Back to Details

discover-framework

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Discover Framework - Framework Research & Integration

发现框架 - 框架研究与集成

Overview

概述

This skill helps users research and add new strategic frameworks to the Strategic Frameworks library. The approach is rigorous and evidence-based - only real, documented, proven frameworks are added.
Core principles:
  • Evidence-based - Real frameworks with credible sources, not AI-generated
  • Comprehensive research - Deep investigation before adding
  • Quality validation - Strict criteria to maintain library quality
  • Proper integration - Correct file structure and system updates
  • Community-driven - Users expand the library collaboratively
Output: New framework file created, integrated into system, and ready to use via 
use-framework
本技能可帮助用户研究并向战略框架库中添加新的战略框架。采用严谨且基于证据的方法——仅添加真实、有文档记录、经过验证的框架。
核心原则：
  • 基于证据 - 仅添加有可信来源的真实框架，而非AI生成的框架
  • 全面研究 - 添加前进行深度调研
  • 质量验证 - 严格遵循标准以维护库的质量
  • 正确集成 - 规范的文件结构与系统更新
  • 社区驱动 - 用户协作扩展框架库
输出结果： 创建新的框架文件，集成到系统中，可通过
use-framework
指令直接使用

Workflow

工作流程

Phase 1: Context Gathering (5 minutes)

阶段1：上下文收集（5分钟）

Goal: Understand what user needs and why.
Questions to ask:
  1. Problem/Need:
    • "What problem or situation needs a framework that's not in our library?"
    • "Why don't existing frameworks fit?"
    • "What's missing from current options?"
  2. Framework Knowledge:
    • "Do you have a specific framework in mind, or should I research options?"
    • "If you know the framework name, what is it?"
    • "Where did you hear about it?"
  3. Category:
    • "What type of framework are you looking for?"
    • Options: Strategic / Decision / Innovation / Operations / Mental Models
  4. Use Case:
    • "How would you use this framework?"
    • "What would it help you accomplish?"
Determine approach:
If user knows specific framework:
  • "Great, let's research [Framework Name] deeply and add it"
  • Move to Phase 3 (Deep Research)
If user doesn't know specific framework:
  • "Let me search for frameworks that fit your need"
  • Move to Phase 2 (Search & Selection)
目标： 理解用户的需求及原因。
需询问的问题：
  1. 问题/需求：
    • “当前有什么问题或场景是现有框架库无法满足的？”
    • “为什么现有框架不适用？”
    • “当前选项缺少了什么？”
  2. 框架相关认知：
    • “你是否有特定的框架名称，还是需要我来研究合适的选项？”
    • “如果你知道框架名称，具体是什么？”
    • “你是从哪里了解到这个框架的？”
  3. 分类：
    • “你需要的是哪种类型的框架？”
    • 可选类别：战略类 / 决策类 / 创新类 / 运营类 / 思维模型类
  4. 使用场景：
    • “你打算如何使用这个框架？”
    • “它能帮你实现什么目标？”
确定后续方案：
如果用户知道具体框架名称：
  • “好的，我们来深度研究[框架名称]并将其添加到系统中”
  • 进入阶段3（深度研究）
如果用户不知道具体框架名称：
  • “让我搜索符合你需求的框架”
  • 进入阶段2（搜索与筛选）

Phase 2: Internet Research & Selection (5-10 minutes)

阶段2：网络研究与筛选（5-10分钟）

Goal: Find 2-3 candidate frameworks matching user's need.
Research approach:
  1. Formulate search queries:
    • Based on problem type, category, use case
    • Examples:
      • "strategic frameworks for [problem]"
      • "decision-making frameworks for [situation]"
      • "[domain] frameworks for [goal]"
  2. Use WebSearch extensively:
    • Search for multiple candidates
    • Look for reputable sources
    • Find frameworks with clear methodology
  3. Initial screening: For each candidate, quickly check:
    • Is it a real framework? (not just concept)
    • Does it have clear creator/origin?
    • Does it have structured methodology?
    • Is it documented somewhere credible?
  4. Present options to user:
markdown
undefined
目标： 找到2-3个符合用户需求的候选框架。
研究方法：
  1. 制定搜索关键词：
    • 基于问题类型、分类、使用场景
    • 示例：
      • "strategic frameworks for [problem]"
      • "decision-making frameworks for [situation]"
      • "[domain] frameworks for [goal]"
  2. 充分使用WebSearch：
    • 搜索多个候选框架
    • 查找有信誉的来源
    • 寻找具备清晰方法论的框架
  3. 初步筛选： 对每个候选框架，快速检查：
    • 是否为真实框架？（而非仅概念）
    • 是否有明确的创建者/起源？
    • 是否有结构化的方法论？
    • 是否在可信渠道有文档记录？
  4. 向用户展示选项：
markdown
undefined

Framework Candidates

框架候选列表

I found 3 frameworks that might fit:
我找到了3个可能符合需求的框架：

1. [Framework Name] by [Creator]

1. [框架名称] by [创建者]

What it is: [1-2 sentence description] Why it fits: [How it addresses user's need] Source: [Where it's documented]
框架简介： [1-2句话描述] 适配原因： [如何满足用户需求] 来源： [文档记录渠道]

2. [Framework Name] by [Creator]

2. [框架名称] by [创建者]

What it is: [Description] Why it fits: [Fit reasoning] Source: [Documentation]
框架简介： [描述] 适配原因： [适配理由] 来源： [文档记录渠道]

3. [Framework Name] by [Creator]

3. [框架名称] by [创建者]

What it is: [Description] Why it fits: [Fit reasoning] Source: [Documentation]
Which would you like me to research deeply and add to the system?

5. **User selects:**
   - Get user's choice
   - Proceed to Phase 3 with selected framework
框架简介： [描述] 适配原因： [适配理由] 来源： [文档记录渠道]
你希望我深度研究并添加哪个框架到系统中？

5. **用户选择：**
   - 获取用户的选择
   - 进入阶段3，对选中的框架进行深度研究

Phase 3: Deep Research & Validation (10-15 minutes)

阶段3：深度研究与验证（10-15分钟）

Goal: Comprehensive investigation of selected framework and validation against quality criteria.
What to research (comprehensive):
Use 
references/research-checklist.md
as guide. Research systematically:
  1. Framework Identity
    • Full name (official)
    • Creator(s) - name(s), credentials
    • Year created/published
    • Origin story / context of creation
    • Original publication or source
  2. Framework Methodology
    • Core structure (phases, steps, components)
    • Key concepts and principles
    • How it works (process flow)
    • What makes it unique
    • Theoretical foundation
  3. Practical Application
    • Target audience (who uses it?)
    • Use cases (when to use it?)
    • Implementation process
    • Tools or templates available
    • Typical outcomes
  4. Real-World Validation
    • Companies using it (specific names)
    • Leaders/practitioners using it
    • Success stories / case studies (2-3 specific examples)
    • Industry recognition
    • Academic validation (if applicable)
  5. Learning Resources
    • Original book/paper
    • Key articles or guides
    • Videos or courses
    • Official websites
    • Authoritative secondary sources
  6. Keywords for Matching
    • Problem types it addresses
    • Situations where it fits
    • Domain or industry focus
    • Related concepts
Quality validation:
Check against 
references/quality-criteria.md
. Assess:
FATAL DISQUALIFIERS (Stop if present): 🔴 AI-generated or made-up framework 🔴 No credible sources or citations 🔴 Duplicate of existing framework in library 🔴 Fundamentally flawed methodology 🔴 Controversial/unethical framework
REQUIRED ELEMENTS (Must have all): ✅ Real creator with credentials ✅ Clear origin and publication date ✅ Structured methodology with steps ✅ Real-world examples (at least 2) ✅ Credible sources (at least 3) ✅ Practical applicability ✅ Unique value vs existing frameworks
NICE TO HAVE (Not required but valuable): ⭐ Multiple case studies ⭐ Tools or templates ⭐ Academic papers ⭐ Wide industry adoption ⭐ Books or comprehensive guides
Validation decision:
  • If passes: "This framework meets our quality criteria. Let's add it."
  • If fails: "This framework doesn't meet our quality criteria because [reasons]. Let me suggest alternatives: [other options]"
  • If marginal: Discuss with user: "This framework is borderline because [concerns]. Should we add it anyway or look for alternatives?"
目标： 对选中的框架进行全面调研，并根据质量标准验证其是否合格。
调研内容（全面覆盖）：
以
references/research-checklist.md
为指南，系统地开展研究：
  1. 框架身份信息
    • 完整官方名称
    • 创建者姓名及资质
    • 创建/发布年份
    • 起源背景/创建上下文
    • 原始出版物或来源
  2. 框架方法论
    • 核心结构（阶段、步骤、组件）
    • 关键概念与原则
    • 运作流程
    • 独特之处
    • 理论基础
  3. 实际应用
    • 目标受众（谁在使用？）
    • 使用场景（何时使用？）
    • 实施流程
    • 可用工具或模板
    • 典型成果
  4. 真实场景验证
    • 使用该框架的公司（具体名称）
    • 使用该框架的领导者/从业者
    • 成功案例/研究（2-3个具体示例）
    • 行业认可度
    • 学术验证（如适用）
  5. 学习资源
    • 原始书籍/论文
    • 关键文章或指南
    • 视频或课程
    • 官方网站
    • 权威二级来源
  6. 匹配关键词
    • 解决的问题类型
    • 适用场景
    • 领域或行业聚焦
    • 相关概念
质量验证：
对照
references/quality-criteria.md
进行评估：
致命不合格项（出现即终止）： 🔴 AI生成或虚构的框架 🔴 无可信来源或引用 🔴 与库中现有框架重复 🔴 方法论存在根本性缺陷 🔴 有争议/不道德的框架
必备要素（必须全部满足）： ✅ 具备资质的真实创建者 ✅ 清晰的起源与发布日期 ✅ 带步骤的结构化方法论 ✅ 至少2个真实场景示例 ✅ 至少3个可信来源 ✅ 实际可应用性 ✅ 相较于现有框架的独特价值
加分项（非必需但有价值）： ⭐ 多个案例研究 ⭐ 配套工具或模板 ⭐ 学术论文 ⭐ 广泛的行业采用 ⭐ 相关书籍或全面指南
验证决策：
  • 通过验证： “该框架符合我们的质量标准，现在将其添加到系统中。”
  • 未通过验证： “该框架不符合我们的质量标准，原因如下：[具体理由]。我来为你推荐替代框架：[其他选项]”
  • 边缘情况： 与用户讨论：“该框架处于合格边缘，问题在于[具体顾虑]。我们是否仍要添加它，还是寻找其他替代框架？”

Phase 4: Framework Creation (5-10 minutes)

阶段4：框架创建（5-10分钟）

Goal: Create properly formatted framework file.
Steps:
  1. Determine framework number:
    • Check existing frameworks in 
      frameworks/
      folder
    • Find highest number (currently 48)
    • New framework = next sequential number
    • Example: If latest is 48, new framework is 49
  2. Create filename:
    • Format: 
      [number]-[framework-name].md
    • Use kebab-case (lowercase with hyphens)
    • Example: 
      39-scamper-technique.md
  3. Use template from 
    references/framework-template.md
    :
markdown
undefined
目标： 创建格式规范的框架文件。
步骤：
  1. 确定框架编号：
    • 查看
      frameworks/
      文件夹中的现有框架
    • 找到当前最高编号（当前为48）
    • 新框架编号为下一个连续数字
    • 示例：如果最新框架编号为48，新框架编号为49
  2. 创建文件名：
    • 格式：
      [number]-[framework-name].md
    • 使用短横线分隔的小写格式（kebab-case）
    • 示例：
      39-scamper-technique.md
  3. 使用
    references/framework-template.md
    中的模板：
markdown
undefined

[Framework Name]

[Framework Name]

Overview

Overview

[2-3 sentence description of what this framework is and what it helps accomplish]
[2-3 sentence description of what this framework is and what it helps accomplish]

Creator & Origin

Creator & Origin

Created by: [Name(s) with credentials]
When: [Year]
Context: [Why was it created? What problem was it solving? What was happening at the time?]
Original source: [Book, paper, or initial publication]
Created by: [Name(s) with credentials]
When: [Year]
Context: [Why was it created? What problem was it solving? What was happening at the time?]
Original source: [Book, paper, or initial publication]

Target Audience

Target Audience

Best for:
  • [User type 1] - [why]
  • [User type 2] - [why]
  • [User type 3] - [why]
Not ideal for:
  • [Situation where it doesn't fit]
Best for:
  • [User type 1] - [why]
  • [User type 2] - [why]
  • [User type 3] - [why]
Not ideal for:
  • [Situation where it doesn't fit]

When to Use This Framework

When to Use This Framework

Use this framework when:
  • [Situation 1]
  • [Situation 2]
  • [Situation 3]
Don't use this framework when:
  • [Situation where alternative is better]
Use this framework when:
  • [Situation 1]
  • [Situation 2]
  • [Situation 3]
Don't use this framework when:
  • [Situation where alternative is better]

Framework Structure

Framework Structure

Phase 1: [Phase Name]

Phase 1: [Phase Name]

Goal: [What this phase accomplishes]
Key questions:
  • [Question 1]
  • [Question 2]
  • [Question 3]
Output: [What you produce in this phase]
Goal: [What this phase accomplishes]
Key questions:
  • [Question 1]
  • [Question 2]
  • [Question 3]
Output: [What you produce in this phase]

Phase 2: [Phase Name]

Phase 2: [Phase Name]

[Same structure for each phase...]
[Continue for all phases/steps]
[Same structure for each phase...]
[Continue for all phases/steps]

Real-World Examples

Real-World Examples

Example 1: [Company/Person] - [Context]

Example 1: [Company/Person] - [Context]

Situation: [What challenge they faced]
Application: [How they used the framework]
Outcome: [What happened as a result]
Situation: [What challenge they faced]
Application: [How they used the framework]
Outcome: [What happened as a result]

Example 2: [Company/Person] - [Context]

Example 2: [Company/Person] - [Context]

[Same structure]
[Same structure]

Example 3: [Company/Person] - [Context]

Example 3: [Company/Person] - [Context]

[Same structure - at least 2 examples required, 3 preferred]
[Same structure - at least 2 examples required, 3 preferred]

Notable Users

Notable Users

Companies:
  • [Company 1]
  • [Company 2]
  • [Company 3]
Thought Leaders:
  • [Name 1]
  • [Name 2]
Companies:
  • [Company 1]
  • [Company 2]
  • [Company 3]
Thought Leaders:
  • [Name 1]
  • [Name 2]

Sources & Further Reading

Sources & Further Reading

Essential:
  • [Original book/paper with full citation]
  • [Key article or guide]
  • [Official website if exists]
Additional:
  • [Supplementary resource 1]
  • [Supplementary resource 2]
Videos/Courses:
  • [If available]
Essential:
  • [Original book/paper with full citation]
  • [Key article or guide]
  • [Official website if exists]
Additional:
  • [Supplementary resource 1]
  • [Supplementary resource 2]
Videos/Courses:
  • [If available]

Keywords

Keywords

For framework matching:
  • [keyword1]
  • [keyword2]
  • [keyword3]
  • [problem-type]
  • [situation-context]
  • [domain/industry]

4. **Fill in all sections:**
   - Use research from Phase 3
   - Be comprehensive and specific
   - Include all required elements
   - Use clear, accessible language

5. **Review for quality:**
   - All sections complete?
   - Specific examples (not generic)?
   - Sources credible and cited?
   - Keywords appropriate?
   - Structure clear and usable?
For framework matching:
  • [keyword1]
  • [keyword2]
  • [keyword3]
  • [problem-type]
  • [situation-context]
  • [domain/industry]

4. **填写所有章节：**
   - 使用阶段3的调研结果
   - 内容全面且具体
   - 包含所有必备要素
   - 语言清晰易懂

5. **质量审核：**
   - 所有章节是否完整？
   - 是否有具体示例（而非泛泛而谈）？
   - 来源是否可信且已引用？
   - 关键词是否恰当？
   - 结构是否清晰易用？

Phase 5: Integration (5 minutes)

阶段5：集成（5分钟）

Goal: Integrate new framework into system.
Steps:
  1. Save framework file to both locations:
    frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
    (Both locations must have identical files)
  2. Update frameworks-index.md: Open 
    skills/choose-framework/references/frameworks-index.md
    Add new entry in appropriate category:
    markdown
    ### [Category Name]

[... existing frameworks ...]

**[Number]. [Framework Name]** by [Creator]
- [One-line description]
- **Use for:** [primary use case]
- **Keywords:** [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3]
  3. Update choose-framework matching logic: Consider if SKILL.md needs updates to mention new framework in:
    • Framework Matching Logic section
    • Relevant category (Strategy/Decision/Innovation/Operations/Mental Models)
  4. Verify integration:
    • Both framework files exist?
    • frameworks-index.md updated?
    • New framework appears in correct category?
目标： 将新框架集成到系统中。
步骤：
  1. 将框架文件保存至两个位置：
    frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
    （两个位置的文件必须完全一致）
  2. 更新frameworks-index.md： 打开
    skills/choose-framework/references/frameworks-index.md
    在对应分类下添加新条目：
    markdown
    ### [Category Name]

[... existing frameworks ...]

**[Number]. [Framework Name]** by [Creator]
- [One-line description]
- **Use for:** [primary use case]
- **Keywords:** [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3]
  3. 更新choose-framework的匹配逻辑： 考虑是否需要更新SKILL.md，在以下部分提及新框架：
    • 框架匹配逻辑章节
    • 相关分类（战略类/决策类/创新类/运营类/思维模型类）
  4. 验证集成结果：
    • 两个位置的框架文件是否都已存在？
    • frameworks-index.md是否已更新？
    • 新框架是否出现在正确的分类下？

Phase 6: Verification & Test Offer (5 minutes)

阶段6：验证与测试邀请（5分钟）

Goal: Confirm success and offer to test new framework.
Show user what was added:
markdown
undefined
目标： 确认添加成功，并邀请用户测试新框架。
向用户展示已添加的内容：
markdown
undefined

Framework Successfully Added! 🎉

框架添加成功！🎉

What was created:

创建的内容：

Framework: [Framework Name] by [Creator] Number: [XX] Category: [Strategic/Decision/Innovation/Operations/Mental Models] Files created:
  • frameworks/[filename].md
  • skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[filename].md
Index updated:
  • Added to 
    frameworks-index.md
    under [Category]
框架名称： [Framework Name] by [Creator] 编号： [XX] 分类： [战略类/决策类/创新类/运营类/思维模型类] 创建的文件：
  • frameworks/[filename].md
  • skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[filename].md
更新的索引：
  • 在[分类名称]下添加至
    frameworks-index.md

Framework Summary

框架摘要

[2-3 sentences about the framework]
Best for: [Primary use cases]
Notable users: [2-3 companies/people]
[2-3句话介绍框架]
最佳适用场景： [主要使用场景]
知名用户： [2-3家公司/个人]

Next Steps

下一步

Would you like to:
  1. Test the framework: Use 
    /use-framework [Framework Name]
    to try it with your situation
  2. Add another framework: Use 
    /discover-framework
    again
  3. Learn more: I can explain how to apply this framework

**Offer to test:**
- "Want to try this framework on your problem? I can guide you through it using `/use-framework [name]`"
- If yes: Transition to use-framework with the new framework
- If no: "Great! The framework is now available in the system for anyone to use."

---
你希望：
  1. 测试框架： 使用
    /use-framework [Framework Name]
    在你的场景中尝试使用
  2. 添加另一个框架： 再次使用
    /discover-framework
    指令
  3. 了解更多： 我可以为你解释如何应用该框架

**邀请测试：**
- “想要在你的问题上尝试这个框架吗？我可以通过`/use-framework [名称]`引导你完成使用流程”
- 如果用户同意：切换至use-framework技能，使用新框架
- 如果用户拒绝：“好的！该框架现已在系统中可用，任何人都可以使用。”

---

Special Cases

特殊情况处理

Framework Already Exists

框架已存在

If during research you discover framework is already in library (maybe under different name):
Response: "I found that [Framework Name] is already in our library as [Existing Framework].
[Show existing framework details]
Would you like to:
  1. Use the existing framework with 
    /use-framework [name]
  2. Look for a different framework
  3. Improve the existing framework documentation"
如果在研究过程中发现该框架已存在于库中（可能名称不同）：
回复： “我发现[框架名称]已存在于我们的库中，对应[现有框架名称]。
[展示现有框架详情]
你希望：
  1. 使用现有框架，指令为
    /use-framework [名称]
  2. 寻找其他框架
  3. 完善现有框架的文档”

Framework Fails Quality Criteria

框架未通过质量验证

If framework doesn't meet quality standards:
Response: "I researched [Framework Name], but it doesn't meet our quality criteria because:
  • [Specific reason 1 - e.g., no credible sources]
  • [Specific reason 2 - e.g., AI-generated content]
  • [Specific reason 3 - e.g., no real-world validation]
Our library maintains high quality standards - we only add real, proven frameworks.
Would you like me to:
  1. Search for alternative frameworks that solve your need
  2. Investigate a different framework you have in mind
  3. Work with existing frameworks in the library"
如果框架不符合质量标准：
回复： “我已研究[框架名称]，但它不符合我们的质量标准，原因如下：
  • [具体理由1 - 例如：无可信来源]
  • [具体理由2 - 例如：AI生成内容]
  • [具体理由3 - 例如：无真实场景验证]
我们的框架库维持高标准——仅添加真实、经过验证的框架。
你希望我：
  1. 搜索符合你需求的替代框架
  2. 研究你指定的另一个框架
  3. 了解库中的现有框架”

Duplicate Framework (Different Name)

重复框架（名称不同）

If new framework is essentially same as existing one:
Response: "[Framework Name] is very similar to [Existing Framework] already in our library. They both:
  • [Similarity 1]
  • [Similarity 2]
The main difference is [key difference].
Would you like to:
  1. Use the existing [Existing Framework]
  2. Add this as a variant (if difference is meaningful)
  3. Look for a more distinct framework"
如果新框架本质上与现有框架相同：
回复： “[框架名称]与我们库中的[现有框架名称]非常相似，二者都：
  • [相似点1]
  • [相似点2]
主要区别在于[核心差异]。
你希望：
  1. 使用现有框架[现有框架名称]
  2. 将其添加为变体（如果差异有意义）
  3. 寻找更具差异性的框架”

Framework Needs More Research

框架信息不足

If you can't find enough information:
Response: "I found [Framework Name] but couldn't find enough credible information to add it:
  • Missing: [What's missing - creator, methodology, examples, sources]
This might mean:
  • Framework is too new/obscure
  • Framework is not well-documented
  • Framework might not be real/established
Would you like to:
  1. Help me find more sources about this framework
  2. Look for better-documented alternatives
  3. Consider existing frameworks that might work"
如果无法找到足够的可信信息：
回复： “我找到了[框架名称]，但无法找到足够的可信信息来添加它：
  • 缺失信息：[具体缺失内容 - 创建者、方法论、示例、来源]
这可能意味着：
  • 框架过于新颖/小众
  • 框架文档不完善
  • 框架可能并非真实/已确立的框架
你希望：
  1. 帮助我寻找更多关于该框架的来源
  2. 寻找文档更完善的替代框架
  3. 考虑可能适用的现有框架”

Quality Checklist

质量检查清单

Before marking framework as complete, verify:
Research completeness:
  • Creator identified with credentials
  • Year and origin story documented
  • Methodology clearly explained
  • At least 2 real-world examples found
  • At least 3 credible sources cited
  • Keywords identified for matching
Quality criteria met:
  • Real framework (not AI-generated)
  • Credible sources exist
  • Not duplicate of existing framework
  • Structured methodology with steps
  • Practical applicability demonstrated
  • Unique value proposition clear
Integration complete:
  • Framework file created in 
    frameworks/
  • Framework file copied to 
    skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/
  • frameworks-index.md updated
  • Appropriate category selected
  • Keywords added for matching
File quality:
  • All template sections filled
  • Specific examples (not generic)
  • Sources properly cited
  • Clear and accessible language
  • Usable structure for workshops
在标记框架完成前，验证以下内容：
调研完整性：
  • 已确认创建者及资质
  • 已记录年份与起源背景
  • 已清晰解释方法论
  • 已找到至少2个真实场景示例
  • 已引用至少3个可信来源
  • 已确定匹配关键词
质量标准达标情况：
  • 真实框架（非AI生成）
  • 存在可信来源
  • 与现有框架不重复
  • 带步骤的结构化方法论
  • 已证明实际可应用性
  • 独特价值主张清晰
集成完成情况：
  • 框架文件已创建于
    frameworks/
  • 框架文件已复制至
    skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/
  • frameworks-index.md已更新
  • 已选择合适的分类
  • 已添加匹配关键词
文件质量：
  • 所有模板章节已填写
  • 示例具体（非泛泛而谈）
  • 来源已正确引用
  • 语言清晰易懂
  • 结构适合工作坊使用

Key Reminders

关键提醒

  1. Use WebSearch extensively - This skill depends on web research
  2. Validate rigorously - Quality standards protect library integrity
  3. Be skeptical - Many "frameworks" online are made-up or low-quality
  4. Document thoroughly - Create comprehensive framework files
  5. Test fit - Framework should fill gap in current library
  6. Integrate properly - Files in both locations, index updated
  7. Offer to test - Let user try their new framework immediately
  1. 充分使用WebSearch - 该技能依赖网络研究
  2. 严格验证 - 质量标准保障框架库的完整性
  3. 保持怀疑态度 - 网上很多“框架”是虚构或低质量的
  4. 详细记录 - 创建全面的框架文件
  5. 测试适配性 - 框架应填补现有库的空白
  6. 正确集成 - 文件需存放在两个位置，索引需更新
  7. 邀请测试 - 让用户立即尝试新添加的框架

Warning Signs (Don't Add These)

警示信号（请勿添加）

🚫 AI-generated frameworks - ChatGPT created, no real origin 🚫 Blog post "frameworks" - Random blog coined term, no adoption 🚫 Unvalidated methodologies - No one actually uses it 🚫 Repackaged existing frameworks - Just renamed something that exists 🚫 Overly complex academic models - Theory with no practical application 🚫 Fad frameworks - Trendy but no substance 🚫 Self-help guru "systems" - Motivational speech, not framework
Test: Would serious business leaders, academics, or practitioners use this? If not, don't add it.
🚫 AI生成框架 - 由ChatGPT创建，无真实起源 🚫 博客“框架” - 随机博客杜撰的术语，无实际采用 🚫 未验证的方法论 - 无人实际使用 🚫 重包装现有框架 - 仅重命名现有框架 🚫 过于复杂的学术模型 - 仅有理论，无实际应用 🚫 潮流框架 - 时髦但无实质内容 🚫 励志导师“系统” - 励志演讲内容，非框架
测试标准： 严肃的企业领导者、学者或从业者会使用它吗？如果不会，请勿添加。

References

参考资料

  • references/framework-template.md
    - Template structure for new frameworks
  • references/research-checklist.md
    - What to research about frameworks
  • references/quality-criteria.md
    - Standards for accepting frameworks
  • references/framework-template.md
    - 新框架的模板结构
  • references/research-checklist.md
    - 框架调研内容指南
  • references/quality-criteria.md
    - 框架接受标准