critical-thinking

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Critical Thinking

批判性思维

Rigorous analysis of arguments, claims, and reasoning.

对论点、主张和推理进行严谨分析。

Pattern Selection

模式选择

Intent	Pattern	When to Use
Claim evaluation	`analyze_claims`	Assess truth claims with evidence
Prediction analysis	`extract_predictions`	Identify and assess predictions
Extraordinary claims	`extract_extraordinary_claims`	Claims contradicting consensus
Controversial ideas	`extract_controversial_ideas`	Contested viewpoints analysis
Error analysis	`analyze_mistakes`	Learn from past errors
Problem finding	`extract_primary_problem`	Root cause identification
Solution analysis	`extract_primary_solution`	Evaluate proposed solutions
Adversarial thinking	`t_red_team_thinking`	Find weaknesses in plans
Decision upgrade	`create_upgrade_pack`	Improve decision-making
Novel insights	`extract_alpha`	Most surprising/novel ideas
Thought organization	`create_idea_compass`	Structure complex ideas
Mind mapping	`create_markmap_visualization`	Visual thinking maps

意图	模式	使用场景
主张评估	`analyze_claims`	结合证据评估真实性主张
预测分析	`extract_predictions`	识别并评估预测内容
非常规主张	`extract_extraordinary_claims`	与共识相悖的主张
争议性观点	`extract_controversial_ideas`	对立观点分析
错误分析	`analyze_mistakes`	从过往错误中学习
问题定位	`extract_primary_problem`	根本原因识别
方案分析	`extract_primary_solution`	评估提议的解决方案
逆向思考	`t_red_team_thinking`	找出方案中的漏洞
决策优化	`create_upgrade_pack`	提升决策能力
新颖见解	`extract_alpha`	最具颠覆性/新颖的观点
思维梳理	`create_idea_compass`	构建复杂观点的结构
思维导图	`create_markmap_visualization`	可视化思维图谱

Decision Flow

决策流程

User request
    │
    ├─ "evaluate claims/fact check" ──→ analyze_claims
    ├─ "predictions/forecasts" ──→ extract_predictions
    ├─ "controversial/contested" ──→ extract_controversial_ideas
    ├─ "what went wrong/mistakes" ──→ analyze_mistakes
    ├─ "root cause/core problem" ──→ extract_primary_problem
    ├─ "red team/devil's advocate" ──→ t_red_team_thinking
    ├─ "surprising/novel insights" ──→ extract_alpha
    └─ "organize my thinking" ──→ create_idea_compass

用户请求
    │
    ├─ "评估主张/事实核查" ──→ analyze_claims
    ├─ "预测/展望" ──→ extract_predictions
    ├─ "有争议/对立" ──→ extract_controversial_ideas
    ├─ "哪里出错了/错误" ──→ analyze_mistakes
    ├─ "根本原因/核心问题" ──→ extract_primary_problem
    ├─ "红队审查/魔鬼代言人" ──→ t_red_team_thinking
    ├─ "颠覆性/新颖见解" ──→ extract_alpha
    └─ "梳理我的思路" ──→ create_idea_compass

Pattern References

模式参考

See

references/

for full patterns:

analyze_claims.md
extract_predictions.md
analyze_mistakes.md
extract_primary_problem.md
t_red_team_thinking.md
extract_alpha.md
create_idea_compass.md

查看

references/

获取完整模式：

analyze_claims.md
extract_predictions.md
analyze_mistakes.md
extract_primary_problem.md
t_red_team_thinking.md
extract_alpha.md
create_idea_compass.md

Output Guidelines

输出规范

Always distinguish claims from evidence
Rate confidence levels explicitly
Identify logical fallacies by name
Present steelman versions of arguments before critiquing
Note when evidence is insufficient to conclude
Acknowledge uncertainty and areas of genuine disagreement

始终明确区分主张与证据
明确标注置信度等级
按名称识别逻辑谬误
在批判前先呈现论点的强化版本（steelman）
当证据不足以得出结论时需注明
承认不确定性和存在真实分歧的领域

Chaining Suggestions

链式建议

After
```
analyze_claims
```
→ offer
```
extract_primary_problem
```
to find root issues
After
```
t_red_team_thinking
```
→ offer
```
create_upgrade_pack
```
to address weaknesses

After

extract_primary_problem

→ offer

extract_primary_solution

for solutions

在
```
analyze_claims
```
之后 → 推荐
```
extract_primary_problem
```
以找出核心问题
在
```
t_red_team_thinking
```
之后 → 推荐
```
create_upgrade_pack
```
以解决漏洞

在

extract_primary_problem

之后 → 推荐

extract_primary_solution

以提供解决方案