academic-research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Academic Research Skill

学术研究技能

Systematic literature search with source prioritization and APA 7th edition citations.

具备来源优先级排序和APA第7版引用格式的系统性文献搜索工具。

Research Workflow

研究工作流

1. Search Strategy (Execute in Order)

1. 搜索策略（按顺序执行）

Phase 1 - Academic databases (Priority 1-2):

```
site:scholar.google.com [topic]
```
```
site:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [topic]
```
```
site:semanticscholar.org [topic]
```
```
site:arxiv.org [topic]
```

Phase 2 - Institutional (Priority 3-4):

```
site:edu [topic] research
```
```
site:gov [topic]
```
```
site:who.int OR site:un.org [topic]
```

Phase 3 - General (only if needed):

Verify author credentials before citing
Cross-reference with academic sources

阶段1 - 学术数据库（优先级1-2）：

```
site:scholar.google.com [主题]
```
```
site:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [主题]
```
```
site:semanticscholar.org [主题]
```
```
site:arxiv.org [主题]
```

阶段2 - 机构来源（优先级3-4）：

```
site:edu [主题] research
```
```
site:gov [主题]
```
```
site:who.int OR site:un.org [主题]
```

阶段3 - 通用来源（仅在必需时使用）：

引用前核实作者资质
与学术来源交叉验证

2. Classify & Tag Sources

2. 来源分类与标记

Classify each source by priority (1=highest, 6=lowest). See references/source_hierarchy.md for domain patterns.

Apply uncertainty markers to findings:

```
[UNVERIFIED]
```
- single source only
```
[CONFLICTING]
```
- sources disagree
```
[INDUSTRY SOURCE]
```
- potential commercial bias
```
[PREPRINT]
```
- not peer-reviewed
```
[OUTDATED]
```
- >5 years old in fast-moving field
```
[SECONDARY]
```
- primary source not accessed

按优先级（1=最高，6=最低）对每个来源进行分类。领域模式请参考references/source_hierarchy.md。

为研究结果添加不确定性标记：

```
[UNVERIFIED]
```
- 仅单一来源
```
[CONFLICTING]
```
- 来源存在分歧
```
[INDUSTRY SOURCE]
```
- 可能存在商业偏见
```
[PREPRINT]
```
- 未经过同行评审
```
[OUTDATED]
```
- 快速发展领域中发布超过5年
```
[SECONDARY]
```
- 未获取原始来源

3. Generate Report

3. 生成报告

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

Research Report: [Topic]

研究报告：[主题]

Query: [question] Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]

查询问题： [问题] 日期： [YYYY-MM-DD]

Executive Summary

执行摘要

[2-3 paragraph synthesis]

[2-3段综合内容]

Methodology

研究方法

Search queries used
Databases searched
Inclusion/exclusion criteria

使用的搜索查询词
检索的数据库
纳入/排除标准

Findings

研究结果

[Theme 1]

[主题1]

[Content with inline citations (Author, Year)]

[带有内联引用的内容（作者，年份）]

Source Quality Assessment

来源质量评估

Source	Type	Priority	Notes

来源	类型	优先级	备注

Uncertainties and Limitations

不确定性与局限性

[conflicts, gaps, biases]

[冲突、空白、偏见]

References

参考文献

[APA 7th edition, alphabetized]

undefined

[APA第7版格式，按字母顺序排列]

undefined

APA Citation Basics

APA引用基础

Inline: (Smith, 2023) or (Smith et al., 2023) for 3+ authors

Common reference formats:

Journal: Author, A. (Year). Title of article. Journal Name, Vol(Issue), pp–pp. https://doi.org/xxx
Website: Author. (Year, Month Day). Title. Site Name. https://url
Report: Organization. (Year). Title of report. https://url

For complete APA 7th edition rules, edge cases, and additional source types, see references/apa_citation.md.

Note: For advanced citation work (complex source types, legal/media citations, batch formatting), the
apa-style-citation
skill provides enhanced expertise.

内联引用： (Smith, 2023) 或当作者为3人及以上时使用(Smith et al., 2023)

常见参考文献格式：

期刊文章： 作者, A. (年份). 文章标题. 期刊名称, 卷号(期号), 页码范围. https://doi.org/xxx
网站： 作者. (年份, 月日). 标题. 网站名称. https://url
报告： 机构. (年份). 报告标题. https://url

完整的APA第7版规则、特殊案例及更多来源类型，请参考references/apa_citation.md。

注意： 若需高级引用工作（复杂来源类型、法律/媒体引用、批量格式化），
apa-style-citation
技能可提供更专业的支持。

Quality Checklist

质量检查清单

Before finalizing:

All claims have citations
Source hierarchy followed (prioritize peer-reviewed)
Conflicts noted with
```
[CONFLICTING]
```
marker
Uncertainties section populated
References complete in APA format

最终定稿前请确认：

所有主张均带有引用
遵循来源优先级规则（优先选择同行评审来源）
已用
```
[CONFLICTING]
```
标记标注冲突内容
已填写不确定性部分
参考文献完整且符合APA格式

Core Rules

核心规则

Never fabricate sources - if no evidence exists, say so
Acknowledge limitations - be transparent about gaps
Maintain objectivity - present conflicting evidence fairly
Prioritize recency - prefer recent sources unless historical context needed
Weight by priority - higher priority sources trump lower when conflicting

绝不编造来源 - 若无相关证据，直接说明
明确局限性 - 透明说明研究空白
保持客观性 - 公平呈现相互矛盾的证据
优先时效性 - 除非需要历史背景，否则优先选择近期来源
按优先级加权 - 当来源存在冲突时，高优先级来源优于低优先级来源

Scripts

脚本

Generate search queries:

python scripts/research_agent.py generate-queries "topic"

Classify a URL:

python scripts/research_agent.py classify-url "https://..."

生成搜索查询词：

python scripts/research_agent.py generate-queries "topic"

分类URL：

python scripts/research_agent.py classify-url "https://..."