biz-dev-social-media-audit-offer
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseFree Social Media Audit — Business Development Skill
免费社交媒体审计——业务开发技能
Use the free social media audit as a lead generation and conversion tool. The audit demonstrates expertise the prospect doesn't have, surfaces the right problems, and creates a natural path to a paid engagement. This is a consultant-facing skill — not a client-facing deliverable.
Source: Johnson, J. (2023) How to Become a Social Media Manager
<!-- dual-compat:start -->
将免费社交媒体审计用作获客与转化工具。该审计能向潜在客户展示其不具备的专业能力,挖掘核心问题,并自然过渡到付费合作。这是面向顾问的技能——而非面向客户的交付成果。
来源: Johnson, J. (2023) How to Become a Social Media Manager
<!-- dual-compat:start -->
Use when
适用场景
- Turns a free 30-minute social media diagnostic into a business development tool — structuring the audit, framing findings to demonstrate expertise, and scripting the transition from free audit to paid engagement. Invoke when a consultant wants to offer a free audit as a lead generation technique, when preparing for a discovery meeting with a prospective client, or when converting an audit presentation into a paid proposal.
- Use this skill when it is the closest match to the requested deliverable or workflow.
- 将30分钟的免费社交媒体诊断转化为业务开发工具——梳理审计流程、呈现调研结果以展示专业能力,并撰写从免费审计到付费合作的过渡话术。当顾问想要将免费审计作为获客手段、准备与潜在客户的发现会议,或是将审计演示转化为付费提案时,可启用该技能。
- 当所请求的交付成果或工作流程与本技能最匹配时使用。
Do not use when
不适用场景
- Do not use this skill for graphic design, video production, software development, or legal advice beyond the repository's stated scope.
- Do not use it when another skill in this repository is clearly more specific to the requested deliverable.
- 请勿将本技能用于图形设计、视频制作、软件开发或超出知识库既定范围的法律咨询。
- 当知识库中另有其他技能明显更符合所请求的交付成果时,请勿使用本技能。
Workflow
工作流程
- Collect the required inputs or source material before drafting, unless this skill explicitly generates the intake itself.
- Follow the section order and decision rules in this ; do not skip mandatory steps or required fields.
SKILL.md - Read files in only when the body points to them or when you need the deeper framework, examples, or evidence.
references/ - Review the draft against the quality criteria, then deliver the final output in markdown unless the skill specifies another format.
- 除非本技能明确说明可自行生成输入信息,否则在起草前需收集所需的输入资料或原始素材。
- 遵循本中的章节顺序和决策规则;请勿跳过必填步骤或必填字段。
SKILL.md - 仅当正文指向中的文件,或需要更深入的框架、示例或证据时,才阅读该文件夹中的文件。
references/ - 根据质量标准审查草稿,除非技能指定其他格式,否则最终输出采用markdown格式。
Anti-Patterns
反模式
- Do not invent client facts, performance data, budgets, or approvals that were not provided or clearly inferred from evidence.
- Do not skip required inputs, mandatory sections, or quality checks just to make the output shorter.
- Do not drift into out-of-scope work such as code implementation, design production, or unsupported legal conclusions.
- 请勿编造未提供或无法从证据中明确推断的客户事实、绩效数据、预算或审批信息。
- 请勿为了缩短输出内容而跳过必填输入、必填章节或质量检查。
- 请勿偏离范围开展工作,例如代码实现、设计制作或无依据的法律结论。
Outputs
输出成果
- A structured markdown document, plan, playbook, or strategy ready for client-facing or internal use.
- 一份结构化的markdown文档、计划、手册或策略,可直接用于客户沟通或内部使用。
References
参考资料
- Read when you need the deeper framework, examples, or supporting material it contains.
references/proposal-frameworks.md
- 当需要更深入的框架、示例或支持材料时,阅读。
references/proposal-frameworks.md
Required Input
必填输入信息
Ask for the following before generating:
- Prospect business name and industry — the business being audited
- Active platforms to audit — list only platforms the prospect currently uses (do not audit dormant accounts)
- Presentation format — in-person meeting, WhatsApp call, or written email report
- Consultant's primary service — the core service to position after the audit (e.g., monthly content management, social media strategy, community management)
生成前需询问以下内容:
- 潜在客户的企业名称与所属行业——被审计的企业
- 需审计的活跃平台——仅列出潜在客户当前使用的平台(请勿审计休眠账户)
- 演示格式——线下会议、WhatsApp通话或书面邮件报告
- 顾问的核心服务——审计后重点推广的核心服务(例如:月度内容管理、社交媒体策略、社群管理)
The Business Logic
商业逻辑
The free audit works because it does two things simultaneously:
- It demonstrates expertise — the consultant surfaces findings the prospect has not noticed. Every specific observation builds credibility.
- It creates a problem → solution dynamic — every finding is a gap, and every gap is a potential service line.
The audit must be specific enough to be genuinely valuable, but not so complete that it eliminates the need to hire the consultant. Surface the right problems; do not solve them for free.
The audit itself costs the consultant 45 minutes: 30 minutes to conduct, 15 minutes to prepare findings. If the prospect converts to a paid client, that time is recovered within the first month's retainer.
Do not charge for the audit. Charging creates friction and removes the low-barrier entry point that makes this technique effective.
免费审计之所以有效,是因为它同时实现了两件事:
- 展示专业能力——顾问能挖掘出潜在客户未曾注意到的问题。每一个具体的观察都能提升可信度。
- 构建“问题→解决方案”的动态关系——每一个发现都是一处缺口,而每一处缺口都对应着潜在的服务方向。
审计内容需足够具体以体现实际价值,但又不能过于完整,以免客户无需再聘请顾问。要挖掘核心问题,但不要免费为客户解决这些问题。
完成一次审计总共需要顾问花费45分钟:30分钟执行审计,15分钟整理调研结果。如果潜在客户转化为付费客户,这些时间成本会在第一个月的服务费中收回。
**请勿对该审计收费。**收费会增加沟通障碍,破坏这种低门槛获客技巧的有效性。
Audit Structure — 5 Areas, 30 Minutes
审计结构——5个维度,30分钟
Conduct the audit before the discovery meeting. Do not do it live in front of the prospect.
在发现会议前完成审计,请勿在潜在客户面前实时进行。
Area 1: Profile Completeness (5 minutes)
维度1:资料完整性(5分钟)
Check across all active platforms:
- Profile photo quality and consistency across platforms
- Bio completeness — does it include a clear call to action, a link, and relevant keywords?
- Contact information — WhatsApp number, email address, physical location where applicable
- Pinned posts, story highlights, and cover photos — are they current and purposeful?
- Link-in-bio destination — does it work? Does it lead to a relevant, converting page?
Score: 0–10. Note the 2 most critical gaps.
检查所有活跃平台的以下内容:
- 头像的质量及跨平台一致性
- 简介完整性——是否包含清晰的行动号召、链接和相关关键词?
- 联系信息——WhatsApp号码、电子邮件地址、适用情况下的实体地址
- 置顶帖子、故事亮点和封面照片——是否最新且具有明确目的性?
- 简介链接的跳转目标——是否可用?是否指向相关的高转化页面?
**评分:0–10分。**记录2个最关键的缺口。
Area 2: Content Quality (10 minutes)
维度2:内容质量(10分钟)
Review the last 30 posts across all active platforms:
- Are content pillars evident, or is posting random and reactive?
- Is the brand voice consistent across posts, or does it shift in tone and register?
- Are posts formatted for the algorithm — video, carousel — or are they single static images by habit?
- Does the copy open with a hook, or does it bury the lead?
- Do promotional posts carry a call to action?
- Is there AI-generated content that sounds generic or off-brand?
Score: 0–10. Note the most common failure pattern — the single issue that appears most frequently across the 30 posts.
回顾所有活跃平台近30条帖子:
- 是否有明确的内容支柱,还是发帖随机且被动?
- 品牌调性是否一致,还是语气风格多变?
- 帖子是否针对算法优化(视频、轮播图),还是习惯性使用单张静态图片?
- 文案是否有钩子开头,还是把核心信息放在后面?
- 推广帖是否包含行动号召?
- 是否存在听起来通用或不符合品牌调性的AI生成内容?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最常见的问题模式——在30条帖子中出现频率最高的单一问题。
Area 3: Engagement and Reach (5 minutes)
维度3:互动与触达(5分钟)
Access native analytics (Meta Business Suite, LinkedIn Analytics, TikTok Studio):
- Average engagement rate vs industry benchmark — EA context: 2–4% is healthy for most SMEs; below 1% signals a content or frequency problem
- Post frequency vs recommended cadence for each platform — note the gap
- Best-performing post type: video, carousel, static image, or story
- Worst-performing post type
- Follower growth rate: growing, flat, or declining over the last 90 days?
Score: 0–10. Note the single biggest engagement opportunity.
访问原生分析工具(Meta Business Suite、LinkedIn Analytics、TikTok Studio):
- 平均互动率 vs 行业基准——EA地区参考:大多数中小企业的健康互动率为2–4%;低于1%表明内容或发帖频率存在问题
- 发帖频率 vs 各平台建议频率——记录差距
- 表现最佳的帖子类型:视频、轮播图、静态图片或故事
- 表现最差的帖子类型
- 粉丝增长率:过去90天是增长、持平还是下降?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最大的互动提升机会。
Area 4: Competitor Snapshot (5 minutes)
维度4:竞品快照(5分钟)
Identify 2 local competitors — same city or same sector:
- Follower count vs prospect
- Posting frequency vs prospect
- Content types used vs prospect
- Most engaged post — note the post type, approximate engagement numbers, and what made it work
- One specific thing the competitor is doing better
This section generates urgency without the consultant manufacturing it artificially. Present competitor data factually and without editorial commentary — the numbers carry the weight.
No score. Use as a comparative reference in the findings presentation.
EA note: Refer to competitor findings with care. East African professional and business circles are small; word travels quickly. Present the data as market context, not as criticism of named businesses.
找出2家本地竞品——同一城市或同一行业:
- 粉丝数量 vs 潜在客户
- 发帖频率 vs 潜在客户
- 使用的内容类型 vs 潜在客户
- 互动量最高的帖子——记录帖子类型、大致互动量以及表现出色的原因
- 竞品做得更好的一个具体方面
这部分内容能自然营造紧迫感,无需顾问刻意制造。客观呈现竞品数据,无需评论——数据本身具有说服力。
**无评分。**在调研结果演示中用作对比参考。
**EA地区提示:**谨慎引用竞品调研结果。东非的专业和商业圈子较小,消息传播迅速。将数据作为市场背景呈现,而非对特定企业的批评。
Area 5: Monetisation and Conversion (5 minutes)
维度5:变现与转化(5分钟)
- Is there a clear path from social post to purchase or enquiry?
- Does the link-in-bio lead to a landing page, a WhatsApp number, or just the homepage?
- Is there a lead magnet or opt-in offer visible on any platform?
- Are paid posts being run? Are they boosted posts or properly targeted campaigns?
- Is there any social commerce integration — Facebook Shop, WhatsApp Business Catalogue, Instagram Shopping?
Score: 0–10. Note the single clearest missed conversion opportunity.
- 是否有从社交帖子到购买或咨询的清晰路径?
- 简介链接是否指向着陆页、WhatsApp号码,还是仅指向首页?
- 任何平台上是否有可见的引流赠品或订阅优惠?
- 是否在投放付费帖子?是提升帖还是精准定位的广告活动?
- 是否有社交电商集成——Facebook Shop、WhatsApp Business Catalogue、Instagram Shopping?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最明显的转化机会缺口。
Findings Presentation Format
调研结果演示格式
Structure findings as a one-page document or a 5-slide mini-deck. Deliver verbally and leave a printed one-pager, or send a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by the document. Adapt to the prospect's preferred communication style.
Section 1: Summary Score
Overall score out of 50. Apply colour coding:
- 0–20 — Critical: Foundational gaps across multiple areas; significant opportunity
- 21–35 — Developing: Inconsistent performance; clear areas for improvement
- 36–50 — Healthy: Strong baseline; refinement and growth strategy needed
Do not present the score as a grade. Frame it as a starting point: "Here's where things stand today, and here's what's possible."
Section 2: Top 3 Wins
Lead with what the prospect is doing well. Choose 3 genuine positives — not faint praise. This section demonstrates that the consultant was paying careful attention, not simply looking for problems. It builds trust before the gaps are introduced.
Section 3: Top 3 Gaps
Present the 3 most important problems. Express each gap as a business impact, not a technical deficiency.
- Not: "Your captions don't have hooks."
- Instead: "Your posts aren't stopping the scroll, which means your organic reach isn't growing even when you post consistently."
Frame each gap as: the symptom → the business consequence → the fix (described at headline level only).
Do not prescribe the full solution. Name the direction; reserve the detail for the paid engagement.
Section 4: The Competitor Gap
One concrete example of a local competitor outperforming the prospect. Use real figures — follower counts, engagement numbers, post frequency. Avoid speculation. One well-chosen example is more effective than a general statement about the competitive landscape.
Section 5: Recommended Next Steps
Give 3 recommended actions — tiered by effort and investment:
- Quick win — something the prospect can do this week at no cost (e.g., update the link-in-bio, pin a strong post, add a WhatsApp number to the Facebook profile)
- Medium-term action — achievable within one month at low cost (e.g., establish 3 content pillars, commit to a posting schedule, set up Meta Business Suite)
- Strategic recommendation — requires professional help and is the natural entry point for the paid engagement (e.g., develop a 90-day content strategy, set up a conversion-optimised profile suite, launch a community management programme)
The quick win demonstrates goodwill. The strategic recommendation opens the conversation about paid work.
将调研结果整理为单页文档或5页迷你演示文稿。可口头演示并留下纸质单页文档,或先发送WhatsApp语音总结,再发送文档。根据潜在客户偏好的沟通方式调整格式。
第1部分:总评分
总分50分,采用颜色编码:
- **0–20分——严重不足:**多个维度存在基础缺口;提升空间巨大
- **21–35分——有待完善:**表现不稳定;存在明确的改进方向
- **36–50分——健康状态:**基础良好;需优化与增长策略
请勿将评分当作等级。将其作为起点:“这是当前的现状,而我们可以实现这样的目标。”
第2部分:3大优势
先介绍潜在客户做得好的地方。选择3个真实的亮点——而非敷衍的赞美。这部分能表明顾问在认真关注,而非只找问题。在指出缺口前先建立信任。
第3部分:3大缺口
呈现3个最重要的问题。将每个缺口表述为业务影响,而非技术缺陷。
- 错误表述:“你的文案没有钩子。”
- 正确表述:“你的帖子无法吸引用户停留,这意味着即使你持续发帖,自然触达量也无法增长。”
每个缺口的表述框架:症状→业务影响→解决方案(仅概述方向)。
请勿提供完整解决方案。只点明方向,详细内容留到付费合作阶段。
第4部分:竞品差距
举一个本地竞品表现优于潜在客户的具体例子。使用真实数据——粉丝数量、互动量、发帖频率。避免猜测。一个精心挑选的例子比关于竞争格局的笼统陈述更有效。
第5部分:建议下一步行动
给出3个建议行动——按投入精力和成本分层:
- 快速见效行动——潜在客户本周可免费完成的事项(例如:更新简介链接、置顶优质帖子、在Facebook资料中添加WhatsApp号码)
- 中期行动——一个月内可完成且成本较低的事项(例如:确立3个内容支柱、制定发帖计划、设置Meta Business Suite)
- 战略建议——需要专业协助,是付费合作的自然切入点(例如:制定90天内容策略、设置优化转化的资料套件、启动社群管理项目)
快速见效行动能展示诚意。战略建议则开启付费合作的对话。
The Transition to Paid
向付费合作过渡
Deliver this pivot after presenting the findings. Use it verbatim or adapt it closely:
"Based on what I've found, there are three areas where I could make an immediate difference for your business. I typically work with businesses like yours on a monthly retainer that covers [describe the core service]. Before I put together a formal proposal, can I ask — what's your priority right now: more content, better reach, or more enquiries from social?"
This question:
- Opens a conversation about the prospect's real goal rather than the consultant's service menu
- Avoids quoting a price before understanding priorities
- Creates a natural path to the written proposal
After the prospect responds, proceed to the proposal stage. Invoke to generate the formal proposal and Statement of Work.
biz-dev-proposal在呈现调研结果后使用以下过渡话术。可直接使用或稍作调整:
“根据我的调研结果,有三个领域我可以立即为你的业务带来改变。我通常为与你类似的企业提供月度服务费制的服务,涵盖[描述核心服务]。在我准备正式提案前,能否问一下——你当前的优先目标是什么:更多内容、更广触达,还是更多来自社交媒体的咨询?”
这个问题:
- 开启关于潜在客户真实目标的对话,而非只介绍顾问的服务菜单
- 在了解客户优先级前避免报价
- 自然过渡到书面提案阶段
潜在客户回应后,进入提案阶段。启用****生成正式提案和工作说明书。
biz-dev-proposalEA-Specific Delivery Notes
EA地区专属交付提示
- Conduct the initial audit discovery on WhatsApp or in person — not email. Conversion rates for professional services engagements in the East African market are higher through direct, personal communication.
- The findings presentation can be delivered verbally with a printed one-pager, or via a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by a shared document. Match the format to the prospect's communication habits.
- If the prospect is not ready to engage, close with: "Can I check back with you in 30 days?" Recurring touchpoints are how East African professional services businesses build pipeline. Do not treat a deferred decision as a lost lead.
- On WhatsApp: send the one-pager as a PDF, not as a series of text messages. A document signals professionalism and is easier for the prospect to share internally.
- 初始审计沟通通过WhatsApp或线下进行——而非电子邮件。在东非市场,专业服务合作的转化率在直接、个性化沟通中更高。
- 调研结果可通过口头演示加纸质单页文档,或WhatsApp语音总结加共享文档的方式交付。根据潜在客户的沟通习惯选择格式。
- 如果潜在客户尚未准备好合作,以这句话收尾:“我可以在30天后再联系你吗?”定期跟进是东非专业服务企业建立客户渠道的方式。请勿将延迟决策视为流失客户。
- 在WhatsApp上:将单页文档以PDF形式发送,而非一系列短信。文档更显专业,且便于潜在客户内部共享。
Persuasion Frameworks
说服框架
Apply frameworks from when generating this document.
references/proposal-frameworks.mdKey principles for audit offer documents:
- Open with the problem the audit will reveal — not the audit methodology (Sant: Primacy Principle — the client cares about the insight, not the process)
- The audit offer is a diagnostic gift, not a sales tool — position it as intelligence the prospective client genuinely needs, regardless of whether they engage (Hatton: Empathy Model)
- Apply Go/No-Go criteria before offering a free audit — invest time only in prospects who meet all three qualifying criteria (Hatton)
- Frame the audit findings as the N (Need) in NOSE — the audit surfaces the problem; the proposal that follows provides the O, S, and E (Sant: NOSE)
- The audit offer document itself is Physical Evidence — its quality and specificity demonstrate the rigour of the agency's analytical process before the engagement begins (Hatton: Competitive Advantage Equation)
Read for the full framework guide.
references/proposal-frameworks.md生成本文档时,应用中的框架。
references/proposal-frameworks.md审计邀约文档的核心原则:
- 以审计将揭示的问题开篇——而非审计方法(Sant:首要原则——客户关心的是洞察,而非流程)
- 审计邀约是诊断性礼物,而非销售工具——将其定位为潜在客户真正需要的情报,无论他们是否选择合作(Hatton:共情模型)
- 在提供免费审计前应用通过/不通过标准——仅将时间投入到符合所有三项资格标准的潜在客户(Hatton)
- 将审计结果表述为NOSE框架中的N(需求)——审计挖掘问题;后续提案提供O、S和E(Sant:NOSE框架)
- 审计邀约文档本身就是实物证据——其质量和专业性能在合作开始前展示机构分析流程的严谨性(Hatton:竞争优势公式)
阅读获取完整框架指南。
references/proposal-frameworks.mdQuality Criteria
质量标准
- All 5 audit areas are scored numerically (0–10 each); no area is described qualitatively without a score
- The findings presentation leads with wins before gaps — trust is established before problems are introduced
- The competitor gap section uses real, specific data — follower counts, post types, engagement figures — not hypothetical or generalised comparisons
- The transition to paid is scripted word-for-word, not described abstractly
- The full audit takes no more than 30 minutes to conduct; preparation takes no more than 15 minutes
- Delivery format guidance is specific to EA context — WhatsApp, in-person, printed one-pager are all named explicitly
- Recommended next steps follow the three-tier structure: one free quick win, one low-cost medium-term action, one professional-help strategic recommendation
- Gap statements are framed as business consequences, not technical observations
- 所有5个审计维度均采用0–10分的数值评分;不得仅做定性描述而无评分
- 调研结果演示先介绍优势再指出缺口——在提出问题前先建立信任
- 竞品差距部分使用真实、具体的数据——粉丝数量、帖子类型、互动量——而非假设或笼统对比
- 向付费合作过渡的话术为逐字撰写,而非抽象描述
- 完整审计执行时间不超过30分钟;准备时间不超过15分钟
- 交付格式指南针对EA地区具体场景——明确提及WhatsApp、线下、纸质单页文档
- 建议下一步行动遵循三层结构:一个免费快速见效行动、一个低成本中期行动、一个需专业协助的战略建议
- 缺口表述为业务影响,而非技术观察