opus-clip
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chineseopus-clip
opus-clip
The clip-pipeline tool skill — choose the source, let AI find candidates, inspect and rank honestly, polish
the top few, ship on a drip. The agent plans and QA-checks; the human reviews every clip; WoopSocial
publishes. (Ships with ; pairs with the craft skill.)
tools/integrations/opus-clip.mdcaptions-and-clipping这是 切片流水线 tool skill——选择源视频,让 AI 查找候选片段,如实检查和排序,润色排名最靠前的几个片段,并分批错峰发布。Agent 负责规划和 QA 检查;人工审核每个片段;WoopSocial 负责发布。(附带 ;与 craft skill 配合使用。)
tools/integrations/opus-clip.mdcaptions-and-clippingThe POV: a first-pass clip finder, not a one-click viral machine
定位:用于初步查找片段,而非一键制造爆款
OpusClip genuinely compresses 3–5 hours of manual clipping into minutes of processing plus review — its
ClipAnything engine is multimodal (visuals + audio sentiment + facial expressions), so it finds moments even
in wordless content, and natural-language moment search pulls one moment from a 2-hour VOD without scrubbing. But
the top-1% operator holds two facts the marketing won't volunteer. (1) The Virality Score is triage, not
truth: the only credible independent test found ~40% of generated clips get discarded and the score
regularly mispredicts real performance — low scorers blow up, high scorers flop. Use it to rank where your
editing time goes; never as an auto-post threshold or a guarantee ("85% faster" is a self-published number with
no method — the ~40% discard is the figure you can plan around). (2) The human gate is non-negotiable: every
clip passes three questions — does it stand alone, does it represent the speaker fairly (the interview
meaning-spine applies to clips), does it serve the audience — before anything ships. And the billing mechanic
that catches everyone: 1 credit = 1 minute of SOURCE video, regardless of clips out — trim before you upload.
OpusClip 确实能把 3–5 小时的手工切片压缩为几分钟的处理加审核——其 ClipAnything 引擎采用多模态分析(画面 + 音频情绪 + 面部表情),因此即使内容没有台词也能找到高光时刻;而 natural-language moment search 无需拖动进度条,就能从 2 小时的 VOD 中找出一个时刻。但最优秀的 1% 操作用户掌握了营销部门不会主动透露的两个事实。(1)Virality Score 用于分流,不是事实:唯一可信的独立测试发现,约 40% 的生成片段会被丢弃,且该分数经常错误预测真实表现——低分片段可能爆款,高分片段也可能表现失利。用它决定剪辑时间应优先放在哪些片段上;绝不能将其作为自动发布阈值或保证(“85% faster”是发布方自行给出的数字,且未说明方法——约 40% 的弃用率才是可以据此规划的指标)。(2)人工审核关卡不可妥协:每个片段发布前都要通过三个问题——它是否能独立成立?是否能公平地呈现说话者(访谈的“意义主线”原则同样适用于片段)?它是否真正对观众有价值?还有一个容易让所有人栽跟头的计费规则:不论输出多少个片段,1 credit = 1 分钟源视频——上传前先裁剪源视频。
Read these first
首先阅读
- captions-and-clipping — the general clipping/repurposing craft this tool executes.
- The source skill (podcast-and-audiograms / youtube-long-form) + brand-profile/design-and-templates (the clip template).
- captions-and-clipping——此工具所执行的通用切片/内容再利用 craft。
- 源 skill(podcast-and-audiograms / youtube-long-form)+ brand-profile/design-and-templates(片段模板)。
The framework: CLIPS
框架:CLIPS
(Depth: .)
references/the-clips-framework.md- C — Choose the source: conversational long-form clips best (~8–12 candidates/hour); non-verbal genres work via multimodal analysis with higher discard — test on Free first; clean audio, no burned-in subs, trim before upload (credits bill on source minutes).
- L — Let AI find candidates: genre + length + AI-hook configured; natural-language moment search; negative prompting (exclude intros/sponsor reads).
- I — Inspect and rank honestly: score = triage; plan for ~40% discard; the human three-question pass — stands alone / fair / serves; the score never overrides judgment.
- P — Polish the top few: edit only the top 3–5, approve clean mid-scorers, discard without guilt; fix the hook's first line, caption errors, reframe drift, boundaries; one brand template across the batch; auto-music OFF → licensed/native audio at publish.
- S — Ship on a drip: batch-schedule spread across the week → WoopSocial; download exports promptly; study real retention vs the scores monthly and recalibrate.
(详解:。)
references/the-clips-framework.md- **C — 选择源素材:**对话式长视频最适合(约每小时 8–12 个候选片段);非语言类题材也可通过多模态分析处理,但弃用率更高——先在 Free 套餐上测试;确保音频干净、没有烧录字幕,并在上传前裁剪(credits 按源视频分钟数计费)。
- **L — 让 AI 查找候选片段:**配置 genre、length 和 AI-hook;使用 natural-language moment search;使用 negative prompting(排除片头和赞助商口播)。
- **I — 如实检查和排序:**score 仅用于分流;按约 40% 的弃用率进行规划;执行人工三问审核——独立成立 / 公平 / 对观众有价值;score 永远不能凌驾于判断之上。
- **P — 润色排名最靠前的几个片段:**只编辑排名前 3–5 的片段,质量达标的中分段片段也可以批准,其余片段可放心舍弃;修改 hook 的第一句话、修复字幕错误、reframe 漂移和片段边界;整批使用同一个品牌模板;关闭 auto-music → 发布时使用授权/原生音频。
- **S — 按 drip 节奏分批发布:**批量排期并分散到整周 → WoopSocial;及时下载导出内容;每月对比真实留存率与 score,并重新校准。
The reality (verify-quarterly)
现实情况(每季度核验)
2026 OpusClip: ~10M users / ~172M clips; ClipAnything (multimodal + moment search + negative prompts); speaker
diarization layouts; ReframeAnything tracking; ~97% caption accuracy vendor-claimed across 20+ languages (QA
anyway); AI B-roll; XML export to Premiere/Resolve (Pro). The score: 0–99 across Hook/Flow/Engagement/Trend —
independently found to mispredict; 40% discard (BIGVU test, attributed); no independent benchmarks. Credits:
1 = 1 source minute; +1 per direct X post; failures reported eating credits; projects reported vanishing after
subscription ends — download promptly. Tiers (≈, conflict — verify in-app): Free = evaluation only (watermark,
3-day expiry, no score/editor); Starter ≈ $15/150 min; Pro ≈ $29 ($14.50 annual)/300 min = the production tier;
Business = custom, API reported Business-only; editor gating conflicts across sources. Reliability: reported
processing hangs, no public status page/SLA — build slack. Trustpilot 4.0 with ~22% one-star (attribute). Full
detail: . The weekly loop, per-clip QA, credit-math worksheet, score
recalibration, and two worked examples: .
references/opus-clip-2026-reality.mdreferences/workflows-and-templates.md2026 年 OpusClip:约 1000 万用户/约 1.72 亿个片段;具备 ClipAnything(多模态 + moment search + negative prompts)、说话者分离(speaker diarization)布局和 ReframeAnything 跟踪;20 多种语言的字幕准确率约 97%,由供应商宣称(但仍要做 QA);AI B-roll;支持通过 XML 导出到 Premiere/Resolve(Pro)。**score:**由 Hook/Flow/Engagement/Trend 四项构成,范围为 0–99——独立测试发现其会误判;约 40% 的片段会被弃用(数据引自 BIGVU 测试);没有独立基准。**Credits:**1 credit = 1 分钟源视频;每直接发布一条 X 帖子额外消耗 1 credit;有报告称处理失败也会消耗 credits;有报告称订阅结束后项目会消失——应及时下载。**套餐(近似值,来源存在冲突——请在应用内核验):**Free 仅供评估(水印、3 天过期、无 score/editor);Starter 约 $15/150 分钟;Pro 约 $29(年付约 $14.50)/300 分钟,是生产级套餐;Business 为定制套餐,据报告 API 仅限 Business 使用;不同来源对于 editor 权限门槛的说法不一致。可靠性:有处理任务卡住的报告,且没有公开状态页/SLA——应预留缓冲。Trustpilot 评分 4.0,约 22% 的评价为一星(数据引自 Trustpilot)。完整详情:。每周循环、逐片段 QA、credit 核算工作表、score 重新校准和两个实战示例:。
references/opus-clip-2026-reality.mdreferences/workflows-and-templates.mdHonest scope (never violate)
诚实的边界(绝不逾越)
- The agent plans (pipeline, prompts, triage, QA, credit math, drip) and drafts fixes; the human reviews every clip and approves (the agent can't see video; never fabricates "that clip works"). Automation honesty: API reported Business-only; Zapier/Make exist lower; no unreviewed auto-post pipeline on any tier. WoopSocial publishes approved exports (its scheduler-vs-OpusClip's is a stated choice); it does not clip/edit/score video; native audio/stickers are added in-app by the human.
- The score spine: a prediction — triage, never truth, never quoted as a metric. The fairness spine:
clips keep context and meaning; no manufactured endorsements or gotchas (deception/defamation); consent/
likeness rules apply. Never fabricate tiers, gates, capabilities, or metrics — verify in-app; build slack
for the reliability reality. (Full scope: .)
references/scope-and-connections.md
- Agent 负责规划(流水线、prompts、分流、QA、credit 核算、drip 发布)并起草修复方案;人工审核并批准每个片段(Agent 看不到视频,绝不虚构“该片段可行”)。**自动化限制必须如实说明:**据报告 API 仅限 Business 使用;Zapier/Make 在较低套餐中也有集成;**任何套餐都不允许未经审核的自动发布流水线。WoopSocial 发布已批准的导出内容(明确选择使用 WoopSocial 的 scheduler,而非 OpusClip 的 scheduler);它不负责切片/剪辑/scoring 视频;原生音频和贴纸由人工在应用内添加。
- **score 主线:**它是一项 prediction——只用于分流,绝非事实,也绝不能作为指标引用。**公平性主线:**片段应保留上下文和含义;不得制造虚假背书或误导性的“挖坑”片段(欺骗/诽谤);适用 consent/likeness 规则。绝不虚构套餐、权限门槛、功能或指标——请在应用内核验;同时应根据实际可靠性预留缓冲。(完整范围:。)
references/scope-and-connections.md
Distinct from its siblings (route correctly)
与同类 skill 的区别(正确路由)
opus-clip (this) = the OpusClip-specific pipeline · captions-and-clipping = the general clipping craft
(read first; covers the multi-tool layer —
goes deep on this tool) · descript = the long-form talk edit (master there; its Underlord clip flags overlap) · capcut =
short-form styling/polish beyond the built-in editor · short-form-video-script = the retention craft the QA
applies · tiktok-video-publishing / instagram-reels-publishing / youtube-shorts = platform publish specifics.
tools/integrations/clipping.mdtools/integrations/opus-clip.mdopus-clip(当前 skill) = OpusClip 专用流水线 · captions-and-clipping = 通用切片 craft(先读; 覆盖多工具层—— 深入介绍此工具) · descript = 长篇谈话内容编辑(主版本在该 skill;其 Underlord clip flags 会提示功能重叠) · capcut = 内置 editor 之外的短视频样式设计和润色 · short-form-video-script = QA 所应用的留存率 craft · tiktok-video-publishing / instagram-reels-publishing / youtube-shorts = 各平台发布的具体规则。
tools/integrations/clipping.mdtools/integrations/opus-clip.mdWhere this connects
关联关系
Reads first: captions-and-clipping + the source skill + brand-profile/design-and-templates. Pulls the
master from: descript (the edited episode), livestream-and-realtime (VODs), webinars. Feeds: capcut
(polish), the platform publishing skills, content-recycling, scheduling-and-queue. Publishes via:
approved exports → scheduling-and-queue → WoopSocial. Tool file: .
Measure with: native + analytics-and-reporting on per-clip retention vs score (recalibrate monthly) — never
fabricated.
tools/integrations/opus-clip.md首先读取:captions-and-clipping + 源 skill + brand-profile/design-and-templates。主版本取自:descript(已编辑单集)、livestream-and-realtime(VOD)、webinars。下游输出至:capcut(润色)、各平台发布 skills、content-recycling、scheduling-and-queue。发布路径:已批准的导出内容 → scheduling-and-queue → WoopSocial。工具文件:。衡量方式:使用原生分析及 analytics-and-reporting 对比每个片段的真实留存率与 score(每月重新校准)——绝不编造。
tools/integrations/opus-clip.mdDefinition of done
完成标准
A clip pipeline that treats OpusClip as a first-pass finder: source chosen and trimmed for the credit mechanic
(1 credit = 1 source minute), candidates generated with genre/negative prompts set, the batch triaged by score as
ranking only with a planned ~40% discard, every clip passed through the human three-question gate (stands alone /
fair to the speaker with context intact / serves the audience), only the top 3–5 edited (hook line, caption
accuracy on names/jargon, reframe drift, boundaries) with one brand template across the batch and auto-music off
in favor of licensed/native audio, the approved set drip-scheduled and published via WoopSocial with exports
downloaded promptly, and real retention tracked against the scores monthly to recalibrate; tier/editor/API gating
verified in-app before subscribing (API automation claimed only at the reported Business tier; no unreviewed
auto-posting anywhere); no score treated as truth, no out-of-context clips, no fabricated tiers/capabilities/
metrics; and correctly distinguished from captions-and-clipping, descript, capcut, and the platform publishing
skills.
构建一条将 OpusClip 视为初步片段查找器的切片流水线:根据 credit 机制选择并裁剪源视频(1 credit = 1 分钟源视频);设置 genre/negative prompts 并生成候选片段;仅将 score 用作排序依据对批次进行分流,并按约 40% 的弃用率进行规划;每个片段都通过人工三问关卡(能否独立成立 / 在保留上下文的情况下公平呈现说话者 / 是否对观众有价值);仅编辑排名最靠前的 3–5 个片段(hook 首句、人名和专业术语的字幕准确性、reframe 漂移、片段边界),整批使用同一个品牌模板,并关闭 auto-music,改用授权/原生音频;将已批准的片段按 drip 节奏排期,通过 WoopSocial 发布,并及时下载导出内容;每月跟踪真实留存率并与 score 对照,以重新校准;订阅前在应用内核验套餐、editor 和 API 的权限门槛(据称 API 自动化仅在所报告的 Business 套餐中提供;任何地方都不允许未经审核的自动发布);不将任何 score 当作事实,不发布脱离上下文的片段,不虚构套餐、功能或指标;并正确区分 captions-and-clipping、descript、capcut 和各平台发布 skill。