biz-dev-social-media-audit-offer

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Free Social Media Audit — Business Development Skill

免费社交媒体审计——业务开发技能

Use the free social media audit as a lead generation and conversion tool. The audit demonstrates expertise the prospect doesn't have, surfaces the right problems, and creates a natural path to a paid engagement. This is a consultant-facing skill — not a client-facing deliverable.
Source: Johnson, J. (2023) How to Become a Social Media Manager

<!-- dual-compat:start -->
将免费社交媒体审计用作获客与转化工具。该审计能向潜在客户展示其不具备的专业能力,挖掘核心问题,并自然过渡到付费合作。这是面向顾问的技能——而非面向客户的交付成果。
来源: Johnson, J. (2023) How to Become a Social Media Manager

<!-- dual-compat:start -->

Use when

适用场景

  • Turns a free 30-minute social media diagnostic into a business development tool — structuring the audit, framing findings to demonstrate expertise, and scripting the transition from free audit to paid engagement. Invoke when a consultant wants to offer a free audit as a lead generation technique, when preparing for a discovery meeting with a prospective client, or when converting an audit presentation into a paid proposal.
  • Use this skill when it is the closest match to the requested deliverable or workflow.
  • 将30分钟的免费社交媒体诊断转化为业务开发工具——梳理审计流程、呈现调研结果以展示专业能力,并撰写从免费审计到付费合作的过渡话术。当顾问想要将免费审计作为获客手段、准备与潜在客户的发现会议,或是将审计演示转化为付费提案时,可启用该技能。
  • 当所请求的交付成果或工作流程与本技能最匹配时使用。

Do not use when

不适用场景

  • Do not use this skill for graphic design, video production, software development, or legal advice beyond the repository's stated scope.
  • Do not use it when another skill in this repository is clearly more specific to the requested deliverable.
  • 请勿将本技能用于图形设计、视频制作、软件开发或超出知识库既定范围的法律咨询。
  • 当知识库中另有其他技能明显更符合所请求的交付成果时,请勿使用本技能。

Workflow

工作流程

  1. Collect the required inputs or source material before drafting, unless this skill explicitly generates the intake itself.
  2. Follow the section order and decision rules in this
    SKILL.md
    ; do not skip mandatory steps or required fields.
  3. Read files in
    references/
    only when the body points to them or when you need the deeper framework, examples, or evidence.
  4. Review the draft against the quality criteria, then deliver the final output in markdown unless the skill specifies another format.
  1. 除非本技能明确说明可自行生成输入信息,否则在起草前需收集所需的输入资料或原始素材。
  2. 遵循本
    SKILL.md
    中的章节顺序和决策规则;请勿跳过必填步骤或必填字段。
  3. 仅当正文指向
    references/
    中的文件,或需要更深入的框架、示例或证据时,才阅读该文件夹中的文件。
  4. 根据质量标准审查草稿,除非技能指定其他格式,否则最终输出采用markdown格式。

Anti-Patterns

反模式

  • Do not invent client facts, performance data, budgets, or approvals that were not provided or clearly inferred from evidence.
  • Do not skip required inputs, mandatory sections, or quality checks just to make the output shorter.
  • Do not drift into out-of-scope work such as code implementation, design production, or unsupported legal conclusions.
  • 请勿编造未提供或无法从证据中明确推断的客户事实、绩效数据、预算或审批信息。
  • 请勿为了缩短输出内容而跳过必填输入、必填章节或质量检查。
  • 请勿偏离范围开展工作,例如代码实现、设计制作或无依据的法律结论。

Outputs

输出成果

  • A structured markdown document, plan, playbook, or strategy ready for client-facing or internal use.
  • 一份结构化的markdown文档、计划、手册或策略,可直接用于客户沟通或内部使用。

References

参考资料

  • Read
    references/proposal-frameworks.md
    when you need the deeper framework, examples, or supporting material it contains.
<!-- dual-compat:end -->
  • 当需要更深入的框架、示例或支持材料时,阅读
    references/proposal-frameworks.md
<!-- dual-compat:end -->

Required Input

必填输入信息

Ask for the following before generating:
  • Prospect business name and industry — the business being audited
  • Active platforms to audit — list only platforms the prospect currently uses (do not audit dormant accounts)
  • Presentation format — in-person meeting, WhatsApp call, or written email report
  • Consultant's primary service — the core service to position after the audit (e.g., monthly content management, social media strategy, community management)

生成前需询问以下内容:
  • 潜在客户的企业名称与所属行业——被审计的企业
  • 需审计的活跃平台——仅列出潜在客户当前使用的平台(请勿审计休眠账户)
  • 演示格式——线下会议、WhatsApp通话或书面邮件报告
  • 顾问的核心服务——审计后重点推广的核心服务(例如:月度内容管理、社交媒体策略、社群管理)

The Business Logic

商业逻辑

The free audit works because it does two things simultaneously:
  1. It demonstrates expertise — the consultant surfaces findings the prospect has not noticed. Every specific observation builds credibility.
  2. It creates a problem → solution dynamic — every finding is a gap, and every gap is a potential service line.
The audit must be specific enough to be genuinely valuable, but not so complete that it eliminates the need to hire the consultant. Surface the right problems; do not solve them for free.
The audit itself costs the consultant 45 minutes: 30 minutes to conduct, 15 minutes to prepare findings. If the prospect converts to a paid client, that time is recovered within the first month's retainer.
Do not charge for the audit. Charging creates friction and removes the low-barrier entry point that makes this technique effective.

免费审计之所以有效,是因为它同时实现了两件事:
  1. 展示专业能力——顾问能挖掘出潜在客户未曾注意到的问题。每一个具体的观察都能提升可信度。
  2. 构建“问题→解决方案”的动态关系——每一个发现都是一处缺口,而每一处缺口都对应着潜在的服务方向。
审计内容需足够具体以体现实际价值,但又不能过于完整,以免客户无需再聘请顾问。要挖掘核心问题,但不要免费为客户解决这些问题。
完成一次审计总共需要顾问花费45分钟:30分钟执行审计,15分钟整理调研结果。如果潜在客户转化为付费客户,这些时间成本会在第一个月的服务费中收回。
**请勿对该审计收费。**收费会增加沟通障碍,破坏这种低门槛获客技巧的有效性。

Audit Structure — 5 Areas, 30 Minutes

审计结构——5个维度,30分钟

Conduct the audit before the discovery meeting. Do not do it live in front of the prospect.

在发现会议前完成审计,请勿在潜在客户面前实时进行。

Area 1: Profile Completeness (5 minutes)

维度1:资料完整性(5分钟)

Check across all active platforms:
  • Profile photo quality and consistency across platforms
  • Bio completeness — does it include a clear call to action, a link, and relevant keywords?
  • Contact information — WhatsApp number, email address, physical location where applicable
  • Pinned posts, story highlights, and cover photos — are they current and purposeful?
  • Link-in-bio destination — does it work? Does it lead to a relevant, converting page?
Score: 0–10. Note the 2 most critical gaps.

检查所有活跃平台的以下内容:
  • 头像的质量及跨平台一致性
  • 简介完整性——是否包含清晰的行动号召、链接和相关关键词?
  • 联系信息——WhatsApp号码、电子邮件地址、适用情况下的实体地址
  • 置顶帖子、故事亮点和封面照片——是否最新且具有明确目的性?
  • 简介链接的跳转目标——是否可用?是否指向相关的高转化页面?
**评分:0–10分。**记录2个最关键的缺口。

Area 2: Content Quality (10 minutes)

维度2:内容质量(10分钟)

Review the last 30 posts across all active platforms:
  • Are content pillars evident, or is posting random and reactive?
  • Is the brand voice consistent across posts, or does it shift in tone and register?
  • Are posts formatted for the algorithm — video, carousel — or are they single static images by habit?
  • Does the copy open with a hook, or does it bury the lead?
  • Do promotional posts carry a call to action?
  • Is there AI-generated content that sounds generic or off-brand?
Score: 0–10. Note the most common failure pattern — the single issue that appears most frequently across the 30 posts.

回顾所有活跃平台近30条帖子:
  • 是否有明确的内容支柱,还是发帖随机且被动?
  • 品牌调性是否一致,还是语气风格多变?
  • 帖子是否针对算法优化(视频、轮播图),还是习惯性使用单张静态图片?
  • 文案是否有钩子开头,还是把核心信息放在后面?
  • 推广帖是否包含行动号召?
  • 是否存在听起来通用或不符合品牌调性的AI生成内容?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最常见的问题模式——在30条帖子中出现频率最高的单一问题。

Area 3: Engagement and Reach (5 minutes)

维度3:互动与触达(5分钟)

Access native analytics (Meta Business Suite, LinkedIn Analytics, TikTok Studio):
  • Average engagement rate vs industry benchmark — EA context: 2–4% is healthy for most SMEs; below 1% signals a content or frequency problem
  • Post frequency vs recommended cadence for each platform — note the gap
  • Best-performing post type: video, carousel, static image, or story
  • Worst-performing post type
  • Follower growth rate: growing, flat, or declining over the last 90 days?
Score: 0–10. Note the single biggest engagement opportunity.

访问原生分析工具(Meta Business Suite、LinkedIn Analytics、TikTok Studio):
  • 平均互动率 vs 行业基准——EA地区参考:大多数中小企业的健康互动率为2–4%;低于1%表明内容或发帖频率存在问题
  • 发帖频率 vs 各平台建议频率——记录差距
  • 表现最佳的帖子类型:视频、轮播图、静态图片或故事
  • 表现最差的帖子类型
  • 粉丝增长率:过去90天是增长、持平还是下降?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最大的互动提升机会。

Area 4: Competitor Snapshot (5 minutes)

维度4:竞品快照(5分钟)

Identify 2 local competitors — same city or same sector:
  • Follower count vs prospect
  • Posting frequency vs prospect
  • Content types used vs prospect
  • Most engaged post — note the post type, approximate engagement numbers, and what made it work
  • One specific thing the competitor is doing better
This section generates urgency without the consultant manufacturing it artificially. Present competitor data factually and without editorial commentary — the numbers carry the weight.
No score. Use as a comparative reference in the findings presentation.
EA note: Refer to competitor findings with care. East African professional and business circles are small; word travels quickly. Present the data as market context, not as criticism of named businesses.

找出2家本地竞品——同一城市或同一行业:
  • 粉丝数量 vs 潜在客户
  • 发帖频率 vs 潜在客户
  • 使用的内容类型 vs 潜在客户
  • 互动量最高的帖子——记录帖子类型、大致互动量以及表现出色的原因
  • 竞品做得更好的一个具体方面
这部分内容能自然营造紧迫感,无需顾问刻意制造。客观呈现竞品数据,无需评论——数据本身具有说服力。
**无评分。**在调研结果演示中用作对比参考。
**EA地区提示:**谨慎引用竞品调研结果。东非的专业和商业圈子较小,消息传播迅速。将数据作为市场背景呈现,而非对特定企业的批评。

Area 5: Monetisation and Conversion (5 minutes)

维度5:变现与转化(5分钟)

  • Is there a clear path from social post to purchase or enquiry?
  • Does the link-in-bio lead to a landing page, a WhatsApp number, or just the homepage?
  • Is there a lead magnet or opt-in offer visible on any platform?
  • Are paid posts being run? Are they boosted posts or properly targeted campaigns?
  • Is there any social commerce integration — Facebook Shop, WhatsApp Business Catalogue, Instagram Shopping?
Score: 0–10. Note the single clearest missed conversion opportunity.

  • 是否有从社交帖子到购买或咨询的清晰路径?
  • 简介链接是否指向着陆页、WhatsApp号码,还是仅指向首页?
  • 任何平台上是否有可见的引流赠品或订阅优惠?
  • 是否在投放付费帖子?是提升帖还是精准定位的广告活动?
  • 是否有社交电商集成——Facebook Shop、WhatsApp Business Catalogue、Instagram Shopping?
**评分:0–10分。**记录最明显的转化机会缺口。

Findings Presentation Format

调研结果演示格式

Structure findings as a one-page document or a 5-slide mini-deck. Deliver verbally and leave a printed one-pager, or send a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by the document. Adapt to the prospect's preferred communication style.

Section 1: Summary Score
Overall score out of 50. Apply colour coding:
  • 0–20 — Critical: Foundational gaps across multiple areas; significant opportunity
  • 21–35 — Developing: Inconsistent performance; clear areas for improvement
  • 36–50 — Healthy: Strong baseline; refinement and growth strategy needed
Do not present the score as a grade. Frame it as a starting point: "Here's where things stand today, and here's what's possible."

Section 2: Top 3 Wins
Lead with what the prospect is doing well. Choose 3 genuine positives — not faint praise. This section demonstrates that the consultant was paying careful attention, not simply looking for problems. It builds trust before the gaps are introduced.

Section 3: Top 3 Gaps
Present the 3 most important problems. Express each gap as a business impact, not a technical deficiency.
  • Not: "Your captions don't have hooks."
  • Instead: "Your posts aren't stopping the scroll, which means your organic reach isn't growing even when you post consistently."
Frame each gap as: the symptom → the business consequence → the fix (described at headline level only).
Do not prescribe the full solution. Name the direction; reserve the detail for the paid engagement.

Section 4: The Competitor Gap
One concrete example of a local competitor outperforming the prospect. Use real figures — follower counts, engagement numbers, post frequency. Avoid speculation. One well-chosen example is more effective than a general statement about the competitive landscape.

Section 5: Recommended Next Steps
Give 3 recommended actions — tiered by effort and investment:
  1. Quick win — something the prospect can do this week at no cost (e.g., update the link-in-bio, pin a strong post, add a WhatsApp number to the Facebook profile)
  2. Medium-term action — achievable within one month at low cost (e.g., establish 3 content pillars, commit to a posting schedule, set up Meta Business Suite)
  3. Strategic recommendation — requires professional help and is the natural entry point for the paid engagement (e.g., develop a 90-day content strategy, set up a conversion-optimised profile suite, launch a community management programme)
The quick win demonstrates goodwill. The strategic recommendation opens the conversation about paid work.

将调研结果整理为单页文档或5页迷你演示文稿。可口头演示并留下纸质单页文档,或先发送WhatsApp语音总结,再发送文档。根据潜在客户偏好的沟通方式调整格式。

第1部分:总评分
总分50分,采用颜色编码:
  • **0–20分——严重不足:**多个维度存在基础缺口;提升空间巨大
  • **21–35分——有待完善:**表现不稳定;存在明确的改进方向
  • **36–50分——健康状态:**基础良好;需优化与增长策略
请勿将评分当作等级。将其作为起点:“这是当前的现状,而我们可以实现这样的目标。”

第2部分:3大优势
先介绍潜在客户做得好的地方。选择3个真实的亮点——而非敷衍的赞美。这部分能表明顾问在认真关注,而非只找问题。在指出缺口前先建立信任。

第3部分:3大缺口
呈现3个最重要的问题。将每个缺口表述为业务影响,而非技术缺陷。
  • 错误表述:“你的文案没有钩子。”
  • 正确表述:“你的帖子无法吸引用户停留,这意味着即使你持续发帖,自然触达量也无法增长。”
每个缺口的表述框架:症状→业务影响→解决方案(仅概述方向)。
请勿提供完整解决方案。只点明方向,详细内容留到付费合作阶段。

第4部分:竞品差距
举一个本地竞品表现优于潜在客户的具体例子。使用真实数据——粉丝数量、互动量、发帖频率。避免猜测。一个精心挑选的例子比关于竞争格局的笼统陈述更有效。

第5部分:建议下一步行动
给出3个建议行动——按投入精力和成本分层:
  1. 快速见效行动——潜在客户本周可免费完成的事项(例如:更新简介链接、置顶优质帖子、在Facebook资料中添加WhatsApp号码)
  2. 中期行动——一个月内可完成且成本较低的事项(例如:确立3个内容支柱、制定发帖计划、设置Meta Business Suite)
  3. 战略建议——需要专业协助,是付费合作的自然切入点(例如:制定90天内容策略、设置优化转化的资料套件、启动社群管理项目)
快速见效行动能展示诚意。战略建议则开启付费合作的对话。

The Transition to Paid

向付费合作过渡

Deliver this pivot after presenting the findings. Use it verbatim or adapt it closely:
"Based on what I've found, there are three areas where I could make an immediate difference for your business. I typically work with businesses like yours on a monthly retainer that covers [describe the core service]. Before I put together a formal proposal, can I ask — what's your priority right now: more content, better reach, or more enquiries from social?"
This question:
  • Opens a conversation about the prospect's real goal rather than the consultant's service menu
  • Avoids quoting a price before understanding priorities
  • Creates a natural path to the written proposal
After the prospect responds, proceed to the proposal stage. Invoke
biz-dev-proposal
to generate the formal proposal and Statement of Work.

在呈现调研结果后使用以下过渡话术。可直接使用或稍作调整:
“根据我的调研结果,有三个领域我可以立即为你的业务带来改变。我通常为与你类似的企业提供月度服务费制的服务,涵盖[描述核心服务]。在我准备正式提案前,能否问一下——你当前的优先目标是什么:更多内容、更广触达,还是更多来自社交媒体的咨询?”
这个问题:
  • 开启关于潜在客户真实目标的对话,而非只介绍顾问的服务菜单
  • 在了解客户优先级前避免报价
  • 自然过渡到书面提案阶段
潜在客户回应后,进入提案阶段。启用**
biz-dev-proposal
**生成正式提案和工作说明书。

EA-Specific Delivery Notes

EA地区专属交付提示

  • Conduct the initial audit discovery on WhatsApp or in person — not email. Conversion rates for professional services engagements in the East African market are higher through direct, personal communication.
  • The findings presentation can be delivered verbally with a printed one-pager, or via a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by a shared document. Match the format to the prospect's communication habits.
  • If the prospect is not ready to engage, close with: "Can I check back with you in 30 days?" Recurring touchpoints are how East African professional services businesses build pipeline. Do not treat a deferred decision as a lost lead.
  • On WhatsApp: send the one-pager as a PDF, not as a series of text messages. A document signals professionalism and is easier for the prospect to share internally.

  • 初始审计沟通通过WhatsApp或线下进行——而非电子邮件。在东非市场,专业服务合作的转化率在直接、个性化沟通中更高。
  • 调研结果可通过口头演示加纸质单页文档,或WhatsApp语音总结加共享文档的方式交付。根据潜在客户的沟通习惯选择格式。
  • 如果潜在客户尚未准备好合作,以这句话收尾:“我可以在30天后再联系你吗?”定期跟进是东非专业服务企业建立客户渠道的方式。请勿将延迟决策视为流失客户。
  • 在WhatsApp上:将单页文档以PDF形式发送,而非一系列短信。文档更显专业,且便于潜在客户内部共享。

Persuasion Frameworks

说服框架

Apply frameworks from
references/proposal-frameworks.md
when generating this document.
Key principles for audit offer documents:
  • Open with the problem the audit will reveal — not the audit methodology (Sant: Primacy Principle — the client cares about the insight, not the process)
  • The audit offer is a diagnostic gift, not a sales tool — position it as intelligence the prospective client genuinely needs, regardless of whether they engage (Hatton: Empathy Model)
  • Apply Go/No-Go criteria before offering a free audit — invest time only in prospects who meet all three qualifying criteria (Hatton)
  • Frame the audit findings as the N (Need) in NOSE — the audit surfaces the problem; the proposal that follows provides the O, S, and E (Sant: NOSE)
  • The audit offer document itself is Physical Evidence — its quality and specificity demonstrate the rigour of the agency's analytical process before the engagement begins (Hatton: Competitive Advantage Equation)
Read
references/proposal-frameworks.md
for the full framework guide.

生成本文档时,应用
references/proposal-frameworks.md
中的框架。
审计邀约文档的核心原则:
  • 以审计将揭示的问题开篇——而非审计方法(Sant:首要原则——客户关心的是洞察,而非流程)
  • 审计邀约是诊断性礼物,而非销售工具——将其定位为潜在客户真正需要的情报,无论他们是否选择合作(Hatton:共情模型)
  • 在提供免费审计前应用通过/不通过标准——仅将时间投入到符合所有三项资格标准的潜在客户(Hatton)
  • 将审计结果表述为NOSE框架中的N(需求)——审计挖掘问题;后续提案提供O、S和E(Sant:NOSE框架)
  • 审计邀约文档本身就是实物证据——其质量和专业性能在合作开始前展示机构分析流程的严谨性(Hatton:竞争优势公式)
阅读
references/proposal-frameworks.md
获取完整框架指南。

Quality Criteria

质量标准

  • All 5 audit areas are scored numerically (0–10 each); no area is described qualitatively without a score
  • The findings presentation leads with wins before gaps — trust is established before problems are introduced
  • The competitor gap section uses real, specific data — follower counts, post types, engagement figures — not hypothetical or generalised comparisons
  • The transition to paid is scripted word-for-word, not described abstractly
  • The full audit takes no more than 30 minutes to conduct; preparation takes no more than 15 minutes
  • Delivery format guidance is specific to EA context — WhatsApp, in-person, printed one-pager are all named explicitly
  • Recommended next steps follow the three-tier structure: one free quick win, one low-cost medium-term action, one professional-help strategic recommendation
  • Gap statements are framed as business consequences, not technical observations
  • 所有5个审计维度均采用0–10分的数值评分;不得仅做定性描述而无评分
  • 调研结果演示先介绍优势再指出缺口——在提出问题前先建立信任
  • 竞品差距部分使用真实、具体的数据——粉丝数量、帖子类型、互动量——而非假设或笼统对比
  • 向付费合作过渡的话术为逐字撰写,而非抽象描述
  • 完整审计执行时间不超过30分钟;准备时间不超过15分钟
  • 交付格式指南针对EA地区具体场景——明确提及WhatsApp、线下、纸质单页文档
  • 建议下一步行动遵循三层结构:一个免费快速见效行动、一个低成本中期行动、一个需专业协助的战略建议
  • 缺口表述为业务影响,而非技术观察