reflect
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseMANDATORY PREPARATION
必备准备工作
Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first.
Analyze the Maestro audit trail and decision log to produce a skill-effectiveness scorecard. This tells you which commands work, which fail, and where your workflow needs attention.
调用/agent-workflow —— 其中包含工作流原则、反模式以及上下文收集协议。在继续操作前请遵循该协议——如果尚未存在工作流上下文,你必须先运行/teach-maestro。
分析Maestro审计跟踪记录和决策日志,生成技能有效性评分卡。这将告诉你哪些命令有效、哪些失效,以及工作流中需要关注的环节。
Data Sources
数据源
Read these files from the project root:
- — every command invocation with duration, cost, and outcome
.maestro/audit.jsonl - — decisions made with outcomes and next steps
.maestro/decisions.jsonl
If neither file exists, respond: "No audit data found. Run commands with Maestro to start tracking, then come back."
从项目根目录读取以下文件:
- —— 每条命令调用记录,包含时长、成本和执行结果
.maestro/audit.jsonl - —— 已做出的决策记录,包含执行结果和后续步骤
.maestro/decisions.jsonl
如果两个文件都不存在,请回复:"未找到审计数据。使用Maestro运行命令以开始跟踪,之后再返回。"
Analysis Dimensions
分析维度
1. Usage Frequency
- Which commands run most/least?
- Are any commands never used? (candidates for removal)
2. Completion Rate
- What % of invocations complete successfully?
- Which commands fail most often?
3. Command Flow
- What are the most common command sequences (A → B)?
- Which commands lead to follow-ups vs. abandonment?
- Abandonment rate per command (no follow-up within 30 min)
4. Cost Distribution
- Total estimated cost across all commands
- Cost per command (average)
- Most/least expensive commands
5. Duration Analysis
- Average duration per command
- Outliers (unusually slow invocations)
1. 使用频率
- 哪些命令运行次数最多/最少?
- 是否存在从未被使用的命令?(可考虑移除)
2. 完成率
- 成功完成的调用占比是多少?
- 哪些命令失败次数最多?
3. 命令流
- 最常见的命令序列是什么(A → B)?
- 哪些命令会引发后续操作,哪些会被弃用?
- 各命令的弃用率(30分钟内无后续操作)
4. 成本分布
- 所有命令的总预估成本
- 单条命令的平均成本
- 成本最高/最低的命令
5. 时长分析
- 单条命令的平均执行时长
- 异常值(执行异常缓慢的调用)
Output Format
输出格式
text
╔══════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ MAESTRO EFFECTIVENESS ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Commands Run __ (__ unique) ║
║ Completion Rate __% ║
║ Most Used /_____ (__×) ║
║ Most Abandoned /_____ (__% ⚠️) ║
║ Avg Duration __s ║
║ Total Cost ~$__.__ ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ STRONGEST PIPELINES ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ /_____ → /_____ __× ║
║ /_____ → /_____ __× ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ COST PER COMMAND ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ /_____ $__.__/run ████░░ avg ║
║ /_____ $__.__/run █░░░░░ cheap ║
║ /_____ $__.__/run █████░ costly ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════╝
INSIGHTS:
1. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]
2. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]
3. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]text
╔══════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ MAESTRO EFFECTIVENESS ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Commands Run __ (__ unique) ║
║ Completion Rate __% ║
║ Most Used /_____ (__×) ║
║ Most Abandoned /_____ (__% ⚠️) ║
║ Avg Duration __s ║
║ Total Cost ~$__.__ ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ STRONGEST PIPELINES ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ /_____ → /_____ __× ║
║ /_____ → /_____ __× ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ COST PER COMMAND ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ /_____ $__.__/run ████░░ avg ║
║ /_____ $__.__/run █░░░░░ cheap ║
║ /_____ $__.__/run █████░ costly ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════╝
INSIGHTS:
1. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]
2. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]
3. [Data-driven observation with recommended action]Insights Rules
洞察规则
Every insight MUST:
- Reference specific data (e.g., "40% abandonment rate")
- Suggest a specific Maestro command to address it
- Distinguish correlation from causation
每条洞察必须:
- 引用具体数据(例如:"40%的弃用率")
- 建议使用特定的Maestro命令来解决问题
- 区分相关性与因果关系
Reflection Checklist
反思检查清单
- All 5 analysis dimensions covered
- Scorecard generated with real data
- Insights are data-driven, not speculative
- Cost estimates labeled as approximate (~)
- Recommended actions reference specific Maestro commands
- 覆盖所有5个分析维度
- 使用真实数据生成评分卡
- 洞察基于数据,而非推测
- 成本估算标注为近似值(~)
- 建议的操作引用具体的Maestro命令
Recommended Next Step
推荐后续步骤
After reflecting, run to remove unused commands, or on the most-abandoned command to improve its prompt quality.
/streamline/refineNEVER:
- Require audit data to exist — degrade gracefully
- Invent metrics beyond what the logs contain
- Show cost data without the "estimate" disclaimer (~)
- Make judgments without evidence (say "100% completion rate" not "works great")
- Compare across projects — reflect is project-scoped
反思完成后,运行移除未使用的命令,或对弃用率最高的命令运行以提升其提示质量。
/streamline/refine禁止:
- 强制要求审计数据存在——需优雅降级处理
- 生成日志中未包含的指标
- 展示成本数据时未标注“预估”声明(~)
- 无证据情况下做出判断(应说“100%完成率”而非“效果很好”)
- 跨项目对比——反思仅针对当前项目