rw-research-question
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseRW Research Question
RW Research Question
把研究兴趣转成可界定、可检索、可证伪和可执行的问题。
Transform research interests into definable, searchable, falsifiable, and executable research questions.
启动
Activation
- 读取 、
references/standalone.md和references/method.md。references/standards.md - 读取用户本轮提供的材料;没有材料时,只完成当前证据允许的部分。
- 需要规则判断时检索 ;遇到相似任务时读取
references/atoms.jsonl。references/cases.md - 需要选择方法或工具时读取 ,并使用
references/domain-guide.md组织交付。assets/worksheet.md - 读取 。
references/acceptance.md只用于测试,不作为用户任务事实。references/behavior-tests.json - 当前文献、API、报告规范和期刊要求可能变化时,打开 中的官方链接核验并记录日期。
references/source-map.md
- Read ,
references/standalone.md, andreferences/method.md.references/standards.md - Read the materials provided by the user in this session; if no materials are provided, only complete the parts allowed by current evidence.
- Retrieve when rule judgment is needed; read
references/atoms.jsonlwhen encountering similar tasks.references/cases.md - Read when selecting methods or tools, and use
references/domain-guide.mdto organize deliverables.assets/worksheet.md - Read .
references/acceptance.mdis only used for testing and not as factual information for user tasks.references/behavior-tests.json - When current literature, APIs, report specifications, or journal requirements may change, verify by opening the official links in and record the date.
references/source-map.md
工作阶段
Work Phases
- 保留原始兴趣、决策场景和用户真正想解释的现象。
- 识别问题类型:描述、关联、因果、诊断、预测、体验、实施、经济或证据综合。
- 定义人群或情境、现象或干预、比较、结果、时间和研究层级。
- 为核心构念写操作性定义、可观察指标和不可接受的替代定义。
- 列出至少两个替代解释、一个反例和会改变结论的结果。
- 输出主问题、子问题、检索概念、数据要求和不可回答部分。
- Retain the original interest, decision-making scenario, and the phenomenon the user actually wants to explain.
- Identify the problem type: descriptive, correlational, causal, diagnostic, predictive, experiential, implementation, economic, or evidence synthesis.
- Define the population or context, phenomenon or intervention, comparison, outcome, time, and research level.
- Write operational definitions, observable indicators, and unacceptable alternative definitions for core constructs.
- List at least two alternative explanations, one counterexample, and outcomes that would change the conclusion.
- Output the main question, sub-questions, search concepts, data requirements, and unanswerable parts.
运行规则
Operational Rules
- 先选择问题类型,再选择问题框架;PICO 不是所有问题的默认格式。
- 可检索的问题要把核心构念拆成概念和同义词。
- 可执行的问题要说明能够取得什么数据,而不是只写理想数据。
- 可证伪的问题要说明何种观察会削弱主要解释。
- 构念定义不清时,样本量和统计方法都不能补救。
- 数据已经存在,只能限制问题,不能自动证明问题有价值。
- 描述问题不能在输出中变成因果问题。
- 预测问题要区分模型开发、内部验证、外部验证和临床效用。
- 定性问题要说明经验、过程或意义所处的情境。
- 实施问题要区分干预效果和实施结果。
- 研究问题必须有范围边界,不能靠无限加变量解决。
- 最终问题应能生成检索式、纳排标准或研究设计入口。
- Select the problem type first, then the problem framework; PICO is not the default format for all questions.
- For searchable questions, split core constructs into concepts and synonyms.
- For executable questions, specify what data can be obtained, rather than just writing ideal data.
- For falsifiable questions, specify what observations would weaken the main explanation.
- Unclear construct definitions cannot be remedied by sample size or statistical methods.
- If data already exists, only limit the question; do not automatically prove the question is valuable.
- Descriptive questions cannot be turned into causal questions in the output.
- For predictive questions, distinguish between model development, internal validation, external validation, and clinical utility.
- For qualitative questions, specify the context in which experience, process, or meaning occurs.
- For implementation questions, distinguish between intervention effects and implementation outcomes.
- Research questions must have scope boundaries; do not solve problems by adding unlimited variables.
- The final question should be able to generate search strategies, inclusion-exclusion criteria, or entry points for research design.
输出
Output
- 主研究问题和子问题。
- 构念、边界、替代解释和证伪条件。
- 检索概念、数据要求和下一步。
- Main research question and sub-questions.
- Constructs, boundaries, alternative explanations, and falsification conditions.
- Search concepts, data requirements, and next steps.
停止条件
Termination Conditions
- 核心构念无法定义时,停止在构念澄清。
- 没有可取得的数据或可接触的研究对象时,标记不可执行。
- 不因新颖措辞声称研究存在文献缺口。
- 不把相关性问题改写成因果结论。
- Stop at construct clarification when core constructs cannot be defined.
- Mark as non-executable when there is no accessible data or research subjects.
- Do not claim a literature gap based on novel wording.
- Do not rewrite correlational questions into causal conclusions.
独立运行
Standalone Operation
- 默认不读取私人工作区、个人语料目录或预设 research-lab。
- 用户提供的文件、文本、链接和数据是当前任务输入,不是安装依赖。
- 网络不可用时,使用 Skill 内的稳定方法继续;需要当前事实的部分标记为待核验。
- 本包内其他科研 Skill 存在时可以接续;单独安装时直接返回下一步说明,不停止当前任务。
- By default, do not read private workspaces, personal corpus directories, or preset research-lab.
- Files, text, links, and data provided by the user are inputs for the current task, not installation dependencies.
- When the network is unavailable, continue using stable methods within the Skill; mark parts requiring current facts as pending verification.
- Can connect with other research Skills in this package if available; when installed alone, directly return instructions for next steps without stopping the current task.
来源纪律
Source Discipline
- 把用户材料、公开来源、当前推断和未知事项分开。
- 报告规范只检查报告透明度,不自动证明设计质量。
- 公开来源摘要保存在 Skill 内;需要版本、费用、政策、API 或期刊现状时回到官方页面。
- 不生成不存在的论文、数据、DOI、工具运行结果或期刊要求。
- Separate user materials, public sources, current inferences, and unknown matters.
- Report specifications only check report transparency; do not automatically prove design quality.
- Public source abstracts are stored within the Skill; return to official pages when needing version, cost, policy, API, or journal status.
- Do not generate non-existent papers, data, DOIs, tool operation results, or journal requirements.