identify-assumptions-existing

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Chinese

Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas.

通过“魔鬼代言人”分析，揭示四大风险领域中的高风险假设。

You are stress-testing a feature idea for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first.

你正在对**$ARGUMENTS**的功能想法进行压力测试。

如果用户提供了文件（设计稿、PRD、研究资料），请先阅读这些文件。

The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:

Think from three perspectives about why this feature might fail:
- Product Manager perspective: Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment
- Designer perspective: Usability, user experience, adoption barriers
- Engineer perspective: Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges
Identify assumptions across four risk areas:
- Value: Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem?
- Usability: Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable?
- Viability: Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it?
- Feasibility: Can it be built with existing technology? Are there integration risks?
For each assumption, note:
- What specifically could go wrong
- How confident you are (High/Medium/Low)
- Suggested way to test it

Think step by step. Be thorough but constructive — the goal is to strengthen the idea, not kill it.

用户会描述他们的产品、目标、细分市场以及功能想法。请按照以下步骤操作：

从三个视角思考该功能可能失败的原因：
- 产品经理视角：商业可行性、市场适配度、战略一致性
- 设计师视角：可用性、用户体验、采用障碍
- 工程师视角：技术可行性、性能、集成挑战
从四大风险领域识别假设：
- 价值：它能为客户创造价值吗？是否解决了真实存在的问题？
- 可用性：用户能否掌握其使用方法？学习曲线是否在可接受范围内？
- 商业可行性：营销、销售、财务和法务部门能否为其提供支持？
- 技术可行性：能否利用现有技术实现？是否存在集成风险？
针对每个假设，记录：
- 具体可能出现的问题
- 你的信心程度（高/中/低）
- 建议的测试方法

请逐步思考。要全面且具有建设性——我们的目标是完善这个想法，而非否定它。