |
| Readability| 10/10     | 7/10      | Version A |

Comprehensive Comparison:
- Version A performs best in clarity and readability
- Version B performs best in engagement and persuasion
- Both versions have their own advantages and are suitable for different scenarios

---

Version Ranking:

1. Comprehensive Scoring Ranking:
   1st Place: Version A (8/10) and Version B (8/10) tied

2. Scenario-adapted Ranking (Marketing promotion scenario, higher weights for engagement and persuasion):
   1st Place: Version B
   2nd Place: Version A

---

Selection Suggestions:

1. If the goal is to enhance brand image and professionalism:
   Recommend: Version A
   Reason: Version A is more professional and standardized, suitable for brand building

2. If the goal is to improve conversion rate and user clicks:
   Recommend: Version B
   Reason: Version B is more engaging and has a stronger call-to-action

3. If the target audience is young people:
   Recommend: Version B
   Reason: The language style of Version B fits the preferences of young audiences better

4. If the target audience is business professionals:
   Recommend: Version A
   Reason: Version A is more professional and formal

---

Combined Optimization Suggestions:

You can consider combining the advantages of both versions to create an optimized version:

Optimized Version:
"This product is powerful, very useful, easy to operate, and user-friendly. 100,000 users have chosen us, come and experience it now!"

Optimization Points:
- Retain engagement from Version B: "This", "very useful", "come and experience it now!"
- Retain professionalism from Version A: "powerful", "easy to operate", "user-friendly"
- Enhance persuasion: "100,000 users have chosen us"

versions: [
  {"version_name": "Version A", "content": "Limited time offer! Original price $299, now only $99!", "version_info": "Direct discount type"},
  {"version_name": "Version B", "content": "The $299 product can be taken home for $99 today! Only available today!", "version_info": "Limited time emphasis type"},
  {"version_name": "Version C", "content": "Get the $299 product for only $99, and get a VIP membership for free!", "version_info": "Gift offer type"}
]
evaluation_criteria: ["clarity", "engagement", "persuasion"]
target_audience: "general"
use_case: "marketing"
evaluation_method: "both"
provide_optimization_suggestions: true

【Version Evaluation Report】

Overview:
- Number of versions: 3
- Evaluation criteria: Clarity, Engagement, Persuasion
- Target audience: General public
- Usage scenario: Marketing promotion

---

Detailed Analysis of Each Version:

【Version A: Direct Discount Type】
Content: "Limited time offer! Original price $299, now only $99!"

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 10/10 - Very clear, price information is straightforward
- Engagement: 7/10 - Engaging, but slightly plain
- Persuasion: 8/10 - Relatively strong persuasion, obvious price comparison

Total Score: 8.3/10

Advantages:
- Very clear price information
- Directly shows discount strength
- Concise and clear

Disadvantages:
- Lack of strong engagement, plain
- Lack of sense of urgency

Optimization Suggestions:
1. Enhance engagement: Add emotional elements such as "super value", "must grab"
2. Enhance urgency: Emphasize limited time, such as "Today's only offer", "Limited to today"

---

【Version B: Limited Time Emphasis Type】
Content: "The $299 product can be taken home for $99 today! Only available today!"

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 9/10 - Clear and complete information
- Engagement: 9/10 - Very engaging, strong emotional impact
- Persuasion: 9/10 - Very strong persuasion, strong sense of urgency

Total Score: 9/10

Advantages:
- Very engaging, strong emotional impact
- Strong sense of urgency, stimulates purchase impulse
- Vivid expression, "taken home" is down-to-earth

Disadvantages:
- No obvious disadvantages

Optimization Suggestions:
- Already excellent, can be kept as is

---

【Version C: Gift Offer Type】
Content: "Get the $299 product for only $99, and get a VIP membership for free!"

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 8/10 - Relatively clear, but slightly more information
- Engagement: 8/10 - Relatively engaging, gift is a highlight
- Persuasion: 9/10 - Very strong persuasion, gift adds attraction

Total Score: 8.3/10

Advantages:
- Gift adds engagement
- Strong sense of cost-effectiveness
- Very persuasive

Disadvantages:
- Slightly more information, clarity is slightly inferior to Version A and B
- Lack of sense of urgency

Optimization Suggestions:
1. Enhance urgency: Add "Today's only offer", "Limited time" etc.
2. Improve clarity: Simplify expression, such as "$99 = $299 product + VIP membership"

---

Comparative Analysis:

| Dimension | Version A | Version B | Version C | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Clarity   | 10/10     | 9/10      | 8/10      | Version A |
| Engagement| 7/10      | 9/10      | 8/10      | Version B |
| Persuasion| 8/10      | 9/10      | 9/10      | Version B & C |

Comprehensive Comparison:
- Version A performs best in clarity
- Version B performs best in engagement and persuasion
- Version C performs excellent in persuasion, gift is a highlight

---

Version Ranking:

1. Comprehensive Scoring Ranking:
   1st Place: Version B (9/10)
   2nd Place: Version A and Version C (8.3/10) tied

2. Scenario-adapted Ranking (Marketing promotion scenario, higher weights for engagement and persuasion):
   1st Place: Version B
   2nd Place: Version C
   3rd Place: Version A

---

Selection Suggestions:

1. If the goal is quick conversion and emphasizing urgency:
   Recommend: Version B
   Reason: Version B has the strongest sense of urgency and engagement, most likely to stimulate purchase impulse

2. If the goal is to convey super value and emphasize cost-effectiveness:
   Recommend: Version C
   Reason: Version C enhances the sense of super value through gifts, and has a strong sense of cost-effectiveness

3. If the goal is to convey information clearly and avoid information overload:
   Recommend: Version A
   Reason: Version A is the most concise and clear, and information is easiest to understand

---

Combined Optimization Suggestions:

You can consider combining the urgency of Version B and the gift of Version C to create an ultimate version:

Ultimate Optimized Version:
"The $299 product can be taken home for $99 today! Get a free VIP membership! Only available today!"

Optimization Points:
- Retain urgency from Version B: "today", "taken home", "Only available today!"
- Retain gift highlight from Version C: "Get a free VIP membership!"
- Clear price comparison: $299 vs $99

versions: [
  {"version_name": "Version A", "content": "Artificial intelligence technology is changing our lives."},
  {"version_name": "Version B", "content": "AI technology is changing our lives at an unprecedented speed."},
  {"version_name": "Version C", "content": "The development of artificial intelligence technology is profoundly affecting all aspects of our lives."}
]
evaluation_criteria: ["clarity", "professionalism", "readability"]
evaluation_method: "scoring"
provide_optimization_suggestions: false

【Version Evaluation Report】

Overview:
- Number of versions: 3
- Evaluation criteria: Clarity, Professionalism, Readability
- Target audience: General public
- Usage scenario: Information dissemination

---

Detailed Analysis of Each Version:

【Version A】
Content: "Artificial intelligence technology is changing our lives."

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 10/10 - Very clear expression, no ambiguity
- Professionalism: 8/10 - Uses standardized terms, relatively professional
- Readability: 10/10 - Concise sentence, very readable

Total Score: 9.3/10

Advantages:
- Concise and clear expression
- Standard term usage
- Easy to understand

Disadvantages:
- Relatively plain expression, lacks depth

---

【Version B】
Content: "AI technology is changing our lives at an unprecedented speed."

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 8/10 - Relatively clear, but "unprecedented speed" is slightly exaggerated
- Professionalism: 7/10 - "AI" is an abbreviation, less standardized than "artificial intelligence"
- Readability: 9/10 - Slightly longer sentence, but relatively readable

Total Score: 8/10

Advantages:
- Relatively vivid expression
- Has certain appeal

Disadvantages:
- Uses abbreviation "AI", not standardized
- "unprecedented speed" is slightly exaggerated

---

【Version C】
Content: "The development of artificial intelligence technology is profoundly affecting all aspects of our lives."

Scores for each dimension:
- Clarity: 7/10 - Relatively lengthy expression, "all aspects" is slightly vague
- Professionalism: 9/10 - Uses standardized terms, professional expression
- Readability: 7/10 - Relatively long sentence, moderate readability

Total Score: 7.7/10

Advantages:
- Professional and standardized expression
- "profoundly affecting" has depth

Disadvantages:
- Relatively long sentence
- "all aspects" is slightly vague, affecting clarity

---

Version Ranking:

Comprehensive Scoring Ranking:
1st Place: Version A (9.3/10)
2nd Place: Version B (8/10)
3rd Place: Version C (7.7/10)

---

Selection Suggestions:

1. If the goal is to convey information concisely and clearly:
   Recommend: Version A
   Reason: Version A is the most concise and clear, easiest to understand

2. If the goal is to express vividly and have appeal:
   Recommend: Version B
   Reason: Version B is relatively vivid and has certain appeal

3. If the goal is professional expression with depth:
   Recommend: Version C
   Reason: Version C is the most professional and has depth

4. Comprehensive Recommendation:
   Version A has the best comprehensive performance, most recommended