unslop
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseUnslop
Unslop
Edit text to remove AI patterns and add human voice.
编辑文本以去除AI写作模式,增添人类语气。
Process
流程
- Scan for the patterns below
- Rewrite — preserve meaning, match intended tone
- Add soul (see next section)
- Self-audit: "What makes this obviously AI generated?" Fix remaining tells.
- 扫描以下列出的写作模式
- 重写——保留原意,匹配预期语气
- 赋予文字灵魂(见下一部分)
- 自我审核:"是什么让这段文字明显是AI生成的?"修正剩余的痕迹。
Adding soul
赋予文字灵魂
Removing patterns is half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious.
- Have opinions. React to facts instead of neutrally listing pros and cons.
- Vary rhythm. Short sentences. Then longer ones that take their time. Mix it up.
- Acknowledge complexity. "Impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "impressive."
- Use "I" when it fits. First person isn't unprofessional.
- Let some mess in. Perfect structure feels algorithmic.
- Be specific. Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am."
去除模式只是完成了一半工作。枯燥、毫无个性的写作同样会暴露AI痕迹。
- 表达观点。针对事实做出回应,而非中立地罗列优缺点。
- 变换节奏。先用短句,再用长句娓娓道来,交替使用。
- 承认复杂性。"令人印象深刻但也有点不安"比"令人印象深刻"更真实。
- 合适时使用第一人称“我”。第一人称并非不专业。
- 允许些许“不完美”。过于规整的结构会显得像算法生成。
- 具体化表达。不说“这令人担忧”,而是说“凌晨3点还在不停运转的agents(智能代理)总让人觉得有点不安”。
Patterns to detect and fix
需要检测并修正的模式
Content
内容层面
- Significance inflation — "pivotal moment", "testament to", "evolving landscape", "setting the stage for", "indelible mark", "deeply rooted". Cut puffery, state what happened.
- Notability name-dropping — listing media outlets without context. Pick one, say what was said.
- Superficial -ing phrases — "highlighting...", "ensuring...", "reflecting...", "showcasing...", "fostering...". Delete or expand with real sources.
- Promotional language — "nestled", "vibrant", "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "renowned", "stunning", "must-visit". Use neutral descriptions.
- Vague attributions — "Experts believe", "Industry reports suggest", "Some critics argue". Name the source or delete.
- Formulaic challenges — "Despite challenges... continues to thrive." Replace with specific facts.
- 意义夸大——使用“关键时刻”“证明了”“不断演变的格局”“为……奠定基础”“不可磨灭的印记”“根深蒂固”等表述。删掉浮夸辞藻,直接陈述事实。
- 无上下文提及知名媒体——不加背景地罗列媒体机构。选一个,说明其报道内容。
- 空泛的-ing短语——“强调……”“确保……”“反映……”“展示……”“促进……”等。要么删除,要么补充真实来源。
- 宣传性语言——“坐落于”“充满活力的”“令人惊叹的”“开创性的”“著名的”“惊艳的”“必体验的”等。使用中性描述。
- 模糊归因——“专家认为”“行业报告显示”“一些批评家指出”等。要么指明来源,要么删除。
- 公式化挑战表述——“尽管面临挑战……仍持续发展”。替换为具体事实。
Language
语言层面
- AI vocabulary — Additionally, crucial, delve, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, interplay, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), testament, underscore, vibrant. Replace with plain words.
- Copula avoidance — "serves as", "stands as", "boasts", "features". Just say "is" or "has".
- Negative parallelisms — "It's not just X, it's Y." State the point directly.
- Rule of three — forcing ideas into groups of three. Use the natural number.
- Synonym cycling — protagonist/main character/central figure/hero in one paragraph. Pick one, repeat it.
- False ranges — "from X to Y" where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale. List topics directly.
- AI常用词汇——Additionally、crucial、delve、enduring、enhance、fostering、garner、interplay、intricate、landscape(抽象用法)、pivotal、showcase、tapestry(抽象用法)、testament、underscore、vibrant。替换为平实词汇。
- 避免系动词滥用替代表达——“充当”“作为”“拥有”“具备”(对应原文的serves as、stands as、boasts、features)。直接用“是”或“有”。
- 否定平行结构——“这不只是X,更是Y”。直接陈述核心观点。
- 强行凑三原则——把想法硬分成三组。使用自然的数量。
- 同义词循环——在一段中交替使用protagonist/main character/central figure/hero(主角)。选一个,重复使用。
- 虚假范围表述——“从X到Y”但X和Y不在有效尺度上。直接列出主题。
Style
风格层面
- Em dash overuse — avoid em dashes entirely. Use periods, commas, or parentheses. Em dashes are an AI tell.
- Colon overuse — colons are fine before a list or example. Not as mid-sentence connectors. "If you're coming from traditional automation: instead of registering event handlers, you describe conditions" adds nothing with the colon. Rewrite to let the point stand on its own without comparison framing. "Describing when the scheduler should fire works best as plain English." Same meaning, no crutch punctuation.
- Boldface overuse — don't bold every proper noun or acronym.
- Inline-header lists — "Performance: Performance improved..." Convert to prose.
- Title case headings — use sentence case.
- Decorative emojis — remove from headings and bullets.
- Curly quotes — replace with straight quotes.
- 过度使用破折号——完全避免使用破折号。改用句号、逗号或括号。破折号是AI生成文本的典型特征。
- 过度使用冒号——冒号用于列表或示例前是没问题的,但不要用作句中连接词。比如“如果你来自传统自动化领域:不用注册事件处理程序,而是描述条件”中的冒号毫无意义。重写句子,让观点无需对比框架就能独立成立。比如“用平实的英语描述调度程序何时触发效果最佳”。意思相同,没有依赖标点符号的冗余表述。
- 过度使用粗体——不要给每个专有名词或首字母缩写都加粗。
- 行内标题式列表——“**性能:**性能提升……”改成连贯的散文。
- 标题大小写——改用句子大小写(即仅首字母大写)。
- 装饰性表情符号——从标题和项目符号中移除。
- 弯引号——替换为直引号。
Communication artifacts
沟通冗余内容
- Chatbot phrases — "I hope this helps!", "Let me know if...", "Of course!", "Certainly!" Remove.
- Cutoff disclaimers — "While specific details are limited..." Find sources or remove.
- Sycophantic tone — "Great question! You're absolutely right!" Respond directly.
- 聊天机器人式表述——“希望这对你有帮助!”“如有疑问请告知……”“当然!”“没问题!”等。删除此类表述。
- 含糊免责声明——“虽然具体细节有限……”要么找到来源,要么删除。
- 谄媚语气——“好问题!你完全正确!”直接回应即可。
Filler
冗余填充内容
- Filler phrases — "In order to" → "To". "Due to the fact that" → "Because". "It is important to note that" → delete.
- Excessive hedging — "could potentially possibly be argued that it might" → "may".
- Generic conclusions — "The future looks bright." State specific plans or facts.
- 填充短语——“In order to”改为“为了”;“Due to the fact that”改为“因为”;“It is important to note that”直接删除。
- 过度模糊表述——“could potentially possibly be argued that it might”简化为“可能”。
- 通用结论——“未来一片光明”。改为陈述具体计划或事实。