idea-validator
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseIdea Validator - Startup Idea Assessment Framework
创业想法验证器 - 创业想法评估框架
Rigorously assess startup ideas BEFORE building using structured validation—saving months of wasted effort on ideas that won't work.
Hexa's Principle: "You want to make something people want. But people don't always know what they want—so you need to understand what they actually need."
在投入开发前，使用结构化验证方法严格评估创业想法——避免在行不通的想法上浪费数月的精力。
Hexa的原则： "你要打造人们想要的东西。但人们并不总是知道自己想要什么——所以你需要了解他们真正的需求。"
When This Activates
激活场景
- User asks "is this a good idea"
- User says "I want to build X" without validation
- User asks "should I pursue this"
- User mentions a startup idea they're considering
- User wants to know if their idea is worth building
- 用户询问“这个想法好吗”
- 用户表示“我想开发X”但未做任何验证
- 用户询问“我应该推进这个想法吗”
- 用户提及正在考虑的创业想法
- 用户想知道自己的想法是否值得投入开发
The Framework
验证框架
Validation = Opportunity Memo Assessment + Perceived Created Value (PCV) Score
验证 = 机会备忘录评估 + 感知创造价值（PCV）评分
Problem Assessment Matrix
问题评估矩阵
| Dimension | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | [Daily/Weekly/Monthly] | High/Med/Low |
| Severity | [Critical/Important/Nice-to-have] | High/Med/Low |
| Awareness | [Actively seeking/Aware/Unaware] | High/Med/Low |
| Budget | [Has budget/Would find/No budget] | High/Med/Low |
Problem Score: 3-4 High = Strong. 1-2 = Weak. 0 = Not a real problem.
| 维度 | 评分 | 影响 |
|---|---|---|
| 发生频率 | [每日/每周/每月] | 高/中/低 |
| 严重程度 | [关键/重要/锦上添花] | 高/中/低 |
| 用户认知 | [主动寻找解决方案/知晓问题/未意识到问题] | 高/中/低 |
| 预算情况 | [有预算/会寻找预算/无预算] | 高/中/低 |
问题得分： 3-4项为高 = 问题强劲。1-2项 = 问题薄弱。0 = 并非真实问题。
PCV Scoring (4 Dimensions)
PCV评分（4个维度）
Rate current solution problems + your improvement:
| Dimension | Current Problem | Your Improvement |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Not a problem / A problem / Serious | No diff / Some / Serious |
| Quality | Not a problem / A problem / Serious | No diff / Some / Serious |
| Performance | Not a problem / A problem / Serious | No diff / Some / Serious |
| Convenience | Not a problem / A problem / Serious | No diff / Some / Serious |
Scoring: a=0, b=1, c=3 points. Sum all 8 ratings.
| Score | Interpretation | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Weak | Don't pursue |
| 7-12 | Moderate | Needs refinement |
| 13-18 | Strong | Worth pursuing |
| 19-24 | Exceptional | Build NOW |
对现有解决方案的问题以及你的改进点进行评分：
| 维度 | 现有问题 | 你的改进 |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | 无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题 | 无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进 |
| 质量 | 无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题 | 无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进 |
| 性能 | 无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题 | 无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进 |
| 便利性 | 无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题 | 无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进 |
评分规则： a=0分，b=1分，c=3分。将所有8项评分相加。
| 总分 | 解读 | 建议 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | 薄弱 | 不要推进 |
| 7-12 | 中等 | 需要优化完善 |
| 13-18 | 强劲 | 值得推进 |
| 19-24 | 极佳 | 立即投入开发 |
Quick Discovery Questions
快速探索问题
Problem Space:
- What specific pain point does your ICP feel?
- How do they currently solve this?
- What's wrong with current solutions?
- How often do they experience this pain?
- What does this problem cost them?
Timing:
- Why is NOW the right time?
- What has changed recently?
- What barriers existed before that are now gone?
ICP:
- Company type, size, industry
- Buyer vs. user role
- What triggers them to seek a solution?
问题领域：
- 你的ICP（理想客户画像）面临哪些具体痛点？
- 他们目前如何解决这个问题？
- 现有解决方案存在哪些不足？
- 他们多久会遇到一次这个痛点？
- 这个问题会给他们带来哪些成本损失？
时机因素：
- 为什么现在是推进的最佳时机？
- 最近发生了哪些变化？
- 之前存在的哪些障碍现在已经消除？
ICP（理想客户画像）：
- 公司类型、规模、行业
- 采购者与使用者的角色差异
- 什么因素会促使他们寻求解决方案？
Integration
集成工具
| Skill | When to Use |
|---|---|
| After validation passes |
| Deep dive on customer |
| Scope the build |
| Find design partners |
For detailed execution workflow, output templates, and PCV calculations:
references/full-guide.md| 技能 | 使用时机 |
|---|---|
| 验证通过后 |
| 深入研究客户时 |
| 规划开发范围时 |
| 寻找设计合作伙伴时 |
如需详细执行流程、输出模板和PCV计算方法：
references/full-guide.md