Back to Details

lit-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Literature Review

文献综述

Conduct a structured literature search and synthesis on the given topic.
Input: 
$ARGUMENTS
— a topic, paper title, research question, or phenomenon to investigate.
针对给定主题进行结构化的文献检索与综述。
输入： 
$ARGUMENTS
— 需研究的主题、论文标题、研究问题或现象。

Steps

步骤

  1. Parse the topic from 
    $ARGUMENTS
    . If a specific paper is named, use it as the anchor.
  2. Search for related work using available tools:
    • Check 
      master_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/
      for uploaded papers
    • Use 
      WebSearch
      to find recent publications (if available)
    • Use 
      WebFetch
      to access working paper repositories (if available)
    • Read any existing 
      .bib
      file for papers already in the project
  3. Organize findings into these categories:
    • Theoretical contributions — models, frameworks, mechanisms
    • Empirical findings — key results, effect sizes, data sources
    • Methodological innovations — new estimators, identification strategies, inference methods
    • Open debates — unresolved disagreements in the literature
  4. Identify gaps and opportunities:
    • What questions remain unanswered?
    • What data or methods could address them?
    • Where do findings conflict?
  5. Extract citations in BibTeX format for all papers discussed.
  6. Save the report to 
    quality_reports/lit_review_[sanitized_topic].md
  1. 解析主题：从
    $ARGUMENTS
    中提取研究主题。若指定了特定论文，则将其作为核心参考。
  2. 检索相关研究：使用可用工具进行检索：
    • 查看
      master_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/
      目录下的已上传论文
    • 使用
      WebSearch
      查找近期发表的文献（若可用）
    • 使用
      WebFetch
      访问预印本论文库（若可用）
    • 读取项目中已有的
      .bib
      文件获取已收录的论文
  3. 整理研究结果：将发现归类为以下类别：
    • 理论贡献 — 模型、框架、机制
    • 实证发现 — 关键结果、效应量、数据来源
    • 方法创新 — 新估计方法、识别策略、推断方法
    • 争议问题 — 文献中尚未解决的分歧
  4. 识别研究缺口与机会：
    • 哪些问题仍未得到解答？
    • 哪些数据或方法可以解决这些问题？
    • 研究结果存在哪些冲突？
  5. 提取引文：以BibTeX格式提取所有讨论过的论文的引文信息。
  6. 保存报告：将报告保存至
    quality_reports/lit_review_[sanitized_topic].md

Output Format

输出格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Literature Review: [Topic]

文献综述: [主题]

Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] Query: [Original query from user]
日期: [YYYY-MM-DD] 查询词: [用户原始查询内容]

Summary

综述摘要

[2-3 paragraph overview of the state of the literature]
[2-3段关于文献现状的概述]

Key Papers

重点论文

[Author (Year)] — [Short Title]

[作者（年份）] — [简短标题]

  • Main contribution: [1-2 sentences]
  • Method: [Identification strategy / data]
  • Key finding: [Result with effect size if available]
  • Relevance: [Why it matters for our research]
[Repeat for 5-15 papers, ordered by relevance]
  • 核心贡献: [1-2句话]
  • 研究方法: [识别策略/数据来源]
  • 关键发现: [结果，如有效应量请注明]
  • 相关性: [为何与本研究相关]
[按相关性排序，重复此格式展示5-15篇论文]

Thematic Organization

主题分类整理

Theoretical Contributions

理论贡献

[Grouped discussion]
[分组讨论内容]

Empirical Findings

实证发现

[Grouped discussion with comparison across studies]
[分组讨论，对比不同研究结果]

Methodological Innovations

方法创新

[Methods relevant to the topic]
[与主题相关的研究方法]

Gaps and Opportunities

研究缺口与机会

  1. [Gap 1 — what's missing and why it matters]
  2. [Gap 2]
  3. [Gap 3]
  1. [缺口1 — 缺失内容及其重要性]
  2. [缺口2]
  3. [缺口3]

Suggested Next Steps

建议下一步行动

  • [Concrete actions: papers to read, data to obtain, methods to consider]
  • [具体行动：需阅读的论文、需获取的数据、需考虑的方法]

BibTeX Entries

BibTeX 引文

bibtex
@article{...}

---
bibtex
@article{...}

---

Important

注意事项

  • Be honest about uncertainty. If you cannot verify a citation, say so.
  • Prioritize recent work (last 5-10 years) unless seminal papers are older.
  • Note working papers vs published papers — working papers may change.
  • Do NOT fabricate citations. If you're unsure about a paper's details, flag it for the user to verify.
  • 如实说明不确定性：若无法验证某一引文，请明确说明。
  • 优先近期研究（近5-10年），除非是经典的开创性论文。
  • 区分预印本与已发表论文 — 预印本内容可能会发生变化。
  • 禁止伪造引文：若不确定某篇论文的细节，请标记出来供用户核实。