Increase visual impact and personality in designs that are too safe, generic, or visually underwhelming, creating more engaging and memorable experiences.
为过于保守、通用或视觉效果平淡的设计提升视觉冲击力与独特个性，打造更具吸引力和记忆点的体验。
MANDATORY PREPARATION
必备准备工作
Context Gathering (Do This First)
收集背景信息（优先完成）
You cannot do a great job without having necessary context, such as target audience (critical), desired use-cases (critical), brand personality/tone, and everything else that a great human designer would need as well.
Attempt to gather these from the current thread or codebase.
If you don't find exact information and have to infer from existing design and functionality, you MUST STOP and {{ask_instruction}} whether you got it right.
Otherwise, if you can't fully infer or your level of confidence is medium or lower, you MUST {{ask_instruction}} clarifying questions first to complete your context.
Do NOT proceed until you have answers. Guessing leads to generic AI slop.
Analyze what makes the design feel too safe or boring:
Identify weakness sources:
Generic choices: System fonts, basic colors, standard layouts
Timid scale: Everything is medium-sized with no drama
Low contrast: Everything has similar visual weight
Static: No motion, no energy, no life
Predictable: Standard patterns with no surprises
Flat hierarchy: Nothing stands out or commands attention
Understand the context:
What's the brand personality? (How far can we push?)
What's the purpose? (Marketing can be bolder than financial dashboards)
Who's the audience? (What will resonate?)
What are the constraints? (Brand guidelines, accessibility, performance)
If any of these are unclear from the codebase, {{ask_instruction}}
CRITICAL: "Bolder" doesn't mean chaotic or garish. It means distinctive, memorable, and confident. Think intentional drama, not random chaos.
WARNING - AI SLOP TRAP: When making things "bolder," AI defaults to the same tired tricks: cyan/purple gradients, glassmorphism, neon accents on dark backgrounds, gradient text on metrics. These are the OPPOSITE of bold—they're generic. Review ALL the DON'T guidelines in the frontend-design skill before proceeding. Bold means distinctive, not "more effects."
Hero moments: Create clear focal points with dramatic treatment
Diagonal flows: Escape horizontal/vertical rigidity with diagonal arrangements
Full-bleed elements: Use full viewport width/height for impact
Unexpected proportions: Golden ratio? Throw it out. Try 70/30, 80/20 splits
NEVER:
Add effects randomly without purpose (chaos ≠ bold)
Sacrifice readability for aesthetics (body text must be readable)
Make everything bold (then nothing is bold - need contrast)
Ignore accessibility (bold design must still meet WCAG standards)
Overwhelm with motion (animation fatigue is real)
Copy trendy aesthetics blindly (bold means distinctive, not derivative)
核心视觉时刻：打造清晰的视觉焦点并进行戏剧性处理
斜向流动：用斜向布局打破水平/垂直的刻板感
全屏元素：使用视口全宽/高以提升冲击力
非常规比例：黄金比例？抛之脑后。尝试70/30、80/20的分割比例
绝对禁止：
无目的随机添加效果（混乱≠大胆）
为了美观牺牲可读性（正文文本必须清晰可读）
让所有元素都“大胆”（那样就没有元素能突出——需要对比）
忽略可访问性（大胆设计仍需符合WCAG标准）
过度使用动效（会导致用户动画疲劳）
盲目跟风流行美学（大胆意味着独特，而非模仿）
Verify Quality
质量验证
Ensure amplification maintains usability and coherence:
NOT AI slop: Does this look like every other AI-generated "bold" design? If yes, start over.
Still functional: Can users accomplish tasks without distraction?
Coherent: Does everything feel intentional and unified?
Memorable: Will users remember this experience?
Performant: Do all these effects run smoothly?
Accessible: Does it still meet accessibility standards?
The test: If you showed this to someone and said "AI made this bolder," would they believe you immediately? If yes, you've failed. Bold means distinctive, not "more AI effects."
Remember: Bold design is confident design. It takes risks, makes statements, and creates memorable experiences. But bold without strategy is just loud. Be intentional, be dramatic, be unforgettable.