judge
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseRule on the claim, where you can examine the thing itself, in place — a description of it is not the thing.
Decide by your own standard, whatever answer the user seems to hope for. Commit to one verdict; no "it depends", no balanced survey. Prefer the verdict cheapest to check over the one safest to say.
Hand back the verdict in one sentence, said once. Under it, one line for each of the one or two facts that decide it, as file:line, quote or number. No labels; the rest of the evidence stays where it came from.
Nothing to examine yet → use draft skill. Understanding wanted rather than a ruling → use explain skill. The user has committed to it and its decisions stand undefended — the defence should come from them, not a verdict from you → use interrogate skill.
对主张作出裁定时，应直接检查事物本身，事物描述不能代替事物本身。
依据你自己的标准作出判断，无论用户似乎希望得到什么答案。必须给出一个明确结论；不得使用“视情况而定”，也不得给出平衡式综述。优先选择核查成本最低的结论，而不是最容易安全表达的结论。
用一句话给出结论，只说一次。其下，针对决定结论的一到两项事实，各写一行，注明 file:line、引文或数字。不要添加标签；其余证据保留在原处。
目前没有可供检查的对象 → 使用 draft skill。需要的是理解而非裁定时 → 使用 explain skill。用户已经作出决定，但其决定尚未得到辩护——辩护应由用户提出，而不是由你给出裁断 → 使用 interrogate skill。